Papers by Jan M . Buharov
Shagi / Steps, 2019
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
The paper presents an outline of psychotherapy as a
complex of socio-cultural phenomena, consisti... more The paper presents an outline of psychotherapy as a
complex of socio-cultural phenomena, consisting of two levels or
aspects: psychotherapy as a form of professional activity and
psychotherapy as a science. We take into account both the internal
relations between the levels and their external connections
to various scientifc and practical subfelds of psychology and
medicine. A crucial marker of psychotherapy as professional
activity involves the use of four main principles of psychological
infuence: suggestion, explanation, conditioning, and abreaction —
as caregiving. It is proposed that the development of psychotherapy
may be divided into three main stages: the pre-conceptual, from
the middle of the 19th to the beginning of the 20th century; the stage
of formation of the main psychotherapeutic traditions, from the
beginning of the 20th century to the end of the 1940s; and the stage
of the expansion of psychotherapeutic approaches to non-medical
areas of social practice and care, such as counseling, coaching etc.
Special attention was also paid to the development of views on the
contingent of psychotherapeutic care recipients and its infuence
on the development of psychotherapeutic theory. Conceptual
development of psychotherapy is viewed as a systematic expansion
from specifc clinical interests to a broad feld of psychological,
philosophical etc. conceptualization under the infuence of changing
social requests in the 20th century.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Abstract. This presentation is intended as a “problem report” — in other
words, it is rather a st... more Abstract. This presentation is intended as a “problem report” — in other
words, it is rather a statement of a number of questions and a preliminary
marking of the possible range of answers to them, rather than offering
ready-made research results. In addition, in its conception, it represents a
certain critical “outside view” on psychoanalysis — critical in the sense of
searching for the ideological foundations of psychoanalytic knowledge.
Therefore, it is necessary first of all to specify the intended “field of applicability” of the following discourse
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
On the background of characteristic anti‑psychiatric tendencies
in existential‑humanistic philos... more On the background of characteristic anti‑psychiatric tendencies
in existential‑humanistic philosophical and psycho[patho]logical
thought, the fidelity of K. Jaspers, one of its founders, to nosological
approach in psychiatry is reviewed. A review in a broader context of
“psychological crisis” at the transition from XIX to XX century allows to
ascertain that the concept of “mental illness” makes the necessary theoretical element in “understanding” (Verstehen) psychopathology.
Bookmarks Related papers MentionsView impact
Uploads
Papers by Jan M . Buharov
complex of socio-cultural phenomena, consisting of two levels or
aspects: psychotherapy as a form of professional activity and
psychotherapy as a science. We take into account both the internal
relations between the levels and their external connections
to various scientifc and practical subfelds of psychology and
medicine. A crucial marker of psychotherapy as professional
activity involves the use of four main principles of psychological
infuence: suggestion, explanation, conditioning, and abreaction —
as caregiving. It is proposed that the development of psychotherapy
may be divided into three main stages: the pre-conceptual, from
the middle of the 19th to the beginning of the 20th century; the stage
of formation of the main psychotherapeutic traditions, from the
beginning of the 20th century to the end of the 1940s; and the stage
of the expansion of psychotherapeutic approaches to non-medical
areas of social practice and care, such as counseling, coaching etc.
Special attention was also paid to the development of views on the
contingent of psychotherapeutic care recipients and its infuence
on the development of psychotherapeutic theory. Conceptual
development of psychotherapy is viewed as a systematic expansion
from specifc clinical interests to a broad feld of psychological,
philosophical etc. conceptualization under the infuence of changing
social requests in the 20th century.
words, it is rather a statement of a number of questions and a preliminary
marking of the possible range of answers to them, rather than offering
ready-made research results. In addition, in its conception, it represents a
certain critical “outside view” on psychoanalysis — critical in the sense of
searching for the ideological foundations of psychoanalytic knowledge.
Therefore, it is necessary first of all to specify the intended “field of applicability” of the following discourse
in existential‑humanistic philosophical and psycho[patho]logical
thought, the fidelity of K. Jaspers, one of its founders, to nosological
approach in psychiatry is reviewed. A review in a broader context of
“psychological crisis” at the transition from XIX to XX century allows to
ascertain that the concept of “mental illness” makes the necessary theoretical element in “understanding” (Verstehen) psychopathology.
complex of socio-cultural phenomena, consisting of two levels or
aspects: psychotherapy as a form of professional activity and
psychotherapy as a science. We take into account both the internal
relations between the levels and their external connections
to various scientifc and practical subfelds of psychology and
medicine. A crucial marker of psychotherapy as professional
activity involves the use of four main principles of psychological
infuence: suggestion, explanation, conditioning, and abreaction —
as caregiving. It is proposed that the development of psychotherapy
may be divided into three main stages: the pre-conceptual, from
the middle of the 19th to the beginning of the 20th century; the stage
of formation of the main psychotherapeutic traditions, from the
beginning of the 20th century to the end of the 1940s; and the stage
of the expansion of psychotherapeutic approaches to non-medical
areas of social practice and care, such as counseling, coaching etc.
Special attention was also paid to the development of views on the
contingent of psychotherapeutic care recipients and its infuence
on the development of psychotherapeutic theory. Conceptual
development of psychotherapy is viewed as a systematic expansion
from specifc clinical interests to a broad feld of psychological,
philosophical etc. conceptualization under the infuence of changing
social requests in the 20th century.
words, it is rather a statement of a number of questions and a preliminary
marking of the possible range of answers to them, rather than offering
ready-made research results. In addition, in its conception, it represents a
certain critical “outside view” on psychoanalysis — critical in the sense of
searching for the ideological foundations of psychoanalytic knowledge.
Therefore, it is necessary first of all to specify the intended “field of applicability” of the following discourse
in existential‑humanistic philosophical and psycho[patho]logical
thought, the fidelity of K. Jaspers, one of its founders, to nosological
approach in psychiatry is reviewed. A review in a broader context of
“psychological crisis” at the transition from XIX to XX century allows to
ascertain that the concept of “mental illness” makes the necessary theoretical element in “understanding” (Verstehen) psychopathology.