[go: up one dir, main page]

Alpoz et al., 2007 - Google Patents

Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after application of various image processing algorithms

Alpoz et al., 2007

View PDF
Document ID
725103435102529970
Author
Alpoz E
Sogur E
Baksı Akdeniz B
Publication year
Publication venue
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

External Links

Snippet

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare digital radiographs before and after the application of various digital image enhancement methods by means of a perceptibility curve (PC) test. Methods: Radiographs of an aluminium test object containing holes with …
Continue reading at www.researchgate.net (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/58—Testing, adjusting or calibrating devices for radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/582—Calibration
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/02—Devices for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/03—Computerised tomographs
    • A61B6/032—Transmission computed tomography [CT]
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image
    • G06T5/007—Dynamic range modification
    • G06T5/009—Global, i.e. based on properties of the image as a whole
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image
    • G06T5/007—Dynamic range modification
    • G06T5/008—Local, e.g. shadow enhancement
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/42—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment with arrangements for detecting radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis
    • A61B6/4208—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment with arrangements for detecting radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis characterised by using a particular type of detector
    • A61B6/4241—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment with arrangements for detecting radiation specially adapted for radiation diagnosis characterised by using a particular type of detector using energy resolving detectors, e.g. photon counting
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/50—Clinical applications
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/10—Image acquisition modality
    • G06T2207/10116—X-ray image
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/46—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment with special arrangements for interfacing with the operator or the patient
    • A61B6/461—Displaying means of special interest
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/44—Constructional features of the device for radiation diagnosis
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/14—Applications or adaptations for dentistry
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image
    • G06T5/40—Image enhancement or restoration, e.g. from bit-mapped to bit-mapped creating a similar image by the use of histogram techniques

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Mol et al. In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone
Wang et al. Detection of dental root fractures by using cone-beam computed tomography
Akarslan et al. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth
Kositbowornchai et al. Accuracy of diagnosing occlusal caries using enhanced digital images
Sogur et al. Detectability of chemically induced periapical lesions by limited cone beam computed tomography, intra-oral digital and conventional film radiography
Bechara et al. Comparison of cone beam CT scans with enhanced photostimulated phosphor plate images in the detection of root fracture of endodontically treated teeth
Nascimento et al. Influence of brightness and contrast adjustments on the diagnosis of proximal caries lesions
Yalcinkaya et al. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs
Zhang et al. Detection accuracy of condylar defects in cone beam CT images scanned with different resolutions and units
Li et al. Marginal bone levels measured in film and digital radiographs corrected for attenuation and visual response: an in vivo study
Soğur et al. The effect of delayed scanning of storage phosphor plates on occlusal caries detection
Sund et al. Sliding window adaptive histogram equalization of intraoral radiographs: effect on image quality
Kulczyk et al. The influence of amalgam fillings on the detection of approximal caries by cone beam CT: in vitro study
Farias Gomes et al. Influence of the incorporation of a lead foil to intraoral digital receptors on the image quality and root fracture diagnosis
Berkhout et al. Detection of proximal caries with high-resolution and standard resolution digital radiographic systems
Baksi et al. Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation
Guneri et al. The effects of incremental brightness and contrast adjustments on radiographic data: a quantitative study
Hellén-Halme et al. Carious lesions: diagnostic accuracy using pre-calibrated monitor in various ambient light levels: an in vitro study
Brasil et al. Influence of VistaScan image enhancement filters on diagnosis of simulated periapical lesions on intraoral radiographs
Hellén-Halme et al. Digital radiography in general dental practice: a field study
Byakova et al. The detection of vertical root fractures in post-core restored teeth with cone-beam CT: in vivo and ex vivo
Vidor et al. Imaging evaluating of the implant/bone interface—an in vitro radiographic study
de Oliveira Pinto et al. Influence of size of field of view (FOV), position within the FOV, and scanning mode on the detection of root fracture and observer’s perception of artifacts in CBCT images
Li et al. Detection of in vitro proximal caries in storage phosphor plate radiographs scanned with different resolutions
Parissis et al. Conventional radiographs vs digitized radiographs: image quality assessment