[go: up one dir, main page]

Population of communes of France

edit

Hello,

I see that your bot is adding population (P1082) to communes of France. That's great, thank you a lot (it's been a long time I've been wainting for that).

For information, communes can quite complicated in France and there is a tricky detail where your bot is sometime adding population to the wrong item (fortunately, it's only a small number of communes). Apparently, your edits are based on the INSEE municipality code (P374) which is usually unique but this code is only unique for a point in time. When communes merge, the same code can be reattributed. For instance, you added a 2015 population to Bâgé-Dommartin (Q45036453) which was created in 2018, you should have add the population to Bâgé-la-Ville (Q206680). Pymouss is currently checking and correcting the new communes created after 2015.

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 13:06, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

@VIGNERON, Pymouss: Hello. I understand. Thank you for the information. Indeed, as stated by INSEE, 2015 populations refer to the administrative divisions as of 2017-01-01. My mistake was considering "current" administrative divisions instead of the ones as of 2017-01-01.
Indeed my approach was the following:
On the other hand, after having run this task, I have some questions/comments about some specific cases I have found: what about setting the qualifier end time (P582) on INSEE municipality code (P374) of former communes; maybe creating a new property "INSEE code of delegated commune" to avoid INSEE code clashes; what about if an item has a population (P1082) statement from a previous year with the same population value? Should I create a new statement or should I add a qualifier? For now I have skipped these items...
Is there a place where I could discuss and coordinate about this task? Thank you. --Albert Villanova del Moral (talk) 22:51, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
You can discuss about it on Wikidata talk:WikiProject France/Communes (the discussions are mostly in French but you can write in English, I'll do the translation if needed).
Indeed, there should always be a end time (P582) on INSEE municipality code (P374) for former communes but it's often forgotten :( (there is still a huge lot of work to do on communes)
I'm not sure about the « INSEE code of delegated commune », I don't know if it really make sens with the reality of the INSEE and I feel it won't solve the problem, the end time (P582) qualifier seems better to me.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 23:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi, I see that you are adding 2018 populations with determination method or standard (P459): census, but most data actually do not come from a real census. As discussed with user:Roland45 on fr:Discussion Projet:Communes de France/Nouveaux modèles démographiques, the P459 qualifier is actually a bit tricky. Best may be to remove it altogether from your data. On the other hand, adding criterion used (P1013): municipal population (Q15715409) may be useful. Even though municipal population (Q15715409) is the standard population figure, there are other ones (see population "population totale") [1]). --Zolo (talk) 16:06, 16 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Faulty date logic

edit

This edit shows your bot has faulty date handling logic. The edit claims Gregory XIII became pope 13 May 1572 and that this is a Gregorian calendar date, but in reality, this is a Julian calendar date. Your bot should not import any dates unless it can determine reliably which calendar the date is in.

I have reverted the faulty edit. Jc3s5h (talk) 15:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

procurador en Cortes

edit

Hi there, I see that your bot is adding the "procurador en Cortes" statement to a lot of Spanish politicians. Thanks for that. I've just recently updated all the politicians of the cortes franquistas with official data. I was using the member of the Cortes franquistas for this. Procurador is, as the Spanish article states a rather vague concept and does not differentiate between the different epochs of Spanish politics. I've already removed some of the statements before writing this. Sorry about that, I should first have opened the discussion. --Tomukas (talk) 07:38, 28 March 2020 (UTC)Reply