EP0076036A1

EP0076036A1 - Method and apparatus for burning fuel in stages

Info

Publication number: EP0076036A1
Application number: EP82304508A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Richard R. Martin; Kurt S. Jaeger
Original assignee: John Zink Co
Current assignee: Zinklahoma Inc
Priority date: 1981-09-28
Filing date: 1982-08-26
Publication date: 1983-04-06
Also published as: EP0076036B1; CA1212617A; JPS5875606A; DE3276191D1

Abstract

Burner [10] for a furnace and a method of operating the burner [10] involving a primary [22,38] and secondary [28,46] combustion zone wherein staged fuel and air to both combustion zones [22,38;28,46] is provided. By injection of from about 40% to 60% of the liquid or gaseous hydrocarbon fuel along with about 90% of the total air required to a first reaction zone [22,38] and injection of the remaining fuel with the remaining 10% of the air to a secondary reaction zone [28,46] the formation of NO_x is significantly suppressed. Such a burner is useful in minimizing NO_X emissions for a variety of furnace types including both natural draft and forced draft furnaces.

Description

This invention relates to a method and apparatus for burning fuel resulting in low NO formation. More specifically, this invention relates to a staged fuel and air injection burner.
With the advent of contemporary environmental emission standards being imposed by various governmental authorities and agencies involving ever stricter regulations, methods and apparatus to suppress the formation of oxides of nitrogen during combustion with air are becoming increasingly numerous. Various techniques have been suggested and employed in the design and operation of burners and furnaces to meet these regulations. Thus it is known that to burn a hydrocarbon fuel in less than a stoichiometric concentration of oxygen intentionally produces a reducing environment of CO and H₂. This concept is utilized in a staged air type low NO burner wherein the fuel is first burned in a deficiency of air in one zone producing a reduced environment that suppresses NO formation and then the remaining portion of the air is added in a subsequent zone. Staged fuel also has been suggested wherein all of the air and some of the fuel is burned in the first zone and then the remaining fuel is added in the second zone. The presence of an over abundance of air in the first reaction zone acts as a diluent thus lowering the temperature and suppressing formation of NO_x. It has also been proposed to recirculate flue gas to accomplish the lowering of the flame temperature.
However, each of the prior art processes have certain inherent deficiencies and associated problems which have led to limited commercial acceptance. For example, when burning fuel in a sub- stoichiometric oxygen environment the tendency for soot formation is increased. The presence of even small amounts of soot will alter the heat transfer properties of the furnace and heat exchanger surfaces downstream from the burner. Also flame stability can become a critical factor when operating a burner at significantly sub- stoichiometric conditions.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for burning a hydrocarbon fuel resulting in reduced emission of nitrogen oxides generated by the combustion. It is a further object that a two stage fuel and air system be employed in a manner that maintains furnace efficiency without significant soot formation. And, it is an additional object that the method and apparatus be consistent with a variety of burner designs including, for example, flat flame design, round or conical flame burners, high intensity burners and the like. Fulfillment of these objects and the presence and fulfillment of other objects will be apparent upon complete reading of the specification and claims taken in conjunction with the attached drawing.
In view of the problems associated with previously proposed low NO burners, a method has been discovered for burning a gaseous or liquid hydrocarbon fuel in air resulting in low NO formation comprising the steps of:

(a) burning a portion of the fuel with a major portion of the air in a primary reaction zone such as to reduce the formation of NO ,
(b) directing the effluent from the primary reaction zone into a second reaction zone and
(c) burning the remaining portion of the fuel with the remaining minor portion of the air in the second reaction zone.

Thus, the low NO forming burner of the present invention comprises:

(a) a primary reaction zone;
(b) a secondary reaction zone sequentially following the primary reaction zone;
(c) a means for proportioning the fuel between the primary and secondary reaction zones; and
(d) a means for supplying a major portion of the air for burning the fuel to the primary reaction zone and supplying the remaining minor portion of the air to the secondary reaction zone.

The present invention further provides for the fuel to be proportioned from about 40% to 60% to the primary reaction zone and then from about 60% to 40% to the second reaction zone while the air is proportioned from about 80% to 95% to the primary zone (preferably 90%) and from about 20% to 5% to the secondary zone (preferably 10%).
The invention further provides for the primary reaction zone to involve at least one injection nozzle within a centrally located chamber and a secondary reaction zone to involve at least one nozzle and preferably a plurality of nozzles surrounding the outlet of the primary reaction zone. Accordingly, the fuel is supplied to the injection nozzles from a single source with the orifices of the nozzles being sized to proportion the fuel between the primary and secondary reaction zones.
The invention will now be described further, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:-

Fig.l is a vertical cross-section of one embodiment of the invention illustrating a T-bar primary nozzle and a pair of secondary nozzles;
Fig.2 is a side-view cross-section of the T-bar primary nozzle of Fig.l;
Fig.3 is a lower end view of the burner of Fig. 1;
Fig. 4 illustrates the orifice configuration of the secondary nozzles for the burner illustrated in Fig.l;
Fig.5 is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of this invention illustrating a domed nozzle;
Figs. 6, 7 and 8 illustrate alternative secondary nozzle and orifice configurations for the burner of Fig. 5;
Fig.9 is another embodiment illustrating a pair of flat flame design primary nozzles; and
Fig.10 is graph showing the NO levels achieved for each set of tips at various fuel split ratios.

In the embodiment shown in Figs. 1, 2 and 3 the burner is indicated generally by the numeral 10. This particular embodiment involves a primary burner tube 12 leading to a T-bar primary nozzle 14 along with a pair of secondary burner tubes 16 and secondary burner nozzles 18 all being supplied hydrocarbon fuel from a common source through tube 20. The fuel exiting primary nozzle 14 enters the primary combustion zone 22 wherein it is burned in the presence of a significant stoichiometric excess of air flowing through the interior 24 of the burner and entering the primary reaction zone 22 through an annular space 26 surrounding the primary nozzle 14, as indicated by the presence of arrows.
The effluent from the primary reaction zone 22 enters a larger secondary reaction zone 28. Simultaneously, the fuel exiting the secondary nozzle 18 is mixed with air from the interior 24 of the burner 10 passing through annular conduits 30 surrounding burner tubes 16 and is then burned in the secondary reaction zone 28 in the presence of the effluent from the first reaction zone 22.
The orifices of the respective T-bar nozzle 14 and secondary nozzles 18 are sized such that the fuel is proportioned between the primary reaction zone and the secondary reaction zone. Preferably from about 40 to about 60% of the fuel is directed through the primary nozzle 14 and the remaining fuel is directed to the secondary nozzles 18. Similarly, the cross-sectional area of the annular space 26 and the annular conduits 30 for conducting air to primary and secondary reaction zones are selected such as to deliver about 80% to 95% of the total air to the primary reaction zone 22 and the remaining 20% to 596 of the total air to the secondary reaction zone 28.
Fig.4 illustrates the directional characteristics of the orifices of each secondary nozzle 18. As illustrated, the five fuel ports 32 will issue a fan like sheet of fuel directed towards the effluent of the primary combustion zone.
In Fig. 5 an alternate forced draft burner 10 is illustrated involving a single gas nozzle 34 that directs the fuel delivered through conduit 36 into the primary combustion zone 38 defined by the refractory walls 40 of the burner. Riser pipes 42 fitted with orifice tips 44 extend through this refractory wall 40 such as to deliver the secondary fuel to the secondary combustion zone 46. Similar to Fig.l, combustion air flows through the interior 48 of burner 10 into the primary zone 38 by way of annular conduit 49 and into secondary combustion zone 46 through annular openings 50. Figs. 6, 7 and 8 illustrate the basic orifice or port configuration 52 of the secondary nozzles 44 including alternate angles of inclination (Fig.7) towards the axial direction of the flow in the primary reaction zone 38.
Fig.9 illustrates another alternate embodiment of a staged fuel and air burner 10 of the present invention wherein the particular burner is a flat flame design involving a pair of primary nozzles 54 and 56 each essentially adjacent to the refractory walls forming the primary reaction zone 58. Similar to the previous embodiments, secondary fuel conduits 60 and 62 pass through the refractory material such as to deliver fuel to the secondary reaction zone 64.
In order to evaluate the principle of separating the gaseous fuel into two essentially equal but sequential burning stages wherein a significant stoichiometric excess or major portion of the air is employed in the first stage with the remaining minor portion of the air in the second stage, a series of tests were conducted using a burner configuration as illustrated in Fig.5. The burner was of a forced draft design using natural gas. A center mounted gas gun was mounted to fire inside a refractory chamber. Four riser pipes fitted with orifice tips were installed through the refractory wall of the combustion chamber parallel to the center line of the burner. Three sets of tips were tested, each having orifices discharging at different angles to the tiro centerline. The burner was tested by firing vertically upward into a furnace.
Three series of tests were conducted; one series for each set of secondary riser tip drillings. The tip drillings included three orifices and were oriented in the first series discharging vertically upward (parallel to the centerline of the burner), in the second series discharging at a small angle, e.g. 15 off vertical (towards the burner centerline) and in the third series discharging 30⁰ off vertical (towards the burner centerline). Each test series of each set of tips included variations of primary/secondary fuel ratio and turned down tests.
Fig.lO shows the graphs plotted as a result of the tests. The burner was also fired on center gas only to establish the base point for non-staged operation of 80 ppm NO_x. The lowest NO levels were obtained with secondary orifices discharging parallel to the burner axis, but this set of tips also produces the highest level of combustibles. Turn down on 30° tips was about 3:1 on a fifty/fifty fuel split and turn down on 15° tips was about 2:1 on a forty/sixty split. Flame appearance was generally good on all arrangements.
From the data and test results it is readily apparent that the basic concept of staged air and fuel combustion is capable of producing NO_x levels significantly lower than conventional combustion. The test results have also established that these low NO levels are achieved in the absence of significant soot formation or flame instability. Additional advantages of the present invention include the fact that the NO levels achieved are lower than those associated with staged air combustion and the fact that the basic concept of staged air and-fuel is compatible with a wide variety of types of burners.

Claims

1. A method for burning a gaseous or liquid fuel in air resulting in low NO formation characterised in that it comprises the steps of burning a portion of the fuel with a major portion of the air in a primary reaction zone such as to reduce the formation of NO_x, directing the effluent from the primary reaction zone into a second reaction zone and burning the remaining portion of the fuel with the remaining minor portion of the air in the second reaction zone.

2. A method according to claim 1, characterised in that the fuel is proportioned from about 40% to 60% to primary reaction zone and from about 60% to 40% to the second reaction zone.

3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the major portion of the air in the primary reaction zone is from about 80% to 95% of the total air and the remaining minor portion of air in the second reaction zone is from about 20% to 5%.

4. A method according to claim 3, eharacterised in that the major portion of air is about 90% and the minor portion is about 10%.

5. A low NO forming burner characterised in that it comprises a primary reaction zone (22, 38 or 58) a secondary reaction zone (28, 46 or 64) sequentially following the primary reaction zone, means for proportioning the fuel between the primary and the secondary reaction zones and a means for supplying a major portion of air for burning the fuel to the primary reaction zone and supplying the remaining minor portion of air to the secondary reaction zone.

6. A burner according to claim 5, characterised in that the primary reaction zone (38) involves at least one injection nozzle (34) within a centrally located chamber and the secondary reaction zone (46) involves at least one nozzle (42) surrounding the outlet of the primary reaction zone (38).

7. A burner according to claim 6, characterised in that the means for proportioning the fuel involves a single source of fuel (20) being supplied to the injection nozzles and wherein the orifices in the nozzles are sized to proportion the fuel between the primary and secondary reaction zones.

8. A burner according to claim 5, 6 or 7, characterised in that the means for proportioning the fuel involves from about 40% to 60% of the fuel being supplied to the primary reaction zone and from about 60% to 40% of the fuel being supplied to the secondary reaction zone.

9. A burner according to claim 8, characterised in that the major portion of the air is from about 80% to 95% of the total air and the minor portion of air is from about 20% to 5%.

10. A burner according to claim 8, characterised in that the major portion of the air is about 90% and the minor portion of air is about 10%.