8000 feat(build): ignore test + story files in `runtime/` directory by danielroe · Pull Request #480 · nuxt/module-builder · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

feat(build): ignore test + story files in runtime/ directory #480

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025
Merged

feat(build): ignore test + story files in runtime/ directory #480

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

danielroe
Copy link
Member

🔗 Linked issue

❓ Type of change

  • 📖 Documentation (updates to the documentation or readme)
  • 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • 👌 Enhancement (improving an existing functionality)
  • ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 🧹 Chore (updates to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

📚 Description

This updates the defaults to ignore test + story files in runtime/ (#211).

It remains possible to customise the pattern via a hook (#211 (comment)):

'build:before'(context) {
    const mkdistEntry = context.options.entries.find(entry => entry.builder === 'mkdist')
    mkdistEntry.pattern = ['**/*.ts', '!**/*.test.ts']
},

@danielroe danielroe merged commit ccefe68 into main Jan 6, 2025
2 checks passed
@danielroe danielroe deleted the feat/ignore-tests branch January 6, 2025 14:10
@danielroe danielroe mentioned this pull request Jan 6, 2025
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@danielroe
0