CN106244481A - A kind of compound micro-ecological preparation, its preparation method and application processed for farm animal excrement - Google Patents
A kind of compound micro-ecological preparation, its preparation method and application processed for farm animal excrement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN106244481A CN106244481A CN201610610209.9A CN201610610209A CN106244481A CN 106244481 A CN106244481 A CN 106244481A CN 201610610209 A CN201610610209 A CN 201610610209A CN 106244481 A CN106244481 A CN 106244481A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- bacillus subtilis
- lactobacillus casei
- enterococcus faecalis
- candida utilis
- farm animal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 title claims abstract description 41
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 40
- 244000199866 Lactobacillus casei Species 0.000 claims abstract description 54
- 235000013958 Lactobacillus casei Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 54
- 229940017800 lactobacillus casei Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 54
- 241000235646 Cyberlindnera jadinii Species 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- 241000194032 Enterococcus faecalis Species 0.000 claims abstract description 51
- 229940032049 enterococcus faecalis Drugs 0.000 claims abstract description 51
- 244000063299 Bacillus subtilis Species 0.000 claims abstract description 50
- 235000014469 Bacillus subtilis Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 48
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 23
- 238000000855 fermentation Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000004151 fermentation Effects 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000000968 intestinal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 241000186660 Lactobacillus Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 229940039696 lactobacillus Drugs 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims 4
- 235000013351 cheese Nutrition 0.000 claims 2
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 claims 1
- 239000012467 final product Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 239000008267 milk Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 210000004080 milk Anatomy 0.000 claims 1
- 235000013336 milk Nutrition 0.000 claims 1
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims 1
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims 1
- SIKJAQJRHWYJAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Indole Chemical compound C1=CC=C2NC=CC2=C1 SIKJAQJRHWYJAI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 74
- 244000144972 livestock Species 0.000 abstract description 66
- 244000144977 poultry Species 0.000 abstract description 66
- PZOUSPYUWWUPPK-UHFFFAOYSA-N indole Natural products CC1=CC=CC2=C1C=CN2 PZOUSPYUWWUPPK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 37
- RKJUIXBNRJVNHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N indolenine Natural products C1=CC=C2CC=NC2=C1 RKJUIXBNRJVNHR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 abstract description 37
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 abstract description 26
- 239000006041 probiotic Substances 0.000 abstract description 20
- 235000018291 probiotics Nutrition 0.000 abstract description 20
- 210000003608 fece Anatomy 0.000 abstract description 17
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 abstract description 4
- 241000589516 Pseudomonas Species 0.000 abstract 1
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 33
- SEOVTRFCIGRIMH-UHFFFAOYSA-N indole-3-acetic acid Chemical compound C1=CC=C2C(CC(=O)O)=CNC2=C1 SEOVTRFCIGRIMH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 25
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 24
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 19
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 14
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 description 13
- 239000003617 indole-3-acetic acid Substances 0.000 description 12
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Chemical compound O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 10
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000010871 livestock manure Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 7
- HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium hydroxide Chemical compound [OH-].[Na+] HEMHJVSKTPXQMS-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 6
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000013401 experimental design Methods 0.000 description 5
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000006153 eosin methylene blue Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 3
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229940041514 candida albicans extract Drugs 0.000 description 3
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000000529 probiotic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000012086 standard solution Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000012138 yeast extract Substances 0.000 description 3
- MPDGHEJMBKOTSU-YKLVYJNSSA-N 18beta-glycyrrhetic acid Chemical compound C([C@H]1C2=CC(=O)[C@H]34)[C@@](C)(C(O)=O)CC[C@]1(C)CC[C@@]2(C)[C@]4(C)CC[C@@H]1[C@]3(C)CC[C@H](O)C1(C)C MPDGHEJMBKOTSU-YKLVYJNSSA-N 0.000 description 2
- WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N Glucose Natural products OC[C@H]1OC(O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@@H]1O WQZGKKKJIJFFOK-GASJEMHNSA-N 0.000 description 2
- CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L Magnesium sulfate Chemical compound [Mg+2].[O-][S+2]([O-])([O-])[O-] CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- RAHZWNYVWXNFOC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulphur dioxide Chemical compound O=S=O RAHZWNYVWXNFOC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000009360 aquaculture Methods 0.000 description 2
- 244000144974 aquaculture Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010170 biological method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005265 energy consumption Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003337 fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000008103 glucose Substances 0.000 description 2
- JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N lactic acid Chemical compound CC(O)C(O)=O JVTAAEKCZFNVCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 description 2
- VLTRZXGMWDSKGL-UHFFFAOYSA-N perchloric acid Chemical compound OCl(=O)(=O)=O VLTRZXGMWDSKGL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001954 sterilising effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004659 sterilization and disinfection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011550 stock solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000012137 tryptone Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000193830 Bacillus <bacterium> Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001478240 Coccus Species 0.000 description 1
- RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dihydrogen sulfide Chemical compound S RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000012880 LB liquid culture medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006142 Luria-Bertani Agar Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001888 Peptone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108010080698 Peptones Proteins 0.000 description 1
- VMHLLURERBWHNL-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium acetate Chemical compound [Na+].CC([O-])=O VMHLLURERBWHNL-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- BWKOZPVPARTQIV-UHFFFAOYSA-N azanium;hydron;2-hydroxypropane-1,2,3-tricarboxylate Chemical compound [NH4+].OC(=O)CC(O)(C(O)=O)CC([O-])=O BWKOZPVPARTQIV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- -1 biological Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004332 deodorization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001877 deodorizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- ZPWVASYFFYYZEW-UHFFFAOYSA-L dipotassium hydrogen phosphate Chemical compound [K+].[K+].OP([O-])([O-])=O ZPWVASYFFYYZEW-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- TXKMVPPZCYKFAC-UHFFFAOYSA-N disulfur monoxide Inorganic materials O=S=S TXKMVPPZCYKFAC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000012154 double-distilled water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003344 environmental pollutant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002550 fecal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910000037 hydrogen sulfide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000009309 intensive farming Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004310 lactic acid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000014655 lactic acid Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052943 magnesium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000019341 magnesium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229940099596 manganese sulfate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000011702 manganese sulphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000007079 manganese sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- SQQMAOCOWKFBNP-UHFFFAOYSA-L manganese(II) sulfate Chemical compound [Mn+2].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O SQQMAOCOWKFBNP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000005416 organic matter Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019319 peptone Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000000053 physical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000719 pollutant Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 235000010482 polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920000053 polysorbate 80 Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001007 puffing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010865 sewage Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000001632 sodium acetate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000017281 sodium acetate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002910 solid waste Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011593 sulfur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005211 surface analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012085 test solution Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/20—Bacteria; Culture media therefor
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C05—FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
- C05F—ORGANIC FERTILISERS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C05B, C05C, e.g. FERTILISERS FROM WASTE OR REFUSE
- C05F17/00—Preparation of fertilisers characterised by biological or biochemical treatment steps, e.g. composting or fermentation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C05—FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
- C05F—ORGANIC FERTILISERS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C05B, C05C, e.g. FERTILISERS FROM WASTE OR REFUSE
- C05F3/00—Fertilisers from human or animal excrements, e.g. manure
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/14—Fungi; Culture media therefor
- C12N1/16—Yeasts; Culture media therefor
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A40/00—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production
- Y02A40/10—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production in agriculture
- Y02A40/20—Fertilizers of biological origin, e.g. guano or fertilizers made from animal corpses
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W30/00—Technologies for solid waste management
- Y02W30/40—Bio-organic fraction processing; Production of fertilisers from the organic fraction of waste or refuse
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
- Virology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Mycology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Treatment Of Sludge (AREA)
Abstract
本发明的目的在于提供一种用于畜禽排泄物处理的复合微生态制剂、其制备方法及应用,以100g畜禽排泄物计,需要加入的复合微生态制剂由以下体积的菌液混合而成:干酪乳杆菌 0.03~0.10 mL、粪肠球菌 0.03~0.10 mL、产朊假丝酵母菌0.05~0.50 mL、枯草芽孢杆菌 0.03~0.10 mL,所述干酪乳杆菌、粪肠球菌、产朊假丝酵母菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液的有效活菌数均为1.0×109 cfu/mL。本发明利用该复合微生态制剂发酵畜禽排泄物,可降低其中的pH和大肠杆菌数量(P>0.05),并使吲哚的含量降低58%(P<0.05),对于消除粪便的臭味具有重要意义。
The object of the present invention is to provide a kind of compound probiotics for the treatment of livestock and poultry excrement, its preparation method and application, based on 100g of livestock and poultry excrement, the composite probiotics that needs to be added is prepared by mixing the bacterial liquid of the following volume Ingredients: Lactobacillus casei 0.03~0.10 mL, Enterococcus faecalis 0.03~0.10 mL, Candida utilis 0.05~0.50 mL, Bacillus subtilis 0.03~0.10 mL, said Lactobacillus casei, Enterococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas utilis The effective number of viable bacteria in the bacterial solution of Trichosaccharomyces and Bacillus subtilis was 1.0×10 9 cfu/mL. The present invention uses the compound microecological preparation to ferment livestock and poultry excrement, which can reduce the pH and the number of coliform bacteria (P>0.05), and reduce the content of indole by 58% (P<0.05), which is helpful for eliminating the odor of feces is of great significance.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明属于微生态制剂技术领域,具体涉及一种用于畜禽排泄物处理的复合微生态制剂、其制备方法及应用。The invention belongs to the technical field of probiotics, and in particular relates to a composite probiotic for treating livestock and poultry excrement, a preparation method and application thereof.
背景技术Background technique
据报道,全国畜禽粪便年产生量约为19亿吨,是工业固体废弃物的2.4倍,再加上污水的排放量,我国每年养殖业排出的废物高达60多亿吨;畜禽废弃物污染已成为污染的主要原因之一。畜禽饲养量不断增长的同时,农村建设用地使有效承载畜禽废弃物的农田面积减少,跟着集约化养殖模式不断增加,畜禽废弃物的产出量超出当地农田可承载的负荷,对环境造成严重的污染。According to reports, the annual production of livestock and poultry manure in the country is about 1.9 billion tons, which is 2.4 times that of industrial solid waste. In addition to the discharge of sewage, the waste discharged by the aquaculture industry in my country is as high as more than 6 billion tons every year; livestock and poultry waste Pollution has become one of the main causes of pollution. While the amount of livestock and poultry is kept increasing, the rural construction land reduces the area of farmland that can effectively carry livestock and poultry waste. With the continuous increase of intensive farming models, the output of livestock and poultry waste exceeds the load that local farmland can carry, which has a negative impact on the environment. cause serious pollution.
2003年国家正式实施《畜禽养殖业污染物排放标准》;2013年10月8日国务院第26次常务会议通过,于2013年11月公布了《畜禽规模养殖污染防治条例》。要求各级政府从政策、资金、技术和项目建设上给予养殖业大力扶持,走“生态型、福利型”环保之路,依照“种养结合、生态环保、循环经济”新模式,奉行创新型养殖新技术,促进养殖业与种植业的有序发展。In 2003, the country formally implemented the Pollutant Discharge Standards for Livestock and Poultry Breeding Industry; on October 8, 2013, the State Council adopted the 26th executive meeting, and in November 2013 promulgated the Regulations on the Prevention and Control of Pollution from Large-scale Livestock and Poultry Breeding. Governments at all levels are required to give strong support to the breeding industry in terms of policies, funds, technology and project construction, take the road of "ecological and welfare" environmental protection, follow the new model of "combination of planting and breeding, ecological environmental protection, circular economy", and pursue innovative Breeding new technology to promote the orderly development of aquaculture and planting.
畜禽废弃物无害化处理的方法主要有三种,分别是生物、化学与物理处理法。化学方法是利用化学试剂对粪便进行处理的一种方法,其原理是粪便中的有机物质与化学物质发生反应,例如H2S可以氧化成硫化氢还可以氧化成硫或二氧化硫,由于效果不稳定,使得该技术应用效果不好。物理方法主要包括热喷处理、高温干燥、膨化处理以及自然干燥等,但是,物理处理方法还存在一定的缺陷,比如,自然干燥虽然成本低,但处理过程中存在耗时长、有氨气等臭气产生等缺点,高温干燥法存在生产设备投资大、耗能高、排出的气体易造成二次污染等缺点。生物方法是指在特定的环境下,利用微生物来处理畜禽粪便,生物方法具有肥效高、成本低等特点;另外,生物处理方法还具有灭菌与除臭的功效,是一种较为合理的生态处理方法。There are three main methods for the harmless treatment of livestock and poultry waste, namely biological, chemical and physical treatment. The chemical method is a method of using chemical reagents to treat feces. The principle is that the organic matter in the feces reacts with chemical substances. For example, H 2 S can be oxidized into hydrogen sulfide or sulfur or sulfur dioxide. Due to the unstable effect , making the application of this technique ineffective. Physical methods mainly include thermal spray treatment, high temperature drying, puffing treatment and natural drying, etc. However, there are still certain defects in physical treatment methods. The high-temperature drying method has the disadvantages of large investment in production equipment, high energy consumption, and the discharged gas is likely to cause secondary pollution. Biological method refers to the use of microorganisms to treat livestock and poultry manure in a specific environment. The biological method has the characteristics of high fertilizer efficiency and low cost. In addition, the biological treatment method also has the effect of sterilization and deodorization, which is a relatively reasonable method. Ecological treatment methods.
发明内容Contents of the invention
本发明的目的在于提供一种用于畜禽排泄物处理的复合微生态制剂、其制备方法及应用,利用该复合微生态制剂发酵畜禽排泄物,可降低其中的pH和大肠杆菌数量(P>0.05),并使吲哚的含量降低58%(P<0.05),对于消除粪便的臭味具有重要意义。The object of the present invention is to provide a kind of compound probiotics for livestock and poultry excrement treatment, its preparation method and application, utilize this compound probiotics to ferment livestock and poultry excrement, can reduce wherein pH and Escherichia coli quantity (P >0.05), and reduced the content of indole by 58% (P<0.05), which is of great significance for eliminating the odor of feces.
本发明采用如下技术方案:The present invention adopts following technical scheme:
一种用于畜禽排泄物处理的复合微生态制剂,以100g畜禽排泄物计,需要加入的复合微生态制剂由以下体积的菌液混合而成:干酪乳杆菌 0.03~0.10 mL、粪肠球菌 0.03~0.10mL、产朊假丝酵母菌0.05~0.50 mL、枯草芽孢杆菌 0.03~0.10 mL,所述干酪乳杆菌、粪肠球菌、产朊假丝酵母菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液的有效活菌数均为1.0×109 cfu/mL。A compound microecological preparation for the treatment of livestock and poultry excrement. Based on 100g of livestock and poultry excrement, the compound microecological preparation to be added is prepared by mixing the following volumes of bacterial liquid: Lactobacillus casei 0.03~0.10 mL, fecal intestinal Coccus 0.03 ~ 0.10mL, Candida utilis 0.05 ~ 0.50 mL, Bacillus subtilis 0.03 ~ 0.10 mL, the effective effect of the bacterial liquid of Lactobacillus casei, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida utilis and Bacillus subtilis The number of viable bacteria was 1.0×10 9 cfu/mL.
上述的用于畜禽排泄物处理的复合微生态制剂,以100g畜禽排泄物计,需要加入的复合微生态制剂由以下体积的菌液混合而成:干酪乳杆菌 0.06 mL、粪肠球菌 0.07 mL、产朊假丝酵母菌0.15 mL、枯草芽孢杆菌 0.07 mL,所述干酪乳杆菌、粪肠球菌、产朊假丝酵母菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液的有效活菌数均为1.0×109 cfu/mL。The above-mentioned compound probiotics for the treatment of livestock and poultry excrement, based on 100g of livestock and poultry excrement, the compound probiotics that need to be added are mixed with the following volumes of bacterial liquid: Lactobacillus casei 0.06 mL, Enterococcus faecalis 0.07 mL, Candida utilis 0.15 mL, Bacillus subtilis 0.07 mL, the effective number of viable bacteria of the bacterium liquid of described Lactobacillus casei, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida utilis and Bacillus subtilis is 1.0×10 9 cfu/mL.
一种用于畜禽排泄物处理的复合微生态制剂的制备方法,包括以下步骤:A preparation method for a compound probiotics for livestock and poultry excrement treatment, comprising the following steps:
(1)将干酪乳杆菌、粪肠球菌、产朊假丝酵母菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的菌株分别接种到MRS液体培养基、MRS液体培养基、YPD液体培养基和LB液体培养基,培养得到各自的菌液;(1) The strains of Lactobacillus casei, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida utilis and Bacillus subtilis were respectively inoculated into MRS liquid medium, MRS liquid medium, YPD liquid medium and LB liquid medium, and cultured to obtain their respective the bacterial liquid;
(2)然后将所得干酪乳杆菌、粪肠球菌、产朊假丝酵母菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液按体积配比混合即得。(2) Then, the obtained bacterial solution of Lactobacillus casei, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida utilis and Bacillus subtilis is mixed according to the volume ratio.
上述的用于畜禽排泄物处理的复合微生态制剂的制备方法,以100g畜禽排泄物计,步骤(2)中混合时,所述干酪乳杆菌、粪肠球菌、产朊假丝酵母菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液的体积配比为:干酪乳杆菌 0.03~0.10 mL、粪肠球菌 0.03~0.10 mL、产朊假丝酵母菌0.05~0.50 mL、枯草芽孢杆菌 0.03~0.10 mL,所述干酪乳杆菌、粪肠球菌、产朊假丝酵母菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液的有效活菌数均为1.0×109 cfu/mL。The preparation method of the above-mentioned compound probiotics for livestock and poultry excrement treatment, based on 100g of livestock and poultry excrement, when mixed in step (2), the Lactobacillus casei, Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida utilis The volume ratio of the bacterial liquid of Bacillus subtilis is: Lactobacillus casei 0.03~0.10 mL, Enterococcus faecalis 0.03~0.10 mL, Candida utilis 0.05~0.50 mL, Bacillus subtilis 0.03~0.10 mL, the The effective viable counts of Lactobacillus casei, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida utilis and Bacillus subtilis were all 1.0×10 9 cfu/mL.
上述的用于畜禽排泄物处理的复合微生态制剂的制备方法,以100g畜禽排泄物计,步骤(2)中混合时,所述干酪乳杆菌、粪肠球菌、产朊假丝酵母菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液的体积配比为:干酪乳杆菌 0.06 mL、粪肠球菌 0.07 mL、产朊假丝酵母菌0.15 mL、枯草芽孢杆菌 0.07 mL,所述干酪乳杆菌、粪肠球菌、产朊假丝酵母菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液的有效活菌数均为1.0×109 cfu/mL。The preparation method of the above-mentioned compound probiotics for livestock and poultry excrement treatment, based on 100g of livestock and poultry excrement, when mixed in step (2), the Lactobacillus casei, Enterococcus faecalis, and Candida utilis The volume ratio of the bacterial liquid of Bacillus subtilis is: Lactobacillus casei 0.06 mL, Enterococcus faecalis 0.07 mL, Candida utilis 0.15 mL, Bacillus subtilis 0.07 mL, said Lactobacillus casei, Enterococcus faecalis, The effective number of viable bacteria in the bacterial solution of Candida utilis and Bacillus subtilis was 1.0×10 9 cfu/mL.
上述的复合微生态制剂在畜禽排泄物处理时的应用,取畜禽排泄物作为发酵培养基,将所述复合微生态制剂接种至所述发酵培养基中,35℃~42℃发酵培养100h~140h。For the application of the above-mentioned compound microecological preparation in the treatment of livestock and poultry excrement, livestock and poultry excrement is used as a fermentation medium, and the composite probiotic preparation is inoculated into the fermentation medium, and fermented and cultivated at 35°C~42°C for 100h ~140h.
上述的复合微生态制剂在畜禽排泄物处理时的应用,取畜禽排泄物作为发酵培养基,将所述复合微生态制剂接种至所述发酵培养基中,37℃~42℃发酵培养120h。For the application of the above-mentioned compound microecological preparation in the treatment of livestock and poultry excrement, livestock and poultry excrement is used as a fermentation medium, and the complex probiotic preparation is inoculated into the fermentation medium, and fermented and cultivated at 37°C~42°C for 120h .
本发明的有益效果如下:The beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows:
本发明利用复合微生态制剂来处理畜禽排泄物,本发明中畜禽排泄物指畜禽粪便,无需化学物质的添加,也无需过多设备的使用,不会产生污染环境的有害气体,有效地降低了畜禽排泄物的处理成本,减少能耗,处理时间快。而且利用本发明所述复合微生态制剂来处理畜禽排泄物,兼具灭菌与除臭的功效,可降低其中的pH和大肠杆菌数量(P>0.05),并使吲哚的含量降低58%(P<0.05),对于消除粪便的臭味具有重要意义,处理后的畜禽排泄物可以作为肥料使用,是一种较为合理的生态处理方法。The present invention utilizes the composite probiotics to treat the excrement of livestock and poultry. In the present invention, the excrement of livestock and poultry refers to the feces of livestock and poultry. It does not require the addition of chemical substances or the use of excessive equipment, and does not produce harmful gases that pollute the environment, effectively It greatly reduces the processing cost of livestock and poultry excrement, reduces energy consumption, and has a fast processing time. Moreover, using the compound probiotics of the present invention to treat livestock and poultry excrement has both sterilization and deodorizing effects, can reduce the pH and the number of Escherichia coli (P>0.05), and reduce the content of indole by 58% % (P<0.05), it is of great significance to eliminate the odor of feces, and the treated livestock and poultry excrement can be used as fertilizer, which is a more reasonable ecological treatment method.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1为吲哚含量标准曲线;Fig. 1 is the standard curve of indole content;
图2干酪乳杆菌和粪肠球菌对吲哚含量的影响;The influence of Fig. 2 Lactobacillus casei and Enterococcus faecalis on indole content;
图3干酪乳杆菌和产朊假丝酵母菌对吲哚含量的影响;The influence of Fig. 3 Lactobacillus casei and Candida utilis on indole content;
图4干酪乳杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌对吲哚含量的影响;The influence of Fig. 4 Lactobacillus casei and Bacillus subtilis on indole content;
图5粪肠球菌和产朊假丝酵母菌对吲哚含量的影响;The influence of Fig. 5 Enterococcus faecalis and Candida utilis on indole content;
图6枯草芽孢杆菌和粪肠球菌对吲哚含量的影响;The influence of Fig. 6 Bacillus subtilis and Enterococcus faecalis on indole content;
图7枯草芽孢杆菌和产朊假丝酵母菌对吲哚含量的影响。Figure 7 Effect of Bacillus subtilis and Candida utilis on indole content.
具体实施方式detailed description
为了使本发明的技术目的、技术方案和有益效果更加清楚,下面结合附图和具体实施例对本发明的技术方案作出进一步的说明,但所述实施例旨在解释本发明,而不能理解为对本发明的限制,实施例中未注明具体技术或条件者,按照本领域内的文献所描述的技术或条件或者按照产品说明书进行,所用试剂或仪器未注明生产厂商者,均为可以通过市购获得的常规产品。In order to make the technical objectives, technical solutions and beneficial effects of the present invention clearer, the technical solutions of the present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments, but the embodiments are intended to explain the present invention, and cannot be interpreted as explanations for the present invention. Limitation of the invention, if the specific techniques or conditions are not indicated in the examples, it shall be carried out according to the techniques or conditions described in the literature in this field or according to the product instructions, and the reagents or instruments used shall not indicate the manufacturer, all of which can be obtained through the market. conventional products purchased.
实施例1Example 1
1 试验材料与方法1. Test materials and methods
1.1试验材料1.1 Test material
1.1.1菌种选择1.1.1 Strain selection
选用干酪乳杆菌(CGMCC1.62)Lactobacillus casei、产朊假丝酵母菌(CGMCC2.1004)Candida utilis、粪肠球菌(CGMCC1.101) Enterococcus faecalis、枯草芽孢杆菌(CGMCC1.504)Bacillus subtilis,且上述菌种均购自中国普通微生物菌种保藏管理中心。Lactobacillus casei (CGMCC1.62) Lactobacillus casei , Candida utilis (CGMCC2.1004) Candida utilis , Enterococcus faecalis (CGMCC1.101) Enterococcus faecalis , Bacillus subtilis (CGMCC1.504) Bacillus subtilis were selected, and the above All strains were purchased from China General Microorganism Culture Collection and Management Center.
1.1.2仪器设备1.1.2 Instruments and equipment
电热恒温隔水培养箱(上海跃进医疗机械厂);Electric constant temperature water-proof incubator (Shanghai Yuejin Medical Machinery Factory);
立式高压蒸汽灭菌锅(上海申安医疗器械有限公司);Vertical high-pressure steam sterilizer (Shanghai Shen'an Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.);
BCM-1000型生物净化工作台(苏州净化设备有限公司);BCM-1000 biological purification workbench (Suzhou Purification Equipment Co., Ltd.);
双层汽浴震荡器(江苏金坛杰瑞尔电器有限公司);Double-layer steam bath oscillator (Jiangsu Jintan Jerry Electric Co., Ltd.);
PHS-2C酸度计(天津赛得利斯实验分析仪器制造厂);PHS-2C acidity meter (Tianjin Saidelis Experimental Analysis Instrument Factory);
79-1磁力搅拌器(金坛市中大仪器厂);79-1 magnetic stirrer (Jintan Zhongda Instrument Factory);
高速冷冻离心机;High-speed refrigerated centrifuge;
紫外分光光度计;UV spectrophotometer;
电子分析天平;electronic analytical balance;
三角瓶;triangular flask;
培养皿。petri dish.
1.1.3 菌种培养1.1.3 Bacteria culture
培养枯草芽孢杆菌的LB液体培养基:胰蛋白胨10 g,酵母浸粉5 g,氯化钠10 g,用蒸馏水定容至1 L,在121℃、0.15 MPa高压蒸汽灭菌20 min备用;固体培养基加入1.5%的琼脂。LB liquid medium for cultivating Bacillus subtilis: tryptone 10 g, yeast extract powder 5 g, sodium chloride 10 g, dilute to 1 L with distilled water, sterilize at 121 °C, 0.15 MPa high-pressure steam for 20 min; solid Add 1.5% agar to the medium.
枯草芽孢杆菌经过LB固体培养基培养筛选纯化之后,接种至LB液体培养基进行扩培,培养条件为37℃、200 r/min,培养时间为24 h,得到枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液;所得枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液的有效活菌数调整为1.0×109 cfu/mL。After Bacillus subtilis was cultured, screened and purified in LB solid medium, it was inoculated into LB liquid medium for expansion. The culture conditions were 37°C, 200 r/min, and the culture time was 24 h to obtain the bacterial liquid of Bacillus subtilis; the obtained subtilis The effective number of viable bacteria in the bacterial solution of Bacillus was adjusted to 1.0×10 9 cfu/mL.
培养干酪乳杆菌和粪肠球菌的MRS液体培养基:胰蛋白胨15 g,酵母浸份10 g,葡萄糖20 g、吐温-80 1 mL、磷酸氢二钾2 g、乙酸钠2 g、柠檬酸铵2 g、硫酸镁0.2 g、硫酸锰0.05 g,用蒸馏水定容至1 L,在121℃、0.15 MPa高压蒸汽灭菌20 min备用;固体培养基加入1.5%的琼脂。MRS liquid medium for cultivating Lactobacillus casei and Enterococcus faecalis: tryptone 15 g, yeast extract 10 g, glucose 20 g, Tween-80 1 mL, dipotassium hydrogen phosphate 2 g, sodium acetate 2 g, citric acid Ammonium 2 g, magnesium sulfate 0.2 g, manganese sulfate 0.05 g, dilute to 1 L with distilled water, sterilize at 121 °C, 0.15 MPa high-pressure steam for 20 min for later use; add 1.5% agar to the solid medium.
干酪乳杆菌和粪肠球菌分别经过MRS固体培养基培养筛选纯化之后,分别接种至MRS液体培养基进行扩培,培养条件为37℃、静置培养24 h,分别得到干酪乳杆菌和粪肠球菌的菌液;所得干酪乳杆菌和粪肠球菌的菌液的有效活菌数调整为1.0×109 cfu/mL。Lactobacillus casei and Enterococcus faecalis were cultured, screened and purified on MRS solid medium, respectively, and then inoculated into MRS liquid medium for expansion. The culture conditions were 37°C and static culture for 24 hours to obtain Lactobacillus casei and Enterococcus faecalis, respectively. The bacterial liquid of Lactobacillus casei and Enterococcus faecalis obtained was adjusted to 1.0×10 9 cfu/mL.
培养产朊假丝酵母菌的YPD液体培养基:酵母浸粉10 g、蛋白胨20 g、葡萄糖20 g,用蒸馏水定容至1 L,在121℃、0.15 MPa高压蒸汽灭菌20 min备用;固体培养基加入1.5%的琼脂。YPD liquid medium for cultivating Candida utilis: yeast extract powder 10 g, peptone 20 g, glucose 20 g, dilute to 1 L with distilled water, sterilize at 121°C, 0.15 MPa high-pressure steam for 20 min; solid Add 1.5% agar to the medium.
产朊假丝酵母菌经过YPD固体培养基培养筛选纯化之后,接种至YPD液体培养基进行扩培,培养条件为28℃、200 r/min,培养时间为24 h,得到产朊假丝酵母菌的菌液;所得产朊假丝酵母菌的菌液的有效活菌数调整为1.0×109 cfu/mL。After Candida utilis was screened and purified by YPD solid medium culture, it was inoculated into YPD liquid medium for expansion culture. The culture conditions were 28°C, 200 r/min, and the culture time was 24 h to obtain Candida utilis The bacterial liquid of Candida utilis obtained was adjusted to 1.0×10 9 cfu/mL for effective viable count.
培养大肠杆菌的伊红美蓝培养基:(EMB,北京奥博星):称取EMB 42.5 g,用蒸馏水定容至1 L,在121℃、0.15 MPa高压蒸汽灭菌20 min备用。培养条件为37℃、静置培养48 h。Eosin methylene blue medium for cultivating Escherichia coli: (EMB, Aoboxing, Beijing): Weigh 42.5 g of EMB, dilute to 1 L with distilled water, and sterilize at 121°C, 0.15 MPa high-pressure steam for 20 min for later use. The culture conditions were 37°C, static culture for 48 h.
下述单因素试验和响应面设计试验在使用干酪乳杆菌、产朊假丝酵母菌、粪肠球菌和枯草芽孢杆菌时,均为使用上述所得各菌液。When using Lactobacillus casei, Candida utilis, Enterococcus faecalis and Bacillus subtilis in the following single factor test and response surface design test, each bacterial solution obtained above was used.
1.2试验方法1.2 Test method
1.2.1 单因素试验1.2.1 Single factor test
将1.1.3所得干酪乳杆菌、产朊假丝酵母菌、粪肠球菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液分别用于发酵畜禽排泄物,进行单因素试验。The bacterial solutions of Lactobacillus casei, Candida utilis, Enterococcus faecalis and Bacillus subtilis obtained in 1.1.3 were used to ferment livestock and poultry excrement respectively, and a single factor test was carried out.
以干酪乳杆菌为例进行说明单因素试验过程,其他菌种的单因素试验过程与此相同:Taking Lactobacillus casei as an example to illustrate the single factor test process, the single factor test process of other strains is the same:
(1)首先测定畜禽排泄物中含水量为69.69%,取五只250 mL锥形瓶,每只锥形瓶中均加入200 g畜禽排泄物作为发酵培养基;(1) Firstly, the water content in livestock and poultry excreta was determined to be 69.69%, and five 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks were taken, and 200 g of livestock and poultry excreta were added to each Erlenmeyer flask as a fermentation medium;
(2)上述五只锥形瓶分别作为一个对照组和四个试验组,且依次按0、0.05%、0.1%、0.5%和1 %的不同梯度的体积重量比接种1.1.3 菌种培养中所得干酪乳杆菌的菌液(例如0.05%的体积重量比是指100g的畜禽排泄物加入0.05mL的菌液),各不同梯度体积重量比的菌液均用对应培养基稀释至同等体积;所以分别取0mL、0.1mL、0.2mL、1.0mL和2mL干酪乳杆菌的菌液且均用LB液体培养基稀释至2mL,然后依次加入到对照组和试验组;(2) The above five Erlenmeyer flasks were used as a control group and four test groups, respectively, and were inoculated with the 1.1.3 strain culture at different gradient volume-to-weight ratios of 0, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.5% and 1%. The bacterial solution of Lactobacillus casei obtained in the above method (for example, the volume-to-weight ratio of 0.05% means that 100g of livestock and poultry excrement is added to 0.05mL of the bacterial solution), and the bacterial solutions with different gradient volume-to-weight ratios are diluted to the same volume with the corresponding medium ; So get the bacterium liquid of 0mL, 0.1mL, 0.2mL, 1.0mL and 2mL of Lactobacillus casei respectively and be diluted to 2mL with LB liquid culture medium, then add to control group and test group successively;
(3)对照组和试验组均在37℃培养箱中发酵培养120 h后,取样测含水量、干物质、总活菌数、大肠杆菌数、pH值、氮和吲哚含量等指标。(3) Both the control group and the test group were fermented and cultured in a 37°C incubator for 120 h, and then samples were taken to measure water content, dry matter, total viable bacteria count, E. coli count, pH value, nitrogen and indole content and other indicators.
1)含水量的测定:采用国标GB/T6435-1986;1) Determination of water content: adopt national standard GB/T6435-1986;
2)总活菌数:LB琼脂平板涂布法;2) Total number of viable bacteria: LB agar plate coating method;
3)大肠杆菌数:伊红美蓝平板涂布法;3) Escherichia coli count: eosin methylene blue plate coating method;
4)pH值:pH S-2C酸度计(天津赛得利斯实验分析仪器);4) pH value: pH S-2C acidity meter (Tianjin Saidelis experimental analysis instrument);
5)N含量:GB/T6432-94;5) N content: GB/T6432-94;
6)吲哚乙酸(简称IAA)含量测定方法如下:6) The determination method of indole acetic acid (IAA) content is as follows:
a. IAA标准曲线的绘制a. Drawing of IAA standard curve
IAA标准溶液的配制:精确称取IAA(A.R.)10 g,先用少量乙醇溶解,后用蒸馏水定容至100 mL(其浓度为100 mg/mL)作为贮备液;然后用贮备液配成0 mg/mL(空白)、0.5 mg/mL、1.0 mg/mL、5.0 mg/mL、10.0 mg/mL、15.0 mg/mL、20.0 mg/mL、25.0 mg/mL的系列浓度标准溶液,现用现配。Preparation of IAA standard solution: Accurately weigh 10 g of IAA (A.R.), dissolve it with a small amount of ethanol, and then dilute to 100 mL with distilled water (the concentration is 100 mg/mL) as a stock solution; then use the stock solution to make 0 mg/mL (blank), 0.5 mg/mL, 1.0 mg/mL, 5.0 mg/mL, 10.0 mg/mL, 15.0 mg/mL, 20.0 mg/mL, 25.0 mg/mL serial concentration standard solution match.
试剂A:由0.5 mol/L FeCl3溶液15 mL、浓H2SO4(比重1.84)300 mL、蒸馏水500 mL配制而成,于使用前混合均匀,避光保存。Reagent A: Prepared from 15 mL of 0.5 mol/L FeCl 3 solution, 300 mL of concentrated H 2 SO 4 (specific gravity 1.84), and 500 mL of distilled water, mix well before use, and store away from light.
试剂B:由0.5 mol/L FeCl3溶液10mL、35%高氯酸500 mL配制而成,于使用前混合摇匀,避光保存。Reagent B: Prepared from 10 mL of 0.5 mol/L FeCl 3 solution and 500 mL of 35% perchloric acid, mix and shake well before use, and store in the dark.
1 mL试液需加试剂A 4 mL或试剂B 2 mL,试剂A与试剂B可任选一种(试剂B比试剂A灵敏)1 mL of test solution needs to add 4 mL of reagent A or 2 mL of reagent B, either of reagent A and reagent B can be selected (reagent B is more sensitive than reagent A)
取试管8支(标记为0-7号),依次加入IAA系列浓度标准溶液2 mL,并分别加入试剂B 4mL(或试剂A 8 mL)于40℃保温箱中暗保温30 min(加速显色反应);于530 nm下比色,以OD值为纵坐标,以IAA浓度(mg/mL)为横坐标,绘制出一条标准曲线,如图1所示。Take 8 test tubes (marked as No. 0-7), add 2 mL of IAA series concentration standard solution in sequence, and add 4 mL of reagent B (or 8 mL of reagent A) respectively, and incubate in the dark at 40°C for 30 min (accelerated color development). reaction); colorimetric at 530 nm, with the OD value as the ordinate and the IAA concentration (mg/mL) as the abscissa, draw a standard curve, as shown in Figure 1.
a. 样品IAA含量的测定a. Determination of sample IAA content
称取畜禽排泄物发酵培养后的样品10 g装入烧杯,加入0.1 mol/L的 NaOH溶液40 mL,于100℃水浴中煮沸15 min(上面加盖防止水分蒸干),取出烧杯后再向其中加入0.1 mol/L的NaOH溶液25 mL,充分摇匀后,用甲醇定容至100 mL,静置30 min,离心30 min取上清液,上清液即为样品的IAA提取液。Weigh 10 g of livestock and poultry excrement fermented and cultured samples into a beaker, add 40 mL of 0.1 mol/L NaOH solution, boil in a water bath at 100°C for 15 min (cover the top to prevent the water from evaporating to dryness), take out the beaker and then Add 25 mL of 0.1 mol/L NaOH solution to it, shake well, then dilute to 100 mL with methanol, let stand for 30 min, and centrifuge for 30 min to get the supernatant, which is the IAA extract of the sample.
取试管两支,两支试管中均加入上述样品的IAA提取液2 mL和试剂A 8 mL,于40℃保温箱中显色30 min,在530 nm下比色(以双蒸水调零),记录OD值。根据下面的公式(1)计算得出样品中吲哚含量:Take two test tubes, add 2 mL of the IAA extract of the above sample and 8 mL of reagent A to both test tubes, develop the color in a 40°C incubator for 30 min, and measure the color at 530 nm (set to zero with double distilled water) , record the OD value. Calculate the indole content in the sample according to the following formula (1):
样品吲哚含量(mg/g)=(A×V1)/(W×V2) (1)Sample indole content (mg/g)=(A×V1)/(W×V2) (1)
式中:A—标准曲线上查得的IAA浓度(mg/mL);In the formula: A—the concentration of IAA found on the standard curve (mg/mL);
V1—样品的IAA提取液体积(mL);V1—the volume of the IAA extract of the sample (mL);
W—称取的样品重量(g);W - weighed sample weight (g);
V2—样品反应液总体积(mL),样品反应液总体积是指样品的IAA提取液和试剂A的总体积。V2—the total volume of the sample reaction solution (mL), the total volume of the sample reaction solution refers to the total volume of the sample IAA extract and reagent A.
1.2.2 单因素试验结果1.2.2 Single factor test results
根据1.2.1中单因素试验中所述方法,分别进行干酪乳杆菌、产朊假丝酵母菌、粪肠球菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液对畜禽排泄物的发酵培养试验,并设置对照组,对照组的处理过程与各试验组相同,区别仅在于不加入菌种,即菌种的加入量为0%,处理结束后进行各指标的检测。According to the method described in the single factor test in 1.2.1, the fermentation culture test of the bacterial liquid of Lactobacillus casei, Candida utilis, Enterococcus faecalis and Bacillus subtilis on livestock and poultry excrement was carried out respectively, and a control group was set up , the treatment process of the control group is the same as that of the test groups, the only difference is that bacteria are not added, that is, the amount of bacteria added is 0%, and the detection of each index is carried out after the treatment.
1)数据统计和分析1) Data statistics and analysis
试验所得数据采用SPSS软件进行ANOVA方差分析,结果用“平均数±标准差”表示,以P<0.05表示差异显著,所得数据如表1至表4所示。The data obtained from the experiment were analyzed by ANOVA using SPSS software, and the results were expressed as "mean ± standard deviation", and P<0.05 indicated a significant difference. The obtained data are shown in Table 1 to Table 4.
表1 干酪乳杆菌发酵畜禽排泄物的单因素试验Table 1 Single factor test of Lactobacillus casei fermented livestock and poultry excrement
注:同行大写字母相同表示差异不显著(P > 0.05),不同表示差异显著(P < 0.05)。Note: The same uppercase letters in the same row indicate no significant difference (P > 0.05), and different ones indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).
从表1可以看出,与对照组相比,在畜禽排泄物发酵过程中添加干酪乳杆菌,可不同程度地提高发酵温度,显著地降低氮含量、总活菌数、大肠杆菌数、干物质损失率和吲哚含量(P<0.05);以乳酸菌添加量为0.5%时温度值最高、干物质损失率和吲哚含量最低。由于干酪乳杆菌0.05%与0.5%在提高发酵温度和降低吲哚含量方面无显著性差异(P>0.05),因而在下一步的响应面设计试验中干酪乳杆菌的使用中心剂量为0.05%。It can be seen from Table 1 that, compared with the control group, adding Lactobacillus casei during the fermentation of livestock and poultry excrement can increase the fermentation temperature to varying degrees, significantly reduce the nitrogen content, the total number of viable bacteria, the number of E. Material loss rate and indole content (P<0.05); when the addition of lactic acid bacteria was 0.5%, the temperature value was the highest, and the dry matter loss rate and indole content were the lowest. Since 0.05% and 0.5% of Lactobacillus casei had no significant difference (P>0.05) in increasing the fermentation temperature and reducing the indole content, the central dosage of Lactobacillus casei was 0.05% in the next response surface design experiment.
表2 产朊假丝酵母菌发酵畜禽排泄物的单因素试验Table 2 Single factor test of Candida utilis fermentation of livestock and poultry excrement
注:同行大写字母相同表示差异不显著(P > 0.05),不同表示差异显著(P < 0.05)。Note: The same uppercase letters in the same row indicate no significant difference (P > 0.05), and different ones indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).
从表2看出,产朊假丝酵母菌单因素试验中温度值、氮含量、pH值、总活菌数、大肠杆菌数、干物质损失率和吲哚含量对照组和各试验组差异显著(P<0.05);产朊假丝酵母菌添加量为0.1%时温度值最高、吲哚含量最低(P<0.05),0.5%时大肠杆菌数和干物质损失率最低(P<0.05)。重点考虑吲哚含量因素,将0.1%产朊假丝酵母作为下一步响应面设计试验的中心剂量。As can be seen from Table 2, the temperature value, nitrogen content, pH value, total number of live bacteria, number of Escherichia coli, dry matter loss rate and indole content in the single factor test of Candida utilis have significant differences between the control group and each test group (P<0.05); the temperature value was the highest and the indole content was the lowest when the addition of Candida utilis was 0.1% (P<0.05), and the number of E. coli and the loss rate of dry matter were the lowest when the amount of Candida utilis was 0.5% (P<0.05). Focusing on the indole content factor, 0.1% Candida utilis was used as the central dose of the next response surface design experiment.
表3 粪肠球菌发酵畜禽排泄物的单因素试验Table 3 Single factor test of Enterococcus faecalis fermented livestock and poultry excrement
注:同行大写字母相同表示差异不显著(P > 0.05),不同表示差异显著(P < 0.05)Note: The same uppercase letters in the same row mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), different means significant difference (P < 0.05)
从表3可以看出,粪肠球菌单因素试验中温度值、pH值、总活菌数、大肠杆菌数、干物质损失率和吲哚含量对照组和各试验组差异显著(P<0.05);粪肠球菌添加量在0.05%温度值最高、干物质损失率最低,1%时氮含量相对较高、吲哚含量最小,0.5%时大肠杆菌数最低。综合考虑,0.05%粪肠球菌作为下一步响应面设计试验的中心剂量。It can be seen from Table 3 that in the single factor test of Enterococcus faecalis, the temperature value, pH value, total number of viable bacteria, number of Escherichia coli, dry matter loss rate and indole content were significantly different between the control group and each test group (P<0.05) ; The temperature value of Enterococcus faecalis was the highest at 0.05%, the dry matter loss rate was the lowest, the nitrogen content was relatively high at 1%, the indole content was the smallest, and the number of E. coli was the lowest at 0.5%. Considering comprehensively, 0.05% Enterococcus faecalis was used as the central dose of the next response surface design experiment.
表4 枯草芽孢杆菌发酵畜禽排泄物的单因素试验Table 4 Single factor test of Bacillus subtilis fermented livestock and poultry excrement
注:同行大写字母相同表示差异不显著(P > 0.05),不同表示差异显著(P < 0.05)Note: The same uppercase letters in the same row mean no significant difference (P > 0.05), different means significant difference (P < 0.05)
从表4可以看出,枯草芽孢杆菌单因素试验中温度值、氮含量、总活菌数、干物质损失率和吲哚含量对照组和各试验组差异显著(P<0.05);枯草芽孢杆菌添加量在0.05%时干物质损失率最低,在0.5%时温度值最高,在1%时吲哚含量最小。综合考虑,0.05%枯草芽孢杆菌作为下一步响应面设计试验的中心剂量。As can be seen from Table 4, the temperature value, nitrogen content, total viable count, dry matter loss rate and indole content in the Bacillus subtilis single factor test were significantly different between the control group and each test group (P<0.05); The dry matter loss rate was the lowest when the addition amount was 0.05%, the temperature value was the highest when the addition amount was 0.5%, and the indole content was the smallest when the addition amount was 1%. Considering comprehensively, 0.05% Bacillus subtilis was used as the central dose of the next response surface design experiment.
实施例2Example 2
2.1 复合微生态制剂2.1 Compound probiotics
根据实施例1中单因素试验结果,干酪乳杆菌、粪肠球菌、产朊假丝酵母菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的菌液对畜禽排泄物进行发酵培养,均能不同程度地降低其中的大肠杆菌数和吲哚含量,消除畜禽排泄物的臭味,对畜禽排泄物的无害化处理发挥着重要作用。According to the single factor test results in Example 1, the bacterial liquid of Lactobacillus casei, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida utilis and Bacillus subtilis fermented and cultivated livestock and poultry excrement, all of which can reduce Escherichia coli therein to varying degrees. It can reduce the number and indole content, eliminate the odor of livestock and poultry excrement, and play an important role in the harmless treatment of livestock and poultry excrement.
本实施例中,以100g畜禽排泄物计,将以下体积范围的菌液:干酪乳杆菌 0.03~0.10 mL、粪肠球菌 0.03~0.10 mL、产朊假丝酵母菌0.05~0.50 mL、枯草芽孢杆菌 0.03~0.10 mL,取不同的体积数值进行组合(见下表5),混匀后得多种组合的复合微生态制剂,并将该复合微生态制剂分别做畜禽排泄物的发酵培养试验,发酵培养的试验方法同1.2.1中的方法,即采用250 mL锥形瓶,畜禽排泄物取样量为200 g作为发酵培养基,按配比接种所得复合微生态制剂,置于37℃培养箱,120 h后取样,检测相关指标(见下表6)。In this example, based on 100 g of livestock and poultry excrement, the following volume ranges of bacterial liquids were used: Lactobacillus casei 0.03-0.10 mL, Enterococcus faecalis 0.03-0.10 mL, Candida utilis 0.05-0.50 mL, Bacillus subtilis Bacillus 0.03~0.10 mL, take different volume values to combine (see Table 5 below), mix well to get multiple combinations of compound probiotics, and use the compound probiotics for fermentation and culture tests of livestock and poultry excrement , the test method of fermentation culture is the same as the method in 1.2.1, that is, a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask is used, and the sampling volume of livestock and poultry excrement is 200 g as the fermentation medium, and the obtained compound microecological preparation is inoculated according to the ratio, and cultured at 37 °C box, take samples after 120 hours, and test related indicators (see Table 6 below).
2.2 最优复合微生态制剂的响应面回归设计2.2 Response surface regression design of optimal compound microecological preparation
2.2.1 试验设计2.2.1 Experimental design
根据单因素试验的结果,将加入量为以下体积重量比的干酪乳杆菌(Lactobacillus casei):0.05%、粪肠球菌(Enterococcus faecalis):0.05%、产朊假丝酵母菌(Candida utilis):0.10%、枯草芽孢杆菌(Bacillus subtilis):0.05% 作为四因素进行响应面回归设计,表5为试验因素水平编码;将吲哚含量作为响应值R1,表6为试验设计与结果。试验设计和分析采用Design-expert软件。According to the results of the single factor test, Lactobacillus casei ( Lactobacillus casei ): 0.05%, Enterococcus faecalis ( Enterococcus faecalis ): 0.05%, Candida utilis ( Candida utilis ): 0.10 %, Bacillus subtilis ( Bacillus subtilis ): 0.05% was used as four factors for response surface regression design, Table 5 is the level code of the experimental factors; the indole content was taken as the response value R1, Table 6 is the experimental design and results. Design-expert software was used for experimental design and analysis.
试验所得到的回归方程为:R1=0.12 + 0.007275A + 0.013B + 0.010C - 0.011D+ 0.027AB - 0.00285AC - 0.007625AD - 0.011BC + 0.0041BD + 0.008025CD +0.009164A2 + 0.022B2 - 0.004736C2 + 0.016D2。The regression equation obtained from the experiment is: R1=0.12 + 0.007275A + 0.013B + 0.010C - 0.011D+ 0.027AB - 0.00285AC - 0.007625AD - 0.011BC + 0.0041BD + 0.008025CD + 0.009164A 2 + 0.07 -02 C 2 + 0.016D 2 .
表5因素水平编码Table 5 Factor level coding
注:表5中所列各菌液的用量是以100g畜禽排泄物为基准。Note: The amount of each bacterial solution listed in Table 5 is based on 100g of livestock and poultry excrement.
表6试验设计与结果Table 6 Experimental design and results
如表6所示为试验设计与结果,并结合如下图2至图7所示的响应面分析结果:The experimental design and results are shown in Table 6, combined with the response surface analysis results shown in Figures 2 to 7 below:
从图2可知,干酪乳杆菌和粪肠球菌交互作用对降低畜禽粪中吲哚的含量有显著影响,粪肠球菌在0.07%及乳酸菌在0.06%左右时,吲哚含量最小。It can be seen from Figure 2 that the interaction between Lactobacillus casei and Enterococcus faecalis has a significant effect on reducing the indole content in livestock and poultry manure. When Enterococcus faecalis is at 0.07% and Lactobacillus is at about 0.06%, the indole content is the smallest.
从图3可知,产朊假丝酵母菌和干酪乳杆菌交互作用对降低畜禽粪中吲哚含量有一定的作用。产朊假丝酵母菌在0.1%及干酪乳杆菌在0.06%左右时吲哚含量最低。It can be seen from Figure 3 that the interaction between Candida utilis and Lactobacillus casei has a certain effect on reducing the indole content in livestock and poultry manure. Candida utilis had the lowest indole content at 0.1% and Lactobacillus casei at about 0.06%.
从图4可知,干酪乳杆菌和枯草芽孢杆菌交互作用可显著地降低畜禽粪中吲哚的含量。It can be seen from Figure 4 that the interaction between Lactobacillus casei and Bacillus subtilis can significantly reduce the content of indole in livestock and poultry manure.
从图5可知,粪肠球菌和产朊假丝酵母菌交互作用对降低畜禽粪中吲哚的含量有明显影响,粪肠球菌在0.07%及产朊假丝酵母菌在0.15%时吲哚含量较低。It can be seen from Figure 5 that the interaction between Enterococcus faecalis and Candida utilis has a significant effect on reducing the content of indole in livestock and poultry manure. When Enterococcus faecalis is 0.07% and Candida utilis is at 0.15%, indole The content is lower.
从图6可知,粪肠球菌和枯草芽孢杆菌交互作用可显著地降低畜禽粪中吲哚的含量,两者在0.07%左右时吲哚含量最低。It can be seen from Figure 6 that the interaction between Enterococcus faecalis and Bacillus subtilis can significantly reduce the content of indole in livestock and poultry manure, and the indole content is the lowest when the two are around 0.07%.
从图7可知,产朊假丝酵母菌和枯草芽孢杆菌交互作用对降低畜禽粪中吲哚的含量较显著,枯草孢杆菌在0.07%及产朊假丝酵母菌在0.15时吲哚含量较低。It can be seen from Figure 7 that the interaction between Candida utilis and Bacillus subtilis is more significant in reducing the content of indole in livestock and poultry manure. Low.
因此,复合微生态制剂与畜禽排泄物的体积重量比为以下数值时,处理效果最佳:干酪乳杆菌0.06%、粪肠球菌0.07%、产朊假丝酵母菌0.15%、枯草芽孢杆菌0.07%;即复合微生态制剂所包括各菌液的最佳配比为:以100g畜禽排泄物计,干酪乳杆菌0.06 mL、粪肠球菌0.07 mL、产朊假丝酵母菌0.15 mL、枯草芽孢杆菌0.07 mL。Therefore, when the volume-to-weight ratio of the compound microecological preparation to livestock and poultry excrement is the following value, the treatment effect is the best: Lactobacillus casei 0.06%, Enterococcus faecalis 0.07%, Candida utilis 0.15%, Bacillus subtilis 0.07% %; that is, the optimal ratio of each bacterial solution included in the compound microecological preparation is: based on 100g of livestock and poultry excrement, Lactobacillus casei 0.06 mL, Enterococcus faecalis 0.07 mL, Candida utilis 0.15 mL, Bacillus subtilis Bacillus 0.07 mL.
2.2.2 响应面回归设计方差分析2.2.2 Response Surface Regression Design Analysis of Variance
从表7响应面回归方程系数的方差分析结果可知,模型Prob>F值小于0.01,表明该模型可信度高,因此得到的复合微生态制剂的最佳配比可信度高。From the variance analysis results of the response surface regression equation coefficients in Table 7, it can be seen that the model Prob>F value is less than 0.01, indicating that the model has high reliability, so the obtained optimal ratio of the compound microecological preparation has high reliability.
表7响应面回归方程系数的方差分析Table 7 Analysis of variance of coefficients of response surface regression equation
注:Prob>F的小于0.05说明模型或考察因素有显著影响,Prob>F的小于0.01说明影响极其显著。Note: Prob>F less than 0.05 indicates that the model or factors under investigation have a significant impact, and Prob>F less than 0.01 indicates that the impact is extremely significant.
实施例3:复合微生态制剂对畜禽排泄物大肠杆菌和臭气的影响Example 3: Effects of compound probiotics on Escherichia coli and odor from livestock and poultry excrement
将实施例2中所得最佳配比的复合微生态制剂进行畜禽排泄物的发酵培养试验,以100g畜禽排泄物计,将以下体积的菌液:干酪乳杆菌0.06 mL、粪肠球菌0.07 mL、产朊假丝酵母菌0.15 mL、枯草芽孢杆菌0.07 mL,混匀后得复合微生态制剂,并将该复合微生态制剂做畜禽排泄物的发酵培养试验,发酵培养的试验方法同2.1中的方法,即采用250 mL锥形瓶,取样量为200 g,按配比接种所得复合微生态制剂,置于37℃培养箱,120 h后取样,检测相关指标。The compound microecological preparation with the optimal proportion obtained in Example 2 is carried out the fermentation culture experiment of livestock and poultry excrement, counts 100g of livestock and poultry excrement, the bacterium liquid of following volume: Lactobacillus casei 0.06 mL, Enterococcus faecalis 0.07 mL, 0.15 mL of Candida utilis, and 0.07 mL of Bacillus subtilis were mixed to obtain a compound microecological preparation, and the compound microecological preparation was used as a fermentation test of livestock and poultry excrement. The test method of fermentation culture was the same as that in 2.1. The method in the article is to use a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask with a sampling volume of 200 g, inoculate the obtained compound microecological preparation according to the ratio, place it in a 37°C incubator, and take a sample after 120 hours to detect related indicators.
表8 复合微生物制剂发酵畜禽排泄物中pH值、吲哚含量和大肠杆菌数量的变化(n=6)Table 8 Changes of pH value, indole content and Escherichia coli number in the excrement of livestock and poultry fermented by compound microbial preparation (n=6)
从表8可知,利用最佳配比的复合微生态制剂发酵畜禽排泄物,可降低其中的pH和大肠杆菌数量(P>0.05),并使吲哚的含量降低58%(P<0.05),对于消除粪便的臭味具有重要意义。It can be seen from Table 8 that the use of the optimal ratio of compound probiotics to ferment livestock and poultry excrement can reduce the pH and the number of Escherichia coli (P>0.05), and reduce the content of indole by 58% (P<0.05) , It is of great significance to eliminate the odor of feces.
最后所应说明的是:上述实施例仅用于说明而非限制本发明的技术方案,任何对本发明进行的等同替换及不脱离本发明精神和范围的修改或局部替换,其均应涵盖在本发明权利要求保护的范围之内。Finally, it should be noted that: the above-mentioned embodiments are only used to illustrate and not limit the technical solutions of the present invention, and any equivalent replacements to the present invention and modifications or partial replacements that do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention shall be covered by this disclosure. within the scope of protection of the invention claims.
Claims (7)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610610209.9A CN106244481A (en) | 2016-07-29 | 2016-07-29 | A kind of compound micro-ecological preparation, its preparation method and application processed for farm animal excrement |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610610209.9A CN106244481A (en) | 2016-07-29 | 2016-07-29 | A kind of compound micro-ecological preparation, its preparation method and application processed for farm animal excrement |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN106244481A true CN106244481A (en) | 2016-12-21 |
Family
ID=57604969
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN201610610209.9A Pending CN106244481A (en) | 2016-07-29 | 2016-07-29 | A kind of compound micro-ecological preparation, its preparation method and application processed for farm animal excrement |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN106244481A (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108935949A (en) * | 2018-06-26 | 2018-12-07 | 河南广安生物科技股份有限公司 | A kind of feeding antibiotic alternative composite preparation and preparation method thereof |
CN109280629A (en) * | 2018-09-21 | 2019-01-29 | 河南德邻生物制品有限公司 | A composite microbial preparation for harmless treatment of pig manure and its preparation method and application |
CN109825460A (en) * | 2019-03-29 | 2019-05-31 | 上海华杰生态环境工程有限公司 | The composite bacteria agent and preparation method thereof of Rapid Fermentation human and animal excreta |
CN109913389A (en) * | 2019-03-26 | 2019-06-21 | 江苏和吉环保科技有限公司 | A kind of microbiological treatment microbial inoculum and its preparation method and application handling human excrement and urine |
CN110713944A (en) * | 2018-07-12 | 2020-01-21 | 无锡三智生物科技有限公司 | Deodorizing microbial preparation for breeding house and manufacturing process |
CN112645746A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-04-13 | 东北农业大学 | Animal manure straw bio-organic fertilizer and preparation method thereof |
CN115353430A (en) * | 2022-08-26 | 2022-11-18 | 河南德邻生物制品有限公司 | Additive for passivating heavy metals in livestock and poultry manure and using method and application thereof |
CN115948286A (en) * | 2022-11-28 | 2023-04-11 | 郑州昌诺机电科技有限公司 | A kind of microbial agent for waterless toilet base material and its preparation process |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN1309098A (en) * | 2001-01-23 | 2001-08-22 | 任啟刚 | A method and device for treating feces and urine with compound microorganisms |
CN101503664A (en) * | 2009-03-12 | 2009-08-12 | 沈阳惠泽生物制品有限公司 | Method for producing efficient composite microbial preparation by livestock and poultry liquid dung |
CN101804214A (en) * | 2009-12-30 | 2010-08-18 | 沈阳科丰牧业科技有限公司 | Air purifying preparation of animal house |
CN101948763A (en) * | 2009-10-13 | 2011-01-19 | 中国农业科学院饲料研究所 | High-efficiency compound microbial inoculum for fermenting beds, and preparation method and application thereof |
CN103865860A (en) * | 2014-04-01 | 2014-06-18 | 江苏省农业科学院 | Ternary compound inoculant for fermentation bed for pigs |
CN104307012A (en) * | 2014-11-05 | 2015-01-28 | 双胞胎(集团)股份有限公司 | Deodorant special for livestock and poultry farms and application thereof |
CN105802870A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2016-07-27 | 付顺林 | Method for treatment of organic waste with microbial composite inoculant |
-
2016
- 2016-07-29 CN CN201610610209.9A patent/CN106244481A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN1309098A (en) * | 2001-01-23 | 2001-08-22 | 任啟刚 | A method and device for treating feces and urine with compound microorganisms |
CN101503664A (en) * | 2009-03-12 | 2009-08-12 | 沈阳惠泽生物制品有限公司 | Method for producing efficient composite microbial preparation by livestock and poultry liquid dung |
CN101948763A (en) * | 2009-10-13 | 2011-01-19 | 中国农业科学院饲料研究所 | High-efficiency compound microbial inoculum for fermenting beds, and preparation method and application thereof |
CN101804214A (en) * | 2009-12-30 | 2010-08-18 | 沈阳科丰牧业科技有限公司 | Air purifying preparation of animal house |
CN103865860A (en) * | 2014-04-01 | 2014-06-18 | 江苏省农业科学院 | Ternary compound inoculant for fermentation bed for pigs |
CN104307012A (en) * | 2014-11-05 | 2015-01-28 | 双胞胎(集团)股份有限公司 | Deodorant special for livestock and poultry farms and application thereof |
CN105802870A (en) * | 2014-12-30 | 2016-07-27 | 付顺林 | Method for treatment of organic waste with microbial composite inoculant |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN108935949A (en) * | 2018-06-26 | 2018-12-07 | 河南广安生物科技股份有限公司 | A kind of feeding antibiotic alternative composite preparation and preparation method thereof |
CN108935949B (en) * | 2018-06-26 | 2022-04-01 | 河南广安生物科技股份有限公司 | Feed antibiotic substitute composite preparation and preparation method thereof |
CN110713944A (en) * | 2018-07-12 | 2020-01-21 | 无锡三智生物科技有限公司 | Deodorizing microbial preparation for breeding house and manufacturing process |
CN109280629A (en) * | 2018-09-21 | 2019-01-29 | 河南德邻生物制品有限公司 | A composite microbial preparation for harmless treatment of pig manure and its preparation method and application |
CN109280629B (en) * | 2018-09-21 | 2021-10-08 | 河南德邻生物制品有限公司 | A composite microbial preparation for harmless treatment of pig manure and its preparation method and application |
CN109913389A (en) * | 2019-03-26 | 2019-06-21 | 江苏和吉环保科技有限公司 | A kind of microbiological treatment microbial inoculum and its preparation method and application handling human excrement and urine |
CN109825460A (en) * | 2019-03-29 | 2019-05-31 | 上海华杰生态环境工程有限公司 | The composite bacteria agent and preparation method thereof of Rapid Fermentation human and animal excreta |
CN112645746A (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2021-04-13 | 东北农业大学 | Animal manure straw bio-organic fertilizer and preparation method thereof |
CN115353430A (en) * | 2022-08-26 | 2022-11-18 | 河南德邻生物制品有限公司 | Additive for passivating heavy metals in livestock and poultry manure and using method and application thereof |
CN115353430B (en) * | 2022-08-26 | 2023-08-25 | 河南德邻生物制品有限公司 | Additive for passivation of heavy metals in livestock and poultry manure and its use and application |
CN115948286A (en) * | 2022-11-28 | 2023-04-11 | 郑州昌诺机电科技有限公司 | A kind of microbial agent for waterless toilet base material and its preparation process |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106244481A (en) | A kind of compound micro-ecological preparation, its preparation method and application processed for farm animal excrement | |
CN102199562B (en) | Composite bacterial preparation as well as preparation method and application thereof | |
CN108048344B (en) | Two plants of deodorization bacterial strains and its application in preparation composite biological deodorant | |
Jiang et al. | Inactivation of Salmonella during dry co-digestion of food waste and pig manure | |
CN105036853B (en) | A kind of method that biological organic fertilizer is prepared using chicken manure fermenting | |
CN106978367B (en) | Bacillus ureafaciens strain TB42 and application thereof in promoting compost maturity | |
Tiukova et al. | Interaction of Lactobacillus vini with the ethanol‐producing yeasts Dekkera bruxellensis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae | |
CN108611285A (en) | A kind of sulfa antibiotics degradation bacteria and its application | |
CN104152375B (en) | One strain deamination deodorization bacterial strain QDN01 and the application in biological deodorizing thereof | |
CN101525583B (en) | Bacillus subtilis dcy-1 and application thereof in biofermentation | |
CN106754571B (en) | A kind of composite microbial deodorant and preparation method thereof | |
Odey et al. | Optimization of lactic acid fermentation for pathogen inactivation in fecal sludge | |
CN114015586A (en) | A kind of deodorizing and degrading compound bacterial agent and its preparation method and application | |
CN106146218B (en) | A kind of preparation method of soil improvement liquid and soil improvement liquid | |
CN103300209A (en) | Marsh rhodopseudomonas activation preparation and preparation method thereof | |
CN105176868B (en) | A composite bacterial agent for efficiently purifying anaerobic effluent from pig farm sewage and its preparation method and application | |
CN103710284B (en) | There is bacterium mixture and the application thereof of ammonia nitrogen degradation ability | |
CN110699298B (en) | Bacillus coagulans P1-678 strain for producing urease inhibitor and application thereof | |
CN102676407A (en) | Microzyme for degrading residual lincomycin in fermented leaves and application thereof | |
Zhu et al. | Application of carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes in bacteria-microalgae-fungi consortium for efficient antibiotics removal | |
CN108935949A (en) | A kind of feeding antibiotic alternative composite preparation and preparation method thereof | |
CN114292774A (en) | Mycelium or thallus, application thereof and method for breeding bacterial strain by utilizing mycelium or thallus | |
CN106694521B (en) | One metal ion species strengthen method of the thermophilic lysis bacterium for antibiotic bacterium dregs minimizing | |
CN104962502A (en) | Composite microbial inoculant for sludge treatment and preparation method thereof | |
CN115636698B (en) | Method for performing innocent treatment on livestock manure by utilizing saccharomycetes and application of method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20161221 |
|
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |