Tepel et al., 1997 - Google Patents
Endodontic hand instruments: cutting efficiency, instrumentation of curved canals, bending and torsional propertiesTepel et al., 1997
View PDF- Document ID
- 11773968408822728960
- Author
- Tepel J
- Schäfer E
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Dental Traumatology
External Links
Snippet
In an assessment of the usefulness of different root canal instruments, two aspects are of particular interest for the endodontist: the cutting efficiency of the instruments and their ability id enlarge curved canals without undesirable changes of the canal shape such as the …
- 238000005452 bending 0 title abstract description 25
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Tepel et al. | Endodontic hand instruments: cutting efficiency, instrumentation of curved canals, bending and torsional properties | |
| Schäfer | Root canal instruments for manual use: a review | |
| Schäfer et al. | Efficiency of rotary nickel–titanium FlexMaster instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile–Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. | |
| Zarrabi et al. | An in vitro comparative study of apically extruded debris resulting from conventional and three rotary (Profile, Race, FlexMaster) instrumentation techniques | |
| Zuolo et al. | Instrument deterioration with usage: nickel-titanium versus stainless steel. | |
| Walia et al. | An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files | |
| Bryant et al. | Shaping ability of Profile rotary nickel‐titanium instruments with ISO sized tips in simulated root canals: Part 1 | |
| Alapati et al. | SEM observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that fractured during clinical use | |
| Wolcott et al. | Torsional properties of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel endodontic files | |
| US5624259A (en) | Dental hand instrument | |
| US5653590A (en) | Kit of endodontic instruments and method of utilizing same | |
| Haïkel et al. | Mechanical properties of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments and the effect of sodium hypochlorite treatment | |
| Blum et al. | Location of contact areas on rotary Profile1 instruments in relationship to the forces developed during mechanical preparation on extracted teeth | |
| Schäfer | Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals | |
| Thompson et al. | Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel‐titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 1 | |
| Mohlin et al. | Examination of Chinese NiTi wire by a combined clinical and laboratory approach | |
| Haikel et al. | Dynamic fracture of hybrid endodontic hand instruments compared with traditional files | |
| Camps et al. | Machining efficiency of nickel‐titanium K‐type files in a linear motion | |
| Miserendino et al. | Cutting efficiency of endodontic instruments. Part III. Comparison of sonic and ultrasonic instrument systems | |
| Canalda‐Sahli et al. | A comparison of bending and torsional properties of K‐files manufactured with different metallic alloys | |
| Kyaw et al. | Effect of kinematics on the torque/force generation, surface characteristics, and shaping ability of a nickel‐titanium rotary glide path instrument: An ex vivo study | |
| Goldberg et al. | Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of curved root canals | |
| Valois et al. | Effectiveness of the ProFile. 04 Taper Series 29 Files in removal of gutta-percha root fillings during curved root canal retreatment | |
| Camps et al. | Relationship between file size and stiffness of stainless steel instruments | |
| Zmener et al. | Effectiveness of different endodontic files for preparing curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study |