WO2010091475A1 - Ion selective electrode sensing device - Google Patents
Ion selective electrode sensing device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2010091475A1 WO2010091475A1 PCT/AU2010/000156 AU2010000156W WO2010091475A1 WO 2010091475 A1 WO2010091475 A1 WO 2010091475A1 AU 2010000156 W AU2010000156 W AU 2010000156W WO 2010091475 A1 WO2010091475 A1 WO 2010091475A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- layer
- sensing device
- polymeric membrane
- ion selective
- selective electrode
- Prior art date
Links
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 180
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 156
- 239000012491 analyte Substances 0.000 claims description 43
- -1 poly(aniline) Polymers 0.000 claims description 39
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims description 33
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 32
- 239000002555 ionophore Substances 0.000 claims description 30
- 230000000236 ionophoric effect Effects 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 27
- 239000003792 electrolyte Substances 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000003869 coulometry Methods 0.000 claims description 17
- 230000002209 hydrophobic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 125000000217 alkyl group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000002322 conducting polymer Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 229920001940 conductive polymer Polymers 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000000284 resting effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000005342 ion exchange Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicium dioxide Chemical compound O=[Si]=O VYPSYNLAJGMNEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titan oxide Chemical compound O=[Ti]=O GWEVSGVZZGPLCZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000003365 glass fiber Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N gold Chemical compound [Au] PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000010931 gold Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 229910021607 Silver chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 150000002148 esters Chemical class 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229910052709 silver Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000004332 silver Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- HKZLPVFGJNLROG-UHFFFAOYSA-M silver monochloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Ag+] HKZLPVFGJNLROG-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 claims description 5
- RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N Diethyl ether Chemical compound CCOCC RTZKZFJDLAIYFH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000027756 respiratory electron transport chain Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000006276 transfer reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- YTPLMLYBLZKORZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Divinylene sulfide Natural products C=1C=CSC=1 YTPLMLYBLZKORZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- KTWOOEGAPBSYNW-UHFFFAOYSA-N ferrocene Chemical class [Fe+2].C=1C=C[CH-]C=1.C=1C=C[CH-]C=1 KTWOOEGAPBSYNW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910001092 metal group alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910044991 metal oxide Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- 150000004767 nitrides Chemical class 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920000767 polyaniline Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000377 silicon dioxide Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 229930192474 thiophene Natural products 0.000 claims description 3
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004721 Polyphenylene oxide Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000001408 amides Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000001412 amines Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000003575 carbonaceous material Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 125000002887 hydroxy group Chemical group [H]O* 0.000 claims description 2
- 229920000570 polyether Polymers 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000007970 thio esters Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000003568 thioethers Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 125000001391 thioamide group Chemical group 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 69
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 21
- 239000012488 sample solution Substances 0.000 description 19
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 16
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 14
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 13
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 13
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 13
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 13
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silver Chemical class [Ag] BQCADISMDOOEFD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 12
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 11
- 230000003647 oxidation Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000007254 oxidation reaction Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000006722 reduction reaction Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000002269 spontaneous effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 6
- NFHFRUOZVGFOOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N palladium;triphenylphosphane Chemical compound [Pd].C1=CC=CC=C1P(C=1C=CC=CC=1)C1=CC=CC=C1.C1=CC=CC=C1P(C=1C=CC=CC=1)C1=CC=CC=C1.C1=CC=CC=C1P(C=1C=CC=CC=1)C1=CC=CC=C1.C1=CC=CC=C1P(C=1C=CC=CC=1)C1=CC=CC=C1 NFHFRUOZVGFOOS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 229920000915 polyvinyl chloride Polymers 0.000 description 6
- 239000004800 polyvinyl chloride Substances 0.000 description 6
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M Chloride anion Chemical compound [Cl-] VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 5
- ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium Chemical compound [K] ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 5
- 125000000524 functional group Chemical group 0.000 description 5
- 239000003960 organic solvent Substances 0.000 description 5
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 description 5
- SBHRWOBHKASWGU-UHFFFAOYSA-M tridodecyl(methyl)azanium;chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].CCCCCCCCCCCC[N+](C)(CCCCCCCCCCCC)CCCCCCCCCCCC SBHRWOBHKASWGU-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 5
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 4
- WCUXLLCKKVVCTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M Potassium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[K+] WCUXLLCKKVVCTQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000002484 cyclic voltammetry Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 4
- VJHINFRRDQUWOJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N dioctyl sebacate Chemical compound CCCCC(CC)COC(=O)CCCCCCCCC(=O)OCC(CC)CCCC VJHINFRRDQUWOJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 4
- XIXADJRWDQXREU-UHFFFAOYSA-M lithium acetate Chemical compound [Li+].CC([O-])=O XIXADJRWDQXREU-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008929 regeneration Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000011069 regeneration method Methods 0.000 description 4
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-O Ammonium Chemical compound [NH4+] QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-O 0.000 description 3
- 229910002651 NO3 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrate Chemical compound [O-][N+]([O-])=O NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 150000004945 aromatic hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 150000001768 cations Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000006911 enzymatic reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012510 hollow fiber Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002444 silanisation Methods 0.000 description 3
- BAZAXWOYCMUHIX-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium perchlorate Chemical compound [Na+].[O-]Cl(=O)(=O)=O BAZAXWOYCMUHIX-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 3
- 229910001488 sodium perchlorate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000000807 solvent casting Methods 0.000 description 3
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229920001609 Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003287 bathing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000001913 cellulose Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920002678 cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000000536 complexating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 229920001577 copolymer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000008151 electrolyte solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000017 hydrogel Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000005012 migration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013508 migration Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001807 normal pulse voltammetry Methods 0.000 description 2
- VLTRZXGMWDSKGL-UHFFFAOYSA-M perchlorate Inorganic materials [O-]Cl(=O)(=O)=O VLTRZXGMWDSKGL-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- VLTRZXGMWDSKGL-UHFFFAOYSA-N perchloric acid Chemical compound OCl(=O)(=O)=O VLTRZXGMWDSKGL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 2
- BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N platinum Chemical compound [Pt] BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920001603 poly (alkyl acrylates) Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920001467 poly(styrenesulfonates) Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920000867 polyelectrolyte Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 229960002796 polystyrene sulfonate Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 239000011970 polystyrene sulfonate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920002635 polyurethane Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000004814 polyurethane Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000001103 potassium chloride Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000011164 potassium chloride Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000004313 potentiometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001205 potentiostatic coulometry Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006479 redox reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920002379 silicone rubber Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 239000000223 sodium ionophore Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004094 surface-active agent Substances 0.000 description 2
- DXCTUMLYTQODSP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-dodecoxy-2-nitrobenzene Chemical compound CCCCCCCCCCCCOC1=CC=CC=C1[N+]([O-])=O DXCTUMLYTQODSP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- MIZUUMRXJDZBJU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-azaniumyl-8-hydroxy-3,4-dihydro-1h-naphthalene-2-carboxylate Chemical compound C1=CC(O)=C2CC(N)(C(O)=O)CCC2=C1 MIZUUMRXJDZBJU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-M Bicarbonate Chemical compound OC([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- BTBUEUYNUDRHOZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Borate Chemical compound [O-]B([O-])[O-] BTBUEUYNUDRHOZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium chloride Chemical compound [Cl-].[Cl-].[Ca+2] UXVMQQNJUSDDNG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Carbonate Chemical compound [O-]C([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 1
- HTTJABKRGRZYRN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Heparin Chemical compound OC1C(NC(=O)C)C(O)OC(COS(O)(=O)=O)C1OC1C(OS(O)(=O)=O)C(O)C(OC2C(C(OS(O)(=O)=O)C(OC3C(C(O)C(O)C(O3)C(O)=O)OS(O)(=O)=O)C(CO)O2)NS(O)(=O)=O)C(C(O)=O)O1 HTTJABKRGRZYRN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- WHXSMMKQMYFTQS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Lithium Chemical compound [Li] WHXSMMKQMYFTQS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium Chemical compound [Mg] FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920012485 Plasticized Polyvinyl chloride Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 102000007327 Protamines Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010007568 Protamines Proteins 0.000 description 1
- FKNQFGJONOIPTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sodium cation Chemical compound [Na+] FKNQFGJONOIPTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulphide Chemical compound [S-2] UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Urea Chemical compound NC(N)=O XSQUKJJJFZCRTK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 108010046334 Urease Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 150000001450 anions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003146 anticoagulant agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940127219 anticoagulant drug Drugs 0.000 description 1
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052788 barium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- DSAJWYNOEDNPEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N barium atom Chemical compound [Ba] DSAJWYNOEDNPEQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052792 caesium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- TVFDJXOCXUVLDH-UHFFFAOYSA-N caesium atom Chemical compound [Cs] TVFDJXOCXUVLDH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000001110 calcium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001628 calcium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000004202 carbamide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005266 casting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003750 conditioning effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920006037 cross link polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000032798 delamination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003467 diminishing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000835 electrochemical detection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002255 enzymatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- AEOCXXJPGCBFJA-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethionamide Chemical compound CCC1=CC(C(N)=S)=CC=N1 AEOCXXJPGCBFJA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960002897 heparin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229920000669 heparin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- XMBWDFGMSWQBCA-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydrogen iodide Chemical compound I XMBWDFGMSWQBCA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 1
- AMGQUBHHOARCQH-UHFFFAOYSA-N indium;oxotin Chemical compound [In].[Sn]=O AMGQUBHHOARCQH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007791 liquid phase Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052744 lithium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011777 magnesium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002207 metabolite Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003094 perturbing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 125000001997 phenyl group Chemical group [H]C1=C([H])C([H])=C(*)C([H])=C1[H] 0.000 description 1
- 239000004014 plasticizer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229920005597 polymer membrane Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229910001414 potassium ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940048914 protamine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000011946 reduction process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- YGSDEFSMJLZEOE-UHFFFAOYSA-M salicylate Chemical compound OC1=CC=CC=C1C([O-])=O YGSDEFSMJLZEOE-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 229960001860 salicylate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000007650 screen-printing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003378 silver Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910001415 sodium ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000004528 spin coating Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004448 titration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002463 transducing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004832 voltammetry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001075 voltammogram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
- G01N27/26—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating electrochemical variables; by using electrolysis or electrophoresis
- G01N27/28—Electrolytic cell components
- G01N27/30—Electrodes, e.g. test electrodes; Half-cells
- G01N27/333—Ion-selective electrodes or membranes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
- G01N27/26—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating electrochemical variables; by using electrolysis or electrophoresis
- G01N27/28—Electrolytic cell components
- G01N27/30—Electrodes, e.g. test electrodes; Half-cells
- G01N27/327—Biochemical electrodes, e.g. electrical or mechanical details for in vitro measurements
- G01N27/3275—Sensing specific biomolecules, e.g. nucleic acid strands, based on an electrode surface reaction
- G01N27/3277—Sensing specific biomolecules, e.g. nucleic acid strands, based on an electrode surface reaction being a redox reaction, e.g. detection by cyclic voltammetry
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a sensing device and method for the determination of analyte in a sample.
- the device and method of the present invention relate to the extraction of analyte ions from a thin layer sample to a selective membrane by electrochemical means to determine the concentration of the analyte.
- Analytical sensors for determining analyte concentrations in various sample solutions have been an area of focus for some time, especially in the medical field where it is desirable to minimise as much as possible the sample size required to conduct a measurement.
- potentiometric systems typically involve reference electrodes, which in turn require a liquid junction for accurate measurement. While potentiometric sensors are today widespread in clinical analysis settings, there is still a great need for robust sensor principles that do not require recalibration. Direct potentiometry as a method cannot meet this need.
- a potential is applied between two electrodes, which results in the exhaustive depletion of the analyte from a sample via a redox reaction.
- the process is monitored as a current, which depletes to zero as the reaction comes to completion.
- the current is integrated over time, yielding the coulomb number for the exhaustive process, which is then converted to the molar amount of material by Faraday's law.
- Controlled potential coulometry uses traditional metallic electrodes where oxidation and reduction reactions occur, but has found limited use in practice for two reasons: (i) it is difficult or impossible to impart sufficient chemical selectivity to the oxidation/reduction process for the principle to be useful for the analysis in complex sample compositions; and (ii) a close spacing of the two electrodes that make up the electrochemical cell is necessary to allow for a short analysis time. Furthermore, analyte species that are converted at one electrode can freely diffuse to the counter electrode to be converted to the original analyte, hence resulting in an undesired self-catalytic background current.
- Thin-layer devices for determining analyte concentrations under controlled potential conditions are desirable because they have the potential to significantly reduce the sample size required, improve measurement times, and eliminate the requirement for repetitive re-calibration.
- few devices have been developed for thin layer analysis.
- One existing thin layer device has been developed in the field of glucose biosensors, in which an enzyme layer is attached to a conducting material at one of the electrodes. The approach still measures an oxidation/reduction reaction under a controlled potential, but couples the process to an enzymatic conversion step. The selectivity of the sensor is chiefly provided by the enzyme reaction.
- enzymes suffer thermal long term stability problems, as enzymes have a tendency to denature.
- Another reported approach uses controlled potential to drive analyte ions from an aqueous sample solution placed in a porous tube material into a contacting organic solvent that contains a suitable ionophore for that ion.
- the electrochemical circuit is completed by placing a chlorinated silver wire within the tube and in close contact with the sample solution.
- Analyte cations present in the sample are extracted into the organic liquid phase, resulting in the oxidation of the silver metal to silver chloride placed on the silver wire, hence removing chloride counter ions from the sample solution to maintain charge neutrality.
- the current relating to this reaction is monitored and integrated over the analysis time.
- this approach is not practical for a variety of reasons.
- the simple organic solvents used to extract the analyte are a health and environmental hazard and make it impossible to miniaturize the device.
- the required contact length between the two solutions is in the order of 20 to 50 cm, relying on a coiled tube and large volumes of organic solvents.
- the large volume of organic solvent also makes it impossible for the device to be chemically regenerated, resulting in eventual contamination of the organic solvent and complete oxidation of the chlorinated silver wire.
- the choice of chlorinated silver wire as counterelectrode in direct contact with the sample solution is inadequate for any samples that contain compounds that may form silver precipitates.
- Sulfide containing compounds including amino acids present in most biological and environmental samples, will result in the fouling of the counter electrode and hence to erroneously applied potentials. This method would not be suitable for miniaturization to produce a device that would be portable or used by the average consumer, for example, medical patients.
- a sensing device for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample comprising: a first and second ion selective electrode, each having a first and second layer;
- the first layer of the first ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the first ion selective electrode
- the first layer of the second ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode
- the first and second ion selective electrodes being positioned in opposing arrangement such that, the respective polymeric membrane layers are in direct contact with a thin layer sample containing ions, located between the first and second electrodes;
- the thin layer sample is not in direct contact with the second layer.
- the present invention confers the advantage that direct contact of the thin layer sample with the second layer is substantially eliminated in each electrode.
- ions are extracted from the thin layer sample under controlled potential conditions, into the polymeric membrane layer where they are electrically coupled to an electron transfer reaction at the second layer. The progress of the electron transfer reaction is detected by the detector.
- interferences of other ions in the thin layer sample are substantially minimised as there is no direct contact of the thin layer sample with the second layer.
- the polymeric membrane layer is itself selective to the analyte ion and therefore does not require an enzyme reaction to impart selectivity to the electrode.
- the polymeric membrane layer is preferably in direct contact with both the thin layer sample and the second layer.
- the second layer may be formed of an aqueous or gelified inner solution in contact with a reference electrode to complete an electrochemical cell.
- the second layer comprises a silver/silver chloride couple.
- the second layer may be formed of a solid transducer layer and a solid conducting layer.
- a solid transducer layer and conducting layer enables an electrical change to be monitored whilst substantially eliminating the requirement for inner aqueous electrolytes required for more traditional electrode designs.
- the transducer layer facilitates the conversion of an ion flux generated by an oxidation/reduction, into an electrical current so that it can be measured.
- the tranducer layer is formed from materials containing chemically bound functionalities that can be suitably oxidised and reduced while exhibiting hydrophobic characteristics, including but not limited to, ferrocene derivatives, and conducting polymers, including poly(aniline), poly(pyrrole), poly(alkyl thiophene) with alkyl chains that are between 2 and 12 carbons long, and poly(alkyldioxythiophene) and poly(alkylmonoxythiophene) with alkyl chains lengths of 2 and 12 carbons.
- the transducer layer is doped with an ionic species common to the polymeric membrane layer, for example a tetraphenylborate derivative.
- Both the polymeric membrane layer and the transducer layer preferably exhibit electrochemical reversibility.
- the transducer layer preferably also exhibits a suitable potential window, such that it helps avoid unwanted oxidation/reduction reactions with species other than the transducing material. More preferably, the potential window for oxidation is given above about 0.5V (measured against Ag/AgCI). - D -
- tranducer layer there is also solvent compatibility between the tranducer layer and polymeric membrane layer.
- the conducting layer preferably comprises any conducting material, including a conducting polymer, gold, gold coated copper, or a conducting carbon material.
- the polymeric membrane layer preferably has limited ion-exchange properties to reduce the spontaneous extraction of any ions to and from the membrane and thin layer sample. This also helps to minimise spontaneous contamination of the thin layer sample via the contacting membrane.
- the membrane preferably contains a suitable lipophilic electrolyte, including, but not limited to, salts of long chain quaternary ammonium ions and tetraphenylborate derivatives or sulfonated organic ions.
- the polymeric membrane layer may comprise ion-exchange properties. Whilst operation in this mode may allow spontaneous extraction of ions to and from the thin layer sample, it has the benefit of allowing the use of thinner membranes or membranes that are fast diffusing.
- the polymeric membrane layer is also doped with ionophores, which contain suitable functional groups including, but not limited to, ether, polyether, thioether, ester, thioester, hydroxyl, amide, amine, thioamide, and metal coordinating functionalities for complexing ionic species.
- the ionophores may contain a lipophilic backbone to retain the molecule in the polymeric membrane layer.
- the ionophore may be covalently attached onto the polymeric backbone of the polymeric membrane layer, or onto a solid support layer.
- the solid support layer is preferably formed from materials known in the art including but not limited to, silica, metal alloy or oxide such as porous alumina, ceramic, glass or glass fiber materials including filters, carbon, titania, carbide, nitride or sintered metal.
- the polymeric membrane layer doped with ionophores has a mobility within the range of about 10 "6 to 10 "8 cm 2 s ⁇ 1 . More preferably, the polymeric membrane layer doped with ionophores has a mobility within the range of about 10 "6 to 10 "7 cmV.
- the polymeric membrane layer is preferably hydrophobic and water immiscible.
- Preferred materials include polymers that are either plasticised or non-plasticised, including polyvinyl chloride), poly(alkyl acrylate) with an alkyl chain length of 3 to 16, poly(alkyl methacrylate) with an alkyl chain length of 3 to 16, silicone rubbers, polyurethanes, or a combination or co-polymer thereof.
- the polymeric membrane layer is coated with a hydrophilic layer.
- the hydrophilic layer aids biocompatibility and confers a charge transfer resistance to regulate the ion transfer kinetics from the thin layer sample to the membrane phase.
- Such hydrophilic layers may include, but are not limited to cellulose materials, hydrogels, surfactants, covalently attached molecules containing hydrophilic or electrically charged functional groups, and polyelectrolyte multilayers.
- the polymeric membrane layer may be in the form of a thin-layer membrane, with dimensions between about 10 nm to 10 ⁇ m, in order to facilitate the rapid and reversible ionic extraction in and out of the polymeric membrane layer.
- the polymeric membrane layer may be in the form of a thicker membrane layer, with dimensions between 10 ⁇ m to 10 mm, in order to act as a large electrolyte reservoir and to operate in a detection mode where regeneration of the polymeric membrane at the thin layer sample side is not critical.
- this configuration preferably involves the selective ionophores being retained by second layer, such as by covalent attachment, and the remainder of the polymeric membrane layer acting as an electrolyte reservoir.
- the second layer in this configuration is in the form of a thin layer with a thickness within the range of about 100nm to 10 ⁇ m.
- the distance between the polymeric membrane layers of the first and second ion selective electrodes is preferably in the range of 10 to 200 ⁇ m. This distance determines the thickness of the thin layer sample and thus enables the volume of the thin layer sample to be known.
- the detector may be an electrical detector for coulometric determination, monitoring the total change in current as ions that are extracted into the polymeric membrane layer.
- Coulometry measures all of the analyte in a thin layer sample and therefore does not require calibration. Conversely, potentiometric measurements do require frequent calibration. Thus, despite developments which have enabled minimisation of electrodes for potentiometric measurements, the need for calibration is an undesirable aspect of all potentiometric devices which have been developed.
- the detector may be an optical detector.
- the optical detector detects a change in colour in the polymeric membrane layer.
- the change in colour may result from a reaction of the analyte ion with an ionophore in the polymeric membrane layer.
- the polymeric membrane layer thus acts as an indicator in these circumstances. This arrangement enables undesired electrical interferences to be minimised, such as capacitive charging currents or interferences from electroactive species that easily diffuse across the membrane.
- a sensing device for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample comprising:
- first and second ion selective electrode each having a first and second layer
- the first layer of the first ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the first - - ion selective electrode
- the first layer of the second ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode
- the first and second ion selective electrodes being positioned in opposing arrangement such that, the respective polymeric membrane layers are in direct contact with a thin layer sample containing ions, located between the first and second electrodes;
- the sensing device is an all solid state device.
- a coulometric sensing device for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample comprising:
- first and second ion selective electrode each having a first and second layer
- the first layer of the first ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the first ion selective electrode
- the first layer of the second ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode
- the first and second ion selective electrodes being positioned in opposing arrangement such that, the respective polymeric membrane layers are in direct contact with a thin layer sample containing ions, located between the first and second electrodes; and a detector in electrical connection with the first and second electrodes.
- the first layer of the first ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the first ion selective electrode and the first layer of the second ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode;
- the measuring potential is applied until about 50 to 99% of the analyte ions are extracted from the thin layer sample.
- the method comprises the additional step of applying a resting potential or zero current period. This has the benefit of allowing polymeric membrane layer to be regenerated substantially to its original state, in preparation _ _
- this also may allow for back extracting the analyte ions into the thin layer sample once the measurement is complete. It may also be considered advantageous that this back-extraction step may return a thin layer sample substantially to its original composition, if desired.
- the resting potential or zero current period is preferably applied for a time period which is longer than the original measurement time.
- the correct measuring potential is preferably determined by conducting a voltage scan prior to performing a measurement.
- Figure 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a sensing device according to a first embodiment of the present invention
- Figure 2 is a diagrammatic representation of the chemical pathways which occur in use of the device of Figure 1 ;
- Figure 3 is a design of a thin layer cell for an ion-extraction coulometric measurement conducted in a semi-solid state system, in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention
- Figure 4 shows a cyclic voltammogram obtained from a scan of the thin- layer cell of Figure 3;
- Figure 5 is a scheme of the reactions occurring at the various peaks identified by the voltammogram in Figure 3;
- Figure 6 depicts a typical coulometric measurement performed in the thin layer cell of Figure 3;
- Figure 7 compares the normal pulse voltammetric responses of a device of the present invention as depicted in Figure 3 and as an all solid state design
- Figure 8 shows a cyclic voltammogram for an all solid state device as depicted in Figure 1 ;
- Figure 9 shows the expected zero current Nernstian potentiometric response of a hollow fiber membrane doped with a calcium-selective membrane material to various concentrations of calcium in a background of
- Figure 10 shows the depletion currents for the same hollow fiber membrane, containing a tighly fitting chlorinated silver wire and 50 ⁇ M of calcium chloride in 10 mM potassium chloride as sample solution inside of the tubing. Potentials are applied relative to the open circuit potential and result in the depletion of the inside sample solution;
- Figure 11 demonstrates for the same system that the decay currents are a direct function of the indicated calcium concentration.
- the inset shows the calculated charge from the same experiments and demonstrate linearity with concentration;
- Figure 12 shows normal pulse voltammetry on a 50 ⁇ m thin layer sample sandwiched between two ion-selective membranes, of which one contains a sodium-selective ionophore.
- One experiment contains the background electrolyte (10 mM lithium acetate) while the other contains 0.1 mM sodium perchlorate in the same background electrolyte; _
- Figure 13 shows current decays in the coulometric operation of the same two thin layer sample solutions as in Figure 12;
- Figure 14 demonstrates a Nernstian response slope for the potentiometric zero current behavior of a glass fiber membrane that was silanized and doped with an calcium-selective membrane material
- Figure 15 demonstrates a similarly Nernstian response slope for the potentiometric response of a silanized alumina membrane containing nanoscale pores and that is doped with a sodium-selective membrane material.
- FIG. 1 there is shown a sensing device 10 for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample, in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention.
- analyte ions the ions whose concentration are to be determined will be referred to as analyte ions.
- a first and second solid state ion selective electrode, 12 and 14 each comprise a polymeric membrane layer 16 and 18, which is contacted with a second layer 20, by methods, including but not limited to, for example solvent casting, screen printing, spin coating or drop casting.
- the second layer 20 in turn comprises a transducer layer 22 and/or 24 and a conducting layer 26. This substantially eliminates the requirement for an inner aqueous electrolyte solution required in traditional electrodes in order to measure an electrical change.
- the transducer layers 22 and 24 facilitate the conversion of ions into an electrical current so that an oxidation reduction reaction can be measured.
- the transducer layers 22 and 24 are each formed from materials having functional groups that can be suitably oxidised or reduced while exhibiting hydrophobic properties including for example, ferrocene derivatives, conducting polymers, including poly(aniline), poly(pyrrole), poly(alkyl thiophene) with alkyl chains that are between 2 and 12 carbons long, and poly(alkyldioxythiophene) and poly(alkylmonoxythiophene) with alkyl chains lengths of 2 and 12 carbons.
- ferrocene derivatives conducting polymers, including poly(aniline), poly(pyrrole), poly(alkyl thiophene) with alkyl chains that are between 2 and 12 carbons long, and poly(alkyldioxythiophene) and poly(alkylmonoxythiophene) with alkyl chains lengths of 2 and 12 carbons.
- each ion selective electrode 12 and 14 is in electrical connection with a potentiostat 28 and in turn, a detector 30, which monitors the decay of current as ions are extracted from the thin layer sample 32 into the polymeric membrane layers, 16 and 18. This measurement of current is integrated over time to calculate the number of coulombs in accordance Faraday's law. The number of coulombs can then be used to calculate the number of analyte ions extracted from the thin layer sample 32.
- the detector 30 is an electrical detector, for example, a coulometric detector to measure the depletion in current as a result of the analyte ion undergoing an oxidation/reduction reaction.
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 and the transducer layer 22 and/or 24 ideally both have similar properties, for example electrochemical reversibility, compatibility and similar potential “windows", which helps to avoid undesirable oxidation/reduction reactions occurring with species other than the material of the transducer layer 22 or 24.
- electrochemical reversibility compatibility
- similar potential "windows” which helps to avoid undesirable oxidation/reduction reactions occurring with species other than the material of the transducer layer 22 or 24.
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 and 18 is hydrophobic, or water immiscible, and is formed from plasticised or non-plasticised polymers including, for example, including polyvinyl chloride), poly(alkyl acrylate) with an alkyl chain length of 3 to 16, poly(alkyl methacrylate) with an alkyl chain length of 3 to 16, silicone rubbers, polyurethanes, or a combination or co-polymer thereof.
- plasticised or non-plasticised polymers including, for example, including polyvinyl chloride), poly(alkyl acrylate) with an alkyl chain length of 3 to 16, poly(alkyl methacrylate) with an alkyl chain length of 3 to 16, silicone rubbers, polyurethanes, or a combination or co-polymer thereof.
- the hydrophobic nature of the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18 substantially avoids spontaneous uptake of electrolyte/thin layer sample solution, which would result in interference at the electrode and a difficulty in measuring the presence and/or concentration of ana
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 has limited ion exchange properties to reduce the spontaneous extraction of any ions to and from the membrane and thin layer sample 32. This helps to minimise spontaneous contamination of the thin layer sample 32 in contact with the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18.
- extraction of an analyte ion from the thin layer sample 32 into the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18, is accompanied by the transfer of an ion from the transducer layer 22 or 24 (i.e. not the thin layer sample 32).
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 contains a suitable lipophilic electrolyte, for example, salts of long chain quaternary ammonium ions and tetraphenylborate derivatives, or sulfonated organic ions.
- a suitable lipophilic electrolyte for example, salts of long chain quaternary ammonium ions and tetraphenylborate derivatives, or sulfonated organic ions.
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 may comprise ion exchange properties.
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 may contain an ion exchange electrolyte, to effect transfer of analyte ions into the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18. This allows one to monitor the open circuit potential and apply potentials relative to this measured value.
- This mode also allows for the use of membranes that are thin for example, less than 10 ⁇ m, and fast diffusing, since an applied voltage effects the transport of the same ion from the thin layer sample 32 across the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 and into the transducer layer 22 or 24.
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 is preferably in the form of a thin-layer membrane, with dimensions between about 10 nm to 10 ⁇ m, in order to facilitate the rapid and reversible ionic extraction in and out of the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18.
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 may be in the form of a thicker membrane layer, with dimensions between about 10 ⁇ m to 10 mm.
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 may act as a large - - electrolyte reservoir and operate in a detection mode where regeneration of the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 at the sample side is not critical.
- this configuration may also involve the selective ionophores being retained by the second layer layer 20, such as by covalent attachment.
- the second layer 20 in this configuration is in the form of a thin layer with a thickness within the range of about 100nm to 10 ⁇ m.
- the conducting layer 26 can be formed from any conducting metal, for example gold.
- the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18 are each doped with a suitable ionophore, which is selective to the ion to be extracted, for example, the ionophore contains suitable functional groups for complexing ionic species and a lipophilic backbone to retain the molecule in the polymeric membrane layers 16 or 18.
- the ionophore may be covalently attached onto the polymeric backbone of the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 itself.
- the ionophores may be attached to a solid membrane support layer 17, which imparts strength to the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18 whilst maintaining good mobility, for example, a diffusion coefficient within the range of approximately 10 "6 to 10 ⁇ 8 cmV 1 , for example 10 "6 to 10 '7 cmV 1 , unlike standard stiffened polymers which exhibit a reduction in mobility, for example, a diffusion coeffeicient of approximately 10 "8 cmV 1 or less.
- the solid membrane support layer 17 may be formed from a number of materials known in the art including, for example, silica, metal alloy or oxide such as porous alumina, ceramic, glass or glass fiber materials including filters, carbon, titania, carbide, nitride or sintered metal.
- the solid support layer is suitably coated, for example by silanization, to be coated or doped with the ion-selective membrane material.
- Ionophores are required for most analytes in order to impart selectivity to the polymeric membrane 16 and/or 18. However, there are some analytes which do not require selective ionophores, for example some hydrophobic ions includingperchlorate, nitrate, cesium, barium and various organic ions.
- the solid state ion selective electrodes 12 and 14 are arranged such that the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18 are in opposing arrangement with respect to each other. In use, a thin layer sample 32, having a known volume, is located therebetween so that the thin layer sample 32 is able to simultaneously contact the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18 of both ion selective electrodes 12 and 14.
- the distance between the two electrodes 12 and 14 and therefore, the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18, is within the range of about 10 to 200 ⁇ m.
- the area between the electrodes is known so that the volume of the thin layer sample 32 can be easily determined, and therefore the concentration of the analyte ion from the observed coulomb number. It is understood that if the distance between the electrodes 12 and 14 is too short, then the analysis time will also be too short relative to the capacitive charging current pulse upon applying the excitation potential. If the distance is too long then excessively long analysis times will be required.
- a voltage scan may be conducted to determine an appropriate measuring potential to be applied. This will be particularly important where the analyte to be detected varies. If necessary, the cell resistance may also be evaluated by applying a rapid oscillating potential pulse prior to analysis, allowing one to correct for variable potential drops that originate from this resistance.
- the potentiostat 28 applies the measuring potential to the first ion selective electrode 12.
- the electrons flow via the conductor layer 26 through the circuit to the conductor layer 27 of the second ion selective electrode 18.
- a reverse reaction occurs whereby electrons flow from the conductor 27 to the tranducer layer 24.
- the flow of electrons is an electrical current which can be detected by the coulometric detector 30.
- the concentration of analyte ions in the thin layer sample 32 are depleted, a decay in the electrical current is observed until it becomes so minimal as to approach zero. At this point substantially all of the analyte ions have been extracted from the thin layer sample 32.
- the concentration of the analyte in the thin layer sample 32 can be determined.
- the measuring potential is applied for a time sufficient to extract at least about 50 to 99% of the analyte ions from the thin layer sample 32 into the polymeric membrane layer 16. This will be dependent on the geometry, selectivity and chemistry of the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18, with films of less than 1 to 5 ⁇ m thickness requiring much shorter regeneration times. It is anticipated that optimal geometries may allow one to extrapolate from an initially recorded current decay to infinite time by use of suitable diffusion models, thus simplifying the experimental procedure and enabling shorter analysis times.
- a resting potential or zero current period is then applied to effect regeneration of the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 substantially to its original state.
- the application of a resting potential or zero current period may also effect the reversal of the reaction and subsequently deposit most of the extracted analyte ions back into the thin layer sample 32. This is particularly advantageous for situations where it is not desired or safe to substantially alter the thin layer sample 32 composition in the course of the measurement, such as in clinical or biochemical monitoring scenarios.
- the resting potential or current is applied for a longer time period than the measuring potential, to ensure substantially all of the analyte ions are back-extracted. The time period will be dependent on the polymer membrane geometry, composition and mode of operation. - -
- the second layer 20 is formed of an aqueous or gelified inner solution in contact with a reference electrode to complete an electrochemical cell.
- the second layer 20 comprises a silver/silver chloride couple.
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 prevents direct contact of the solid sensing layer 20 with the thin layer sample 32, thus avoiding interferences caused by fouling at the electrode surface. Interferences are also substantially avoided because only the ions selectively extracted into polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 result in a oxidation/reduction reaction at the ion to electron transduer layer 22 or 24 in contact with the electron conductor.
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 is itself selective to the analyte ion and therefore does not require an enzyme reaction to impart selectivity to the electrode.
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 can be coated with a hydrophilic layer to aid in biocompatibility and infer a charge transfer resistance to regulate the ion transfer kinetics from the thin layer sample to the membrane phase.
- hydrophilic layers may include, but are not limited to, cellulose materials, hydrogels, surfactants, covalently attached molecules containing hydrophilic or electrically charged functional groups, and polyelectrolyte multilayers.
- the transducer layers 22 and 24 may also be doped with a ionic species common to the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18, for example a tetraphenylborate derivative. This doping process may also occur spontaneously during a suitable conditioning process with an aqueous thin layer sample before first use.
- transducer layers 22 and 24 can be spin coated or electro- polymerised onto a conducting layer 26.
- detectors can be used, for example, optical detectors.
- the detector is an optical detector, it detects a change in colour in the polymeric membrane layer, which results from a reaction of the analyte ion - - with a ionophore in the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18.
- the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 thus acts as an indicator in these circumstances.
- This arrangement enables undesired electrical interferences to be minimised, such as capacitive charging currents or interferences from electroactive species that easily diffuse across the membrane, for example, oxygen.
- An optical readout may be performed on a smaller area than the active electrode surface, helping to eliminate errors arising from diffusion of analyte from the surrounding solution.
- the active electrode area and cell design needs to be optimal to reduce the effect of mass transport of analyte from the surrounding solution into the thin layer where the detection (coulometric or optical) is performed. This may be accomplished by judicious choice of active surface area and geometry relative to the areas that contact the remainder of the sample. Small electrode areas may be accomplished by using a bipotentiostat configuration utilizing an outer and inner electrode held at the same potential, and recording the current for coulometry only at the inner electrode. Any undesired mass transport processes from the contacting solution will have an effect on the outer electrode only, thereby allowing one to work with smaller dimensions at high accuracy.
- One of the primary benefits of utilising controlled potential coulometric detection for determining the concentration of an analyte is that no calibration is required. This is because substantially all of the analyte ions are extracted from the thin layer sample and measured.
- having an all solid state system means that a practical device can be developed for a wide range of applications, for example environmental monitoring and clinical diagnostics (in-vivo or in-vitro).
- the all solid state system further enables the device to be miniaturised to a much greater degree than present technologies in the field of coulometry.
- the solid state electrode/s coupled with ion extraction enables detection of species that cannot be electrolysed at an electrode using traditional techniques such as voltammetry. That is, any ion for which a selective membrane can be fabricated can be detected, including but not limited to, calcium, potassium, sodium, lithium, magnesium, ammonium, nitrate, perchlorate, chloride, salicylate, iodide, carbonate, bicarbonate, anticoagulant heparin via protamine titration, total acidity, total basicity.
- Enzymes may also be utilised to determine metabolites and/or organics. For example, by coupling urease with urea, ammonium is produced. Ammonium, in turn, can be detected coulometrically.
- FIG 3 there is depicted an experimental set-up for measurement of an analyte ion according to a second embodiment the present invention, involving polymeric membranes having an inner aqueous electrolyte.
- Two polymeric membrane electrodes are spaced closely together and are each contacted with an aqueous inner solution, as depicted in Figure 3.
- the cell is completed by placing a silver/silver chloride electrode into each of the inner solutions.
- the spacing between the two membrane electrodes contains the thin layer sample solution.
- Accurate spacing is preferably accomplished by a hard spacing material.
- the polymeric membranes preferably have a well defined and constant shape, but preferably retain a high ion mobility. This is preferably accomplished by containing the membrane within a hard porous material such as a ceramic or crosslinked polymer.
- Figure 4 shows a cyclic voltamogram obtained from a scan of the thin-layer cell of Figure 3.
- the polymeric membrane layer was produced by solvent casting and contains polyvinyl chloride) plasticized with bis(2-ethyl hexyl sebacate) in a mass ratio of 1 :2.
- the polymeric membrane layer was formulated to also contain a lipophilic electrolyte, 10 wt% of tridodecylmethylammonium tetrakis(4- chlorophenylborate) and 10 mM of the sodium-selective ionophore tert- butylcalix[4]arene tetraethyl ester.
- the inner solutions contained both 10 mM - -
- FIG. 4 shows the observed current of a thin layer electrode configuration as an applied potential is cycled in the window between -1.5 V and 1.5 V, with a starting and ending potential of zero volts. Note the direction of the scan by the indicated arrow. A total of 8 peaks are noted, which are approximately symmetrical owing to the symmetric geometry and composition of the cell. As the potential is scanned from 0 to -1.5 V, peaks A and B appear. Figure 5 interprets these regions with the indicated reactions. At peak A, the desired extraction of sodium into membrane 1 and of chloride into membrane 2 is accomplished selectively, without interference from potassium. At peak B, the applied potential is sufficiently large to also effect the extraction of potassium.
- FIG. 6 A typical coulometry experiment is demonstrated in Figure 6, where the potential is stepped from zero to -0.8 V and held at that value for a period of time, in this case 20 s. Note that this corresponds to peak A in Figure 1.
- a current is observed that decays with time, signifying the exhaustive extraction of sodium into membrane 1.
- the integrated Faradaic current during this pulse yields the total charge for the extraction process, and translates into the amount of material in the thin layer sample by using Faraday's law. Smaller membrane spacings will give rise to a faster decay.
- the potential is stepped back to zero volts, the current spike changes sign and again decays with time, demonstrating the back extraction from the membrane into the thin layer sample.
- Figure 2 also shows the observed current as the potential is stepped to just -0.3 V, with is approximately at the beginning of the sodium extraction region. The potential is not sufficiently large to effect a sodium extraction process. Note that the back extraction current at 0 V is also very small. This shows how the magnitude of the applied potential is an effective parameter to optimize the working conditions of the coulometric sensor.
- FIG. 7 compares the normal pulse voltammetric responses of two ion-selective electrodes to the indicated electrolytes (each at 1 mM concentrations). The top plot shows the behavior of a membrane containing an aqueous inner contact, measured against a traditional reference electrode. The membrane did not contain an ionophore for simplicity reasons, but otherwise is comparable to the composition given in Example 1.
- Normal pulse voltammetry subjects the cell to an extended baseline potential pulse (here at 0 V) between excitations. This gives voltammetric responses that only reflect ion uptake processes and are simpler to interpret.
- the currents start to increase, which is indicative of anions entering the membrane from the thin layer sample solution side.
- the preference for this process is perchlorate > nitrate > chloride, which reflects the order of hydrophilicity for these ions. This is also called the Hofmeister selectivity sequence.
- the cations potassium and sodium are extracted, again in the order of potassium > sodium.
- a gold electrode was coated with poly(ethylenedioxythiophene), PEDOT, doped with polystyrene sulfonate (PSS) by solvent casting.
- the ion-selective membrane containing the same composition as for the top plot, was solvent cast on top of the conducting polymer and resulted in an all-solid state electrode.
- the bottom plot of Figure 7 shows the same basic behaviour for electrolyte extraction as for the aqueous inner solution system, demonstrating the feasibility of designing all solid state electrodes for coulometric measurements.
- Figure 8 shows the cyclic voltammogram for an all solid state membrane containing poly(octylthiophene) as conducting polymer and coated with a plasticized PVC membrane without ionophore.
- the conducting polymer was obtained by electropolymerization onto indium tin oxide (ITO) glass.
- the overlay membrane was spin coated and contained a lipophilic salt of the tetradodecylammonium cation and the tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl] borate.
- Figure 8 demonstrates the cyclic voltammogram for chloride anion uptake from the thin layer sample solution into the all solid state membrane assembly, which occurs above 1 V. Scanning the potential back toward 0 V reveals that the chloride anions are extracted back out of the film around 0.4 V. This demonstrates that all solid state membrane electrodes with electropolymerized and lipophilic conducting polymers as underlayers can be successfully fabricated.
- a third example employs a membrane material doped into a porous polypropylene tubing material (600 ⁇ m inner diameter), whose inside compartment contains a chlorinated silver wire of 500 ⁇ m diameter.
- the impregnated tubing is connected on one side to a pump or other sample delivery system, while the other side is connected to waste while the silver wire acts as the working electrode and is connected to a potentiostat.
- the impregnated tubing is wholly immersed in an aqueous electrolyte solution where the counter and reference electrodes are placed.
- the tubing is impregnated with the lipophilic solvent dodecyl 2-nitrophenyl ether, 10 wt% of lipophilic electrolyte tridodecylmethylammonium tetrakis(4-chlorophenylborate), 10 mmol/kg membrane of the Ca 2+ -ionophore N,N,N',N'-tetradodecyl-3,6- dioxaoctanedithioamide and 30 mol% (relative to the ionophore) of potassium tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate.
- the lipophilic solvent dodecyl 2-nitrophenyl ether
- the sample solutions consisted of 0.01 M KCI plus the indicated concentration of calcium, while the solution outside of the tubing consisted of 10-3 M CaCI2 in 10-2 M KCI.
- a platinum electrode served as the counter electrode, while a double junction reference electrode was used.
- the inside of the tubing acts as the thin layer sample solution.
- this configuration can be electrochemically monitored under zero current conditions without substantially perturbing the composition of this thin layer sample solution.
- Figure 9 demonstrates that such a configuration gives a Nernstian response to logarithmic calcium concentration in complete analogy to a traditional calcium-selective electrode.
- FIG. 10 shows for the 50 ⁇ M calcium in the thin layer sample, depletion currents increase with applied potential until they become indifferent of applied potential.
- Figure 11 illustrates for an applied potential of 270 mV that the observed current decays are a direct function of calcium concentration. The inset shows the calculated charge (integrated from the current decays) as a function of concentration, demonstrating linearity with concentration.
- the device can operate with inner and outside solutions of the same, unknown composition.
- the hollow fiber membrane configuration is especially attractive when coupled to a transmembrane accumulation process.
- the thin layer sample solution is placed outside the tubing, while the inner solution contains a specific composition that results in the transport and accumulation of the analyte ions from the thin layer sample into the inner compartment.
- the readout of the inner compartment is accomplished as described above.
- the fourth example demonstrates the thin layer coulometric behavior in analogy to Example 1 , but with a custom made flow through cell in which the thin layer sample is guided through a meandering channel that is sandwiched between two ion-selective membranes.
- the channel is designed to be 50 ⁇ m deep and 1 mm wide. Depth and width can vary.
- Both ion-selective membranes consist of 10 wt% of lipophilic electrolyte tridodecylmethylammonium tetrakis(4- chlorophenylborate), and polyvinyl chloride) and the plasticizer bis(2-ethyl hexyl sebacate) in a 1 :2 ratio by mass, while one of the two membranes additionally contains 10 mmol of the sodium-selective ionophore tert-butylcalix[4]arene tetraethyl ester per kilogram of membrane.
- the membranes are about 100 ⁇ m thick, and are each contacted with a 0.1 M aqueous lithium acetate solution in which a chlorinated silver electrode is immersed.
- Figure 12 shows normal pulse voltammetric response of this cell, containing either 0.01 M lithium acetate (A) or 10 "4 M sodium perchlorate in the same 0.01 M lithium acetate background (B).
- the current readings were taken after 1 s of applied potential for each of the indicated values, while a resting potential of 0 V was applied between pulses.
- the figure demonstrates that the sensor system can be operated at positive or negative potential values. At negative potentials, there is a somewhat larger separation from the background because of the presence of the sodium ionophore in the membrane side where cation extraction from the thin layer sample occurs.
- Figure 13 shows the current decay upon an applied negative potential pulse (same setup as in Figure 12 for either the background alone or the background plus 10 "4 M sodium perchlorate, demonstrating the coulometric response principle for a thin layer sample sandwiched between two polymeric membranes.
- This fifth example demonstrates the use of a rigid support for the fabrication of ion-selective polymeric membranes.
- a rigid support for the fabrication of ion-selective polymeric membranes.
- One example of such a support has already been shown above under example 3 with a porous polypropylene material.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
Abstract
A sensing device for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample (32) comprising: a first (12) and second (14) ion selective electrode, each having a first (16) and second layer (20); the first layer (16) of the first ion selective electrode (12) being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer (20) of the first ion selective electrode (12), and the first layer (18) of the second ion selective electrode (14) being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer (20) of the second ion selective electrode (14); the first and second ion selective electrodes being positioned in opposing arrangement such that, the respective polymeric membrane layers are in direct contact with a thin layer sample (32) containing ions, located between the first and second electrodes; and a detector (28) in electrical connection with the first (12) and second (14) ion selective electrodes.
Description
ION SELECTIVE ELECTRODE SENSING DEVICE
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a sensing device and method for the determination of analyte in a sample. In particular, the device and method of the present invention relate to the extraction of analyte ions from a thin layer sample to a selective membrane by electrochemical means to determine the concentration of the analyte.
Background Art
Analytical sensors, in particular potentiometric sensors, for determining analyte concentrations in various sample solutions have been an area of focus for some time, especially in the medical field where it is desirable to minimise as much as possible the sample size required to conduct a measurement.
One significant problem with the method of direct potentiometry with such sensors is their need for frequent recalibration to compensate for potential drift. Furthermore, potentiometric systems typically involve reference electrodes, which in turn require a liquid junction for accurate measurement. While potentiometric sensors are today widespread in clinical analysis settings, there is still a great need for robust sensor principles that do not require recalibration. Direct potentiometry as a method cannot meet this need.
In controlled potential coulometry, a potential is applied between two electrodes, which results in the exhaustive depletion of the analyte from a sample via a redox reaction. The process is monitored as a current, which depletes to zero as the reaction comes to completion. The current is integrated over time, yielding the coulomb number for the exhaustive process, which is then converted to the molar amount of material by Faraday's law. Controlled potential coulometry uses traditional metallic electrodes where oxidation and reduction reactions occur, but
has found limited use in practice for two reasons: (i) it is difficult or impossible to impart sufficient chemical selectivity to the oxidation/reduction process for the principle to be useful for the analysis in complex sample compositions; and (ii) a close spacing of the two electrodes that make up the electrochemical cell is necessary to allow for a short analysis time. Furthermore, analyte species that are converted at one electrode can freely diffuse to the counter electrode to be converted to the original analyte, hence resulting in an undesired self-catalytic background current.
Thin-layer devices for determining analyte concentrations under controlled potential conditions are desirable because they have the potential to significantly reduce the sample size required, improve measurement times, and eliminate the requirement for repetitive re-calibration. However, as a result of the problems outlined above, few devices have been developed for thin layer analysis. One existing thin layer device has been developed in the field of glucose biosensors, in which an enzyme layer is attached to a conducting material at one of the electrodes. The approach still measures an oxidation/reduction reaction under a controlled potential, but couples the process to an enzymatic conversion step. The selectivity of the sensor is chiefly provided by the enzyme reaction. However, enzymes suffer thermal long term stability problems, as enzymes have a tendency to denature.
Another reported approach uses controlled potential to drive analyte ions from an aqueous sample solution placed in a porous tube material into a contacting organic solvent that contains a suitable ionophore for that ion. The electrochemical circuit is completed by placing a chlorinated silver wire within the tube and in close contact with the sample solution. Analyte cations present in the sample are extracted into the organic liquid phase, resulting in the oxidation of the silver metal to silver chloride placed on the silver wire, hence removing chloride counter ions from the sample solution to maintain charge neutrality. The current relating to this reaction is monitored and integrated over the analysis time. However, this approach is not practical for a variety of reasons. The simple
organic solvents used to extract the analyte are a health and environmental hazard and make it impossible to miniaturize the device. The required contact length between the two solutions is in the order of 20 to 50 cm, relying on a coiled tube and large volumes of organic solvents. The large volume of organic solvent also makes it impossible for the device to be chemically regenerated, resulting in eventual contamination of the organic solvent and complete oxidation of the chlorinated silver wire. Moreover, the choice of chlorinated silver wire as counterelectrode in direct contact with the sample solution is inadequate for any samples that contain compounds that may form silver precipitates. Sulfide containing compounds, including amino acids present in most biological and environmental samples, will result in the fouling of the counter electrode and hence to erroneously applied potentials. This method would not be suitable for miniaturization to produce a device that would be portable or used by the average consumer, for example, medical patients.
It is an objective of this invention to provide a sensing device and method for controlled potential determination of an analyte, which at least partially overcomes one or more of the problems associated with the prior art.
The preceding discussion of the background art is intended to facilitate an understanding of the present invention only. The discussion is not an acknowledgement or admission that any of the material referred to is or was part of the common general knowledge as at the priority date of the application.
Throughout the specification and claims, unless the context requires otherwise, the word "comprise" or variations such as "comprises" or "comprising", will be understood to imply the inclusion of a stated integer or group of integers but not the exclusion of any other integer or group of integers.
Disclosure of the Invention
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a sensing device for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample comprising:
a first and second ion selective electrode, each having a first and second layer;
the first layer of the first ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the first ion selective electrode, and the first layer of the second ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode;
the first and second ion selective electrodes being positioned in opposing arrangement such that, the respective polymeric membrane layers are in direct contact with a thin layer sample containing ions, located between the first and second electrodes; and
a detector in electrical connection with the first and second electrodes,
Preferably, the thin layer sample is not in direct contact with the second layer. The present invention confers the advantage that direct contact of the thin layer sample with the second layer is substantially eliminated in each electrode. For example ions are extracted from the thin layer sample under controlled potential conditions, into the polymeric membrane layer where they are electrically coupled to an electron transfer reaction at the second layer. The progress of the electron transfer reaction is detected by the detector. Thus, interferences of other ions in the thin layer sample are substantially minimised as there is no direct contact of the thin layer sample with the second layer. The polymeric membrane layer is itself selective to the analyte ion and therefore does not require an enzyme reaction to impart selectivity to the electrode.
The polymeric membrane layer is preferably in direct contact with both the thin layer sample and the second layer.
In one form of the invention the second layer may be formed of an aqueous or gelified inner solution in contact with a reference electrode to complete an electrochemical cell. Preferably, the second layer comprises a silver/silver chloride couple.
Alternatively, in another form of the invention the second layer may be formed of a solid transducer layer and a solid conducting layer. The combination of a solid transducer layer and conducting layer enables an electrical change to be monitored whilst substantially eliminating the requirement for inner aqueous electrolytes required for more traditional electrode designs.
In use, the transducer layer facilitates the conversion of an ion flux generated by an oxidation/reduction, into an electrical current so that it can be measured. Preferably the tranducer layer is formed from materials containing chemically bound functionalities that can be suitably oxidised and reduced while exhibiting hydrophobic characteristics, including but not limited to, ferrocene derivatives, and conducting polymers, including poly(aniline), poly(pyrrole), poly(alkyl thiophene) with alkyl chains that are between 2 and 12 carbons long, and poly(alkyldioxythiophene) and poly(alkylmonoxythiophene) with alkyl chains lengths of 2 and 12 carbons.
More preferably, the transducer layer is doped with an ionic species common to the polymeric membrane layer, for example a tetraphenylborate derivative.
Both the polymeric membrane layer and the transducer layer preferably exhibit electrochemical reversibility.
The transducer layer preferably also exhibits a suitable potential window, such that it helps avoid unwanted oxidation/reduction reactions with species other than the transducing material. More preferably, the potential window for oxidation is given above about 0.5V (measured against Ag/AgCI).
- D -
Preferably, there is also solvent compatibility between the tranducer layer and polymeric membrane layer.
The conducting layer preferably comprises any conducting material, including a conducting polymer, gold, gold coated copper, or a conducting carbon material.
In a first mode of operation the polymeric membrane layer preferably has limited ion-exchange properties to reduce the spontaneous extraction of any ions to and from the membrane and thin layer sample. This also helps to minimise spontaneous contamination of the thin layer sample via the contacting membrane. In this mode the membrane preferably contains a suitable lipophilic electrolyte, including, but not limited to, salts of long chain quaternary ammonium ions and tetraphenylborate derivatives or sulfonated organic ions.
Alternatively, as a second mode of operation, the polymeric membrane layer may comprise ion-exchange properties. Whilst operation in this mode may allow spontaneous extraction of ions to and from the thin layer sample, it has the benefit of allowing the use of thinner membranes or membranes that are fast diffusing.
Preferably, the polymeric membrane layer is also doped with ionophores, which contain suitable functional groups including, but not limited to, ether, polyether, thioether, ester, thioester, hydroxyl, amide, amine, thioamide, and metal coordinating functionalities for complexing ionic species. The ionophores may contain a lipophilic backbone to retain the molecule in the polymeric membrane layer. Alternatively, the ionophore may be covalently attached onto the polymeric backbone of the polymeric membrane layer, or onto a solid support layer.
The solid support layer is preferably formed from materials known in the art including but not limited to, silica, metal alloy or oxide such as porous alumina, ceramic, glass or glass fiber materials including filters, carbon, titania, carbide, nitride or sintered metal. Preferably, the polymeric membrane layer doped with ionophores has a mobility within the range of about 10"6 to 10"8 cm2s~1. More
preferably, the polymeric membrane layer doped with ionophores has a mobility within the range of about 10"6 to 10"7 cmV.
The polymeric membrane layer is preferably hydrophobic and water immiscible.
This substantially avoids spontaneous uptake of electrolyte/thin layer sample solution, which would result in interference at the electrode and a difficulty in measuring the analyte ion. Preferred materials include polymers that are either plasticised or non-plasticised, including polyvinyl chloride), poly(alkyl acrylate) with an alkyl chain length of 3 to 16, poly(alkyl methacrylate) with an alkyl chain length of 3 to 16, silicone rubbers, polyurethanes, or a combination or co-polymer thereof.
More preferably, the polymeric membrane layer is coated with a hydrophilic layer. The hydrophilic layer aids biocompatibility and confers a charge transfer resistance to regulate the ion transfer kinetics from the thin layer sample to the membrane phase. Such hydrophilic layers may include, but are not limited to cellulose materials, hydrogels, surfactants, covalently attached molecules containing hydrophilic or electrically charged functional groups, and polyelectrolyte multilayers.
The polymeric membrane layer may be in the form of a thin-layer membrane, with dimensions between about 10 nm to 10 μm, in order to facilitate the rapid and reversible ionic extraction in and out of the polymeric membrane layer.
Alternatively, in use, the polymeric membrane layer may be in the form of a thicker membrane layer, with dimensions between 10μm to 10 mm, in order to act as a large electrolyte reservoir and to operate in a detection mode where regeneration of the polymeric membrane at the thin layer sample side is not critical. Further, this configuration preferably involves the selective ionophores being retained by second layer, such as by covalent attachment, and the remainder of the polymeric membrane layer acting as an electrolyte reservoir.
- -
More preferably, the second layer in this configuration is in the form of a thin layer with a thickness within the range of about 100nm to 10 μm.
The distance between the polymeric membrane layers of the first and second ion selective electrodes is preferably in the range of 10 to 200 μm. This distance determines the thickness of the thin layer sample and thus enables the volume of the thin layer sample to be known.
The detector may be an electrical detector for coulometric determination, monitoring the total change in current as ions that are extracted into the polymeric membrane layer. Coulometry measures all of the analyte in a thin layer sample and therefore does not require calibration. Conversely, potentiometric measurements do require frequent calibration. Thus, despite developments which have enabled minimisation of electrodes for potentiometric measurements, the need for calibration is an undesirable aspect of all potentiometric devices which have been developed.
Alternatively, the detector may be an optical detector. The optical detector detects a change in colour in the polymeric membrane layer. The change in colour may result from a reaction of the analyte ion with an ionophore in the polymeric membrane layer. The polymeric membrane layer thus acts as an indicator in these circumstances. This arrangement enables undesired electrical interferences to be minimised, such as capacitive charging currents or interferences from electroactive species that easily diffuse across the membrane.
In accordance with a further form of the present invention there is provided a sensing device for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample comprising:
a first and second ion selective electrode, each having a first and second layer;
the first layer of the first ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the first
- - ion selective electrode, and the first layer of the second ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode;
the first and second ion selective electrodes being positioned in opposing arrangement such that, the respective polymeric membrane layers are in direct contact with a thin layer sample containing ions, located between the first and second electrodes; and
a detector in electrical connection with the first and second electrodes;
wherein the sensing device is an all solid state device.
In accordance with a still further form of the present invention there is provided a coulometric sensing device for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample comprising:
a first and second ion selective electrode, each having a first and second layer;
the first layer of the first ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the first ion selective electrode, and the first layer of the second ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode;
the first and second ion selective electrodes being positioned in opposing arrangement such that, the respective polymeric membrane layers are in direct contact with a thin layer sample containing ions, located between the first and second electrodes; and
a detector in electrical connection with the first and second electrodes.
In accordance with the present invention there is provided a method for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample comprising the method steps of:
contacting a thin layer sample containing ions to a first and second ion selective electrode each electrode having a first and second layer;
the first layer of the first ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the first ion selective electrode and the first layer of the second ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode;
applying a measuring potential to the first electrode allowing a current to flow across each electrode;
extracting ions out of the thin layer sample into the or each polymeric membrane layer where they are electrochemically coupled to an electron transfer reaction at the or each second layer; and
detecting the current decay via a detector in electrical contact with the first and second ion selective electrodes..
Preferably, the measuring potential is applied until about 50 to 99% of the analyte ions are extracted from the thin layer sample.
Preferably, the method comprises the additional step of applying a resting potential or zero current period. This has the benefit of allowing polymeric membrane layer to be regenerated substantially to its original state, in preparation
_ _
for the next measurement. Optionally, this also may allow for back extracting the analyte ions into the thin layer sample once the measurement is complete. It may also be considered advantageous that this back-extraction step may return a thin layer sample substantially to its original composition, if desired.
The resting potential or zero current period is preferably applied for a time period which is longer than the original measurement time.
The correct measuring potential is preferably determined by conducting a voltage scan prior to performing a measurement.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to one embodiment thereof and the accompanying drawings, in which;
Figure 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a sensing device according to a first embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 2 is a diagrammatic representation of the chemical pathways which occur in use of the device of Figure 1 ;
Figure 3 is a design of a thin layer cell for an ion-extraction coulometric measurement conducted in a semi-solid state system, in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 4 shows a cyclic voltammogram obtained from a scan of the thin- layer cell of Figure 3;
Figure 5 is a scheme of the reactions occurring at the various peaks identified by the voltammogram in Figure 3;
Figure 6 depicts a typical coulometric measurement performed in the thin layer cell of Figure 3;
Figure 7 compares the normal pulse voltammetric responses of a device of the present invention as depicted in Figure 3 and as an all solid state design;
Figure 8 shows a cyclic voltammogram for an all solid state device as depicted in Figure 1 ;
Figure 9 shows the expected zero current Nernstian potentiometric response of a hollow fiber membrane doped with a calcium-selective membrane material to various concentrations of calcium in a background of
0.01 M potassium chloride;
Figure 10 shows the depletion currents for the same hollow fiber membrane, containing a tighly fitting chlorinated silver wire and 50 μM of calcium chloride in 10 mM potassium chloride as sample solution inside of the tubing. Potentials are applied relative to the open circuit potential and result in the depletion of the inside sample solution;
Figure 11 demonstrates for the same system that the decay currents are a direct function of the indicated calcium concentration. The inset shows the calculated charge from the same experiments and demonstrate linearity with concentration;
Figure 12 shows normal pulse voltammetry on a 50 μm thin layer sample sandwiched between two ion-selective membranes, of which one contains a sodium-selective ionophore. One experiment contains the background electrolyte (10 mM lithium acetate) while the other contains 0.1 mM sodium perchlorate in the same background electrolyte;
_
Figure 13 shows current decays in the coulometric operation of the same two thin layer sample solutions as in Figure 12;
Figure 14 demonstrates a Nernstian response slope for the potentiometric zero current behavior of a glass fiber membrane that was silanized and doped with an calcium-selective membrane material; and
Figure 15 demonstrates a similarly Nernstian response slope for the potentiometric response of a silanized alumina membrane containing nanoscale pores and that is doped with a sodium-selective membrane material.
Best Mode(s) for Carrying Out the Invention
In Figure 1 there is shown a sensing device 10 for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample, in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention.
For the purpose of this description, the ions whose concentration are to be determined will be referred to as analyte ions.
A first and second solid state ion selective electrode, 12 and 14 each comprise a polymeric membrane layer 16 and 18, which is contacted with a second layer 20, by methods, including but not limited to, for example solvent casting, screen printing, spin coating or drop casting. The second layer 20 in turn comprises a transducer layer 22 and/or 24 and a conducting layer 26. This substantially eliminates the requirement for an inner aqueous electrolyte solution required in traditional electrodes in order to measure an electrical change. The transducer layers 22 and 24 facilitate the conversion of ions into an electrical current so that an oxidation reduction reaction can be measured. The transducer layers 22 and 24 are each formed from materials having functional groups that can be suitably oxidised or reduced while exhibiting hydrophobic properties including for example, ferrocene derivatives, conducting polymers, including poly(aniline), poly(pyrrole), poly(alkyl thiophene) with alkyl chains that are between 2 and 12 carbons long,
and poly(alkyldioxythiophene) and poly(alkylmonoxythiophene) with alkyl chains lengths of 2 and 12 carbons.
The conducting layers 26 and 27 of each ion selective electrode 12 and 14, is in electrical connection with a potentiostat 28 and in turn, a detector 30, which monitors the decay of current as ions are extracted from the thin layer sample 32 into the polymeric membrane layers, 16 and 18. This measurement of current is integrated over time to calculate the number of coulombs in accordance Faraday's law. The number of coulombs can then be used to calculate the number of analyte ions extracted from the thin layer sample 32. The detector 30 is an electrical detector, for example, a coulometric detector to measure the depletion in current as a result of the analyte ion undergoing an oxidation/reduction reaction.
The polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 and the transducer layer 22 and/or 24 ideally both have similar properties, for example electrochemical reversibility, compatibility and similar potential "windows", which helps to avoid undesirable oxidation/reduction reactions occurring with species other than the material of the transducer layer 22 or 24. There is also solvent compatibility between the tranducer layer 22 or 24 and the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18, to substantially avoid delamination of the material and the formation of an undesirable intermediate water layer, which would result in variable contact resistance and diminishing electrochemical reversibility and stability.
The polymeric membrane layer 16 and 18 is hydrophobic, or water immiscible, and is formed from plasticised or non-plasticised polymers including, for example, including polyvinyl chloride), poly(alkyl acrylate) with an alkyl chain length of 3 to 16, poly(alkyl methacrylate) with an alkyl chain length of 3 to 16, silicone rubbers, polyurethanes, or a combination or co-polymer thereof. The hydrophobic nature of the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18 substantially avoids spontaneous uptake of electrolyte/thin layer sample solution, which would result in interference at the electrode and a difficulty in measuring the presence and/or concentration of analyte ions. It is understood that a hydrophobic membrane will only uptake ions
~ " as a result of a suitably imposed potential, resulting in a current that can be counted.
In a first mode of operation, the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 has limited ion exchange properties to reduce the spontaneous extraction of any ions to and from the membrane and thin layer sample 32. This helps to minimise spontaneous contamination of the thin layer sample 32 in contact with the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18. To maintain electroneutrality in the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18, extraction of an analyte ion from the thin layer sample 32 into the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18, is accompanied by the transfer of an ion from the transducer layer 22 or 24 (i.e. not the thin layer sample 32). In this mode of operation, the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 contains a suitable lipophilic electrolyte, for example, salts of long chain quaternary ammonium ions and tetraphenylborate derivatives, or sulfonated organic ions.
Alternatively, as a second mode of operation, the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 may comprise ion exchange properties. For example the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 may contain an ion exchange electrolyte, to effect transfer of analyte ions into the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18. This allows one to monitor the open circuit potential and apply potentials relative to this measured value. This mode also allows for the use of membranes that are thin for example, less than 10μm, and fast diffusing, since an applied voltage effects the transport of the same ion from the thin layer sample 32 across the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 and into the transducer layer 22 or 24. The polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 is preferably in the form of a thin-layer membrane, with dimensions between about 10 nm to 10 μm, in order to facilitate the rapid and reversible ionic extraction in and out of the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18.
Alternatively, the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 may be in the form of a thicker membrane layer, with dimensions between about 10μm to 10 mm. In this arrangement the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 may act as a large
- - electrolyte reservoir and operate in a detection mode where regeneration of the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 at the sample side is not critical. Further, this configuration may also involve the selective ionophores being retained by the second layer layer 20, such as by covalent attachment. The second layer 20 in this configuration is in the form of a thin layer with a thickness within the range of about 100nm to 10 μm. The conducting layer 26 can be formed from any conducting metal, for example gold.
The polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18 are each doped with a suitable ionophore, which is selective to the ion to be extracted, for example, the ionophore contains suitable functional groups for complexing ionic species and a lipophilic backbone to retain the molecule in the polymeric membrane layers 16 or 18. The ionophore may be covalently attached onto the polymeric backbone of the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 itself. Alternatively, the ionophores may be attached to a solid membrane support layer 17, which imparts strength to the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18 whilst maintaining good mobility, for example, a diffusion coefficient within the range of approximately 10"6 to 10~8 cmV1, for example 10"6 to 10'7 cmV1, unlike standard stiffened polymers which exhibit a reduction in mobility, for example, a diffusion coeffeicient of approximately 10"8 cmV1 or less. The solid membrane support layer 17 may be formed from a number of materials known in the art including, for example, silica, metal alloy or oxide such as porous alumina, ceramic, glass or glass fiber materials including filters, carbon, titania, carbide, nitride or sintered metal. The solid support layer is suitably coated, for example by silanization, to be coated or doped with the ion-selective membrane material.
Ionophores are required for most analytes in order to impart selectivity to the polymeric membrane 16 and/or 18. However, there are some analytes which do not require selective ionophores, for example some hydrophobic ions includingperchlorate, nitrate, cesium, barium and various organic ions.
The solid state ion selective electrodes 12 and 14 are arranged such that the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18 are in opposing arrangement with respect to each other. In use, a thin layer sample 32, having a known volume, is located therebetween so that the thin layer sample 32 is able to simultaneously contact the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18 of both ion selective electrodes 12 and 14. The distance between the two electrodes 12 and 14 and therefore, the polymeric membrane layers 16 and 18, is within the range of about 10 to 200μm. The area between the electrodes is known so that the volume of the thin layer sample 32 can be easily determined, and therefore the concentration of the analyte ion from the observed coulomb number. It is understood that if the distance between the electrodes 12 and 14 is too short, then the analysis time will also be too short relative to the capacitive charging current pulse upon applying the excitation potential. If the distance is too long then excessively long analysis times will be required.
Prior to performing a measurement a voltage scan may be conducted to determine an appropriate measuring potential to be applied. This will be particularly important where the analyte to be detected varies. If necessary, the cell resistance may also be evaluated by applying a rapid oscillating potential pulse prior to analysis, allowing one to correct for variable potential drops that originate from this resistance.
During a measurement the potentiostat 28 applies the measuring potential to the first ion selective electrode 12. This results in migration of analyte ions, depicted in Figure 2 as A", from a thin layer sample 32, into the polymeric membrane layer 16, where it interacts with a ionophore L and in turn results in the transfer of an intermediate ion to the transducer layer 22. The electrons flow via the conductor layer 26 through the circuit to the conductor layer 27 of the second ion selective electrode 18. At the second ion selective electrode, a reverse reaction occurs whereby electrons flow from the conductor 27 to the tranducer layer 24. This causes migration of an intermediate ion into the polymeric membrane layer 18
causing oppositely charged ions (depicted as M+) to be extracted from the thin layer sample 32.
The flow of electrons is an electrical current which can be detected by the coulometric detector 30. As the reaction proceeds and the concentration of analyte ions in the thin layer sample 32 are depleted, a decay in the electrical current is observed until it becomes so minimal as to approach zero. At this point substantially all of the analyte ions have been extracted from the thin layer sample 32. By integrating the current measured by the detector 30, the concentration of the analyte in the thin layer sample 32 can be determined.
The measuring potential is applied for a time sufficient to extract at least about 50 to 99% of the analyte ions from the thin layer sample 32 into the polymeric membrane layer 16. This will be dependent on the geometry, selectivity and chemistry of the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18, with films of less than 1 to 5 μm thickness requiring much shorter regeneration times. It is anticipated that optimal geometries may allow one to extrapolate from an initially recorded current decay to infinite time by use of suitable diffusion models, thus simplifying the experimental procedure and enabling shorter analysis times.
Once a measurement is complete, a resting potential or zero current period is then applied to effect regeneration of the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 substantially to its original state. The application of a resting potential or zero current period may also effect the reversal of the reaction and subsequently deposit most of the extracted analyte ions back into the thin layer sample 32. This is particularly advantageous for situations where it is not desired or safe to substantially alter the thin layer sample 32 composition in the course of the measurement, such as in clinical or biochemical monitoring scenarios. The resting potential or current is applied for a longer time period than the measuring potential, to ensure substantially all of the analyte ions are back-extracted. The time period will be dependent on the polymer membrane geometry, composition and mode of operation.
- -
In a second preferred embodiment, the second layer 20 is formed of an aqueous or gelified inner solution in contact with a reference electrode to complete an electrochemical cell. Preferably, the second layer 20 comprises a silver/silver chloride couple.
The polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 prevents direct contact of the solid sensing layer 20 with the thin layer sample 32, thus avoiding interferences caused by fouling at the electrode surface. Interferences are also substantially avoided because only the ions selectively extracted into polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 result in a oxidation/reduction reaction at the ion to electron transduer layer 22 or 24 in contact with the electron conductor. The polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 is itself selective to the analyte ion and therefore does not require an enzyme reaction to impart selectivity to the electrode.
It is envisaged that the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 can be coated with a hydrophilic layer to aid in biocompatibility and infer a charge transfer resistance to regulate the ion transfer kinetics from the thin layer sample to the membrane phase. Such hydrophilic layers may include, but are not limited to, cellulose materials, hydrogels, surfactants, covalently attached molecules containing hydrophilic or electrically charged functional groups, and polyelectrolyte multilayers.
The transducer layers 22 and 24 may also be doped with a ionic species common to the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18, for example a tetraphenylborate derivative. This doping process may also occur spontaneously during a suitable conditioning process with an aqueous thin layer sample before first use.
It is envisaged that the transducer layers 22 and 24 can be spin coated or electro- polymerised onto a conducting layer 26.
It is also envisaged that other types of detectors can be used, for example, optical detectors. Where the detector is an optical detector, it detects a change in colour in the polymeric membrane layer, which results from a reaction of the analyte ion
- - with a ionophore in the polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18. The polymeric membrane layer 16 or 18 thus acts as an indicator in these circumstances. This arrangement enables undesired electrical interferences to be minimised, such as capacitive charging currents or interferences from electroactive species that easily diffuse across the membrane, for example, oxygen. An optical readout may be performed on a smaller area than the active electrode surface, helping to eliminate errors arising from diffusion of analyte from the surrounding solution.
It is understood that the active electrode area and cell design needs to be optimal to reduce the effect of mass transport of analyte from the surrounding solution into the thin layer where the detection (coulometric or optical) is performed. This may be accomplished by judicious choice of active surface area and geometry relative to the areas that contact the remainder of the sample. Small electrode areas may be accomplished by using a bipotentiostat configuration utilizing an outer and inner electrode held at the same potential, and recording the current for coulometry only at the inner electrode. Any undesired mass transport processes from the contacting solution will have an effect on the outer electrode only, thereby allowing one to work with smaller dimensions at high accuracy.
One of the primary benefits of utilising controlled potential coulometric detection for determining the concentration of an analyte is that no calibration is required. This is because substantially all of the analyte ions are extracted from the thin layer sample and measured. In addition, having an all solid state system means that a practical device can be developed for a wide range of applications, for example environmental monitoring and clinical diagnostics (in-vivo or in-vitro).
The all solid state system further enables the device to be miniaturised to a much greater degree than present technologies in the field of coulometry. The solid state electrode/s coupled with ion extraction enables detection of species that cannot be electrolysed at an electrode using traditional techniques such as voltammetry. That is, any ion for which a selective membrane can be fabricated can be detected, including but not limited to, calcium, potassium, sodium, lithium,
magnesium, ammonium, nitrate, perchlorate, chloride, salicylate, iodide, carbonate, bicarbonate, anticoagulant heparin via protamine titration, total acidity, total basicity.
Enzymes may also be utilised to determine metabolites and/or organics. For example, by coupling urease with urea, ammonium is produced. Ammonium, in turn, can be detected coulometrically.
The present invention is further illustrated by way of the following non-limiting examples:
Example 1
In Figure 3 there is depicted an experimental set-up for measurement of an analyte ion according to a second embodiment the present invention, involving polymeric membranes having an inner aqueous electrolyte. Two polymeric membrane electrodes are spaced closely together and are each contacted with an aqueous inner solution, as depicted in Figure 3. The cell is completed by placing a silver/silver chloride electrode into each of the inner solutions. The spacing between the two membrane electrodes contains the thin layer sample solution. Accurate spacing is preferably accomplished by a hard spacing material. The polymeric membranes preferably have a well defined and constant shape, but preferably retain a high ion mobility. This is preferably accomplished by containing the membrane within a hard porous material such as a ceramic or crosslinked polymer.
Figure 4 shows a cyclic voltamogram obtained from a scan of the thin-layer cell of Figure 3. The polymeric membrane layer was produced by solvent casting and contains polyvinyl chloride) plasticized with bis(2-ethyl hexyl sebacate) in a mass ratio of 1 :2. The polymeric membrane layer was formulated to also contain a lipophilic electrolyte, 10 wt% of tridodecylmethylammonium tetrakis(4- chlorophenylborate) and 10 mM of the sodium-selective ionophore tert- butylcalix[4]arene tetraethyl ester. The inner solutions contained both 10 mM
- -
NaCI, while the thin layer sample contained 1 mM NaCI and 10 mM KCI. Figure 4 shows the observed current of a thin layer electrode configuration as an applied potential is cycled in the window between -1.5 V and 1.5 V, with a starting and ending potential of zero volts. Note the direction of the scan by the indicated arrow. A total of 8 peaks are noted, which are approximately symmetrical owing to the symmetric geometry and composition of the cell. As the potential is scanned from 0 to -1.5 V, peaks A and B appear. Figure 5 interprets these regions with the indicated reactions. At peak A, the desired extraction of sodium into membrane 1 and of chloride into membrane 2 is accomplished selectively, without interference from potassium. At peak B, the applied potential is sufficiently large to also effect the extraction of potassium. At B*, potassium ions are back extracted from membrane 1 into the thin layer sample. At A*, the back extraction of sodium ion is observed. Note that peaks C and D at positive potentials are essentially the same processes as for A and B, but with reversed polarity.
A typical coulometry experiment is demonstrated in Figure 6, where the potential is stepped from zero to -0.8 V and held at that value for a period of time, in this case 20 s. Note that this corresponds to peak A in Figure 1. A current is observed that decays with time, signifying the exhaustive extraction of sodium into membrane 1. The integrated Faradaic current during this pulse yields the total charge for the extraction process, and translates into the amount of material in the thin layer sample by using Faraday's law. Smaller membrane spacings will give rise to a faster decay. As the potential is stepped back to zero volts, the current spike changes sign and again decays with time, demonstrating the back extraction from the membrane into the thin layer sample. Figure 2 also shows the observed current as the potential is stepped to just -0.3 V, with is approximately at the beginning of the sodium extraction region. The potential is not sufficiently large to effect a sodium extraction process. Note that the back extraction current at 0 V is also very small. This shows how the magnitude of the applied potential is an effective parameter to optimize the working conditions of the coulometric sensor.
Example 2
A different example entails the development of ion selective electrodes exhibiting a conducting polymer cast onto a solid support as an all-solid state design. Figure 7 compares the normal pulse voltammetric responses of two ion-selective electrodes to the indicated electrolytes (each at 1 mM concentrations). The top plot shows the behavior of a membrane containing an aqueous inner contact, measured against a traditional reference electrode. The membrane did not contain an ionophore for simplicity reasons, but otherwise is comparable to the composition given in Example 1. Normal pulse voltammetry subjects the cell to an extended baseline potential pulse (here at 0 V) between excitations. This gives voltammetric responses that only reflect ion uptake processes and are simpler to interpret. At positive potentials, the currents start to increase, which is indicative of anions entering the membrane from the thin layer sample solution side. The preference for this process is perchlorate > nitrate > chloride, which reflects the order of hydrophilicity for these ions. This is also called the Hofmeister selectivity sequence. At negative potentials, the cations potassium and sodium are extracted, again in the order of potassium > sodium.
For the bottom plot, a gold electrode was coated with poly(ethylenedioxythiophene), PEDOT, doped with polystyrene sulfonate (PSS) by solvent casting. The ion-selective membrane, containing the same composition as for the top plot, was solvent cast on top of the conducting polymer and resulted in an all-solid state electrode. The bottom plot of Figure 7 shows the same basic behaviour for electrolyte extraction as for the aqueous inner solution system, demonstrating the feasibility of designing all solid state electrodes for coulometric measurements.
Figure 8 shows the cyclic voltammogram for an all solid state membrane containing poly(octylthiophene) as conducting polymer and coated with a plasticized PVC membrane without ionophore. The conducting polymer was obtained by electropolymerization onto indium tin oxide (ITO) glass. The overlay
membrane was spin coated and contained a lipophilic salt of the tetradodecylammonium cation and the tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl] borate. Figure 8 demonstrates the cyclic voltammogram for chloride anion uptake from the thin layer sample solution into the all solid state membrane assembly, which occurs above 1 V. Scanning the potential back toward 0 V reveals that the chloride anions are extracted back out of the film around 0.4 V. This demonstrates that all solid state membrane electrodes with electropolymerized and lipophilic conducting polymers as underlayers can be successfully fabricated.
Example 3
A third example employs a membrane material doped into a porous polypropylene tubing material (600 μm inner diameter), whose inside compartment contains a chlorinated silver wire of 500 μm diameter. The impregnated tubing is connected on one side to a pump or other sample delivery system, while the other side is connected to waste while the silver wire acts as the working electrode and is connected to a potentiostat. The impregnated tubing is wholly immersed in an aqueous electrolyte solution where the counter and reference electrodes are placed.
In the specific example, the tubing is impregnated with the lipophilic solvent dodecyl 2-nitrophenyl ether, 10 wt% of lipophilic electrolyte tridodecylmethylammonium tetrakis(4-chlorophenylborate), 10 mmol/kg membrane of the Ca2+-ionophore N,N,N',N'-tetradodecyl-3,6- dioxaoctanedithioamide and 30 mol% (relative to the ionophore) of potassium tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate. The sample solutions consisted of 0.01 M KCI plus the indicated concentration of calcium, while the solution outside of the tubing consisted of 10-3 M CaCI2 in 10-2 M KCI. A platinum electrode served as the counter electrode, while a double junction reference electrode was used.
In this example, the inside of the tubing acts as the thin layer sample solution. Importantly, this configuration can be electrochemically monitored under zero current conditions without substantially perturbing the composition of this thin layer sample solution. Figure 9 demonstrates that such a configuration gives a Nernstian response to logarithmic calcium concentration in complete analogy to a traditional calcium-selective electrode.
Monitoring the zero current potential allows one to apply a potential that is larger by a set quantity relative to the open circuit potential, without requiring a knowledge of the involved concentrations. This results in the transport of calcium from the thin layer sample solution into the membrane and outside bathing solution, which is monitored as a depletion current. Figure 10 shows for the 50 μM calcium in the thin layer sample, depletion currents increase with applied potential until they become indifferent of applied potential. Figure 11 illustrates for an applied potential of 270 mV that the observed current decays are a direct function of calcium concentration. The inset shows the calculated charge (integrated from the current decays) as a function of concentration, demonstrating linearity with concentration.
In this measurement configuration, knowledge of the thin layer sample solution or outside bathing solution is not necessary for proper functioning of the device. In fact, the device can operate with inner and outside solutions of the same, unknown composition.
Note that the hollow fiber membrane configuration is especially attractive when coupled to a transmembrane accumulation process. In this scenario, the thin layer sample solution is placed outside the tubing, while the inner solution contains a specific composition that results in the transport and accumulation of the analyte ions from the thin layer sample into the inner compartment. When this process approaches equilibrium, the readout of the inner compartment is accomplished as described above.
- ZO -
Example 4
The fourth example demonstrates the thin layer coulometric behavior in analogy to Example 1 , but with a custom made flow through cell in which the thin layer sample is guided through a meandering channel that is sandwiched between two ion-selective membranes. In this example, the channel is designed to be 50 μm deep and 1 mm wide. Depth and width can vary. Both ion-selective membranes consist of 10 wt% of lipophilic electrolyte tridodecylmethylammonium tetrakis(4- chlorophenylborate), and polyvinyl chloride) and the plasticizer bis(2-ethyl hexyl sebacate) in a 1 :2 ratio by mass, while one of the two membranes additionally contains 10 mmol of the sodium-selective ionophore tert-butylcalix[4]arene tetraethyl ester per kilogram of membrane. The membranes are about 100 μm thick, and are each contacted with a 0.1 M aqueous lithium acetate solution in which a chlorinated silver electrode is immersed.
Figure 12 shows normal pulse voltammetric response of this cell, containing either 0.01 M lithium acetate (A) or 10"4 M sodium perchlorate in the same 0.01 M lithium acetate background (B). The current readings were taken after 1 s of applied potential for each of the indicated values, while a resting potential of 0 V was applied between pulses. The figure demonstrates that the sensor system can be operated at positive or negative potential values. At negative potentials, there is a somewhat larger separation from the background because of the presence of the sodium ionophore in the membrane side where cation extraction from the thin layer sample occurs.
Figure 13 shows the current decay upon an applied negative potential pulse (same setup as in Figure 12 for either the background alone or the background plus 10"4 M sodium perchlorate, demonstrating the coulometric response principle for a thin layer sample sandwiched between two polymeric membranes.
Example 5
This fifth example demonstrates the use of a rigid support for the fabrication of ion-selective polymeric membranes. One example of such a support has already been shown above under example 3 with a porous polypropylene material.
In Figure 14 the potentiometric response at zero current is demonstrated for a silanized glass fiber filter containing a membrane of the following composition: 10 wt% of lipophilic electrolyte tridodecylmethylammonium tetrakis(4- chlorophenylborate), 10 mmol/kg of membrane of the Ca2+-ionophore N, N, N', N1- tetradodecyl-3,6-dioxaoctanedithioamide and 30 mol% (relative to the ionophore) of the ion-exchanger potassium tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate in polyvinyl chloride) and bis(2-ethyl hexyl sebacate) (mass ratio 1 :4). The membrane material is solvent cast into the filter after silanization. The potentiometric calcium response is rapid and follows theoretical expectations, suggesting that such a glass fiber filter is a promising material for a solid membrane support.
A similar result is shown in Figure 15 for a 20μm thin nanoporous alumina membrane (Anodisk), made hydrophobic by silanization and subsequently doped with the following sodium-selective material: 10 wt% of lipophilic electrolyte tridodecylmethylammonium tetrakis(4-chlorophenylborate), 10 mmol per kg of membrane of the sodium-ionophore tert-butylcalix[4]arene tetraethyl ester and 50 mol% (relative to the ionophore) of the ion-exchanger potassium tetrakis[3,5- bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate in polyvinyl chloride) and bis(2-ethyl hexyl sebacate) (at a mass ratio of 1 :2). The expected Nernstian response slope for sodium is observed in a wide linear range, suggesting that such nanoporous membranes are suitable supports for ion-selective electrodes.
Modifications and variations such as would be apparent to the skilled addressee are considered to fall within the scope of the present invention.
Claims
1. A sensing device for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample comprising:
a first and second ion selective electrode, each having a first and second layer;
the first layer of the first ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the first ion selective electrode, and the first layer of the second ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode;
the first and second ion selective electrodes being positioned in opposing arrangement such that, the respective polymeric membrane layers are in direct contact with a thin layer sample containing ions, located between the first and second electrodes; and
a detector in electrical connection with the first and second electrodes.
2. A sensing device according to claim 1 , wherein the thin layer sample is not in direct contact with the second layer of the first or second ion selective electrode.
3. A sensing device according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the polymeric membrane layer is selective to the analyte ions.
4. A sensing device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the second layer is formed of an aqueous inner solution in contact with a reference electrode. _
5. A sensing device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the second layer is formed of a gelified inner solution in contact with a reference electrode.
6. A sensing device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the second layer comprises a silver/silver chloride couple.
7. A sensing device according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the second layer comprises a solid transducer layer and a solid conducting layer.
8. A sensing device according to claim 7, wherein the transducer layer is formed from materials containing chemically bound functionalities capable of being oxidised or reduced.
9. A sensing device according to claim 7 or 8, wherein the transducer layer is hydrophobic.
10. A sensing device according to any one of claims 7 to 9, wherein the transducer layer is formed from materials including, but not limited to, ferrocene derivatives.
11. A sensing device according to any one of claims 7 to 9, wherein the transducer layer is formed from materials including, but not limited to conducting polymers, including poly(aniline), poly(pyrrole), poly(alkyl thiophene) with alkyl chains that are between 2 and 12 carbons long, and poly(alkyldioxythiophene) and poly(alkylmonoxythiophene) with alkyl chains lengths of 2 and 12 carbons.
12. A sensing device according to any one of claims 7 to 10, wherein the transducer layer is doped with an ionic species common to the polymeric membrane layer. _ _
13. A sensing device according to claim 11 , wherein the ionic species comprises a tetraphenylborate derivative.
14. A sensing device according to any one of claims 7 to 12, wherein the polymeric membrane layer and the transducer layer exhibit electrochemical reversibility.
15. A sensing device according to any one of claims 7 to 13, wherein there is solvent compatibility between the transducer layer and the polymeric membrane layer.
16. A sensing device according to any one of claims 7 to 14, wherein the solid conducting layer is formed from any conducting material.
17. A sensing device according to any one of claims 7 to 15, wherein the solid conducting layer is formed from any one of a conducting polymer, gold, gold coated copper, or a conducting carbon material.
18.A sensing device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the polymeric membrane layer exhibits ion exchange properties.
19. A sensing device according to any one of claims 1 to 17, wherein the polymeric membrane layer exhibits limited ion exchange properties.
20. A sensing device according to claim 19, wherein the polymeric membrane layer contains a lipophilic electrolyte.
21. A sensing device according to claim 20, wherein the lipophilic electrolyte comprises salts of long chain quaternary ammonium ions and tetraphenylborate derivatives or sulfonated organic ions.
22.A sensing device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the polymeric membrane layer is doped with ionophores. - -
23.A sensing device according to claim 22, wherein the ionophores contain any one of ether, polyether, thioether, ester, thioester, hydroxyl, amide, amine, thioamide functional groups.
24.A sensing device according to any one of claims 22 to 23, wherein the ionophores are covalently attached to the polymeric membrane layer or a solid support layer.
25.A sensing device according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the polymeric membrane layer has a mobility within the range of about 10"6 to 10-8 cmV1.
26.A sensing device according to claim 24, wherein the solid support layer is formed from known materials including, silica, metal alloy or oxide, porous alumina, ceramic, glass or glass fibre materials such as filters, carbon, titania, carbide nitride, or sintered metal.
27.A sensing device according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the polymeric membrane layer is hydrophobic.
28.A sensing device according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the polymeric membrane layer is hydrophobic and coated with a hydrophilic layer.
29.A sensing device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the polymeric membrane layer has a thickness that falls within the range of about 10nm to 10mm.
30. A sensing device according to claim 29, wherein the polymeric membrane layer has a thickness within the range of about 10nm and 10μm. - -
31. A sensing device according to any one of claims 1 to 29, wherein the polymeric membrane layer acts as a electrolyte reservoir and has a thickness within the range of about 10μm and 10mm.
32.A sensing device according to claim 31 , where the second layer has a thickness within the range of about 100nm and 10μm.
33.A sensing device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the first and second ion selective electrodes are arranged such that the respective polymeric membrane layers are separated by a distance within the range of about 10μm to 200μm.
34.A sensing device according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the detector is in the form of any one of an electrical detector or optical detector.
35.A sensing device for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample comprising:
a first and second ion selective electrode, each having a first and second layer;
the first layer of the first ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the first ion selective electrode, and the first layer of the second ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode;
the first and second ion selective electrodes being positioned in opposing arrangement such that, the respective polymeric membrane layers are in direct contact with a thin layer sample containing ions, located between the first and second electrodes; and a detector in electrical connection with the first and second ion selective electrodes;
wherein the sensing device is an all solid state device.
36.A coulometric sensing device for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample comprising:
a first and second ion selective electrode, each having a first and second layer;
the first layer of the first ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode, and the first layer of the second ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode;
the first and second ion selective electrodes being positioned in opposing arrangement such that, the respective polymeric membrane layers are in direct contact with a thin layer sample containing ions, located between the first and second electrodes; and
a detector in electrical connection with the first and second electrodes.
37.A method for the determination of ions in a thin layer sample comprising the method steps of:
exposing a thin layer sample containing ions to a first and second ion selective electrode each electrode having a first and second layer; the first layer of the first ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the first ion selective electrode and the first layer of the second ion selective electrode being a polymeric membrane layer in electrical contact with the second layer of the second ion selective electrode;
applying a measuring potential to the first electrode allowing a current to flow across each electrode;
extracting ions out of the thin layer sample into the or each polymeric membrane layer where they are electrochemically coupled to an electron transfer reaction at the or each second layer; and
detecting the current decay via a detector in electrical contact with the first and second ion selective electrodes..
38.A method according to claim 37, wherein the measuring potential is applied until about 50% to 99% of the analyte ions are extracted from the thin layer sample.
39.A method according to claim 37 or 38, wherein a resting potential or zero current period is applied after the step of detecting current decay.
40. A method according to claim 39, wherein the resting potential or zero current period is applied for a time period longer than the time period for applying the measuring potential.
41. A method according any one of claims 37 to 40, wherein a voltage scan is conducted prior to performing a measurement.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP10740850.2A EP2396648A4 (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2010-02-12 | DETECTION DEVICE AND METHOD |
US13/201,158 US20120118762A1 (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2010-02-12 | Sensing device and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2009900623 | 2009-02-13 | ||
AU2009900623A AU2009900623A0 (en) | 2009-02-13 | Sensing device and method |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2010091475A1 true WO2010091475A1 (en) | 2010-08-19 |
Family
ID=42561332
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2010/000156 WO2010091475A1 (en) | 2009-02-13 | 2010-02-12 | Ion selective electrode sensing device |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20120118762A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2396648A4 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010091475A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2013081443A1 (en) * | 2011-12-02 | 2013-06-06 | Mimos Berhad | Ammonium selective electrode and method of preparing it |
FR3012610A1 (en) * | 2013-10-29 | 2015-05-01 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | POLYMERIC MEMBRANE ELECTRODE FOR THE POTENTIOMETRIC DETECTION OF AT LEAST ONE ANALYTE PRESENT IN A SOLUTION AND CHEMICAL SENSOR COMPRISING SUCH AN ELECTRODE |
WO2017150107A1 (en) * | 2016-03-01 | 2017-09-08 | 国立大学法人静岡大学 | Ion concentration measuring device and ion concentration measuring method |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102013101735A1 (en) * | 2012-04-17 | 2013-10-17 | Endress + Hauser Conducta Gesellschaft für Mess- und Regeltechnik mbH + Co. KG | Potentiometric sensor device |
US9562885B2 (en) * | 2013-05-17 | 2017-02-07 | Umm Al-Qura University | Ionophore and polymer membrane selective for aluminum (III) ion |
WO2019180660A1 (en) * | 2018-03-22 | 2019-09-26 | Clinical Sensors, Inc. | Composite membrane-coated electrodes |
WO2019191589A1 (en) * | 2018-03-29 | 2019-10-03 | Ecowater Systems Llc | Method for determining hardness concentration using a monovalent ion selective electrode |
CN109406604A (en) * | 2018-12-21 | 2019-03-01 | 蚌埠学院 | A kind of all solid state Lead Ion-selective Electrode and preparation method thereof |
CN111443121A (en) * | 2020-04-16 | 2020-07-24 | 安徽师范大学 | Preparation method of electrochemical biosensor electrode |
CN113588753A (en) * | 2021-07-09 | 2021-11-02 | 中国科学院烟台海岸带研究所 | Ion selective electrode current detection method |
JP2023034205A (en) * | 2021-08-30 | 2023-03-13 | シスメックス株式会社 | Ion sensor and ion measuring method |
AU2023380411A1 (en) * | 2022-11-15 | 2025-06-19 | Proton Intelligence Inc. | Electropolymerization of pyrrole on gold (au) electrode |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4758325A (en) * | 1983-05-19 | 1988-07-19 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ion selective electrode and flow type ion sensor using the same |
US5807471A (en) * | 1996-04-30 | 1998-09-15 | Medtronic, Inc. | Sensor for detecting low concentrations of polyions |
US5985117A (en) * | 1997-12-29 | 1999-11-16 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Ion-selective membrane sensors with mercuracarborand ionophore |
US6289241B1 (en) * | 1990-03-30 | 2001-09-11 | Alza Corporation | Method and apparatus for controlled environment electrotransport |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3607700A (en) * | 1967-12-20 | 1971-09-21 | Univ Duke | Electrode for measuring potassium and other specific ion activities |
US3856649A (en) * | 1973-03-16 | 1974-12-24 | Miles Lab | Solid state electrode |
US4207305A (en) * | 1979-04-27 | 1980-06-10 | Allied Chemical Corporation | Hexacoordinated ruthenium moderated production of hydrogen peroxide and sulfur from oxygen and hydrogen sulfide |
US4973394A (en) * | 1988-09-02 | 1990-11-27 | Sri International | Immobilized valinomycin molecule for K+ sensor |
US5286365A (en) * | 1992-01-15 | 1994-02-15 | Beckman Instruments, Inc. | Graphite-based solid state polymeric membrane ion-selective electrodes |
KR100379792B1 (en) * | 2000-06-12 | 2003-04-11 | 주식회사 아이센스 | Microchip-based carbon dioxide gas sensor |
-
2010
- 2010-02-12 WO PCT/AU2010/000156 patent/WO2010091475A1/en active Application Filing
- 2010-02-12 US US13/201,158 patent/US20120118762A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2010-02-12 EP EP10740850.2A patent/EP2396648A4/en not_active Withdrawn
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4758325A (en) * | 1983-05-19 | 1988-07-19 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Ion selective electrode and flow type ion sensor using the same |
US6289241B1 (en) * | 1990-03-30 | 2001-09-11 | Alza Corporation | Method and apparatus for controlled environment electrotransport |
US5807471A (en) * | 1996-04-30 | 1998-09-15 | Medtronic, Inc. | Sensor for detecting low concentrations of polyions |
US5985117A (en) * | 1997-12-29 | 1999-11-16 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Ion-selective membrane sensors with mercuracarborand ionophore |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP2396648A4 * |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2013081443A1 (en) * | 2011-12-02 | 2013-06-06 | Mimos Berhad | Ammonium selective electrode and method of preparing it |
FR3012610A1 (en) * | 2013-10-29 | 2015-05-01 | Commissariat Energie Atomique | POLYMERIC MEMBRANE ELECTRODE FOR THE POTENTIOMETRIC DETECTION OF AT LEAST ONE ANALYTE PRESENT IN A SOLUTION AND CHEMICAL SENSOR COMPRISING SUCH AN ELECTRODE |
WO2015063128A1 (en) * | 2013-10-29 | 2015-05-07 | Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives | Polymer membrane electrode for the potentiometric detection of at least one analyte present in a solution and chemical sensor comprising such an electrode |
WO2017150107A1 (en) * | 2016-03-01 | 2017-09-08 | 国立大学法人静岡大学 | Ion concentration measuring device and ion concentration measuring method |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20120118762A1 (en) | 2012-05-17 |
EP2396648A4 (en) | 2013-10-30 |
EP2396648A1 (en) | 2011-12-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20120118762A1 (en) | Sensing device and method | |
van de Velde et al. | Solid contact potassium selective electrodes for biomedical applications–a review | |
Bieg et al. | Introduction to polymer-based solid-contact ion-selective electrodes—basic concepts, practical considerations, and current research topics | |
Jarolimova et al. | Capacitive model for coulometric readout of ion-selective electrodes | |
Shvarev et al. | Pulsed galvanostatic control of ionophore-based polymeric ion sensors | |
Kim et al. | Stripping analysis of nanomolar perchlorate in drinking water with a voltammetric ion-selective electrode based on thin-layer liquid membrane | |
Bakker | Electroanalysis with membrane electrodes and liquid–liquid interfaces | |
Mensah et al. | Nanomolar detection limits of Cd2+, Ag+, and K+ using paper-strip ion-selective electrodes | |
Mathison et al. | Effect of transmembrane electrolyte diffusion on the detection limit of carrier-based potentiometric ion sensors | |
Rubinova et al. | Solid-contact potentiometric polymer membrane microelectrodes for the detection of silver ions at the femtomole level | |
Lindner et al. | Reference electrodes with ionic liquid salt bridge: when will these innovative novel reference electrodes gain broad acceptance? | |
Crespo et al. | Dynamic electrochemistry with ionophore based ion-selective membranes | |
Ishimatsu et al. | Electrochemical mechanism of ion–ionophore recognition at plasticized polymer membrane/water interfaces | |
Grygolowicz-Pawlak et al. | Thin layer coulometry with ionophore based ion-selective membranes | |
US20090277805A1 (en) | Electrochemical sensors, sensor systems and method of sensing analytes | |
Sawada et al. | Pulse amperometric detection of lithium in artificial serum using a flow injection system with a liquid/liquid-type ion-selective electrode | |
Shvarev et al. | Response characteristics of a reversible electrochemical sensor for the polyion protamine | |
Kabagambe et al. | Subnanomolar detection limit of stripping voltammetric Ca2+-selective electrode: effects of analyte charge and sample contamination | |
Bartoszewicz et al. | Calibration free solid contact electrodes with two PVC based membranes | |
D’Orazio et al. | Electrochemistry and chemical sensors | |
Jadhav et al. | Voltammetric and amperometric transduction for solvent polymeric membrane ion sensors | |
Muratova et al. | Voltammetric vs. potentiometric sensing of dopamine: advantages and disadvantages, novel cell designs, fundamental limitations and promising options | |
Jarolímová et al. | All solid state chronopotentiometric ion-selective electrodes based on ferrocene functionalized PVC | |
Jadhav et al. | Selectivity behavior and multianalyte detection capability of voltammetric ionophore-based plasticized polymeric membrane sensors | |
Podrażka et al. | Facilitated cation transfer at a three-phase junction and its applicability for ionophore evaluation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 10740850 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2010740850 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 13201158 Country of ref document: US |