US20010012915A1 - Ferromagnetic foreign body detection using magnetics - Google Patents
Ferromagnetic foreign body detection using magnetics Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20010012915A1 US20010012915A1 US09/741,774 US74177400A US2001012915A1 US 20010012915 A1 US20010012915 A1 US 20010012915A1 US 74177400 A US74177400 A US 74177400A US 2001012915 A1 US2001012915 A1 US 2001012915A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- magnetic
- sensor
- applied field
- apparatus recited
- interest
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000005291 magnetic effect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 224
- 230000005294 ferromagnetic effect Effects 0.000 title claims description 24
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title description 10
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 36
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 32
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000004020 conductor Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 abstract description 24
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 8
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 7
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 32
- 210000004185 liver Anatomy 0.000 description 20
- 238000005404 magnetometry Methods 0.000 description 20
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 17
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 15
- 241000238366 Cephalopoda Species 0.000 description 12
- 230000003187 abdominal effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000003534 oscillatory effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 210000000746 body region Anatomy 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 210000004556 brain Anatomy 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000005415 magnetization Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 3
- 206010065973 Iron Overload Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 210000001015 abdomen Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000001307 helium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052734 helium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N helium atom Chemical compound [He] SWQJXJOGLNCZEY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000696 magnetic material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002595 magnetic resonance imaging Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 2
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N nitrogen Substances N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000005641 tunneling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000640 Fe alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Fe2+ Chemical compound [Fe+2] CWYNVVGOOAEACU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- TZXKOCQBRNJULO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ferriprox Chemical compound CC1=C(O)C(=O)C=CN1C TZXKOCQBRNJULO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 102000008857 Ferritin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000008416 Ferritin Methods 0.000 description 1
- 108050000784 Ferritin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000031856 Haemosiderosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 1
- UBQYURCVBFRUQT-UHFFFAOYSA-N N-benzoyl-Ferrioxamine B Chemical compound CC(=O)N(O)CCCCCNC(=O)CCC(=O)N(O)CCCCCNC(=O)CCC(=O)N(O)CCCCCN UBQYURCVBFRUQT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910000990 Ni alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 206010043391 Thalassaemia beta Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002655 chelation therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960003266 deferiprone Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 229960000958 deferoxamine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003745 diagnosis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002405 diagnostic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011152 fibreglass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011888 foil Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002440 hepatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002506 iron compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910000889 permalloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005316 response function Methods 0.000 description 1
- 208000007056 sickle cell anemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002887 superconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005382 thermal cycling Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radio waves
- A61B5/055—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radio waves involving electronic [EMR] or nuclear [NMR] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/24—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric or biomagnetic signals of the body or parts thereof
- A61B5/242—Detecting biomagnetic fields, e.g. magnetic fields produced by bioelectric currents
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/41—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the immune or lymphatic systems
- A61B5/414—Evaluating particular organs or parts of the immune or lymphatic systems
- A61B5/416—Evaluating particular organs or parts of the immune or lymphatic systems the spleen
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/42—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the gastrointestinal, the endocrine or the exocrine systems
- A61B5/4222—Evaluating particular parts, e.g. particular organs
- A61B5/4244—Evaluating particular parts, e.g. particular organs liver
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
- G01R33/12—Measuring magnetic properties of articles or specimens of solids or fluids
- G01R33/16—Measuring susceptibility
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
- G01V3/08—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation operating with magnetic or electric fields produced or modified by objects or geological structures or by detecting devices
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radio waves
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to an instrument using room-temperature sensors that measure magnetic susceptibility variations in the body of a patient.
- the instrument can noninvasively monitor ferromagnetic foreign bodies that may become lodged in a patient.
- biomagnetic susceptometry is a diagnostic procedure that involves noninvasive, radiation-free, direct, and accurate, measurement of the magnetic susceptibility of organs and tissue within a human or animal body.
- biomagnetic susceptometry can be used to measure human iron stores contained in the liver, see Harris, J. W., et al. (1978), Assessment of human iron stores by magnetic susceptibility measurements, Clin. Res. 26, 540A.; Brittenham, G. M., et al. (1993), Hepatic iron stores and plasma ferritin concentration in patients with sickle cell anemia and thalassemia major, Amer. J. Hematology 42, 85; Brittenham, G. M., et al.
- HTS SQUIDs based on the recently developed High-Temperature Superconductors (HTS) could, in principle, reduce the cost of magnetic suceptometry.
- HTS SQUIDs which can operate at liquid-nitrogen temperatures, would reduce operating costs, and some of the equipment costs, compared to SQUID devices operating at liquid helium temperatures. However, even at liquid-nitrogen temperatures, the operating costs would be higher than those of ordinary instruments operating at room temperature.
- HTS-SQUIDs are expensive to construct and use, because of the difficulty and low yield of the fabrication process. The difficulties, and the costs, are compounded because these devices are vulnerable to moisture, thermal cycling, and static electrical discharge. HTS-SQUIDs also require the same expensive electronics as conventional SQUIDs.
- the instant invention obviates the need for cryogenically cooled SQUIDs by providing operational use at room temperature, making for much less expensive fabrication and use.
- the invention allows, generally, for measurements of variations of magnetic susceptibility in a patient and, in particular, for an accurate and inexpensive way of detecting areas of increased magnetic susceptibility in patients.
- certain improvements introduced in this invention are applicable to all types of magnetic susceptibility measurements.
- this invention provides a practical method and apparatus for measuring variations of magnetic susceptibilities in a patient, and, in particular, preferably localized areas of increased magnetic susceptibility.
- the probing instrument's distal end assembly includes a room temperature functioning magnetic sensor that can detect the characteristic magnetic response from tissue to a magnetic field supplied by an applied-field coil that is also part of the instrument's distal end assembly.
- the applied field coil can be an alternating current (AC) coil.
- the magnetic susceptibility measurements have sufficient resolution to monitor small variations in magnetic susceptibility within the patient, when the instrument is placed external to the patient.
- the magnetic sensor can be, but is not necessarily limited to, a magnetoresistive sensor (including giant magnetoresistive and spin-dependent tunneling sensors), a fluxgate magnetometer, or a magneto-inductive sensor.
- the applied field coil dimensions are such that an applied field is optimized for maximum response from localized areas of interest in the body.
- the instrument of the present invention is preferably designed for detecting the presence of ferromagnetic foreign bodies (FFBs) in a patient.
- the applied field coil dimensions are optimized to maximize the magnetic susceptibility response from the item of interest and minimize effects caused by the overlying tissue, while not unduly increasing the sensitivity of the probe instrument due to an organ being in close proximity to the item of interest.
- the applied field is canceled at the position of the sensor. Both the real and imaginary parts of the applied field are canceled.
- the sensor-sample distance is modulated by oscillating the detector assembly.
- the proposed invention's magnetic sensor is moved relative to the patient.
- the instrument's detector assembly has an applied field coil fabricated on a printed circuit (PC) board that is attached to a solid nonmetallic support base which in turn attaches to an oscillatory member which displaces the detector assembly when used for examining a patient.
- PC printed circuit
- the probe instrument's distal end detector assembly has a geometrically designed applied field coil using either multiple parallel-sheet coils or a substantially coplanar applied field coil of concentric design.
- the magnetic sensor is preferably a magnetoresistive (MR) sensor.
- MR magnetoresistive
- a feedback coil is mounted on the sensor, which “locks” the sensor at its optimum operating point by applying a compensating field to cancel changes in the ambient field, thus maintaining a constant sensitivity of the detector assembly.
- the probing instrument's magnetic sensor control electronics, a motor/crank rod arrangement for oscillatory movement of the instrument's distal end detector assembly, an applied field source signal generator, a lock-in amplifier, an audio amplifier, and an FFT spectrum analyzer or equivalent computer device for signal analysis can all be incorporated in a single medical instrument housing for field use.
- a physician uses the probing instrument by positioning the probe's distal end adjacent to an area of interest, and the instrument's detector assembly is preferably oscillated over the area of interest. The probe instrument then analyzes the observed signal, and outputs data corresponding to material of interest.
- FIGS. 1, 2 and 3 show features of a magnetic susceptibility detector, which includes the applied field coil(s) with a magnetic sensor(s), as disclosed in parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,842,986;
- FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 show preferred features of the detector assembly, which include the preferred circular applied field coils and center mounted magnetoresistive sensor used in the probing instrument;
- FIG. 7 shows a block diagram with the preferred applied field current source and analyzing components used in the probing instrument.
- FIG. 8 shows an exemplary perspective view of the probing instrument.
- the invention's probe instrument can make magnetic susceptibility measurements with a very small degree of uncertainty.
- the noise of the room-temperature instrument is small compared to the uncertainties that are caused mainly by the magnetic response of tissues overlying the area of interest. For a room temperature system, as for existing instruments based on SQUID sensors, this overlying tissue effect, and not the noise in the magnetic sensors, determines the precision of the measurement. Because the crucial limitation in the sensitivity of the magnetic susceptibility measurement is imposed by the overlying tissue response, rather than the noise of the sensor itself, the somewhat higher noise of the room temperature functioning magnetic sensor compared to a SQUID is not a limiting factor in the performance of the instrument.
- the instrument has to be sensitive enough to see the small magnetic signals produced by the magnetic susceptibility of the item of interest;
- the magnetic susceptibility of the item of interest has to be determined accurately in the presence of the interfering signal produced by the slight magnetic susceptibility of the overlying tissue and other surrounding tissues, such as an organ.
- a magnetic field is applied, inducing a magnetization in the area of interest.
- a small magnetic field produced by this sample magnetization is then detected using a magnetic sensor.
- the sample magnetization is proportional to the intensity of the applied field and to the magnetic susceptibility of the sample.
- the applied field In order to measure a given magnetic susceptibility, the applied field must be large enough and the noise from the magnetic sensor must be low enough so that the magnetic susceptibility response is much greater than the sensor noise.
- the applied field In practice, using a room-temperature instrument, the applied field is limited by the need to avoid excessive ohmic heating in the applied field coils of the detector assembly. Excessive heat loads can induce thermal drifts in the geometry of the applied field coils. As discussed below, such drifts could affect the ability to suppress spurious signals due to the applied field.
- an applied magnetic field of roughly 10 ⁇ 3 T to an area of interest does not incur excessive thermal drift effects.
- the preferred sensor for the invention is a magnetoresistive (MR) sensor with very low noise.
- MR magnetoresistive
- Such sensors are commercially available from Honeywell, Phillips, and other companies.
- the MR sensor operates on the principle that the resistance of particular magnetic materials (such as permalloy, an alloy of nickel and iron) is a function of the ambient magnetic field. Changes in the magnetic field result in changes in sensor resistance, which can be measured and quantified.
- MR sensors developed by Kodak have noise spectral densities below 30 pT/Hz 1 ⁇ 2 at frequencies above 20-30 Hz. Similar noise levels are achieved by MR sensors commercially available from Honeywell. With a measurement bandwidth of 0.1 Hz (three seconds of data averaging) these sensors exhibit an RMS sensor noise of 10 ⁇ 11 Tesla. This noise level is ten times below a representative signal of 10 ⁇ 10 Tesla.
- magnetoresistance such as giant magnetoresistance sensors and spin dependent tunneling sensors
- the invention's room-temperature system preferably applies an AC magnetic field at a frequency between around 25 and 2,000 hertz, and detects the magnetic response at the same frequency. At these frequencies, environmental background fluctuations are usually small, as long as noise peaks at harmonics of the power-line frequency are avoided.
- Magnetic signal measurements needed for the probe instrument are 10 7 times smaller than the field applied to a patient's body. In making such a measurement, technical issues include the stability of the applied magnetic field, the stability of the magnetic sensors, and the geometrical stability of the magnetic-field coils and sensor array.
- the proposed invention's instrument is designed so that fluctuations of the current in the applied-field coil have only a negligible effect on the magnetic measurements.
- the invention uses a detector assembly whose applied field coil is geometrically configured such that almost no magnetic field occurs at a location where the magnetic sensor is positioned in relation to the applied field coils. If the magnetic sensor were exposed to the full amplitude of the applied field, then the current in the field coils would have to be stable to at least one part in 10 7 to resolve the weak magnetic signals observed in magnetic susceptibility measurements.
- the coil current can vary by as much as one part in 10 4 , and the corresponding variations in the magnetic measurements are then only 10 ⁇ 8 of the field applied to the sample.
- FIGS. 1, 2 and 3 show the applied field coil and magnetic sensor design and system for determining FFB object(s) as disclosed in parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393 of Avrin et al., entitled “Ferromagnetic Foreign Body Screening Method and Apparatus”, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,842,986.
- the detector assembly 10 makes use of the technical principles discussed above.
- This detector assembly 10 provides magnetic susceptibility measurement information available for the detection of retained ferromagnetic foreign body (FFB) object(s), that is metallic objects inside human tissue, as a way of screening patients prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or other medical procedures.
- This detector assembly 10 can also be used in the invention herein.
- the invention herein teaches of another detector assembly with design improvements that improve the noise of the magnetic susceptibility measurements and optimize response from the item of interest with respect to an interfering signal from overlying tissue or an adjacent organ.
- System components also include equipment for using magnetic measurement signals from the sensors to detect and locate ferromagnetic objects, and for distinguishing the signals of the target objects from other interfering magnetic fields.
- FIGS. 1, 2, and 3 collectively show a detector assembly 10 which is intended to be placed near the body region to be screened.
- the applied field coils 18 when supplied with a current from the current signal generator 22 , generate a time-varying applied magnetic field to the body.
- the magnetic material in the body region responds, providing a small magnetic field that is detected by a sensor 24 (shown in FIG. 3) or array of sensors (not shown) positioned adjacent to the body region.
- the applied field coils 18 and the sensor(s) 24 allow measurement of anomalies in the magnetic susceptibility of the body region being screened.
- the geometry of the applied field coils and the placement of the magnetic sensor(s) is such that the interfering applied field experienced by the magnetic sensor(s) 24 is as small as possible. As discussed earlier, this arrangement reduces the interfering signal produced by the varying magnetic field.
- the detector assembly consisting of the sensor(s) 24 and applied field coils 18 can be stationary, or can be movable to generate a magnetic susceptibility anomaly map over the body part being screened. The intensity and the time dependence or frequency dependence of the magnetic susceptibility anomaly can be interpreted rapidly by a signal processor to reveal the location and size of ferrous metallic objects retained within the screened body region.
- the applied magnetic field may be several orders of magnitude larger than the signal of the FFB object(s).
- One arrangement of the device 10 is to configure the applied field coils 18 so that the applied field is nearly canceled out in regions within the device 10 , within which the magnetic sensors 24 are positioned and attached (FIG. 1).
- the applied field coil element 12 is laid out on the surfaces of two printed circuit (PC) boards 14 , 16 .
- the two PC boards 14 , 16 are placed parallel to each other, with the magnetic sensors placed between the two PC boards 14 , 16 .
- Each PC board 14 , 16 accommodates a multiplicity of parallel, evenly spaced current paths 19 traveling in one direction in the center region of the board, with return paths 20 along the outer edges of the board, approximating two spiral patterns.
- the spiral patterns on one PC board are connected in series so that, when a current is passed through them, the resulting electric current distribution approximates a uniform sheet of current flowing in the y-direction as shown, over a substantial region near the center of the board.
- This region of the board is roughly defined by the area between the markers A-A and between the markers B-B.
- This current distribution produces a magnetic field that is nearly uniform over a region of space near the center of the board.
- the two boards 14 , 16 of this design are placed parallel to each other, with this relationship being shown.
- the PC boards 14 , 16 are separated by a distance S which is small compared with the length and width of the central region of uniform current.
- the two PC boards 14 , 16 are mounted so that the current paths 19 on one board are oriented parallel to the corresponding current paths 19 on the other board.
- the current paths on the two boards 14 , 16 are then connected in series to an AC signal generating power supply 22 , so that the current flows in the same direction on both boards, the y-direction in the arrangement shown.
- the source 22 can be equipped with a control device, as is known in the art, to cause the field to be pulsed, to vary in frequency, or to have a waveform with multiple frequencies. These time variations in the applied field can assist in distinguishing the responsive field from the environmental background fields, by synchronization of the sensing circuitry with the power supply.
- the magnetic field produced by this arrangement approximates that produced by a pair of parallel, uniform sheets of current flowing in the y-direction.
- the net magnetic field is nearly zero since the contributions from the two current sheets approximately cancel each other.
- There is a small residual magnetic field since perfect field cancellation is prevented by the finite size of the regions of the current sheets, and the presence of the return paths 20 along the outer edges of the PC boards 14 , 16 .
- the magnetic field is substantially zero in the plane midway between two PC boards.
- the magnetic sensor(s) 24 are placed in a plane parallel to the PC boards 14 , 16 , with the plane of the sensors being located at the midpoint MP between the two PC boards 14 , 16 , so that the sensors are nearly in a zero field state with respect to magnetic fields generated by the applied field coils 18 .
- FIG. 2 shows another view of the sandwiched field coil with a magnetic sensor 24 , preferably an MR sensor, placed in a low-field region between parallel circuit boards 14 and 16 as shown in FIG. 1.
- the current paths are shown with lines and arrows.
- the magnetic sensor 24 is sandwiched between two printed circuit boards 14 , 16 .
- the central region of each circuit board 14 , 16 contains a number of parallel, evenly spaced traces 19 which are connected in series and which carry identical applied field currents.
- FIG. 3 shows where the sensor 24 is placed with respect to the applied field coil 18 .
- the top coil has been removed to show sensor positioning.
- the arrow on the sensor 24 indicates the direction of its field sensitivity.
- Two methods are used to null out the field at the sensor location.
- a set of shims is used to adjust the position of the sensor between the two current sheets. This adjustment is needed because the applied field, given the finite size of the circuit boards 14 , 16 used, is zero only on the plane of symmetry midway between the two current sheets. With this coarse adjustment, a reduced residual field occurs at the sensor to a value roughly 300 times smaller than the field at the outer surface of the coil set.
- a fine balance adjustment is made by placing small tabs of metal near the sensor.
- the in-phase and the out-of-phase components are canceled out of the magnetic field with respect to the ac current supplied to the applied field coil.
- a reduced residual field to a level roughly 30,000 times smaller than the field at the outer surface of the coil set occurs when current is applied. Any noise due to the variations in the ac supply current is less than 10 ⁇ 8 of the field applied to an examined sample, that is the tissue.
- geometrical variation of the applied field coils 18 and sensor(s) 24 is an important effect that this field-nulling system cannot remove. Temperature variations may cause subtle distortions in the geometry of the applied-field coils, or in the position of the magnetic sensor within the coils. Such distortions can perturb the balance of the field-canceling system, producing noise in the magnetic measurements.
- the detector assembly minimizes effects caused by geometric distortion of the detector assembly, by modulating a distance between an area of interest and the instrument's detector assembly at up to several hertz, with displacement of the detector assembly up to six inches. The change in the magnetic signal at the modulation frequency is then measured.
- the invention departs from methods used with conventional SQUID devices by moving the detector assembly 10 while the patient remains stationary.
- the instrument herein performs this function by mounting the detector assembly, which includes the applied field coils 18 and the sensor 24 , on a nonmagnetic platform, and oscillating the detector assembly 10 back and forth at several hertz using a motor.
- the motor can drive a mechanism for producing oscillatory movement of the detector assembly.
- This mechanism can be a cam driven, spring biased plate, where the cam member is belt driven by the motor, or a reciprocating rod where the detector assembly is mounted to a plate that oscillates by a linear drive member.
- Other reciprocating motion-type devices can be used as well to provide proper oscillatory motion with displacements of up to and around six inches, at motion frequencies up to and around 10 hertz.
- the detector assembly is mounted in a housing that provides support and positioning for the instrument.
- the housing and the components of the oscillatory motion mechanism are made of nonmetallic, nonmagnetic materials. Signal analysis described below extracts information from the detector assembly's 10 signal output from the magnetic sensor 24 .
- Another feature of the invention is the ability to measure weak variations of the magnetic field response of the item of interest. It is sometimes desirable that the applied field penetrate more deeply into the body than is possible with the applied field coils 18 in detector 10 . Also it is desirable to maximize the magnetic response from the item of interest with respect to the magnetic response from the overlying tissue and from any nearby organ.
- the applied field coil of the present application optimizes the response of the item of interest with respect to the sensor noise and with respect to the interfering signals from the overlying tissues and adjacent organs.
- FIGS. 4 and 5 show the instant invention's design of an applied field coil arrangement 35 whose geometrical design optimizes a response signal from the item of interest.
- Such a design adjusts the diameter of the applied field coils 26 , 30 to control how deeply the applied magnetic field penetrates into the patient's body.
- a circular coil of radius “a” produces a field that falls off rather slowly out to distances comparable to “a,” and then decays as 1/r 3 at longer distances.
- the two main field coils 26 , 30 allow for measurement of the response of the item of interest, and evaluation of the response due to the susceptibility of the overlying tissues.
- FIG. 5 shows the detector assembly's applied field coil arrangement.
- the detector assembly comprises three concentric circular spiral coils, but can include additional coils for designs that encompass the present invention's design.
- FIG. 5 shows the first coil 26 , with a relatively large diameter, which produces a field that reaches deep into a patient's body.
- the resulting magnetic susceptibility response contains contributions from both the item of interest and the overlying tissues.
- the diameter of this coil 26 maximizes the contribution of the item of interest and minimizes the overlying tissue contribution, so that variations in the susceptibility of the overlying tissue have as little effect as possible on the measurement of susceptibility of the item of interest.
- a mean diameter in a range of around 15-50 cm for the outer coil 26 is preferred.
- FIG. 5 shows the small, innermost applied field coil 28 .
- this smaller coil is connected in series with the outer coil 26 , in such a way that the current in the inner coil 28 is in the opposite direction from that in the outer coil 26 .
- the diameters and numbers of turns in the two coils are adjusted so that the magnetic field due to the inner coil cancels the magnetic field due to the outer coil, in a region near the common center of the two coils, producing a small zone of substantially zero magnetic field.
- the magnetic sensor ( 24 in FIG. 4) is then placed in this zone of substantially zero magnetic field so that, as discussed above, fluctuations of the current in the applied field coils produce very little noise in the magnetic susceptibility measurements.
- the inner coil can have a mean diameter of about 1.5 to 8 cm. Since the magnetic field due to the small, innermost coil 28 dies away rapidly with distance, the magnetic field in the patient's body tissues is produced almost entirely by the outer coil 26 .
- FIG. 5 also shows the intermediate-diameter coil 30 which can optionally be used, in place of the outer coil 26 , to produce a magnetic field that reaches a relatively short distance into the patient's body.
- Magnetic susceptibility measurements made using this intermediate-diameter coil 30 will produce a magnetic susceptibility response whose main contribution comes from the patient's overlying tissues. The results of these measurements can be used to evaluate the magnetic susceptibility of the overlying tissues. This information can then be combined with the results of magnetic susceptibility measurements made using the outer coil 26 , to evaluate the magnetic susceptibility of the item of interest, while removing errors due to the susceptibility of the overlying tissues.
- the intermediate-diameter coil 30 is connected in series with the small, inner coil 28 , in such a way that the magnetic field is canceled at the location of the magnetic sensor.
- FIG. 5 shows exemplary dimensions of the three concentric coils that make up the applied field coil.
- Each coil consists of one or more concentric loops.
- the number of loops in each coil is proportional to its diameter. This ensures that if any two coils are energized with equal but opposite current, the field at the center will be zero.
- This equal and opposite current is realized by making the appropriate electrical interconnections between the inner and outer coils and applying current to the two coils using the same current source.
- the outermost coil 26 has exactly four times the diameter of the innermost coil 28 , and has exactly four times as many turns.
- this coil When magnetic susceptibility measurements are made using the outer coil 26 , this coil is connected in series with the innermost coil 28 , but with opposite polarity, as shown in FIG. 4 by the two oppositely directed arrows. The magnetic field cancels out almost completely at the location of the detector 10 .
- the intermediate-diameter coil 30 has exactly twice the diameter, and twice the number of turns, as the innermost coil 28 . When measurements are made using this intermediate coil 30 , it is connected in series with the innermost coil to cancel out the magnetic field at the sensor 24 location.
- the applied field coils 26 , 28 , 30 can comprise traces on a printed circuit board. To generate the maximum field for a given current magnitude, similar coil sets can be positioned on both sides of the circuit board 14 , thus doubling the number of turns of each coil. In addition, stacks of circuit boards 14 can provide sufficiently strong field to the examined tissue sample, without the excessive ohmic heating (and the resulting undesirable thermal drifts) that can occur if too large a current is passed through a single circuit board. Alternatively, the printed circuit board can be replaced by wires, metal rods, or other electrical conductors supported by a rigid support structure that maintains the appropriate spatial relationship of the current carrying elements.
- FIG. 5 shows a PC board 14 which has a number of circular holes for bolting individual boards together rigidly to a solid G-10 fiberglass plate for structural stability.
- the larger noncircular holes facilitate electrical connections between the coils 26 , 28 , 30 on the stacked circuit boards.
- a hole at the center of the coil set allows for placement of a sensor 24 in a low field region close to the sample.
- the magnetic sensor 24 is placed in the appropriate orientation so as to sense magnetic fields normal to the plane of the applied field coils (as indicated by FIG. 4). In this zero-field region, the sensor is practically immune to the applied field directly and only senses the body's response to the applied field.
- the outer coil 26 consists of 16 equally spaced concentric loops with a mean diameter of 20 cm.
- the inner coil 28 consists of 4 equally spaced concentric loops with a mean diameter of 5 cm.
- the middle coil 30 has 8 equally spaced concentric loops with a mean diameter of 10 cm.
- the applied field coil design ensures that when any pair of coils is energized with equal and opposite current the applied field at the center of the coils is zero.
- Measurements of liver iron concentration involving the cryogenically cooled SQUID systems usually use a “water bag” to help discriminate the signal from the liver from that of the overlying abdominal tissue.
- the magnetic susceptibility of the liver (1.6 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 6 SI units) is only slightly different from that of the abdominal tissue (value close to that of water; ⁇ 9 ⁇ 10 ⁇ 6 SI units).
- the susceptibility contrast between the liver and the abdominal tissue is typically smaller than that between the air and the abdominal tissue. Hence the liver will appear as an anomaly in the body which is itself an anomaly in the surrounding air space.
- the susceptibility contrast between the abdominal tissue and the air produces a magnetic response which interferes with the measurement of the response due to the liver iron itself.
- a bag filled with water is positioned to fill the space between the sensor and the surface of the patient's abdomen.
- the water whose magnetic susceptibility is nearly the same as that of the abdominal tissue, essentially removes any magnetic susceptibility contrast at the outer surface of the abdomen, as if the entire magnetic measurement were being made in an environment filled with material of a constant magnetic susceptibility approximately equal to that of the abdominal tissue.
- the magnetic susceptibility measurement then responds primarily to the magnetic susceptibility contrast between the liver and the surrounding abdominal tissue. This magnetic susceptibility anomaly is due almost entirely to the iron in the liver.
- the room temperature instrument of the present invention can also be used with a water bag, if necessary, to remove the interfering signal from the overlying tissue.
- the contribution of the overlying tissue to the signal can be measured and subtracted out by using the middle coil 30 . Since the middle coil is smaller than the outer coil, the magnetic field generated by the middle coil will not penetrate as deeply into the body as will the field generated by the outer coil. Therefore, with the proper choice of coil dimensions, the response signal due to the applied field of the middle coil will be mostly due to the overlying tissue closer to the surface of the body, whereas the response signal due to the applied field of the outer coil will be due to both the item of interest and the overlying tissue.
- two successive magnetic susceptibility measurements using the outer coil and the middle coil, provide two independent pieces of information, which can be used to solve mathematically for two unknown quantities, the magnetic susceptibilities of the item of interest and the overlying tissue.
- This method determines the magnetic susceptibility of the item of interest, while removing errors due to variability in the magnetic susceptibility of the overlying tissue.
- FIG. 6 shows the detector assembly 10 and the interface assembly components attached thereto.
- an MR sensor can be used along with a feedback coil mounted on the sensor, which allows the sensor to be “locked” at its optimum operating point by applying a compensating field to cancel changes in the ambient field.
- the detection assembly's MR sensor is part of a Wheatstone bridge wherein transduced resistance measurements are related to transduced sensed magnetic measurements.
- An electronic feedback circuit amplifies the voltage of the Wheatstone bridge, and supplies a feedback current to a small feedback coil wrapped around the MR sensor, compensating for changes in the ambient magnetic field and maintaining the sensing element at a constant magnetic field.
- the ambient magnetic field is actually measured by monitoring the current applied to the compensating coil by the feedback loop. This approach eliminates potential errors due to either the sensor's nonlinear response function or its temperature-dependent responsivity.
- a phase sensitive detector measures the component of the output of the magnetic sensor that oscillates in phase with an AC applied field.
- a Fourier transform analyzer calculates the component of the output of the phase-sensitive detector that oscillates in phase with the modulation of the sample-sensor distance. This provides a way to distinguish the signal of interest from the low-frequency noise caused by thermal drifts.
- the function of the phase sensitive detector can be performed by a lockin amplifier, and the function of the Fourier transform analyzer can be performed by a spectrum analyzer. Preferably, either or both functions can be performed on a computer.
- a signal source is used to generate an AC signal between 25 Hz and 2 kHz.
- This signal amplified by an audio frequency amplifier, provides a constant amplitude oscillating current through the applied field coils on the detection head assembly.
- FIG. 7 shows the computer analyzer and control functions which process response signals from the sensor 24 , and output information regarding the magnetic susceptibility of materials in the patient's body.
- the computer integrates and controls all instrument functions, including the modulation of the sensor-sample distance, the generation of the AC field coil current, and the processing of the magnetic sensor outputs to determine the magnetic susceptibility of the sample.
- the computer can be a personal computer with the required functioning signal cards and processors included.
- the motor indicated in FIG. 7 is preferably used to move the detector assembly toward and away from a patient's area of interest.
- the fast Fourier transformer is used to resolve the variation of the received signal in synchrony with this motion.
- the waveform synthesizer is used to generate an AC signal, which is then amplified by the power amplifier to generate an AC current for the applied field coil.
- the waveform synthesizer function can be incorporated by the computer.
- the AC signal can have frequencies up to around 2,000 hertz, preferably avoiding harmonics of the power line frequency.
- the AC signal can be synchronized with the power lines, at a frequency commensurate with the power line frequency, in order to minimize noise due to the power lines.
- Actual output from the computer can be a data storage device, a video display of useful medical information, or a connection to a computer system network.
- FIG. 8 shows the probe instrument 100 with an elongated positioning arm 130 wherein the detector assembly 10 is mounted at the distal end of the arm 110 which has a motor 125 within, with the required oscillatory drive members 120 that move the detector assembly 10 toward and away from a patient.
- FIG. 8 shows the patient on a non-metallic table.
- the detector assembly 10 is positioned over a tissue area of interest.
- the detector assembly 10 has the sensor mounted to a reciprocating member 120 located within the arm 110 that moves the detector assembly 10 translationally toward and away from the distal end of the head member, preferably between one and six inches.
- the reciprocating action typically is in a range between around 0.5 to 10 hertz such that modulation of the detector assembly 10 filters out signal noise caused by temperature drifts in the applied field coils.
- the reciprocating member 120 within the arm of the probe instrument 100 allows modulation of the distance between the examined tissue and the detector assembly 10 , as explained above.
- the reciprocating member is made of nonmagnetic materials.
- a water bag (not shown) may be placed between the detector assembly 10 and the patient.
- Analysis is performed on the signal detected by the sensor to provide output information corresponding to the magnetic susceptibility of items detected in the area of interest.
- Variations to the invention include the following:
- Modulation of the distance between the sample and the detector assembly can improve the signal-to-noise ratio of magnetic susceptibility measurements on any type of sample (i.e., including samples other than the human body).
- the instant invention describes an applied-field coil configuration, as shown in FIG. 5, consisting of two concentric circular loops carrying currents in opposite directions, in which the diameters and number of turns in the two loops are adjusted so as to cancel the magnetic field at the common center of the two coils.
- This applied-field coil design may be used in other types of magnetic susceptibility measurements.
- the concentric-loop coil design (FIG. 5) may be used with the apparatus and methods described in the parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393, for the detection of ferromagnetic foreign bodies (FFBs) within the eye, brain, or body of a patient.
- the use of the concentric-loop coil would increase the magnetic susceptibility response of FFBs located deep below the surface of the patient's face, head, or body.
- the parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393 teaches the measurement of appropriate magnetic-field gradients, or alternatively, the mapping of the magnetic-susceptibility response as a function of position, in order to compute the location of the FFB within the host.
- This spatial mapping or magnetic gradient measurement may be achieved either by using an array of more than one magnetic sensor, or by using a single magnetic sensor and moving the detection unit (applied field coils and magnetic sensor). Either approach may be used in conjunction with the concentric-loop applied field coil design shown in FIG. 5.
- the applied-field coil design of FIG. 5 may be modified to accommodate an array of more than one magnetic sensor.
- the parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393 discloses that to reduce the noise produced by variations in the applied magnetic field, it is desirable to ensure that the applied magnetic field is as small as possible at the location of each magnetic sensor.
- the concentric-loop coil described above cancels the magnetic field at a single point, the common center of the at least two concentric loops. If the radius of the inner coil is decreased slightly in relation to that of the outer coil, or if the current in the inner coil is increased slightly in relation to that of the outer coil, the magnetic field will be canceled not at a single point, but along a circle concentric with the two loops. Multiple sensors may then be placed at different locations on this circle, and the applied magnetic field will be canceled out at the location of each sensor. This arrangement makes possible the simultaneous measurement of the magnetic field response at multiple points in space.
- the noise produced by applied-field variations may be minimized by measuring differences in magnetic field between two or more magnetic sensors, as long as the magnetic sensors are positioned within the applied-field coils in such a way that the applied magnetic field is the same for each of the sensors.
- Such a result may be achieved with an applied field coil consisting of a circular loop, or multiple concentric loops, by placing each of the magnetic sensors at the same distance from the center of the loop(s).
- the applied field coils of the concentric coil design shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 can have differing dimensions and configurations to measure at other tissue regions in the body. Also, switchable configurations of the applied field coil connections can be controlled by the instrument's computer allowing for adaptive control of the instrument for multiple examining capabilities.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Endocrinology (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Vascular Medicine (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- Measurement And Recording Of Electrical Phenomena And Electrical Characteristics Of The Living Body (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Magnetic Means (AREA)
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Apparatus (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This is a continuation patent application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/135,890, filed on Aug. 18, 1998, and entitled “Noninvasive Room Temperature Instrument to Measure Magnetic Susceptibility Variations in Body Tissue”, which is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393, filed on Jun. 25, 1996, and entitled “Ferromagnetic Foreign Body Screening Method and Apparatus”, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,842,986, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
- [0002] The U.S. Government has a license on this invention under the terms of National Institutes of Health Contract No. N 43-DK-7-2250.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- This invention relates generally to an instrument using room-temperature sensors that measure magnetic susceptibility variations in the body of a patient. In particular, the instrument can noninvasively monitor ferromagnetic foreign bodies that may become lodged in a patient.
- 2. Background Art
- There is a need for an accurate, noninvasive method to detect the presence of ferromagnetic foreign bodies in a patient who is being considered for magnetic resonance imaging.
- As a matter of interest, biomagnetic susceptometry is a diagnostic procedure that involves noninvasive, radiation-free, direct, and accurate, measurement of the magnetic susceptibility of organs and tissue within a human or animal body. For instance, biomagnetic susceptometry can be used to measure human iron stores contained in the liver, see Harris, J. W., et al. (1978), Assessment of human iron stores by magnetic susceptibility measurements,Clin. Res. 26, 540A.; Brittenham, G. M., et al. (1993), Hepatic iron stores and plasma ferritin concentration in patients with sickle cell anemia and thalassemia major, Amer. J. Hematology 42, 85; Brittenham, G. M., et al. (1982), Magnetic susceptibility of human iron stores, New England J. Med., 307, 167 1.; Fischer, R., et al. (1992), Liver iron quantification in the diagnosis and therapy control of iron overload patients, Biomagnetism: Clinical. Aspects, M. Hoke, et al., eds., Elsevier, Amsterdam, p. 585., 1992; Fischer, R., et al. (1989), in Advances In Biomagnetism, S. J. Williamson, et al., eds., Plenum, New York, p. 501. Paulson. D. N., et al. (1991), Biomagnetic susceptometer with SQUID instrumentation, IEEE Trans. Magnetics 27, 3249.; and Nielsen, P., et al. (1995), Liver iron stores in patients with secondary hemosideroses under iron chelation therapy with deferoxamine or deferiprone, Br. J. Hematol. 91, 827.
- Unfortunately, instruments based on Superconducting Quantum Interference Devices (SQUIDs), are complex and expensive. They also use liquid helium, leading to significant operating costs and supply problems. Only a few such devices are in use worldwide presently due to their complexity and expense.
- SQUIDs based on the recently developed High-Temperature Superconductors (HTS) could, in principle, reduce the cost of magnetic suceptometry. HTS SQUIDs, which can operate at liquid-nitrogen temperatures, would reduce operating costs, and some of the equipment costs, compared to SQUID devices operating at liquid helium temperatures. However, even at liquid-nitrogen temperatures, the operating costs would be higher than those of ordinary instruments operating at room temperature. Moreover, HTS-SQUIDs are expensive to construct and use, because of the difficulty and low yield of the fabrication process. The difficulties, and the costs, are compounded because these devices are vulnerable to moisture, thermal cycling, and static electrical discharge. HTS-SQUIDs also require the same expensive electronics as conventional SQUIDs.
- The instant invention obviates the need for cryogenically cooled SQUIDs by providing operational use at room temperature, making for much less expensive fabrication and use. The invention allows, generally, for measurements of variations of magnetic susceptibility in a patient and, in particular, for an accurate and inexpensive way of detecting areas of increased magnetic susceptibility in patients. In addition, certain improvements introduced in this invention are applicable to all types of magnetic susceptibility measurements.
- Broadly speaking, this invention provides a practical method and apparatus for measuring variations of magnetic susceptibilities in a patient, and, in particular, preferably localized areas of increased magnetic susceptibility. The probing instrument's distal end assembly includes a room temperature functioning magnetic sensor that can detect the characteristic magnetic response from tissue to a magnetic field supplied by an applied-field coil that is also part of the instrument's distal end assembly. The applied field coil can be an alternating current (AC) coil. The magnetic susceptibility measurements have sufficient resolution to monitor small variations in magnetic susceptibility within the patient, when the instrument is placed external to the patient.
- The magnetic sensor can be, but is not necessarily limited to, a magnetoresistive sensor (including giant magnetoresistive and spin-dependent tunneling sensors), a fluxgate magnetometer, or a magneto-inductive sensor. The applied field coil dimensions are such that an applied field is optimized for maximum response from localized areas of interest in the body. In particular, the instrument of the present invention is preferably designed for detecting the presence of ferromagnetic foreign bodies (FFBs) in a patient. For this application, the applied field coil dimensions are optimized to maximize the magnetic susceptibility response from the item of interest and minimize effects caused by the overlying tissue, while not unduly increasing the sensitivity of the probe instrument due to an organ being in close proximity to the item of interest. To minimize noise introduced in the magnetic sensor due to fluctuations in the applied field, the applied field is canceled at the position of the sensor. Both the real and imaginary parts of the applied field are canceled. To overcome variations in the sensor output caused by changes in ambient temperature and mechanical relaxation of the instrument, the sensor-sample distance is modulated by oscillating the detector assembly. In contrast with conventional biomagnetic measurement instruments that use SQUID sensors, where a patient is moved relative to the instrument, the proposed invention's magnetic sensor is moved relative to the patient. The instrument's detector assembly has an applied field coil fabricated on a printed circuit (PC) board that is attached to a solid nonmetallic support base which in turn attaches to an oscillatory member which displaces the detector assembly when used for examining a patient.
- The probe instrument's distal end detector assembly has a geometrically designed applied field coil using either multiple parallel-sheet coils or a substantially coplanar applied field coil of concentric design. The magnetic sensor is preferably a magnetoresistive (MR) sensor. When an MR sensor is used, a feedback coil is mounted on the sensor, which “locks” the sensor at its optimum operating point by applying a compensating field to cancel changes in the ambient field, thus maintaining a constant sensitivity of the detector assembly.
- The probing instrument's magnetic sensor control electronics, a motor/crank rod arrangement for oscillatory movement of the instrument's distal end detector assembly, an applied field source signal generator, a lock-in amplifier, an audio amplifier, and an FFT spectrum analyzer or equivalent computer device for signal analysis can all be incorporated in a single medical instrument housing for field use.
- A physician uses the probing instrument by positioning the probe's distal end adjacent to an area of interest, and the instrument's detector assembly is preferably oscillated over the area of interest. The probe instrument then analyzes the observed signal, and outputs data corresponding to material of interest.
- The novel features of this invention, as well as the invention itself, will be best understood from the attached drawings, taken along with the following description, in which similar reference characters refer to similar parts, and in which:
- FIGS. 1, 2 and3 show features of a magnetic susceptibility detector, which includes the applied field coil(s) with a magnetic sensor(s), as disclosed in parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,842,986;
- FIGS. 4, 5 and6 show preferred features of the detector assembly, which include the preferred circular applied field coils and center mounted magnetoresistive sensor used in the probing instrument;
- FIG. 7 shows a block diagram with the preferred applied field current source and analyzing components used in the probing instrument; and
- FIG. 8 shows an exemplary perspective view of the probing instrument.
- Provided herein is a room-temperature medical probing instrument that measures variations of magnetic susceptibility. The invention's probe instrument can make magnetic susceptibility measurements with a very small degree of uncertainty.
- The noise of the room-temperature instrument is small compared to the uncertainties that are caused mainly by the magnetic response of tissues overlying the area of interest. For a room temperature system, as for existing instruments based on SQUID sensors, this overlying tissue effect, and not the noise in the magnetic sensors, determines the precision of the measurement. Because the crucial limitation in the sensitivity of the magnetic susceptibility measurement is imposed by the overlying tissue response, rather than the noise of the sensor itself, the somewhat higher noise of the room temperature functioning magnetic sensor compared to a SQUID is not a limiting factor in the performance of the instrument.
- Performance of the room-temperature instrument depends on two critical issues:
- a) The instrument has to be sensitive enough to see the small magnetic signals produced by the magnetic susceptibility of the item of interest; and
- b) The magnetic susceptibility of the item of interest has to be determined accurately in the presence of the interfering signal produced by the slight magnetic susceptibility of the overlying tissue and other surrounding tissues, such as an organ.
- In magnetic susceptibility measurements, a magnetic field is applied, inducing a magnetization in the area of interest. A small magnetic field produced by this sample magnetization is then detected using a magnetic sensor. At low applied field, the sample magnetization is proportional to the intensity of the applied field and to the magnetic susceptibility of the sample.
- In magnetic susceptometry, very weak susceptibilities are sometimes encountered. For comparison, in liver susceptometry, the difference in magnetic susceptibility between the liver and surrounding tissue is proportional to the liver iron concentration. The main iron compound stored in the liver has a susceptibility of approximately 1.6×10−6 (in SI units) per milligram of iron per cubic centimeter of liver. Typical patients with iron overload have several milligrams of iron per cubic centimeter of liver. The instrumental noise of existing SQUID biosusceptometers corresponds to an uncertainty of about 20 micrograms per cubic centimeter in liver iron concentration. Factors including uncertainty in the magnetic susceptibility of surrounding tissues contribute sources of systematic uncertainty in clinical liver measurements. Clinical measurements with existing SQUID-based instruments achieve uncertainties in the range of 0.2-0.5 milligrams of iron per gram of liver, which corresponds to a magnetic susceptibility resolution of (3-7)×10−7 (SI Units).
- To detect a weak magnetic response, there are two technical issues:
- a) Minimization of noise in the detector's magnetic-field sensors (and, to a lesser extent, the background noise from the environment) so that detection of the magnetic response can be performed without applying excessively large fields; and
- b) Ensuring that the spurious signals due to the applied fields are small compared with the desired magnetic susceptibility signal.
- With respect to sensor noise requirements, in order to measure a given magnetic susceptibility, the applied field must be large enough and the noise from the magnetic sensor must be low enough so that the magnetic susceptibility response is much greater than the sensor noise. In practice, using a room-temperature instrument, the applied field is limited by the need to avoid excessive ohmic heating in the applied field coils of the detector assembly. Excessive heat loads can induce thermal drifts in the geometry of the applied field coils. As discussed below, such drifts could affect the ability to suppress spurious signals due to the applied field. However, an applied magnetic field of roughly 10−3 T to an area of interest does not incur excessive thermal drift effects.
- If a field of 10−3 T is applied, and the magnetic field due to the response of the sample is 10−7 times the applied field, then the magnetic sensor noise must be less than 10−10 Tesla. Such noise requirements can readily be met using room-temperature functioning magnetic sensors. The preferred sensor for the invention is a magnetoresistive (MR) sensor with very low noise. Such sensors are commercially available from Honeywell, Phillips, and other companies. The MR sensor operates on the principle that the resistance of particular magnetic materials (such as permalloy, an alloy of nickel and iron) is a function of the ambient magnetic field. Changes in the magnetic field result in changes in sensor resistance, which can be measured and quantified. MR sensors developed by Kodak have noise spectral densities below 30 pT/Hz½ at frequencies above 20-30 Hz. Similar noise levels are achieved by MR sensors commercially available from Honeywell. With a measurement bandwidth of 0.1 Hz (three seconds of data averaging) these sensors exhibit an RMS sensor noise of 10−11 Tesla. This noise level is ten times below a representative signal of 10−10 Tesla. A variety of other sensor types could also meet the requirements of the present invention, including other sensors based on magnetoresistance (such as giant magnetoresistance sensors and spin dependent tunneling sensors), as well as fluxgate magnetometers and magnetoinductive sensors.
- To measure magnetic signals below 100 pT, care is required to reject magnetic noise from the environment. The requirements for noise rejection are less stringent in the present invention than in the existing SQUID biosusceptometers. The SQUID systems use dc magnetic fields, and produce a dc magnetic susceptibility response. These systems convert this dc magnetic response into a time-varying magnetic signal by moving the patient up and down. However, even with this modulation, the measurement takes place at a rather low frequency. At such frequencies, the background noise in many environments is quite large.
- The invention's room-temperature system preferably applies an AC magnetic field at a frequency between around 25 and 2,000 hertz, and detects the magnetic response at the same frequency. At these frequencies, environmental background fluctuations are usually small, as long as noise peaks at harmonics of the power-line frequency are avoided. Magnetic signal measurements needed for the probe instrument are 107 times smaller than the field applied to a patient's body. In making such a measurement, technical issues include the stability of the applied magnetic field, the stability of the magnetic sensors, and the geometrical stability of the magnetic-field coils and sensor array.
- The proposed invention's instrument is designed so that fluctuations of the current in the applied-field coil have only a negligible effect on the magnetic measurements. The invention uses a detector assembly whose applied field coil is geometrically configured such that almost no magnetic field occurs at a location where the magnetic sensor is positioned in relation to the applied field coils. If the magnetic sensor were exposed to the full amplitude of the applied field, then the current in the field coils would have to be stable to at least one part in 107 to resolve the weak magnetic signals observed in magnetic susceptibility measurements. However, if the detector's sensor observes only 10−4 of the field applied to the sample, the coil current can vary by as much as one part in 104, and the corresponding variations in the magnetic measurements are then only 10−8 of the field applied to the sample.
- FIGS. 1, 2 and3 show the applied field coil and magnetic sensor design and system for determining FFB object(s) as disclosed in parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393 of Avrin et al., entitled “Ferromagnetic Foreign Body Screening Method and Apparatus”, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,842,986. The
detector assembly 10 makes use of the technical principles discussed above. Thisdetector assembly 10 provides magnetic susceptibility measurement information available for the detection of retained ferromagnetic foreign body (FFB) object(s), that is metallic objects inside human tissue, as a way of screening patients prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or other medical procedures. Thisdetector assembly 10 can also be used in the invention herein. - The invention herein teaches of another detector assembly with design improvements that improve the noise of the magnetic susceptibility measurements and optimize response from the item of interest with respect to an interfering signal from overlying tissue or an adjacent organ. System components also include equipment for using magnetic measurement signals from the sensors to detect and locate ferromagnetic objects, and for distinguishing the signals of the target objects from other interfering magnetic fields.
- Below, the detector assembly in the parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393 is first described, followed by a description of the instant invention's exemplary instrument design for improved detection characteristics.
- FIGS. 1, 2, and3 collectively show a
detector assembly 10 which is intended to be placed near the body region to be screened. The applied field coils 18, when supplied with a current from thecurrent signal generator 22, generate a time-varying applied magnetic field to the body. The magnetic material in the body region responds, providing a small magnetic field that is detected by a sensor 24 (shown in FIG. 3) or array of sensors (not shown) positioned adjacent to the body region. Together, the applied field coils 18 and the sensor(s) 24 allow measurement of anomalies in the magnetic susceptibility of the body region being screened. In particular, the geometry of the applied field coils and the placement of the magnetic sensor(s) is such that the interfering applied field experienced by the magnetic sensor(s) 24 is as small as possible. As discussed earlier, this arrangement reduces the interfering signal produced by the varying magnetic field. The detector assembly consisting of the sensor(s) 24 and applied field coils 18 can be stationary, or can be movable to generate a magnetic susceptibility anomaly map over the body part being screened. The intensity and the time dependence or frequency dependence of the magnetic susceptibility anomaly can be interpreted rapidly by a signal processor to reveal the location and size of ferrous metallic objects retained within the screened body region. - The applied magnetic field may be several orders of magnitude larger than the signal of the FFB object(s). One arrangement of the
device 10 is to configure the applied field coils 18 so that the applied field is nearly canceled out in regions within thedevice 10, within which themagnetic sensors 24 are positioned and attached (FIG. 1). The appliedfield coil element 12 is laid out on the surfaces of two printed circuit (PC)boards PC boards PC boards PC board current paths 19 traveling in one direction in the center region of the board, withreturn paths 20 along the outer edges of the board, approximating two spiral patterns. The spiral patterns on one PC board are connected in series so that, when a current is passed through them, the resulting electric current distribution approximates a uniform sheet of current flowing in the y-direction as shown, over a substantial region near the center of the board. This region of the board is roughly defined by the area between the markers A-A and between the markers B-B. This current distribution produces a magnetic field that is nearly uniform over a region of space near the center of the board. The twoboards PC boards PC boards current paths 19 on one board are oriented parallel to the correspondingcurrent paths 19 on the other board. The current paths on the twoboards power supply 22, so that the current flows in the same direction on both boards, the y-direction in the arrangement shown. Thesource 22 can be equipped with a control device, as is known in the art, to cause the field to be pulsed, to vary in frequency, or to have a waveform with multiple frequencies. These time variations in the applied field can assist in distinguishing the responsive field from the environmental background fields, by synchronization of the sensing circuitry with the power supply. In a region surrounding the centers of the twoPC boards return paths 20 along the outer edges of thePC boards PC boards PC boards - FIG. 2 shows another view of the sandwiched field coil with a
magnetic sensor 24, preferably an MR sensor, placed in a low-field region betweenparallel circuit boards magnetic sensor 24 is sandwiched between two printedcircuit boards circuit board - FIG. 3 shows where the
sensor 24 is placed with respect to the appliedfield coil 18. The top coil has been removed to show sensor positioning. The arrow on thesensor 24 indicates the direction of its field sensitivity. Two methods are used to null out the field at the sensor location. First, a set of shims is used to adjust the position of the sensor between the two current sheets. This adjustment is needed because the applied field, given the finite size of thecircuit boards - In the
detector 10, geometrical variation of the applied field coils 18 and sensor(s) 24 is an important effect that this field-nulling system cannot remove. Temperature variations may cause subtle distortions in the geometry of the applied-field coils, or in the position of the magnetic sensor within the coils. Such distortions can perturb the balance of the field-canceling system, producing noise in the magnetic measurements. - The detector assembly provided herein minimizes effects caused by geometric distortion of the detector assembly, by modulating a distance between an area of interest and the instrument's detector assembly at up to several hertz, with displacement of the detector assembly up to six inches. The change in the magnetic signal at the modulation frequency is then measured. The invention departs from methods used with conventional SQUID devices by moving the
detector assembly 10 while the patient remains stationary. The instrument herein performs this function by mounting the detector assembly, which includes the applied field coils 18 and thesensor 24, on a nonmagnetic platform, and oscillating thedetector assembly 10 back and forth at several hertz using a motor. The motor can drive a mechanism for producing oscillatory movement of the detector assembly. This mechanism can be a cam driven, spring biased plate, where the cam member is belt driven by the motor, or a reciprocating rod where the detector assembly is mounted to a plate that oscillates by a linear drive member. Other reciprocating motion-type devices can be used as well to provide proper oscillatory motion with displacements of up to and around six inches, at motion frequencies up to and around 10 hertz. The detector assembly is mounted in a housing that provides support and positioning for the instrument. The housing and the components of the oscillatory motion mechanism are made of nonmetallic, nonmagnetic materials. Signal analysis described below extracts information from the detector assembly's 10 signal output from themagnetic sensor 24. - The ability to move the
detector assembly 10 instead of the patient is significant since the overall instrument is much simpler and less expensive. Moving a SQUID type magnetic sensor is not permitted since any magnetic gradients in the environment produce signals that interfere with the direct current magnetic response measurements. These ambient magnetic gradients do not present problems in the proposed invention's measurements. For example, the room temperature sensor(s) 24 have much more tolerance compared to SQUIDs when being moved in the presence of the earth's magnetic field. - Another feature of the invention is the ability to measure weak variations of the magnetic field response of the item of interest. It is sometimes desirable that the applied field penetrate more deeply into the body than is possible with the applied field coils18 in
detector 10. Also it is desirable to maximize the magnetic response from the item of interest with respect to the magnetic response from the overlying tissue and from any nearby organ. The applied field coil of the present application optimizes the response of the item of interest with respect to the sensor noise and with respect to the interfering signals from the overlying tissues and adjacent organs. - FIGS. 4 and 5 show the instant invention's design of an applied
field coil arrangement 35 whose geometrical design optimizes a response signal from the item of interest. Such a design adjusts the diameter of the applied field coils 26, 30 to control how deeply the applied magnetic field penetrates into the patient's body. A circular coil of radius “a” produces a field that falls off rather slowly out to distances comparable to “a,” and then decays as 1/r3 at longer distances. The two main field coils 26, 30 allow for measurement of the response of the item of interest, and evaluation of the response due to the susceptibility of the overlying tissues. - FIG. 5 shows the detector assembly's applied field coil arrangement. The detector assembly comprises three concentric circular spiral coils, but can include additional coils for designs that encompass the present invention's design. FIG. 5 shows the
first coil 26, with a relatively large diameter, which produces a field that reaches deep into a patient's body. The resulting magnetic susceptibility response contains contributions from both the item of interest and the overlying tissues. The diameter of thiscoil 26 maximizes the contribution of the item of interest and minimizes the overlying tissue contribution, so that variations in the susceptibility of the overlying tissue have as little effect as possible on the measurement of susceptibility of the item of interest. A mean diameter in a range of around 15-50 cm for theouter coil 26 is preferred. - FIG. 5 shows the small, innermost applied
field coil 28. During magnetic susceptibility measurements, this smaller coil is connected in series with theouter coil 26, in such a way that the current in theinner coil 28 is in the opposite direction from that in theouter coil 26. The diameters and numbers of turns in the two coils are adjusted so that the magnetic field due to the inner coil cancels the magnetic field due to the outer coil, in a region near the common center of the two coils, producing a small zone of substantially zero magnetic field. The magnetic sensor (24 in FIG. 4) is then placed in this zone of substantially zero magnetic field so that, as discussed above, fluctuations of the current in the applied field coils produce very little noise in the magnetic susceptibility measurements. The inner coil can have a mean diameter of about 1.5 to 8 cm. Since the magnetic field due to the small,innermost coil 28 dies away rapidly with distance, the magnetic field in the patient's body tissues is produced almost entirely by theouter coil 26. - FIG. 5 also shows the intermediate-
diameter coil 30 which can optionally be used, in place of theouter coil 26, to produce a magnetic field that reaches a relatively short distance into the patient's body. Magnetic susceptibility measurements made using this intermediate-diameter coil 30 will produce a magnetic susceptibility response whose main contribution comes from the patient's overlying tissues. The results of these measurements can be used to evaluate the magnetic susceptibility of the overlying tissues. This information can then be combined with the results of magnetic susceptibility measurements made using theouter coil 26, to evaluate the magnetic susceptibility of the item of interest, while removing errors due to the susceptibility of the overlying tissues. In magnetic susceptibility measurements made using the intermediate-diameter coil 30, the intermediate-diameter coil 30 is connected in series with the small,inner coil 28, in such a way that the magnetic field is canceled at the location of the magnetic sensor. - FIG. 5 shows exemplary dimensions of the three concentric coils that make up the applied field coil. Each coil consists of one or more concentric loops. The number of loops in each coil is proportional to its diameter. This ensures that if any two coils are energized with equal but opposite current, the field at the center will be zero. This equal and opposite current is realized by making the appropriate electrical interconnections between the inner and outer coils and applying current to the two coils using the same current source. In this example, the
outermost coil 26 has exactly four times the diameter of theinnermost coil 28, and has exactly four times as many turns. When magnetic susceptibility measurements are made using theouter coil 26, this coil is connected in series with theinnermost coil 28, but with opposite polarity, as shown in FIG. 4 by the two oppositely directed arrows. The magnetic field cancels out almost completely at the location of thedetector 10. The intermediate-diameter coil 30 has exactly twice the diameter, and twice the number of turns, as theinnermost coil 28. When measurements are made using thisintermediate coil 30, it is connected in series with the innermost coil to cancel out the magnetic field at thesensor 24 location. - The applied field coils26, 28, 30 can comprise traces on a printed circuit board. To generate the maximum field for a given current magnitude, similar coil sets can be positioned on both sides of the
circuit board 14, thus doubling the number of turns of each coil. In addition, stacks ofcircuit boards 14 can provide sufficiently strong field to the examined tissue sample, without the excessive ohmic heating (and the resulting undesirable thermal drifts) that can occur if too large a current is passed through a single circuit board. Alternatively, the printed circuit board can be replaced by wires, metal rods, or other electrical conductors supported by a rigid support structure that maintains the appropriate spatial relationship of the current carrying elements. - FIG. 5 shows a
PC board 14 which has a number of circular holes for bolting individual boards together rigidly to a solid G-10 fiberglass plate for structural stability. The larger noncircular holes facilitate electrical connections between thecoils sensor 24 in a low field region close to the sample. Themagnetic sensor 24 is placed in the appropriate orientation so as to sense magnetic fields normal to the plane of the applied field coils (as indicated by FIG. 4). In this zero-field region, the sensor is practically immune to the applied field directly and only senses the body's response to the applied field. - In an example of the design shown in FIG. 5, the
outer coil 26 consists of 16 equally spaced concentric loops with a mean diameter of 20 cm. Theinner coil 28 consists of 4 equally spaced concentric loops with a mean diameter of 5 cm. Themiddle coil 30 has 8 equally spaced concentric loops with a mean diameter of 10 cm. The applied field coil design ensures that when any pair of coils is energized with equal and opposite current the applied field at the center of the coils is zero. - Measurements of liver iron concentration involving the cryogenically cooled SQUID systems usually use a “water bag” to help discriminate the signal from the liver from that of the overlying abdominal tissue. The magnetic susceptibility of the liver (1.6× 10−6 SI units) is only slightly different from that of the abdominal tissue (value close to that of water; −9×10−6 SI units). The susceptibility contrast between the liver and the abdominal tissue is typically smaller than that between the air and the abdominal tissue. Hence the liver will appear as an anomaly in the body which is itself an anomaly in the surrounding air space. In biomagnetic susceptibility measurements, the susceptibility contrast between the abdominal tissue and the air produces a magnetic response which interferes with the measurement of the response due to the liver iron itself. In order to minimize this interfering signal, a bag filled with water is positioned to fill the space between the sensor and the surface of the patient's abdomen. The water, whose magnetic susceptibility is nearly the same as that of the abdominal tissue, essentially removes any magnetic susceptibility contrast at the outer surface of the abdomen, as if the entire magnetic measurement were being made in an environment filled with material of a constant magnetic susceptibility approximately equal to that of the abdominal tissue. The magnetic susceptibility measurement then responds primarily to the magnetic susceptibility contrast between the liver and the surrounding abdominal tissue. This magnetic susceptibility anomaly is due almost entirely to the iron in the liver.
- The room temperature instrument of the present invention can also be used with a water bag, if necessary, to remove the interfering signal from the overlying tissue. Alternatively, the contribution of the overlying tissue to the signal can be measured and subtracted out by using the
middle coil 30. Since the middle coil is smaller than the outer coil, the magnetic field generated by the middle coil will not penetrate as deeply into the body as will the field generated by the outer coil. Therefore, with the proper choice of coil dimensions, the response signal due to the applied field of the middle coil will be mostly due to the overlying tissue closer to the surface of the body, whereas the response signal due to the applied field of the outer coil will be due to both the item of interest and the overlying tissue. Consequently, two successive magnetic susceptibility measurements, using the outer coil and the middle coil, provide two independent pieces of information, which can be used to solve mathematically for two unknown quantities, the magnetic susceptibilities of the item of interest and the overlying tissue. This method determines the magnetic susceptibility of the item of interest, while removing errors due to variability in the magnetic susceptibility of the overlying tissue. - FIG. 6 shows the
detector assembly 10 and the interface assembly components attached thereto. Preferably, an MR sensor can be used along with a feedback coil mounted on the sensor, which allows the sensor to be “locked” at its optimum operating point by applying a compensating field to cancel changes in the ambient field. This technique maintains constant sensitivity of the sensor. The detection assembly's MR sensor is part of a Wheatstone bridge wherein transduced resistance measurements are related to transduced sensed magnetic measurements. An electronic feedback circuit amplifies the voltage of the Wheatstone bridge, and supplies a feedback current to a small feedback coil wrapped around the MR sensor, compensating for changes in the ambient magnetic field and maintaining the sensing element at a constant magnetic field. In this “field-lock” scheme, the ambient magnetic field is actually measured by monitoring the current applied to the compensating coil by the feedback loop. This approach eliminates potential errors due to either the sensor's nonlinear response function or its temperature-dependent responsivity. - A phase sensitive detector measures the component of the output of the magnetic sensor that oscillates in phase with an AC applied field. A Fourier transform analyzer calculates the component of the output of the phase-sensitive detector that oscillates in phase with the modulation of the sample-sensor distance. This provides a way to distinguish the signal of interest from the low-frequency noise caused by thermal drifts. The function of the phase sensitive detector can be performed by a lockin amplifier, and the function of the Fourier transform analyzer can be performed by a spectrum analyzer. Preferably, either or both functions can be performed on a computer.
- A signal source is used to generate an AC signal between 25 Hz and 2 kHz. This signal, amplified by an audio frequency amplifier, provides a constant amplitude oscillating current through the applied field coils on the detection head assembly.
- FIG. 7 shows the computer analyzer and control functions which process response signals from the
sensor 24, and output information regarding the magnetic susceptibility of materials in the patient's body. In FIG. 7, the computer integrates and controls all instrument functions, including the modulation of the sensor-sample distance, the generation of the AC field coil current, and the processing of the magnetic sensor outputs to determine the magnetic susceptibility of the sample. The computer can be a personal computer with the required functioning signal cards and processors included. The motor indicated in FIG. 7 is preferably used to move the detector assembly toward and away from a patient's area of interest. The fast Fourier transformer is used to resolve the variation of the received signal in synchrony with this motion. The waveform synthesizer is used to generate an AC signal, which is then amplified by the power amplifier to generate an AC current for the applied field coil. The waveform synthesizer function can be incorporated by the computer. The AC signal can have frequencies up to around 2,000 hertz, preferably avoiding harmonics of the power line frequency. The AC signal can be synchronized with the power lines, at a frequency commensurate with the power line frequency, in order to minimize noise due to the power lines. - Actual output from the computer can be a data storage device, a video display of useful medical information, or a connection to a computer system network.
- The magnetic sensor control electronics, a motor/crank rod arrangement for oscillatory movement of the instrument's distal end detector assembly, a waveform synthesizer and power amplifier, a lock-in amplifier, and a spectrum analyzer or equivalent computer device for signal analysis can be incorporated in a single medical instrument unit as shown in exemplary form in FIG. 8 as
unit 100. FIG. 8 shows theprobe instrument 100 with anelongated positioning arm 130 wherein thedetector assembly 10 is mounted at the distal end of thearm 110 which has amotor 125 within, with the requiredoscillatory drive members 120 that move thedetector assembly 10 toward and away from a patient. - FIG. 8 shows the patient on a non-metallic table. The
detector assembly 10 is positioned over a tissue area of interest. Thedetector assembly 10 has the sensor mounted to a reciprocatingmember 120 located within thearm 110 that moves thedetector assembly 10 translationally toward and away from the distal end of the head member, preferably between one and six inches. The reciprocating action typically is in a range between around 0.5 to 10 hertz such that modulation of thedetector assembly 10 filters out signal noise caused by temperature drifts in the applied field coils. - The reciprocating
member 120 within the arm of theprobe instrument 100 allows modulation of the distance between the examined tissue and thedetector assembly 10, as explained above. The reciprocating member is made of nonmagnetic materials. In use, a water bag (not shown) may be placed between thedetector assembly 10 and the patient. - Analysis is performed on the signal detected by the sensor to provide output information corresponding to the magnetic susceptibility of items detected in the area of interest.
- Variations to the invention include the following:
- a) Modulation of the distance between the sample and the detector assembly can improve the signal-to-noise ratio of magnetic susceptibility measurements on any type of sample (i.e., including samples other than the human body).
- b) The methods and apparatus described in the parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393 can be modified by the presently described modulation of the sample-sensor distance to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of magnetic susceptibility measurements for the detection of ferromagnetic foreign bodies (FFBs) within the eye, brain, or body of a patient.
- The instant invention describes an applied-field coil configuration, as shown in FIG. 5, consisting of two concentric circular loops carrying currents in opposite directions, in which the diameters and number of turns in the two loops are adjusted so as to cancel the magnetic field at the common center of the two coils. This applied-field coil design may be used in other types of magnetic susceptibility measurements.
- In particular, the concentric-loop coil design (FIG. 5) may be used with the apparatus and methods described in the parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393, for the detection of ferromagnetic foreign bodies (FFBs) within the eye, brain, or body of a patient. The use of the concentric-loop coil would increase the magnetic susceptibility response of FFBs located deep below the surface of the patient's face, head, or body.
- For the detection of FFBs in the eye, brain, or body, the parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393 teaches the measurement of appropriate magnetic-field gradients, or alternatively, the mapping of the magnetic-susceptibility response as a function of position, in order to compute the location of the FFB within the host. This spatial mapping or magnetic gradient measurement may be achieved either by using an array of more than one magnetic sensor, or by using a single magnetic sensor and moving the detection unit (applied field coils and magnetic sensor). Either approach may be used in conjunction with the concentric-loop applied field coil design shown in FIG. 5.
- The applied-field coil design of FIG. 5 may be modified to accommodate an array of more than one magnetic sensor. The parent U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/670,393 discloses that to reduce the noise produced by variations in the applied magnetic field, it is desirable to ensure that the applied magnetic field is as small as possible at the location of each magnetic sensor. The concentric-loop coil described above cancels the magnetic field at a single point, the common center of the at least two concentric loops. If the radius of the inner coil is decreased slightly in relation to that of the outer coil, or if the current in the inner coil is increased slightly in relation to that of the outer coil, the magnetic field will be canceled not at a single point, but along a circle concentric with the two loops. Multiple sensors may then be placed at different locations on this circle, and the applied magnetic field will be canceled out at the location of each sensor. This arrangement makes possible the simultaneous measurement of the magnetic field response at multiple points in space.
- As an alternative, the noise produced by applied-field variations may be minimized by measuring differences in magnetic field between two or more magnetic sensors, as long as the magnetic sensors are positioned within the applied-field coils in such a way that the applied magnetic field is the same for each of the sensors. Such a result may be achieved with an applied field coil consisting of a circular loop, or multiple concentric loops, by placing each of the magnetic sensors at the same distance from the center of the loop(s).
- Moreover, the applied field coils of the concentric coil design shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 can have differing dimensions and configurations to measure at other tissue regions in the body. Also, switchable configurations of the applied field coil connections can be controlled by the instrument's computer allowing for adaptive control of the instrument for multiple examining capabilities.
- While the particular invention as herein shown and disclosed in detail is fully capable of obtaining the objects and providing the advantages hereinbefore stated, it is to be understood that this disclosure is merely illustrative of the presently preferred embodiments of the invention and that no limitations are intended other than as described in the appended claims.
Claims (45)
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/741,774 US6418335B2 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 2000-12-15 | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection using magnetics |
CA 2337429 CA2337429A1 (en) | 2000-12-15 | 2001-02-16 | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection using magnetics |
US09/960,878 US6496713B2 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 2001-09-21 | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection with background canceling |
US10/017,913 US20020115925A1 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 2001-10-29 | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection utilizing eye movement |
US10/025,191 US6965792B2 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 2001-12-18 | Susceptometers for foreign body detection |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/670,393 US5842986A (en) | 1995-08-16 | 1996-06-25 | Ferromagnetic foreign body screening method and apparatus |
US09/135,890 US6208884B1 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 1998-08-18 | Noninvasive room temperature instrument to measure magnetic susceptibility variations in body tissue |
US09/741,774 US6418335B2 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 2000-12-15 | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection using magnetics |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/135,890 Continuation US6208884B1 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 1998-08-18 | Noninvasive room temperature instrument to measure magnetic susceptibility variations in body tissue |
Related Child Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/818,700 Continuation-In-Part US7047059B2 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 2001-03-27 | Simplified water-bag technique for magnetic susceptibility measurements on the human body and other specimens |
US09/960,878 Continuation-In-Part US6496713B2 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 2001-09-21 | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection with background canceling |
US10/017,913 Continuation-In-Part US20020115925A1 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 2001-10-29 | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection utilizing eye movement |
US10/025,191 Continuation-In-Part US6965792B2 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 2001-12-18 | Susceptometers for foreign body detection |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20010012915A1 true US20010012915A1 (en) | 2001-08-09 |
US6418335B2 US6418335B2 (en) | 2002-07-09 |
Family
ID=24690230
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/670,393 Expired - Fee Related US5842986A (en) | 1995-08-16 | 1996-06-25 | Ferromagnetic foreign body screening method and apparatus |
US09/135,890 Expired - Lifetime US6208884B1 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 1998-08-18 | Noninvasive room temperature instrument to measure magnetic susceptibility variations in body tissue |
US09/741,774 Expired - Fee Related US6418335B2 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 2000-12-15 | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection using magnetics |
Family Applications Before (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/670,393 Expired - Fee Related US5842986A (en) | 1995-08-16 | 1996-06-25 | Ferromagnetic foreign body screening method and apparatus |
US09/135,890 Expired - Lifetime US6208884B1 (en) | 1996-06-25 | 1998-08-18 | Noninvasive room temperature instrument to measure magnetic susceptibility variations in body tissue |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US5842986A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0917441A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2001504714A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2258268A1 (en) |
IL (1) | IL127659A0 (en) |
WO (1) | WO1997049334A1 (en) |
Cited By (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003073934A1 (en) * | 2002-03-06 | 2003-09-12 | Imperial College Innovations Limited | Detection system |
WO2004091392A1 (en) | 2003-04-15 | 2004-10-28 | Philips Intellectual Property & Standards Gmbh | Method and arrangement for influencing magnetic particles and detecting interfering material |
WO2004091408A3 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2005-01-27 | Philips Intellectual Property | Elastography device and method for determining and imaging of mechanical and elastic parameters of an examination object |
US20100052668A1 (en) * | 2006-12-20 | 2010-03-04 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Arrangement and method for influencing and/or detecting magnetic particles in a region of action |
US20100123456A1 (en) * | 2007-01-24 | 2010-05-20 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method for influencing and/or detecting magnetic particles in a region of action, magnetic particles and the use of magnetic particles |
US20110137589A1 (en) * | 2009-12-02 | 2011-06-09 | Nanalysis Corp. | Method and apparatus for producing homogeneous magnetic fields |
US20110133730A1 (en) * | 2009-12-04 | 2011-06-09 | Simon Richard Hattersley | Magnetic Probe Apparatus |
US20110137154A1 (en) * | 2009-12-04 | 2011-06-09 | Simon Richard Hattersley | Magnetic probe apparatus |
US20150381096A1 (en) * | 2014-06-26 | 2015-12-31 | Braun Gmbh | Personal hygiene device with resonant motor |
US9234877B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-01-12 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic detector |
US9239314B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-01-19 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic detector |
US9808539B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2017-11-07 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Hypoosmotic solutions for lymph node detection |
WO2018127844A1 (en) * | 2017-01-05 | 2018-07-12 | St. Jude Medical International Holding S.À R.L. | Localized magnetic field generator |
US10595957B2 (en) | 2015-06-04 | 2020-03-24 | Endomagnetics Ltd | Marker materials and forms for magnetic marker localization (MML) |
US11881799B2 (en) | 2021-09-01 | 2024-01-23 | Braun Gmbh | Motor unit and personal care device comprising a motor unit |
Families Citing this family (157)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5842986A (en) * | 1995-08-16 | 1998-12-01 | Proton Sciences Corp. | Ferromagnetic foreign body screening method and apparatus |
US7047059B2 (en) | 1998-08-18 | 2006-05-16 | Quantum Magnetics, Inc | Simplified water-bag technique for magnetic susceptibility measurements on the human body and other specimens |
GB9813889D0 (en) * | 1998-06-27 | 1998-08-26 | Secr Defence | Apparatus for detecting metals |
ES2235989T3 (en) * | 1999-11-22 | 2005-07-16 | Mallinckrodt Inc. | OXIMETER TYPE SENSOR WITH EXTENDED METAL BAND. |
US6411849B1 (en) * | 1999-12-08 | 2002-06-25 | Pacesetter, Inc. | Implatable electrical device incorporating a magnetoresistive-based motion sensor |
US6992482B2 (en) * | 2000-11-08 | 2006-01-31 | Jentek Sensors, Inc. | Magnetic field sensor having a switchable drive current spatial distribution |
GB0106355D0 (en) * | 2001-03-14 | 2001-05-02 | Hall Effect Technologies Ltd | Magnetic scanning apparatus |
JP4045769B2 (en) * | 2001-10-10 | 2008-02-13 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Magnetic field generator and MRI apparatus using the same |
GB0124887D0 (en) * | 2001-10-17 | 2001-12-05 | Qinetiq Ltd | Metal detection apparatus |
GB0201465D0 (en) * | 2002-01-23 | 2002-03-13 | Roke Manor Research | Pre-mri metal detector |
US7489128B2 (en) * | 2002-03-11 | 2009-02-10 | Kopp Keith A | MRI protector |
US8148989B2 (en) * | 2002-03-11 | 2012-04-03 | Keith Kopp | Ferromagnetic detection enhancer compatible with magnetic resonance |
US6856823B2 (en) * | 2002-06-18 | 2005-02-15 | Ascension Technology Corporation | Spiral magnetic transmitter for position measurement system |
US6812700B2 (en) * | 2002-08-05 | 2004-11-02 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Correction of local field inhomogeneity in magnetic resonance imaging apparatus |
US20040102692A1 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2004-05-27 | General Electric Company | Magnetic resonance imaging system and methods for the detection of brain iron deposits |
US7239134B2 (en) | 2003-01-17 | 2007-07-03 | Mednovus, Inc. | Screening method and apparatus |
US7315166B2 (en) * | 2003-01-17 | 2008-01-01 | Mednovus, Inc. | Magnetic resonance imaging screening method and apparatus |
US6956369B2 (en) * | 2003-01-17 | 2005-10-18 | Mednovus, Inc. | Screening method and apparatus |
US7154266B2 (en) * | 2003-01-17 | 2006-12-26 | Quantum Magnetics, Inc. | Screening method and apparatus |
US8331907B2 (en) * | 2003-02-18 | 2012-12-11 | Roamware, Inc. | Integrating GSM and WiFi service in mobile communication devices |
US20040189292A1 (en) * | 2003-03-25 | 2004-09-30 | Kautz David R. | Mechanism for and method of biasing magnetic sensor |
US20050244337A1 (en) * | 2003-04-08 | 2005-11-03 | Xingwu Wang | Medical device with a marker |
US20050155779A1 (en) * | 2003-04-08 | 2005-07-21 | Xingwu Wang | Coated substrate assembly |
US20050261763A1 (en) * | 2003-04-08 | 2005-11-24 | Xingwu Wang | Medical device |
US20050278020A1 (en) * | 2003-04-08 | 2005-12-15 | Xingwu Wang | Medical device |
US20050240100A1 (en) * | 2003-04-08 | 2005-10-27 | Xingwu Wang | MRI imageable medical device |
US20050119725A1 (en) * | 2003-04-08 | 2005-06-02 | Xingwu Wang | Energetically controlled delivery of biologically active material from an implanted medical device |
US20050020904A1 (en) * | 2003-07-10 | 2005-01-27 | Cline Harvey Ellis | System and method for the detection of brain iron using magnetic resonance imaging |
US6731968B2 (en) * | 2003-07-29 | 2004-05-04 | 4-D Neuroimaging | Magnetically shielded room with internal active magnetic field cancellation, and its use |
DE10351928A1 (en) * | 2003-11-07 | 2005-06-16 | MAX-PLANCK-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. | Eyeball monitoring device for vision inspection, has eyeball coil device with eyeball coil movable relative to eyeball, and visual-field coil device of size smaller than head of subject, that are provided in transmitter/receiver |
FI115736B (en) * | 2004-01-19 | 2005-06-30 | Elekta Neuromag Oy | A method for separating multi-channel signals from AC and DC sources |
JP3736640B2 (en) * | 2004-01-19 | 2006-01-18 | 株式会社エイティング | Personal monitoring system |
US7013245B2 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2006-03-14 | Battelle Energy Alliance, Llc | Method and apparatus for detecting concealed weapons |
EP1574850A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2005-09-14 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Apparatus for non-destructive detection of deep defects in electric conducting materials |
DE102004020680A1 (en) * | 2004-03-25 | 2005-10-13 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | connecting element |
US7844344B2 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2010-11-30 | Medtronic, Inc. | MRI-safe implantable lead |
US7877150B2 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2011-01-25 | Medtronic, Inc. | Lead electrode for use in an MRI-safe implantable medical device |
US20060022670A1 (en) * | 2004-07-31 | 2006-02-02 | Mednovus, Inc. | Magnetic resonance screening portal with combination sensing |
US20060255938A1 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2006-11-16 | Van Den Brink Johan S | Saftey provisions for surgical tools and mri |
US20060038558A1 (en) * | 2004-08-20 | 2006-02-23 | The Boeing Company | Eddy current inspection device |
US20060118758A1 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2006-06-08 | Xingwu Wang | Material to enable magnetic resonance imaging of implantable medical devices |
US7239223B2 (en) * | 2004-10-18 | 2007-07-03 | Mednovus, Inc. | Enhancement magnetizer for magnetic resonance imaging screening |
WO2006083377A2 (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2006-08-10 | R. Brooks Associates, Inc. | Detection system and method thereof |
US20080136408A1 (en) * | 2004-12-20 | 2008-06-12 | Displaycom Track Technologies Gmbh | Assembly and Method For Locating Magnetic Objects or Objects That Can Be Magnetized |
US20060139025A1 (en) * | 2004-12-24 | 2006-06-29 | Mednovus, Inc. | Saturation-resistant magnetoresistive sensor for ferromagnetic screening |
US20060145691A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2006-07-06 | Mednovus, Inc. | Ferromagnetic detection pillar and variable aperture portal |
US7295107B2 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2007-11-13 | Mednovus, Inc. | Ferromagnetic detection pillar |
US7408461B2 (en) * | 2005-01-11 | 2008-08-05 | Controlled Capture Systems, Llc | Metal detection system and method |
US20060241396A1 (en) * | 2005-02-10 | 2006-10-26 | Fabian Carl E | Multi-modal detection of surgical sponges and implements |
US7318001B2 (en) * | 2005-05-03 | 2008-01-08 | Cnv Technologies, Llc | Method and apparatus for collecting data for detecting and locating disturbances |
US8784336B2 (en) | 2005-08-24 | 2014-07-22 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Stylet apparatuses and methods of manufacture |
US20070057786A1 (en) * | 2005-09-13 | 2007-03-15 | Mednovus, Inc. | Ferromagnetic threat warning system |
US7304474B2 (en) * | 2005-11-29 | 2007-12-04 | The Boeing Company | Eddy current inspection device with arrays of magnetoresistive sensors |
US7525309B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2009-04-28 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Magnetic sensor array |
US8862200B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2014-10-14 | DePuy Synthes Products, LLC | Method for determining a position of a magnetic source |
US7796028B1 (en) * | 2006-08-01 | 2010-09-14 | Battelle Energy Alliance, Llc | Circuitry, systems and methods for detecting magnetic fields |
EP2086392A2 (en) * | 2006-08-15 | 2009-08-12 | Dinesh Verma | Ophthalmic diagnostic apparatus |
GB2441346B (en) | 2006-09-01 | 2011-04-13 | Qinetiq Ltd | Metal object detecting apparatus |
US20080281187A1 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2008-11-13 | Mednovus, Inc. | Ferromagnetic threat detection method apparatus |
US8388546B2 (en) | 2006-10-23 | 2013-03-05 | Bard Access Systems, Inc. | Method of locating the tip of a central venous catheter |
US7794407B2 (en) | 2006-10-23 | 2010-09-14 | Bard Access Systems, Inc. | Method of locating the tip of a central venous catheter |
US8068648B2 (en) | 2006-12-21 | 2011-11-29 | Depuy Products, Inc. | Method and system for registering a bone of a patient with a computer assisted orthopaedic surgery system |
US9044593B2 (en) | 2007-02-14 | 2015-06-02 | Medtronic, Inc. | Discontinuous conductive filler polymer-matrix composites for electromagnetic shielding |
US8483842B2 (en) | 2007-04-25 | 2013-07-09 | Medtronic, Inc. | Lead or lead extension having a conductive body and conductive body contact |
US7952348B2 (en) * | 2007-11-05 | 2011-05-31 | General Electric Company | Flexible eddy current array probe and methods of assembling the same |
US10449330B2 (en) | 2007-11-26 | 2019-10-22 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Magnetic element-equipped needle assemblies |
US8781555B2 (en) | 2007-11-26 | 2014-07-15 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | System for placement of a catheter including a signal-generating stylet |
US10524691B2 (en) | 2007-11-26 | 2020-01-07 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Needle assembly including an aligned magnetic element |
US8849382B2 (en) | 2007-11-26 | 2014-09-30 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Apparatus and display methods relating to intravascular placement of a catheter |
US10751509B2 (en) | 2007-11-26 | 2020-08-25 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Iconic representations for guidance of an indwelling medical device |
US9521961B2 (en) | 2007-11-26 | 2016-12-20 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Systems and methods for guiding a medical instrument |
ES2832713T3 (en) | 2007-11-26 | 2021-06-11 | Bard Inc C R | Integrated system for intravascular catheter placement |
US9649048B2 (en) | 2007-11-26 | 2017-05-16 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Systems and methods for breaching a sterile field for intravascular placement of a catheter |
US8478382B2 (en) | 2008-02-11 | 2013-07-02 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Systems and methods for positioning a catheter |
US9037263B2 (en) | 2008-03-12 | 2015-05-19 | Medtronic, Inc. | System and method for implantable medical device lead shielding |
US9575140B2 (en) | 2008-04-03 | 2017-02-21 | Covidien Lp | Magnetic interference detection system and method |
US8473032B2 (en) | 2008-06-03 | 2013-06-25 | Superdimension, Ltd. | Feature-based registration method |
US8218847B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2012-07-10 | Superdimension, Ltd. | Hybrid registration method |
EP2313143B1 (en) | 2008-08-22 | 2014-09-24 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | Catheter assembly including ecg sensor and magnetic assemblies |
US8437833B2 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2013-05-07 | Bard Access Systems, Inc. | Percutaneous magnetic gastrostomy |
US20100156638A1 (en) * | 2008-12-22 | 2010-06-24 | Intercept Logic, Inc. | Hand directed contraband sensing apparatus and method |
WO2010093479A2 (en) * | 2009-02-13 | 2010-08-19 | The Ohio State University Research Foundation | Electromagnetic system and method |
US9844347B2 (en) * | 2009-02-13 | 2017-12-19 | The Ohio State University | Electromagnetic system and method |
EP2429630B1 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2017-10-25 | Medtronic, Inc | A shielded implantable medical lead with reduced torsional stiffness |
BRPI1010773B1 (en) | 2009-06-12 | 2021-06-01 | Bard Access Systems, Inc | ADAPTER FOR ENDOVASCULAR ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY CROSS REFERENCE FOR RELATED ORDER |
US9532724B2 (en) | 2009-06-12 | 2017-01-03 | Bard Access Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for catheter navigation using endovascular energy mapping |
EP2464407A4 (en) | 2009-08-10 | 2014-04-02 | Bard Access Systems Inc | Devices and methods for endovascular electrography |
DE102009028956A1 (en) * | 2009-08-28 | 2011-03-03 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | magnetic field sensor |
EP2517622A3 (en) | 2009-09-29 | 2013-04-24 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Stylets for use with apparatus for intravascular placement of a catheter |
WO2011044421A1 (en) | 2009-10-08 | 2011-04-14 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Spacers for use with an ultrasound probe |
US8761860B2 (en) | 2009-10-14 | 2014-06-24 | Nocimed, Llc | MR spectroscopy system and method for diagnosing painful and non-painful intervertebral discs |
US8825131B2 (en) | 2009-10-14 | 2014-09-02 | Nocimed, Llc | MR spectroscopy system and method for diagnosing painful and non-painful intervertebral discs |
US8593141B1 (en) | 2009-11-24 | 2013-11-26 | Hypres, Inc. | Magnetic resonance system and method employing a digital squid |
US20110193558A1 (en) * | 2010-02-02 | 2011-08-11 | Morpho Detection, Inc. | Passenger scanning systems for detecting contraband |
CN102821679B (en) | 2010-02-02 | 2016-04-27 | C·R·巴德股份有限公司 | For the apparatus and method that catheter navigation and end are located |
US20110187535A1 (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2011-08-04 | Crowley Christopher W | Methods, systems, and apparatus for detecting medical devices |
WO2011111457A1 (en) * | 2010-03-11 | 2011-09-15 | アルプス電気株式会社 | Magnetism sensor and magnetic-balance current sensor provided therewith |
US8970217B1 (en) | 2010-04-14 | 2015-03-03 | Hypres, Inc. | System and method for noise reduction in magnetic resonance imaging |
EP2913000B1 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2020-02-12 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | Apparatus for use with needle insertion guidance system |
WO2011150376A1 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2011-12-01 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | Apparatus for use with needle insertion guidance system |
JP2013535301A (en) | 2010-08-09 | 2013-09-12 | シー・アール・バード・インコーポレーテッド | Ultrasonic probe head support / cover structure |
KR101856267B1 (en) | 2010-08-20 | 2018-05-09 | 씨. 알. 바드, 인크. | Reconfirmation of ecg-assisted catheter tip placement |
US8425425B2 (en) | 2010-09-20 | 2013-04-23 | M. Dexter Hagy | Virtual image formation method for an ultrasound device |
US8801693B2 (en) | 2010-10-29 | 2014-08-12 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Bioimpedance-assisted placement of a medical device |
US9280718B2 (en) | 2010-11-24 | 2016-03-08 | Nocimed, Llc | Systems and methods for automated voxelation of regions of interest for magnetic resonance spectroscopy |
PL393899A1 (en) * | 2011-02-09 | 2012-08-13 | Politechnika Poznańska | Method for generation of the high homogeneity magnetic fields within the examined object and the compensation of external dispersed field and the system for its execution |
US8886283B1 (en) | 2011-06-21 | 2014-11-11 | Stc.Unm | 3D and 4D magnetic susceptibility tomography based on complex MR images |
BR112013030348A2 (en) | 2011-07-06 | 2017-08-01 | Bard Inc C R | method for determining a length of a medical component for use with an ultrasound imaging system including a probe; method for determining a needle length by a needle guidance system; and needle length determination system for an ultrasound imaging device including an ultrasound probe |
US8847587B2 (en) * | 2011-07-13 | 2014-09-30 | Biosense Webster (Israel) Ltd. | Field generator patch with distortion cancellation |
USD699359S1 (en) | 2011-08-09 | 2014-02-11 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Ultrasound probe head |
USD724745S1 (en) | 2011-08-09 | 2015-03-17 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Cap for an ultrasound probe |
US9255875B2 (en) | 2011-10-25 | 2016-02-09 | Jentek Sensors, Inc. | Method and apparatus for inspection of corrosion and other defects through insulation |
US9211107B2 (en) | 2011-11-07 | 2015-12-15 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Ruggedized ultrasound hydrogel insert |
US9317920B2 (en) | 2011-11-30 | 2016-04-19 | Rush University Medical Center | System and methods for identification of implanted medical devices and/or detection of retained surgical foreign objects from medical images |
US8971989B2 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2015-03-03 | Covidien Lp | Magnetic field device for mapping and navigation in laparoscopic surgery |
US8965094B2 (en) * | 2012-04-14 | 2015-02-24 | Nocimed, Llc | Magnetic resonance spectroscopy pulse sequence, acquisition, and processing system and method |
WO2013158189A1 (en) | 2012-04-19 | 2013-10-24 | Medtronic, Inc. | Paired medical lead bodies with braided conductive shields having different physical parameter values |
WO2013188833A2 (en) | 2012-06-15 | 2013-12-19 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for detection of a removable cap on an ultrasound probe |
EP2972440A4 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2017-02-22 | Innovaura Corporation | Magnetic field imaging system |
US10145928B2 (en) * | 2013-11-28 | 2018-12-04 | Medimagemetric LLC | Differential approach to quantitative susceptibility mapping without background field removal |
US9993638B2 (en) | 2013-12-14 | 2018-06-12 | Medtronic, Inc. | Devices, systems and methods to reduce coupling of a shield and a conductor within an implantable medical lead |
US9839372B2 (en) | 2014-02-06 | 2017-12-12 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Systems and methods for guidance and placement of an intravascular device |
US10279171B2 (en) | 2014-07-23 | 2019-05-07 | Medtronic, Inc. | Methods of shielding implantable medical leads and implantable medical lead extensions |
WO2016014816A1 (en) | 2014-07-24 | 2016-01-28 | Medtronic, Inc. | Methods of shielding implantable medical leads and implantable medical lead extensions |
DE102014214992B4 (en) * | 2014-07-30 | 2022-11-17 | Siemens Healthcare Gmbh | Method for recording a magnetic resonance data set of at least one foreign body in a patient and magnetic resonance device |
US10973584B2 (en) | 2015-01-19 | 2021-04-13 | Bard Access Systems, Inc. | Device and method for vascular access |
US10349890B2 (en) | 2015-06-26 | 2019-07-16 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Connector interface for ECG-based catheter positioning system |
US9792682B2 (en) * | 2015-09-07 | 2017-10-17 | Rapid Platforms Llc | Training system for detection and classification of artificial objects in X-ray images |
US11249068B2 (en) | 2015-11-09 | 2022-02-15 | Ohio State Innovation Foundation | Non-invasive method for detecting a deadly form of malaria |
CN108430325B (en) * | 2015-12-21 | 2021-08-24 | 皇家飞利浦有限公司 | Method and apparatus for monitoring food and/or beverage intake by a subject |
US11000207B2 (en) | 2016-01-29 | 2021-05-11 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Multiple coil system for tracking a medical device |
EP4289347A3 (en) | 2016-06-19 | 2024-03-06 | Aclarion, Inc. | Magnetic resonance spectroscopy system and method for diagnosing pain or infection associated with propionic acid |
WO2018024773A1 (en) | 2016-08-02 | 2018-02-08 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Detection of metal artifacts in patient eyes prior to mri examinations |
US10638952B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2020-05-05 | Covidien Lp | Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for calibrating an electromagnetic navigation system |
US10751126B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2020-08-25 | Covidien Lp | System and method for generating a map for electromagnetic navigation |
US10517505B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2019-12-31 | Covidien Lp | Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for optimizing an electromagnetic navigation system |
US10792106B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2020-10-06 | Covidien Lp | System for calibrating an electromagnetic navigation system |
US10446931B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2019-10-15 | Covidien Lp | Electromagnetic navigation antenna assembly and electromagnetic navigation system including the same |
US10418705B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2019-09-17 | Covidien Lp | Electromagnetic navigation antenna assembly and electromagnetic navigation system including the same |
US10615500B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2020-04-07 | Covidien Lp | System and method for designing electromagnetic navigation antenna assemblies |
US10722311B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2020-07-28 | Covidien Lp | System and method for identifying a location and/or an orientation of an electromagnetic sensor based on a map |
US11237233B2 (en) * | 2017-03-22 | 2022-02-01 | Vanderbilt University | Self-decoupled RF coil array for MRI |
US10390727B2 (en) * | 2017-04-21 | 2019-08-27 | The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. | Apparatus and method for imaging currents using nanoparticles and low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) |
US10686336B2 (en) | 2017-05-30 | 2020-06-16 | Wireless Advanced Vehicle Electrification, Inc. | Single feed multi-pad wireless charging |
WO2019060298A1 (en) | 2017-09-19 | 2019-03-28 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement |
US11717686B2 (en) | 2017-12-04 | 2023-08-08 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to facilitate learning and performance |
US11478603B2 (en) | 2017-12-31 | 2022-10-25 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | Method and apparatus for neuroenhancement to enhance emotional response |
US11462943B2 (en) | 2018-01-30 | 2022-10-04 | Wireless Advanced Vehicle Electrification, Llc | DC link charging of capacitor in a wireless power transfer pad |
US11364361B2 (en) | 2018-04-20 | 2022-06-21 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | System and method for inducing sleep by transplanting mental states |
CA3112564A1 (en) | 2018-09-14 | 2020-03-19 | Neuroenhancement Lab, LLC | System and method of improving sleep |
US10992079B2 (en) | 2018-10-16 | 2021-04-27 | Bard Access Systems, Inc. | Safety-equipped connection systems and methods thereof for establishing electrical connections |
JP7209176B2 (en) | 2018-10-26 | 2023-01-20 | スミダコーポレーション株式会社 | Magnetic field source detection device and magnetic field source detection method |
NL2022093B1 (en) * | 2018-11-29 | 2020-06-26 | Sirius Medical Systems B V | The present disclosure relates to a magnetic field probe for determining a disposition of an implantable magnetic marker, a detection unit comprising the probe and a method of detecting the disposition of an implantable magnetic marker. |
US11786694B2 (en) | 2019-05-24 | 2023-10-17 | NeuroLight, Inc. | Device, method, and app for facilitating sleep |
US12089902B2 (en) | 2019-07-30 | 2024-09-17 | Coviden Lp | Cone beam and 3D fluoroscope lung navigation |
US11883047B2 (en) * | 2019-09-02 | 2024-01-30 | Moshe Ein-Gal | Electromagnetic shockwave transducer |
CN114325846B (en) * | 2021-11-18 | 2023-06-20 | 电子科技大学 | A Magnetic Anomaly Detection Method Using Temporal Coherence to Suppress Noise |
Family Cites Families (41)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4042876A (en) * | 1976-04-29 | 1977-08-16 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Energy Research And Development Administration | Eddy current gauge for monitoring displacement using printed circuit coil |
US4431005A (en) * | 1981-05-07 | 1984-02-14 | Mccormick Laboratories, Inc. | Method of and apparatus for determining very accurately the position of a device inside biological tissue |
US4709213A (en) * | 1982-07-23 | 1987-11-24 | Garrett Electronics, Inc. | Metal detector having digital signal processing |
US5073858A (en) * | 1984-12-10 | 1991-12-17 | Mills Randell L | Magnetic susceptibility imaging (msi) |
EP0246419B1 (en) * | 1986-05-21 | 1991-04-10 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Squid magnetometer for a weak magnetic-field measuring apparatus |
US4827217A (en) * | 1987-04-10 | 1989-05-02 | Biomagnetic Technologies, Inc. | Low noise cryogenic apparatus for making magnetic measurements |
GB2204133A (en) * | 1987-04-21 | 1988-11-02 | Mccormick Lab Inc | A device for accurately detecting the position of a ferromagnetic material inside biological tissue |
CA1267192A (en) * | 1987-04-24 | 1990-03-27 | John E. Mcfee | Ferrous object locator and classifier |
CN1049287A (en) * | 1989-05-24 | 1991-02-20 | 住友电气工业株式会社 | The treatment conduit |
US5105829A (en) * | 1989-11-16 | 1992-04-21 | Fabian Carl E | Surgical implement detector utilizing capacitive coupling |
US5057095A (en) * | 1989-11-16 | 1991-10-15 | Fabian Carl E | Surgical implement detector utilizing a resonant marker |
US5188126A (en) * | 1989-11-16 | 1993-02-23 | Fabian Carl E | Surgical implement detector utilizing capacitive coupling |
US5190059A (en) * | 1989-11-16 | 1993-03-02 | Fabian Carl E | Surgical implement detector utilizing a powered marker |
US5107862A (en) * | 1991-05-06 | 1992-04-28 | Fabian Carl E | Surgical implement detector utilizing a powered marker |
DE4005079A1 (en) | 1990-02-17 | 1991-08-22 | Dornier Gmbh | Magnetic field gradient tensor measurement - uses five or more planar gradiometers on three or more non-parallel surfaces |
GB9007408D0 (en) * | 1990-04-02 | 1990-05-30 | Nycomed As | Compositions |
US5122744A (en) * | 1990-10-09 | 1992-06-16 | Ibm Corporation | Gradiometer having a magnetometer which cancels background magnetic field from other magnetometers |
US5268165A (en) * | 1990-10-16 | 1993-12-07 | Biomedical Frontiers, Inc. | Polymer-deferoxamine-ferric iron adducts for use in magnetic resonance imaging |
US5408178A (en) * | 1991-05-17 | 1995-04-18 | Vanderbilt University | Apparatus and method for imaging the structure of diamagnetic and paramagnetic objects |
US5233992A (en) * | 1991-07-22 | 1993-08-10 | Edison Biotechnology Center | MRI method for high liver iron measurement using magnetic susceptibility induced field distortions |
GB9120508D0 (en) * | 1991-09-26 | 1991-11-06 | Nycomed As | Diagnostic agents |
GB2262606B (en) * | 1991-12-16 | 1995-05-31 | Radiodetection Ltd | Metal detector |
US5305751A (en) * | 1992-06-04 | 1994-04-26 | Biomagnetic Technologies, Inc. | Measurement of liquid flows in a living organism |
US5322682A (en) * | 1992-08-06 | 1994-06-21 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Method for quantitatively measuring and mapping stored iron in tissue using MRI |
US5456718A (en) * | 1992-11-17 | 1995-10-10 | Szymaitis; Dennis W. | Apparatus for detecting surgical objects within the human body |
US5353807A (en) * | 1992-12-07 | 1994-10-11 | Demarco Thomas J | Magnetically guidable intubation device |
US5494033A (en) * | 1993-06-21 | 1996-02-27 | Biomagnetic Technologies, Inc. | Biomagnetometer with sealed vacuum enclosure and solid conduction cooling |
US5425382A (en) * | 1993-09-14 | 1995-06-20 | University Of Washington | Apparatus and method for locating a medical tube in the body of a patient |
US5558091A (en) * | 1993-10-06 | 1996-09-24 | Biosense, Inc. | Magnetic determination of position and orientation |
US5705924A (en) | 1993-11-09 | 1998-01-06 | Eastman Kodak Company | Hall effect sensor for detecting an induced image magnet in a smooth material |
US5713354A (en) | 1994-08-01 | 1998-02-03 | Biomagnetic Technologies, Inc. | Biomagnetometer with whole head coverage of a seated reclined subject |
ATE188108T1 (en) * | 1994-08-19 | 2000-01-15 | Biosense Inc | MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND DISPLAY SYSTEM |
SE9403188D0 (en) | 1994-09-22 | 1994-09-22 | Siemens Elema Ab | Magnetic field detector on a medical implant |
DE4436078A1 (en) * | 1994-10-10 | 1996-04-11 | Dornier Gmbh | High resolution imaging sensor system for detection, location and identification of metallic objects |
US5494035A (en) | 1994-10-26 | 1996-02-27 | Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation | Method for detecting presence of ferromagnetic objects in a medical patient |
JP2829375B2 (en) * | 1995-03-13 | 1998-11-25 | 九州大学長 | Weak magnetic field measuring device and measuring method |
US5610518A (en) | 1995-03-16 | 1997-03-11 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method and apparatus for detecting small magnetizable particles and flaws in nonmagnetic conductors |
US5842986A (en) * | 1995-08-16 | 1998-12-01 | Proton Sciences Corp. | Ferromagnetic foreign body screening method and apparatus |
US5689184A (en) | 1995-11-13 | 1997-11-18 | Eastman Kodak Company | Large scale metallic object detector |
US5957847A (en) | 1996-01-23 | 1999-09-28 | Minakuchi; Yoshihisa | Method and apparatus for detecting foreign bodies in the medullary cavity |
US5757183A (en) | 1996-07-26 | 1998-05-26 | Eastman Kodak Company | Device to shield a magnetic field in a given plane |
-
1996
- 1996-06-25 US US08/670,393 patent/US5842986A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1997
- 1997-06-24 CA CA002258268A patent/CA2258268A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1997-06-24 EP EP97931335A patent/EP0917441A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1997-06-24 IL IL12765997A patent/IL127659A0/en unknown
- 1997-06-24 JP JP50344198A patent/JP2001504714A/en active Pending
- 1997-06-24 WO PCT/US1997/010892 patent/WO1997049334A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
1998
- 1998-08-18 US US09/135,890 patent/US6208884B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2000
- 2000-12-15 US US09/741,774 patent/US6418335B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (31)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003073934A1 (en) * | 2002-03-06 | 2003-09-12 | Imperial College Innovations Limited | Detection system |
WO2004091392A1 (en) | 2003-04-15 | 2004-10-28 | Philips Intellectual Property & Standards Gmbh | Method and arrangement for influencing magnetic particles and detecting interfering material |
WO2004091408A3 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2005-01-27 | Philips Intellectual Property | Elastography device and method for determining and imaging of mechanical and elastic parameters of an examination object |
US20060189868A1 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2006-08-24 | Bernhard Gleich | Elastography device and method for determining and imaging of mechanical and elastic parameters of an examination object |
US20070007486A1 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2007-01-11 | Bernhard Gleich | Method and arrangement for influencing magnetic particles and detecting interfering material |
US7370656B2 (en) | 2003-04-15 | 2008-05-13 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and arrangement for influencing magnetic particles and detecting interfering material |
US9107581B2 (en) | 2003-04-15 | 2015-08-18 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Elastography device and method for determining and imaging of mechanical and elastic parameters of an examination object |
US8368394B2 (en) * | 2006-12-20 | 2013-02-05 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Arrangement and method for influencing and/or detecting magnetic particles in a region of action |
US20100052668A1 (en) * | 2006-12-20 | 2010-03-04 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Arrangement and method for influencing and/or detecting magnetic particles in a region of action |
US20100123456A1 (en) * | 2007-01-24 | 2010-05-20 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method for influencing and/or detecting magnetic particles in a region of action, magnetic particles and the use of magnetic particles |
US8354841B2 (en) * | 2007-01-24 | 2013-01-15 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method for influencing and/or detecting magnetic particles in a region of action, magnetic particles and the use of magnetic particles |
US8712706B2 (en) * | 2009-12-02 | 2014-04-29 | Nanalysis Corp. | Method and apparatus for producing homogeneous magnetic fields |
US20110137589A1 (en) * | 2009-12-02 | 2011-06-09 | Nanalysis Corp. | Method and apparatus for producing homogeneous magnetic fields |
US20110133730A1 (en) * | 2009-12-04 | 2011-06-09 | Simon Richard Hattersley | Magnetic Probe Apparatus |
US12092708B2 (en) * | 2009-12-04 | 2024-09-17 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic probe apparatus |
US10634741B2 (en) * | 2009-12-04 | 2020-04-28 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic probe apparatus |
US11592501B2 (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2023-02-28 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic probe apparatus |
US9427186B2 (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2016-08-30 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic probe apparatus |
US20230176152A1 (en) * | 2009-12-04 | 2023-06-08 | Endomagnetics Limited | Magnetic Probe Apparatus |
US20110137154A1 (en) * | 2009-12-04 | 2011-06-09 | Simon Richard Hattersley | Magnetic probe apparatus |
US9808539B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2017-11-07 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Hypoosmotic solutions for lymph node detection |
US9234877B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-01-12 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic detector |
US9523748B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-12-20 | Endomagnetics Ltd | Magnetic detector |
US9239314B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2016-01-19 | Endomagnetics Ltd. | Magnetic detector |
US9628014B2 (en) * | 2014-06-26 | 2017-04-18 | Braun Gmbh | Personal hygiene device with resonant motor |
US20150381096A1 (en) * | 2014-06-26 | 2015-12-31 | Braun Gmbh | Personal hygiene device with resonant motor |
US11504207B2 (en) | 2015-06-04 | 2022-11-22 | Endomagnetics Ltd | Marker materials and forms for magnetic marker localization (MML) |
US10595957B2 (en) | 2015-06-04 | 2020-03-24 | Endomagnetics Ltd | Marker materials and forms for magnetic marker localization (MML) |
US12161513B2 (en) | 2015-06-04 | 2024-12-10 | Endomagnetics Ltd | Marker materials and forms for magnetic marker localization (MML) |
WO2018127844A1 (en) * | 2017-01-05 | 2018-07-12 | St. Jude Medical International Holding S.À R.L. | Localized magnetic field generator |
US11881799B2 (en) | 2021-09-01 | 2024-01-23 | Braun Gmbh | Motor unit and personal care device comprising a motor unit |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2001504714A (en) | 2001-04-10 |
US6418335B2 (en) | 2002-07-09 |
EP0917441A4 (en) | 1999-09-01 |
EP0917441A1 (en) | 1999-05-26 |
US6208884B1 (en) | 2001-03-27 |
US5842986A (en) | 1998-12-01 |
WO1997049334A1 (en) | 1997-12-31 |
IL127659A0 (en) | 1999-10-28 |
CA2258268A1 (en) | 1997-12-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6418335B2 (en) | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection using magnetics | |
US7047059B2 (en) | Simplified water-bag technique for magnetic susceptibility measurements on the human body and other specimens | |
US6496713B2 (en) | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection with background canceling | |
US20020115925A1 (en) | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection utilizing eye movement | |
US8174259B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for determining magnetic properties of materials | |
US6815949B2 (en) | Apparatus for measuring a magnetic field | |
CA2103032C (en) | Apparatus and method for imaging the structure of diamagnetic and paramagnetic objects | |
Borna et al. | Magnetic source imaging using a pulsed optically pumped magnetometer array | |
Platzek et al. | Active shielding to reduce low frequency disturbances in direct current near biomagnetic measurements | |
US20020177769A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for locating cells in the body by measuring magnetic moments | |
JPH11151220A (en) | Magnetic field measuring method | |
Taue et al. | Development of a highly sensitive optically pumped atomic magnetometer for biomagnetic field measurements: A phantom study | |
Matlachov et al. | Instrumentation for simultaneous detection of low field NMR and biomagnetic signals | |
Sinibaldi et al. | NMR Detection at 8.9 mT with a GMR based sensor coupled to a superconducting Nb Flux Transformer | |
CA2337429A1 (en) | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection using magnetics | |
JP2002272695A (en) | Versatile high-sensitivity magnetic detection device | |
CA2372090A1 (en) | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection utilizing eye movement | |
Miyamoto et al. | Development of an MCG/MEG system for small animals and its noise reduction method | |
Fagaly et al. | Superconducting quantum interference (SQUIDs) | |
CA2397261A1 (en) | Ferromagnetic foreign body detection with background canceling | |
Platzek et al. | Low-Tc magnetometer used for active shielding in the frequency range dc-500 Hz in biomagnetic measurements | |
Trahms | Ultrasensitive magnetometry using quantum-based sensor technology | |
CA2379800A1 (en) | Method and device for measuring biomagnetic and in particular cardiomagnetic fields | |
Lee et al. | Tangential cardiomagnetic field measurement system based on double relaxation oscillation SQUID planar gradiometers | |
CN115919318A (en) | A measurement system and method for biomagnetic field |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: QUANTUM MAGNETICS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AVRIN, WILLIAM F.;CZIPOTT, PETER V.;KUMAR, SANKARAN;REEL/FRAME:011599/0088 Effective date: 20010216 Owner name: MEDNOVUS, INC., A CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA, CALIF Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KEMP, MASSENGILL R.;REEL/FRAME:011599/0201 Effective date: 20010212 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAT HOLDER NO LONGER CLAIMS SMALL ENTITY STATUS, ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: STOL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20140709 |