@KFrancis can you arrange for an NDA for this person, please?

@ArielGlenn / @Urbanecm_WMF are you prepared to sponsor this request, please?

@thcipriani do you approve membership of the deployment group, please?

Is there any activity this Gerrit query does not see? In general I'd like to see deployers have experience with developing MediaWiki itself so they're familiar with it's internals (which helps reviewing patches and troubleshoot issues when things go wrong).

In T338468#8914550, @taavi wrote:

Is there any activity this Gerrit query does not see? In general I'd like to see deployers have experience with developing MediaWiki itself so they're familiar with it's internals (which helps reviewing patches and troubleshoot issues when things go wrong).

Hi taavi, yes you're right, but my work here is mainly focused on config changes (actually, I didn't ask to be a deployer, but just to be able to start the training to deploy config changes). About your doubt on MW, I think to have a sufficient knowledge of the software and its dynamics/what generally goes wrong, as I work and test quite a lot on different local test wikis on my computer, even if in this field I'm not very active on gerrit, neither in reviewing other patches or make them myself, mainly due to time constraints - compatibly with my duties on wiki and in RL. I generally tend not to overdo, so I like to always ask for advice from others, my only goal here was to learn how to deploy - mainly config changes with possibility to extend to more in the future - and help out when needed :)

Either way, no harm in signing up for some training while you wait :-)

Hi all, I will need the volunteer's full name, mailing address, and email to process the NDA. Please send the following information to: kfrancis@wikimedia.org. Thank you!

In T338468#8915005, @TheresNoTime wrote:

Either way, no harm in signing up for some training while you wait :-)

Yep, this is actually my only purpose, and I need the permission for this (see the form - this explain why I created this task before asking for a training and only after reading the documents). After the training we'll see :)

In T338468#8915030, @KFrancis wrote:

Hi all, I will need the volunteer's full name, mailing address, and email to process the NDA. Please send the following information to: kfrancis@wikimedia.org. Thank you!

Done! I wrote via wikimail from my account linked to the e-mail address above. Thanks :)

In T338468#8915158, @Superpes15 wrote:

In T338468#8915005, @TheresNoTime wrote:

Either way, no harm in signing up for some training while you wait :-)

Yep, this is actually my only purpose, and I need the permission for this (see the form - this explain why I created this task before asking for a training and only after reading the documents). After the training we'll see :)

As Superpes said :). The goal here is to attend the training, which seems to require NDA on-file according to the form. I recommended Superpes to fill an access request to get past the NDA bit. That said, not sure what the process for that should be like (I assume @thcipriani will clarify :)).

In T338468#8914512, @MatthewVernon wrote:

@ArielGlenn / @Urbanecm_WMF are you prepared to sponsor this request, please?

See above -- the first goal here is to get to the training, and then we can go from there. Does that sound good @MatthewVernon?

Thank you! The agreement has been sent for signatures. I'll confirm when it's complete.

The NDA is complete. Please proceed with the access request.

In T338468#8915689, @KFrancis wrote:

The NDA is complete. Please proceed with the access request.

Awesome!

In T338468#8914512, @MatthewVernon wrote:

@KFrancis can you arrange for an NDA for this person, please?

@ArielGlenn / @Urbanecm_WMF are you prepared to sponsor this request, please?

@thcipriani do you approve membership of the deployment group, please?

Now that @Superpes15 has NDA, they can attend a deployment training slot (note: use this form to set one up if you haven't coordinated with @ArielGlenn already).

After some training, we can get you deploying. Until then, let's hold this—is that fine @MatthewVernon ?

User have been added to the LDAP NDA group, we're holding off processing the rest until after training.

In T338468#8916922, @thcipriani wrote:

Now that @Superpes15 has NDA, they can attend a deployment training slot (note: use this form to set one up if you haven't coordinated with @ArielGlenn already).

After some training, we can get you deploying. Until then, let's hold this

Yep, thanks, I'll plan a training :)

In T338468#8917166, @SLyngshede-WMF wrote:

User have been added to the LDAP NDA group, we're holding off processing the rest until after training.

This also needs an entry in data.yaml in puppet.git

Change 929623 had a related patch set uploaded (by Slyngshede; author: Slyngshede):

[operations/puppet@production] data.yaml: Add user superpes to deployment.

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/929623

In T338468#8926447, @MoritzMuehlenhoff wrote:

In T338468#8917166, @SLyngshede-WMF wrote:

User have been added to the LDAP NDA group, we're holding off processing the rest until after training.

This also needs an entry in data.yaml in puppet.git

The interim LDAP access needs a tracking entry I meant, it's currently alerting for a lack of it, see the mail sent root@

Change 929672 had a related patch set uploaded (by Slyngshede; author: Slyngshede):

[operations/puppet@production] data.yaml: Add superpes as LDAP only user.

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/929672

The interim LDAP access needs a tracking entry I meant, it's currently alerting for a lack of it, see the mail sent root@

Added a new patch, I'll rebase the original when merged.

Change 929672 merged by Slyngshede:

[operations/puppet@production] data.yaml: Add superpes as LDAP only users.

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/929672

@Superpes15 @SLyngshede-WMF @MatthewVernon If i read the ticket right then access to NDA is done and access to deployment is postponed for the future, after training. Can we close this as resolved and ask for a new ticket at a later time? That makes it easier for us to handle since handling these ticket is rotating between different people every week.

I have no problem with that (but I was just the clinician when this ticket came in), if the other people you tagged are also happy with that approach.

No problem here either.

Change #929623 abandoned by Slyngshede:

[operations/puppet@production] data.yaml: Add user superpes to deployment.

Reason:

T338468 Resolved

https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/929623