[go: up one dir, main page]

login
Search: a355190 -id:a355190
     Sort: relevance | references | number | modified | created      Format: long | short | data
Factorial splitting: write n! = x*y*z with x <= y <= z and minimal z-x; sequence gives value of x.
+10
4
1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 4, 8, 14, 32, 70, 140, 324, 768, 1800, 4368, 10800, 27300, 70560, 184800, 494208, 1343680, 3704400, 10388250, 29560960, 85250880, 249318000, 738720000, 2216160000, 6729074352, 20675655000, 64245312000, 201819656500, 640760440320
OFFSET
0,5
COMMENTS
Apparently we have x < y < z for all n > 9. If so, using strict inequalities x < y < z in the definition would make the sequence undefined for n < 3 and affect only a(9) by switching from 9! = 70*72*72 to 9! = 63*72*80.
LINKS
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
Max Alekseyev, Jun 23 2022
STATUS
approved
Factorial splitting: write n! = x*y*z with x <= y <= z and minimal z-x; sequence gives value of z.
+10
4
1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 20, 36, 72, 162, 352, 810, 1872, 4480, 11088, 27720, 71280, 186368, 496128, 1347192, 3720960, 10407936, 29576988, 85322160, 249500160, 738904320, 2216712960, 6732000000, 20680540160, 64257392640, 201852518400, 640832000000, 2055425699250, 6658777165824, 21781337550336
OFFSET
0,3
COMMENTS
Apparently we have x < y < z for all n > 9. If so, using strict inequalities x < y < z in the definition would make the sequence undefined for n < 3 and affect only a(9) by switching from 9! = 70*72*72 to 9! = 63*72*80.
LINKS
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
Max Alekseyev, Jun 23 2022
STATUS
approved
Factorial splitting: write n! = x*y*z with x <= y <= z and minimal z-x; sequence gives value of z-x.
+10
4
0, 0, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 6, 4, 2, 22, 28, 42, 72, 112, 288, 420, 720, 1568, 1920, 3512, 16560, 19686, 16028, 71280, 182160, 184320, 552960, 2925648, 4885160, 12080640, 32861900, 71559680, 77631750, 217165824, 604653336, 368858880, 4069377144, 7919402400, 17537715360, 87352688640, 127718553600
OFFSET
0,4
COMMENTS
a(n) <= A061033(n).
n=61 gives the smallest example where the value of x is not maximal (cf. A061030) and the value of z is not minimal.
Apparently we have x < y < z for all n > 9. If so, using strict inequalities x < y < z in the definition would make the sequence undefined for n < 3 and affect only a(9) by switching from 9! = 70*72*72 to 9! = 63*72*80.
LINKS
KEYWORD
nonn
AUTHOR
Max Alekseyev, Jun 23 2022
STATUS
approved

Search completed in 0.006 seconds