WO2011117298A1 - Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy - Google Patents
Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2011117298A1 WO2011117298A1 PCT/EP2011/054448 EP2011054448W WO2011117298A1 WO 2011117298 A1 WO2011117298 A1 WO 2011117298A1 EP 2011054448 W EP2011054448 W EP 2011054448W WO 2011117298 A1 WO2011117298 A1 WO 2011117298A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- weight
- alloy
- implant
- content
- alloys
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L31/00—Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
- A61L31/02—Inorganic materials
- A61L31/022—Metals or alloys
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2/00—Filters implantable into blood vessels; Prostheses, i.e. artificial substitutes or replacements for parts of the body; Appliances for connecting them with the body; Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
- A61F2/82—Devices providing patency to, or preventing collapsing of, tubular structures of the body, e.g. stents
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L31/00—Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
- A61L31/14—Materials characterised by their function or physical properties, e.g. injectable or lubricating compositions, shape-memory materials, surface modified materials
- A61L31/148—Materials at least partially resorbable by the body
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C23/00—Alloys based on magnesium
- C22C23/06—Alloys based on magnesium with a rare earth metal as the next major constituent
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
- A61F2210/00—Particular material properties of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof
- A61F2210/0004—Particular material properties of prostheses classified in groups A61F2/00 - A61F2/26 or A61F2/82 or A61F9/00 or A61F11/00 or subgroups thereof bioabsorbable
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
- A61L2400/00—Materials characterised by their function or physical properties
- A61L2400/18—Modification of implant surfaces in order to improve biocompatibility, cell growth, fixation of biomolecules, e.g. plasma treatment
Definitions
- the present invention relates to implants made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy.
- Medical implants for greatly varying uses are known in the art.
- a shared goal in the implementation of modern medical implants is high biocompatibility, i.e., a high degree of tissue compatibility of the medical product inserted into the body.
- a temporary presence of the implant in the body is necessary to fulfil the medical purpose.
- Implants made of materials which do not degrade in the body are often to be removed again, because rejection reactions of the body may occur in long term even with highly biocompatible permanent materials.
- biodegrada- tion as used herewith is understood as the sum of microbial procedures or processes solely caused by the presence of bodily media, which result in a gradual degradation of the structure comprising the material.
- the implant, or at least the part of the implant which comprises the biodegradable material loses its mechanical integrity.
- the degradation products are mainly resorbed by the body, although small residues being in general tolerable.
- Biodegradable materials have been developed, inter alia, on the basis of polymers of synthetic nature or natural origin. Because of the material properties, but particularly also because of the degradation products of the synthetic polymers, the use of biodegradable polymers is still significantly limited. Thus, for example, orthopedic implants must frequently withstand high mechanical strains and vascular implants, e.g., stents, must meet very special requirements for modulus of elasticity, brittleness, and formability depending on their design.
- biodegradable metal alloys For example, it is suggested in German Patent Application No. 197 31 021 Al to form medical implants from a metallic material whose main component is to be selected from the group of alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, iron, zinc, and aluminium. Alloys based on magnesium, iron, and zinc are described as especially suitable. Secondary components of the alloys may be manganese, cobalt, nickel, chromium, copper, cadmium, lead, tin, thorium, zirconium, silver, gold, palladium, platinum, silicon, calcium, lithium, aluminium, zinc, and iron.
- Another intravascular implant is described in European Patent Application 1 842 507 Al, wherein the implant is made of a magnesium alloy including gadolinium and the magnesium alloy is being free of yttrium.
- Stents made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy are already in clinical trials.
- the yttrium (W) and rare earth elements (E) containing magnesium alloy ELEKTRON WE43 (US 4,401,621) of Magnesium Elektron, UK has been investigated, wherein a content of yttrium is about 4% by weight and a content of rare earth metals (RE) is about 3% by weight.
- RE rare earth elements
- LRE light rare earth elements (La-Pm)
- HRE heavy rare earth elements (Sm-Lu).
- the alloys respond to thermo-mechanical treatments.
- HRE intermetallic particles can adversely affect the thermo- mechanical processability of alloys.
- manufacturing vascular prostheses like stents made of metallic materials usually starts from drawn seamless tubes made of the material.
- the production of such seamless tubes is usually an alternating process of cold deformation by drawing and subsequent thermal treatments to restore the deformability and ductility, respectively.
- intermetallic particles cause problems because they usually have significant higher hardness than the surrounding matrix.
- magnesium has many advantages for biomedical applications, for example biodegradable inserts like stents, screws/plates for bone repair and surgical suture materials.
- the time for degradation and failure of the magnesium repair device is too soon and can develop too much gas evolution (H 2 ) during the corrosion process.
- EAC Environmentally Assisted Cracking
- SCC Stress Corrosion Cracking
- CF Corrosion Fatigue
- YS Yield Strength
- ECSS European Cooperation for Space Standardisation
- ECSS-Q-70-36 report ranks the susceptibility of several Magnesium alloys, including Mg— Y-Nd-HRE-Zr alloy WE54. This reference classifies materials as high, moderate or low resistance to SCC. WE54 is classed as "low resistance to SCC" (ie poor performance).
- SBF simulated body fluid
- An aim of this invention is to overcome or to at least lower one or more of the above mentioned problems.
- a biodegradable Mg alloy having improved proc- essability especially in new highly sophisticated techniques like micro-extrusion and, if applicable, improved mechanical properties of the material, such as strength, ductility and strain hardening.
- the implant is a stent
- scaffolding strength of the final device as well as the tube drawing properties of the material should be improved.
- a further aspect of the invention may be to enhance the corrosion resistance of the material, more specifically, to slow the degradation, to fasten the formation of a protective conversion layer, and to lessen the hydrogen evolution.
- enhancing the corrosion resistance will lengthen the time wherein the implant can provide sufficient scaffolding ability in vivo.
- Another aspect of the invention may be to enhance the biocompatibility of the material by avoiding toxic components in the alloy or the corrosion products.
- the inventive implant is made in total or in parts of a biodegradable magnesium alloy comprising:
- Tm 0 - 21.0°/ x o by weight
- Tb 0 - 21.0% by weight
- a total content of Ho, Er, Lu, Tb and Tm is more than 5.5% by weight
- the inventive implant is made in total or in parts of a biodegradable magnesium alloy consisting of:
- a total content of Ho, Er, Lu, Tb and Tm is more than 5.5% by weight
- inventive Mg alloy for manufacturing an implant causes an improvement in processability, an increase in corrosion resistance and biocompatibility compared to conventional magnesium alloys, especially WE alloys such as WE43 or WE54.
- the content of Y in the Mg alloy is 0 - 10.0% by weight.
- the content of Y in the Mg alloy is 1.0 - 6.0% by weight; most preferred 3.0 - 4.0% by weight. Keeping the content of Y within the ranges ensures that the consistency of properties, e.g. scatter during tensile testing, is maintained. Further, strength and corrosion behaviour is improved.
- the content of Y is above 10.0% by weight, the ductility of the alloy is deteriorated.
- the content of Nd in the Mg alloy is 0 - 4.5% by weight, preferably 0.05 - 2.5% by weight.
- the content of Nd is above 4.5% by weight, the ductility of the alloy is deteriorated due to a limited solubility of Nd in Mg.
- the content of Gd in the Mg alloy is 0 - 9.0%> by weight, preferably 0 - 4.0%> by weight.
- Gd can reduce the degradation of the alloy in SBF tests and improve its EAC behaviour.
- Levels of Gd approaching the solubility limit in a given alloy reduce ductility.
- a total content of Y, Nd and Gd in the Mg alloy is more than 2.0% by weight, preferably more than 3.0% by weight.
- the content of Dy in the Mg alloy is 0 - 8.0%> by weight, preferably 0 - 6.0%> by weight, most preferred 0 - 4.0%> by weight.
- the content of Ho in the Mg alloy is 0 - 19.0% by weight, preferably 4.0 - 15.0% by weight, most preferred 6.0 - 14.0% by weight. Ho can reduce the degradation of the alloy in SBF and increases strength.
- the content of Er in the Mg alloy is 0 - 23.0% by weight, preferably 4.0 - 15.0% by weight, most preferred 6.0 - 14.0% by weight. Er can reduce the degradation of the alloy in SBF tests and improve its EAC behaviour and strength.
- the content of Lu in the Mg alloy is 0 - 25.0% by weight, preferably 4.0 - 15.0% by weight, most preferred 6.0 - 14.0% by weight. Lu can reduce the degradation of the alloy in SBF tests and improve its EAC behaviour and strength.
- the content of Tm and/or Tb in the Mg alloy is 0 - 21.0% by weight, preferably 4.0 - 15.0% by weight, most preferred 6.0 - 12.0% by weight.
- Tb and Tm the same effect on degradation of the alloy and improvement of the EAC behaviour and strength is expected.
- a total content of Ho, Er, Lu, Tb and Tm in the Mg alloy is more than 5.5% by weight.
- the total content of Ho, Er, Lu, Tb and Tm in the Mg alloy is 6.5 - 25.0% by weight, most preferred 7.0 - 15.0% by weight.
- the total content includes Dy as additional element.
- the content of Zr in the Mg alloy is 0.1 - 1.5% by weight, preferably 0.2 - 0.6%) by weight, most preferred 0.2 - 0.4%> by weight.
- zirconium has a significant benefit of reducing the grain size of magnesium alloys, especially of the pre-extruded material, which improves the ductility of the alloy. Further, Zr removes contaminants from the melt.
- the content of Ca in the Mg alloy is 0 - 2.0% by weight, preferably 0 - 1.0% by weight, most preferred 0.1 - 0.8% by weight.
- Ca has a significant benefit of reducing the grain size of magnesium alloys.
- the content of Zn in the Mg alloy is 0 - 1.5% by weight, preferably 0 - 0.5%> by weight, most preferred 0.1 - 0.3% by weight. Zn can contribute to precipitation and can also affect general corrosion.
- the content of In in the Mg alloy is 0 - 12.0% by weight, preferably 0 - 2.5% by weight, most preferred 0.0 - 0.8% by weight. In has a benefit of improving the corrosion performance of magnesium alloys. Additionally In has a benefit of reducing the grain size of magnesium alloy.
- a total content of In, Zr, Ca and Zn in the Mg alloy is preferably in the range of 0.2 - 2.0% by weight, preferably 0.2 - 0.8%> by weight.
- the content of Sc in the Mg alloy is 0 - 15% by weight. Sc can have a positive effect on corrosion resistance.
- the total content of impurities in the alloy should be less than 0.3% by weight, more preferred less that 0.2% by weight.
- the following maximum impurity levels should be preserved:
- alloys are referred to as biodegradable in which degradation occurs in a physiological environment, which finally results in the entire implant or the part of the implant formed by the material losing its mechanical integrity.
- Artificial plasma has been previously described according to EN ISO 10993-15:2000 for biodegra- dation assays (composition NaCl 6.8 g/1. CaCl 2 0.2 g/1. KC1 0.4 g/1. MgS0 4 0.1 g/1. Na- HCOs 2.2 g/1. Na 2 HP0 4 0.126 g/1. NaH 2 P0 4 0.026 g/1), is used as a testing medium for testing the corrosion behaviour of an alloy coming into consideration.
- Implants are devices introduced into the human body via a surgical method and comprise fasteners for bones, such as screws, plates, or nails, surgical suture material, intestinal clamps, vascular clips, prostheses in the area of the hard and soft tissue, and anchoring elements for electrodes, in particular, of pacemakers or defibrillators.
- the implant is preferably a stent.
- Stents of typical construction have filigree support structures made of metallic struts which are initially provided in an unexpanded state for introduction into the body and are then widened into an expanded state at the location of application.
- Vascular implants are preferably to be designed in regard to the alloys used in such a way that a mechanical integrity of the implant is maintained for 2 through 20 weeks.
- Implants as an occluder are preferably to be designed in regard to the biodegradable in such a way that the mechanical integrity of the implant is maintained for 6 through 12 months.
- Orthopedic implants for osteosynthesis are preferably to be designed in regard to the magnesium alloy in such a way that the mechanical integrity of the implant is maintained for 6 through 36 months.
- FIG. 1 - 7 show microstructures of samples
- FIG. 8 shows an example of secondary cracking caused by EAC in SBF solution.
- FIG. 9 shows the evolution of the relative collapse pressure of stents during corrosion fatigue testing.
- FIG. 10 shows the evolution of the relative load bearing cross section of stents during corrosion fatigue testing.
- melts with different alloy compositions were melted cast, and extruded and subsequently subject to different investigation with the emphasis on the microstructure (grain size, size, fraction and composition of precipitates), the respective thermo-mechanical properties (tensile properties) and the corrosion behaviour with and without superimposed mechanical load. In addition biocompatibility tests were carried out. In general, melts were carried out according to the following casting technique:
- High-purity starting materials (>99.9%) were melted in steel crucibles under a protective gas (C0 2 /2% SF 6 ). The temperature was raised to 760°C to 800°C before the melt was homogenized by stirring. The melt was cast to form bars with a nominal diameter of 120 mm and a length of 300 mm. Next the bars were machined to a nominal diameter of 75 mm with a length of 150 mm to 250 mm and homogenized for 4-8 hours at approximately 525°C.
- a protective gas C0 2 /2% SF 6
- the material was then heated to 350-500C and extruded with the help of a hydraulic press.
- the resulting round rods had a diameter in the range of 6 mm to 16 mm, mostly 9.5-12.7 mm.
- pieces from the start and end of an extrusion 30 cm long were usually removed.
- Table 2 summarises the chemical compositions, corrosion rates and tensile properties of exemplary Mg alloys.
- MI0007, MI0034 and DF4619 are comparative examples of WE43 within AMS4427 chemical specification used as reference material. Each time, melts were produced to generate tensile data and for metallography.
- the 0.2% yield tensile strength (YTS), the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and elongation at fracture (A) were determined as characteristic data.
- the yield strength YS of a material is defined as the stress at which material strain changes from elastic deformation to plastic deformation, causing it to deform permanently.
- the ultimate tensile strength UTS is defined as the maximum stress a material can withstand before break.
- extruded tubes In addition tensile test were also performed with extruded tubes and drawn tubes as reference.
- the typical extruded tubes have a typical length of not less than 30 mm, a diameter of ca. 2 mm and a wall thickness between 50 and 400 ⁇ . They are processed by a hot micro extrusion process at temperatures between 200°C and 480°C and extrusion speeds of 0.1 mm/s to 21 mm/s.
- Table 2 summarizes the chemical composition, mechanical (tensile test) and corrosion (salt fog in NaCl and immersion in SBF) properties of Mg alloys.
- inventive changes in the composition of the alloys affect the tensile properties compared to the reference in terms of strength and ductility.
- the inventive changes of the amount of Y and Nd in the composition of the alloys basically effects strength, ductility and tolerance of some other REs.
- the extruded bulk material is often processed further to achieve a product.
- This processing can include drawing, rolling and bending steps and other advanced processing techniques. It has now been discovered that surprisingly, alloys of the invention show an improvement during such subsequent processing steps for example micro extrusion.
- inventive alloys are more susceptible to thermo-mechanical treatments, in particular micro-extrusion.
- inventive alloy show a significant drop of 10-30% in yield strength for all tested inventive alloys, minor changes of ca. plus minus 10% in ultimate strength depending on the inventive alloy and significant rise of 10 -50% in ductility for all tested inventive alloys.
- Figures 1 through 5 show microstructures of exemplary samples (FIG. 1 : MI0031 / FIG. 2: MI0030 / FIG. 3: MI0037 / FIG. 4: MI0029 / FIG. 5: MI0046) after extrusion. They provide an insight into the effect of alloy composition upon strength and ductility of some of the alloys examples.
- a microstructure which is free of large particles and clusters (“clean microstructure") can offer the advantage of improved ductility if the clusters/particles are brittle.
- Figure 1 is a comparatively "clean microstructure" despite a 12.7% addition of Er - ductility is good (19%).
- Figure 2 shows the effect of adding Nd to the alloy of Figure 1.
- the microstructure has more clusters and ductility falls (10%). It will however be noticed that the alloy of Figure 1 possess higher tensile properties.
- Figure 3 contains a higher level of Er (18%) than the alloy of Figure 1. This result in more clusters and despite an improvement in strength, ductility falls to a very low level (2%).
- the alloy of Figure 4 illustrates that a combination of lower Er compared to the alloy of Figure 1 (8% Er vs. 13% Er) can achieve a comparatively "clean microstructure" and similar properties to that of alloy of Figure 1, by combining Nd with this lower Er content.
- Figure 5 illustrates the effect of Lu, which appears to provide a similar manner to Er, however appears more tolerant to Nd additions in terms of freedom of particles and clusters compared with the alloy of Figure 4.
- Figure 6 and 7 illustrate the difference in micro-structure of drawn tubes from the reference material and micro-extruded tubes from the inventive alloy MI0029. It clearly can be seen that the micro-extruded has significantly less and smaller precipitates than drawn material. In addition the grain size of the extruded tubes is significantly reduced from ca. 15-20 ⁇ for the as extruded bulk materials and 2-15 ⁇ for the drawn condition.
- the corrosion resistance also depends on the corrosion medium. Therefore, an additional test method has been used to determine the corrosion behavior under physiological conditions in view of the special use of the alloys.
- EAC Environmental Assisted Cracking
- SCC stress corrosion cracking
- the test consists of testing a machined cylindrical specimen containing sharp notches to act as stress initiators.
- the samples were loaded with a fixed weight via a cantilever mechanism.
- the specimen was located inside a container which allowed SBF media to immerse the sample to a level greater than the notched portion of the sample. Media was changed every two days to minimize any compositional changes during testing. Pass criteria was at least 250 hours continuous exposure to SBF media without failure.
- the stress value whereby failure occurred in > 250 hours was defined as the threshold value which is reported in Table 4.
- thermo-mechanical treatments and the surface conditions of materials affects the corrosion behaviour we also characterized the corrosion resistance of the materials by quantification of the Mg ion release from micro-extruded tubes and actual fully processed stents in SBF.
- the samples for the Mg ion release tests were manufactured from micro-extruded tubes as described above. Furthermore the extruded tubes were laser beam cut to the shape of stents, electro-polished, crimped on balloon catheters, sterilized and expanded into hoses of appropriate size where they were surrounded be flowing SBF. Samples from the test solution were taken at different time points and subject to quantitative Mg ion evaluation by means of an ion chromatographic procedure described elsewhere. Drawn tubes of WE43 and the respective stent served as reference.
- Tests in immersed SBF, of the alloys of the invention illustrates that the reduction on degradation rate (corrosion). This is best viewed as a % of the reference alloy. In the best case examples from the invention show a greater than 10 fold improvement in degradation.
- Table 4 provides data on EAC tests. Taking WE43 type alloy (DF9319) as a reference, it can be seen that as the HRE content increase, the absolute tolerable stress increase. This improvement is also seen as a % of the actual strength of the material when tested in air (no SBF media effect). The closer this value is to 100%, the less the fracture is related to the media and therefore the less prone the material is likely to be to EAC (SCC) in that media.
- Er additions perform well to at least 14wt %, however at 18 wt % the performance is reduced to beneath that of the reference WE43 type alloy.
- Other HREs perform in different ways, for example only 4% Gd addition gives the best EAC resistance of the alloys tested, and Lu also appears good, Ho performs poorly.
- Figure 8 shows the fracture appearance of alloy DF9400.
- the fracture shows primary and secondary cracking. This type of cracking with secondary cracking remote from the primary crack can be representative of SCC.
- Table 5 shows a comparison of the Mg ion release from bulk material, extruded tubes and the respective stents from these extruded tubes. Values are given in percentage of the respective reference material (reference WE43 bulk materials from Table 2 as reference for the inventive bulk material, drawn tube of WE43 for the extruded tubes of the inventive alloys and stents from drawn tube of WE43 for the stent manufactured from extrude tubes of the inventive alloys).
- grain size is significantly reduced from ca. 15-20 ⁇ in the as extruded and drawn condition to 2-15 ⁇ in the micro-extruded condition.
- High purity (>99.9%) magnesium ingots are smelted in steel crucibles at 500-800°C.
- the melt is protected from burning and sludge formation using fluxless techniques with mixtures of protective gases, e.g. C0 2 /2%> SF 6 or argon/2% SF 6 .
- the temperature is raised to 680-860°C and the respective amounts of alloy ingredients of Y, Nd and Er and Zr are added.
- the melt Before casting in a water-cooled mold to form bars with a nominal diameter of 120 mm and a length of 300 mm the melt is homogenized by stirring. After casting and cooling the bars are machined to a nominal diameter of 75 mm with a length of 250 mm and homogenized for 8 hours at approximately 525°C.
- the material is then reheated to 400-500°C, preferably 450°C, and extruded with the help of a hydraulic press.
- the resulting round rods have a diameter of 12.7 mm.
- 30 cm long pieces are removed from the start and end of the extrusions.
- the mechanical properties of the extruded bulk materials are:
- YTS 246 MPa which is ca. 35 MPa higher than for WE43.
- UTS 322 MPa which is ca. 30 MPa higher than for WE43.
- YTS 195 MPa which is ca. 15 MPa less than for WE43.
- UTS 283 MPa which is ca. 7 MPa less than for WE43.
- a Stent is an endoluminal endoprosthesis having a carrier structure that is formed of a hollow body which is open at its ends and the peripheral wall of which is formed by a plurality of struts connecting together which can be folded in a zig-zag or meander-shaped configuration, where the struts have typical dimensions in width and thickness of 30-450 ⁇
- micro-extrusion process Further processing of the extruded alloys into such above mentioned tubes is accomplished by a micro-extrusion process.
- slugs are machined from the bulk material. These slugs are processed by a hot pressing process at elevated temperatures between 200°C and 480°C and extrusion speeds of 0.001 mm/s to 600 mm/s.
- Typical dimensions for micro-extruded tubes for vessel scaffolds have length of not less than 30 mm, a diameter of ca. 2 mm and a wall thickness between 50 and 400 ⁇ .
- YTS 189 MPa which is ca. 25 MPa higher than for drawn WE43 tubes.
- UTS 316 MPa which is ca. 66 MPa higher than for drawn WE43 tubes.
- YTS 173 MPa which is ca. 10 MPa higher than for drawn WE43 tubes.
- UTS 261 MPa which is ca. 11 MPa higher than for drawn WE43 tubes.
- stents were produced from the micro-extruded tube by laser cutting and electro polishing. Prior to testing the stents were crimped on balloon catheters to a diameter of less than 1.5 mm and sterilized, e.g. ETO (Ethylene Oxide Sterilization) or e-beam (electron beam sterilization). The stents were than over-expanded to their nominal diameter plus 0.5 mm into mock arteries with respective diameters which were previously filled with simulated body fluid (SBF).
- ETO Ethylene Oxide Sterilization
- e-beam electro beam sterilization
- the mock arteries with the stent inside are placed in a test chamber where a cyclic physiological load is applied. After certain periods of time (14 and 28 days) some arteries are transferred into another test chamber where the radial strength of the stent can be measured. Some other arteries are filled with epoxy resin for metallographic determination of the remaining load bearing cross section of the stent struts. For comparison we used the same stent design manufactured from WE43 tubing.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Vascular Medicine (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Cardiology (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Transplantation (AREA)
- Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
- Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (8)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201180010623.1A CN102762235B (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2011-03-23 | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy |
AU2011231630A AU2011231630B2 (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2011-03-23 | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy |
SG2012061164A SG183382A1 (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2011-03-23 | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy |
CA2793568A CA2793568C (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2011-03-23 | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy |
EP11709730.3A EP2550032B1 (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2011-03-23 | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy |
US13/635,039 US20130041455A1 (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2011-03-23 | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy |
JP2013500495A JP5952803B2 (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2011-03-23 | Implants made from biodegradable magnesium alloys |
US15/440,921 US20170157300A1 (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2017-02-23 | Implant made of biodegradable magnesium alloy |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US31729610P | 2010-03-25 | 2010-03-25 | |
US61/317,296 | 2010-03-25 |
Related Child Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/635,039 A-371-Of-International US20130041455A1 (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2011-03-23 | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy |
US15/440,921 Continuation US20170157300A1 (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2017-02-23 | Implant made of biodegradable magnesium alloy |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2011117298A1 true WO2011117298A1 (en) | 2011-09-29 |
Family
ID=43896613
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/054448 WO2011117298A1 (en) | 2010-03-25 | 2011-03-23 | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US20130041455A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2550032B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5952803B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102762235B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2011231630B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2793568C (en) |
SG (1) | SG183382A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011117298A1 (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2013024124A1 (en) * | 2011-08-15 | 2013-02-21 | Meko Laserstrahl-Materialbearbeitungen E.K. | Magnesium alloy and resorbable stents containing the same |
CN104511049A (en) * | 2013-09-27 | 2015-04-15 | 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院 | Biomedical degradable metal capable of treating rheumatoid arthritis, and applications thereof |
WO2015066181A1 (en) * | 2013-10-29 | 2015-05-07 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Bioerodible magnesium alloy microstructures for endoprostheses |
EP3120877A1 (en) | 2015-07-24 | 2017-01-25 | B. Braun Melsungen AG | Endoluminal device |
US9603728B2 (en) | 2013-02-15 | 2017-03-28 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Bioerodible magnesium alloy microstructures for endoprostheses |
WO2018137763A1 (en) | 2017-01-25 | 2018-08-02 | B. Braun Melsungen Ag | Endoluminal device |
RU2687359C1 (en) * | 2018-11-23 | 2019-05-13 | Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Национальный исследовательский технологический университет "МИСиС" | Magnesium casting alloy |
US10426869B2 (en) | 2014-05-05 | 2019-10-01 | The University Of Toledo | Biodegradable magnesium alloys and composites |
US10589005B2 (en) | 2015-03-11 | 2020-03-17 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Bioerodible magnesium alloy microstructures for endoprostheses |
Families Citing this family (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20140249531A1 (en) | 2013-03-01 | 2014-09-04 | Stryker Corporation | Tool with bioabsorbable material for intraoperative use |
CN103882274B (en) * | 2014-03-18 | 2016-06-08 | 北京科技大学 | Biological medical degradable Mg-Zn-Zr-Sc Alloy And Preparation Method |
CN104120320B (en) * | 2014-07-04 | 2016-06-01 | 东莞宜安科技股份有限公司 | A kind of degradable magnesium-rare earth biomaterial for medical purpose and preparation method |
WO2016008687A1 (en) * | 2014-07-16 | 2016-01-21 | Biotronik Ag | A method and a device forcoating a base body |
CN105395298A (en) * | 2014-09-04 | 2016-03-16 | 汤敬东 | Partially degradable blood vessel stent and preparation method thereof |
CN105671391B (en) * | 2016-01-19 | 2020-08-04 | 周倩 | Fully-degradable magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
CN105950931B (en) * | 2016-07-20 | 2018-10-02 | 肖旅 | The high-strength high hard magnesium alloy of controllable reaction and its manufacturing method of component occurs with water |
CN107557633B (en) * | 2017-08-10 | 2019-07-09 | 北京航空航天大学 | Micro-alloyed medical degradable magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
CN107858616B (en) * | 2017-12-12 | 2019-08-27 | 重庆市科学技术研究院 | A kind of high-strength and high-plasticity Mg-Gd-Y-Zn-Nd-Zr casting magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
EP3888717A4 (en) * | 2018-11-30 | 2022-08-31 | U & I Corporation | BIODEGRADABLE METAL ALLOY |
CN109457130B (en) * | 2019-01-14 | 2020-11-20 | 兰州理工大学 | A kind of high toughness biomedical magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
DE102019108327A1 (en) * | 2019-03-29 | 2020-10-01 | Karl Leibinger Medizintechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg | Implant with intrinsic antimicrobial activity and process for its manufacture |
CN110129644B (en) * | 2019-05-23 | 2020-03-17 | 山东省科学院新材料研究所 | Heat-resistant soluble magnesium alloy and preparation method and application thereof |
CN110468319B (en) * | 2019-08-13 | 2021-05-18 | 中国兵器科学研究院宁波分院 | Mg-Y-Nd- (La + Ce) -Zr biodegradable magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
CN110512129A (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2019-11-29 | 中南大学 | An integrated forging and torsion process for preparing ultra-high-strength wrought magnesium alloy rods |
CN110747382B (en) * | 2019-12-11 | 2021-04-23 | 浙江工贸职业技术学院 | Mg-Sc-X alloy under ultrahigh pressure and preparation method thereof |
CN112410632B (en) * | 2020-11-20 | 2022-03-08 | 中国科学院长春应用化学研究所 | Mg-Gd-Y-Nd high-strength rare earth magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
US20220370691A1 (en) | 2021-05-10 | 2022-11-24 | Cilag Gmbh International | Bioabsorbable staple comprising mechanism for delaying the absorption of the staple |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4401621A (en) | 1981-03-25 | 1983-08-30 | Magnesium Elektron Limited | Magnesium alloys |
DE19731021A1 (en) | 1997-07-18 | 1999-01-21 | Meyer Joerg | In vivo degradable metallic implant |
EP1419793B1 (en) | 2002-11-13 | 2006-01-25 | Biotronik AG | Endoprosthesis with a supporting structure of magnesium alloy |
DE102004043231A1 (en) * | 2004-09-07 | 2006-03-09 | Biotronik Vi Patent Ag | Endoprosthesis made of magnesium alloy |
EP1842507A1 (en) | 2005-01-28 | 2007-10-10 | Terumo Kabushiki Kaisha | Intravascular implant |
CN101078080A (en) * | 2007-07-04 | 2007-11-28 | 北京有色金属研究总院 | Creep resistance magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
EP2000551A1 (en) * | 2007-05-28 | 2008-12-10 | Acrostak Corp. BVI | Magnesium-based alloys |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1237035A (en) * | 1969-08-20 | 1971-06-30 | Tsi Travmatologii I Ortopedii | Magnesium-base alloy for use in bone surgery |
DE10128100A1 (en) * | 2001-06-11 | 2002-12-19 | Hannover Med Hochschule | Medical implant used for humans and animals is made from magnesium alloy containing additions of rare earth metals and lithium |
JP2003129160A (en) * | 2001-08-13 | 2003-05-08 | Honda Motor Co Ltd | Heat resistant magnesium alloy |
DE10361942A1 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2005-07-21 | Restate Patent Ag | Radioopaque marker for medical implants |
DE102004036399A1 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2006-02-16 | Biotronik Vi Patent Ag | Biocompatible and bioabsorbable suture and staple material for surgical use |
EP2169090B3 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2014-06-25 | Biotronik VI Patent AG | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy |
US9468704B2 (en) * | 2004-09-07 | 2016-10-18 | Biotronik Vi Patent Ag | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy |
US8663308B2 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2014-03-04 | Cook Medical Technologies Llc | Graft with bioabsorbable support frame |
US20090081313A1 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2009-03-26 | Biomagnesium Systems Ltd. | Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys and Uses Thereof |
DE102008040253A1 (en) * | 2008-07-08 | 2010-01-14 | Biotronik Vi Patent Ag | Implant system with a functional implant made of degradable metal material |
GB0817893D0 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2008-11-05 | Magnesium Elektron Ltd | Magnesium alloys containing rare earths |
-
2011
- 2011-03-23 SG SG2012061164A patent/SG183382A1/en unknown
- 2011-03-23 WO PCT/EP2011/054448 patent/WO2011117298A1/en active Application Filing
- 2011-03-23 JP JP2013500495A patent/JP5952803B2/en active Active
- 2011-03-23 CA CA2793568A patent/CA2793568C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2011-03-23 AU AU2011231630A patent/AU2011231630B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2011-03-23 EP EP11709730.3A patent/EP2550032B1/en active Active
- 2011-03-23 CN CN201180010623.1A patent/CN102762235B/en active Active
- 2011-03-23 US US13/635,039 patent/US20130041455A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2017
- 2017-02-23 US US15/440,921 patent/US20170157300A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4401621A (en) | 1981-03-25 | 1983-08-30 | Magnesium Elektron Limited | Magnesium alloys |
DE19731021A1 (en) | 1997-07-18 | 1999-01-21 | Meyer Joerg | In vivo degradable metallic implant |
EP1419793B1 (en) | 2002-11-13 | 2006-01-25 | Biotronik AG | Endoprosthesis with a supporting structure of magnesium alloy |
DE102004043231A1 (en) * | 2004-09-07 | 2006-03-09 | Biotronik Vi Patent Ag | Endoprosthesis made of magnesium alloy |
EP1842507A1 (en) | 2005-01-28 | 2007-10-10 | Terumo Kabushiki Kaisha | Intravascular implant |
EP2000551A1 (en) * | 2007-05-28 | 2008-12-10 | Acrostak Corp. BVI | Magnesium-based alloys |
CN101078080A (en) * | 2007-07-04 | 2007-11-28 | 北京有色金属研究总院 | Creep resistance magnesium alloy and preparation method thereof |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
G PETZOW, METALLOGRAPHISCHES, KERAMOGRAPHISCHES UND PLASTO- GRAPHISCHES ATZEN, 2006 |
KING ET AL., 59TH ANNUAL WORLD MAGNESIUM CONFERENCE, 2005, pages 15FFL |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9566367B2 (en) | 2011-08-15 | 2017-02-14 | Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht Zentrum fur Material-und Kustenforschung GmbH | Magnesium alloy and resorbable stents containing the same |
WO2013024124A1 (en) * | 2011-08-15 | 2013-02-21 | Meko Laserstrahl-Materialbearbeitungen E.K. | Magnesium alloy and resorbable stents containing the same |
US9603728B2 (en) | 2013-02-15 | 2017-03-28 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Bioerodible magnesium alloy microstructures for endoprostheses |
CN104511049A (en) * | 2013-09-27 | 2015-04-15 | 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院 | Biomedical degradable metal capable of treating rheumatoid arthritis, and applications thereof |
US9522220B2 (en) | 2013-10-29 | 2016-12-20 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Bioerodible magnesium alloy microstructures for endoprostheses |
WO2015066181A1 (en) * | 2013-10-29 | 2015-05-07 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Bioerodible magnesium alloy microstructures for endoprostheses |
US10518001B2 (en) | 2013-10-29 | 2019-12-31 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Bioerodible magnesium alloy microstructures for endoprostheses |
US10426869B2 (en) | 2014-05-05 | 2019-10-01 | The University Of Toledo | Biodegradable magnesium alloys and composites |
US10589005B2 (en) | 2015-03-11 | 2020-03-17 | Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. | Bioerodible magnesium alloy microstructures for endoprostheses |
EP3120877A1 (en) | 2015-07-24 | 2017-01-25 | B. Braun Melsungen AG | Endoluminal device |
WO2018137763A1 (en) | 2017-01-25 | 2018-08-02 | B. Braun Melsungen Ag | Endoluminal device |
US11324862B2 (en) | 2017-01-25 | 2022-05-10 | B. Braun Melsungen Ag | Endoluminal device |
RU2687359C1 (en) * | 2018-11-23 | 2019-05-13 | Федеральное государственное автономное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Национальный исследовательский технологический университет "МИСиС" | Magnesium casting alloy |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP5952803B2 (en) | 2016-07-13 |
CN102762235B (en) | 2014-06-11 |
US20130041455A1 (en) | 2013-02-14 |
SG183382A1 (en) | 2012-09-27 |
CA2793568C (en) | 2015-12-29 |
AU2011231630A1 (en) | 2012-08-23 |
CN102762235A (en) | 2012-10-31 |
JP2013524002A (en) | 2013-06-17 |
EP2550032A1 (en) | 2013-01-30 |
US20170157300A1 (en) | 2017-06-08 |
EP2550032B1 (en) | 2013-11-20 |
CA2793568A1 (en) | 2011-09-29 |
AU2011231630B2 (en) | 2014-05-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2550032B1 (en) | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy | |
US10016530B2 (en) | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy | |
WO2011117630A1 (en) | Magnesium alloy containing heavy rare earths | |
JP6816069B2 (en) | Magnesium alloy, its manufacturing method and its use | |
US9468704B2 (en) | Implant made of a biodegradable magnesium alloy | |
EP2493523B1 (en) | Biodegradable implantable medical devices formed from super - pure magnesium-based material | |
JP5696208B2 (en) | Heavy rare earth element-containing magnesium alloy | |
RU2647951C2 (en) | Magnesium alloy, method for production thereof and use thereof | |
EP2213314B1 (en) | Implant with a base body of a biocorrodible magnesium alloy | |
CN111304504A (en) | Ultrapure magnesium alloy with tunable degradation rate | |
Pastorek | Biodegradable Magnesium Alloys with Aluminum, Lithium and Rare Earth Additions |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 201180010623.1 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 11709730 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2011231630 Country of ref document: AU |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2011231630 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20110323 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2011709730 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2013500495 Country of ref document: JP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 13635039 Country of ref document: US |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2793568 Country of ref document: CA |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |