This book tries to reconcile the legal problem of children born outside marriage after the issuan... more This book tries to reconcile the legal problem of children born outside marriage after the issuance of Decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 by using the Usul Fikih approach. In this book, the Author borrows an inclusive and progressive-responsive Theory Maslahat at-Thufi as his "Knife of Analysis". Theory which in the view of the Author has the same spirit with the principle that carried by the Constitutional Court.
Family law problems in Indonesia are very complex. One that is often a conversation in the commun... more Family law problems in Indonesia are very complex. One that is often a conversation in the community is the recording of marriage. This recording becomes important to question when it has led to the legitimate justification of a marriage. The problem of registering marriage actually arises and is presented by the State itself. The state, as a formulator and legislator, must be responsible for the polemic and social impacts that occur in society. The formulation of article 2 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 concerning ambiguous marriage is the reason for the birth of multi-interpretations of marriage registration as a legitimate instrument of marriage. This paper departs from academic anxiety about legitimate or non-marriage questions that are not recorded by the State based on the country's own constitution. The type of research used in this paper is library research with a statute approach, meaning that the approach is by reviewing all laws and regulations relating to the legal theme being studied, and the method used is the method historical interpretation of the law (de wethistorische interpretatie). The conclusion of this paper is that marriage registration based on the State constitution is not included as a legitimate justification tool for a marriage, but merely a mere "obligation" of administration.
Tulisan ini mengkaji putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 ditinjau dari optik hukum p... more Tulisan ini mengkaji putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 ditinjau dari optik hukum progresif. Mahkamah Konstitusi lewat putusannya telah membuat terobosan baru yang cukup kontroversial. Keberaniannya di dalam mencari kebenaran dan keadilan substantif telah menghantarkannya kepada upaya rule breaking terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang telah ada. Tulisan ini berangkat dari kegelisahan akademik tentang pertanyaan ada tidaknya semangat hukum progresif dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Dalam penelitian ini, teori utama yang digunakan adalah teori hukum progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Pendekatan kasus digunakan penulis untuk memahami dan menguraikan alasan-alasan hukum (ratio decidendi) yang digunakan oleh hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk sampai kepada putusannya. Sedangkan dengan pendekatan konseptual, penulis mencoba merujuk kepada pandangan-pandangan para ahli hukum untuk memahami secara benar dan komprehensif terhadap konsep hukum progresif. Kesimpulan dari tulisan ini adalah bahwa putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 telah mencerminkan semangat hukum progresif.
This book tries to reconcile the legal problem of children born outside marriage after the issuan... more This book tries to reconcile the legal problem of children born outside marriage after the issuance of Decision of the Constitutional Court Number: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 by using the Usul Fikih approach. In this book, the Author borrows an inclusive and progressive-responsive Theory Maslahat at-Thufi as his "Knife of Analysis". Theory which in the view of the Author has the same spirit with the principle that carried by the Constitutional Court.
Family law problems in Indonesia are very complex. One that is often a conversation in the commun... more Family law problems in Indonesia are very complex. One that is often a conversation in the community is the recording of marriage. This recording becomes important to question when it has led to the legitimate justification of a marriage. The problem of registering marriage actually arises and is presented by the State itself. The state, as a formulator and legislator, must be responsible for the polemic and social impacts that occur in society. The formulation of article 2 of Law Number 1 Year 1974 concerning ambiguous marriage is the reason for the birth of multi-interpretations of marriage registration as a legitimate instrument of marriage. This paper departs from academic anxiety about legitimate or non-marriage questions that are not recorded by the State based on the country's own constitution. The type of research used in this paper is library research with a statute approach, meaning that the approach is by reviewing all laws and regulations relating to the legal theme being studied, and the method used is the method historical interpretation of the law (de wethistorische interpretatie). The conclusion of this paper is that marriage registration based on the State constitution is not included as a legitimate justification tool for a marriage, but merely a mere "obligation" of administration.
Tulisan ini mengkaji putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 ditinjau dari optik hukum p... more Tulisan ini mengkaji putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 ditinjau dari optik hukum progresif. Mahkamah Konstitusi lewat putusannya telah membuat terobosan baru yang cukup kontroversial. Keberaniannya di dalam mencari kebenaran dan keadilan substantif telah menghantarkannya kepada upaya rule breaking terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang telah ada. Tulisan ini berangkat dari kegelisahan akademik tentang pertanyaan ada tidaknya semangat hukum progresif dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Dalam penelitian ini, teori utama yang digunakan adalah teori hukum progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo dengan pendekatan kasus (case approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Pendekatan kasus digunakan penulis untuk memahami dan menguraikan alasan-alasan hukum (ratio decidendi) yang digunakan oleh hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk sampai kepada putusannya. Sedangkan dengan pendekatan konseptual, penulis mencoba merujuk kepada pandangan-pandangan para ahli hukum untuk memahami secara benar dan komprehensif terhadap konsep hukum progresif. Kesimpulan dari tulisan ini adalah bahwa putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 telah mencerminkan semangat hukum progresif.
Uploads
Books
Papers