Fun and engaging! Would love to see a leaderboard enabled. As others hsev also said, it looks very polished too. Smooth animations!

While there were many of these kind of games in the jam, I quite like the concept of this one. I really like that the solution to each level is to just put a face-up 2 on the board. You explored a lot of nice levels with that mechanic.

Art and visuals, sfx and music, rendering and UI were all done really well. You've added a lot of polish to this game.

Great submission!

Great design, would add height levels to the game for more content. It looks soooo clean.

Extremely well polished and executed! I think the only main issue I have is that I can kind of just move around randomly until I get the solution (which is common for these kinds of rolling games in the jam). I also think adding hotkeys to flip the view or restart could help a lot in making the game feel smoother. Fun game.

A nice expansion on the idea of rolling a die, probably the most mechanics I've seen in this genre so far.  The levels are cleverly made, which is most impressive for a spacial puzzle game made in such a short time.

Great job!

I like that you used a level just to tell a joke.  That gave me a laugh <3

Visually it is spectacular! Very polished. Many levels and complexity. Nice!

Impressive amount of levels. Presentation is really good too.

Interesting Idea! I really enjoyed the creative design, and how it matches the theme.

This is such a neat little game! Could easily play more levels. There was some great variance between the levels obstruction wise so it would be really cool to see what you guys would introduce 20 levels or 30. I managed to get myself completely stuck on level 9, with no way to roll myself out. So that was a problem. But the only other critique I had was the same I have with other iso games; wasd don't correspond with the movement directions, so there were a few moments where I made the wrong move because controls weren't completely intuitive. That said, it's a hard design problem to crack so I don't really think this matters too much in a jam. Well done guys, this is definitely I highlight for me! 

Nice game! Fun to see how similar ideas can lead to quite different games. :)

Great game, enjoyed it a lot!

Overall nice polished game especially on the graphic side and wise choices in music and SFX. to be honest I have some points for u guys and i will be happy if u do this for me too. A level design like level 11 isn't attractive, puzzle games usually have short intervals between events, and the player instead of being just a viewer has an impact on every event. next, i also could win some levels without touching probably 90 percent of the level's blocks like level 12, so what's the point of this complicated level design when i can dodge it. this game has lots of space to improve. well done and keep it up

This game is so well polished! Feels pretty tranquil. Love how simple it is. Well polished, too! None of the levels took me more than about thirty seconds, which is a little disappointing for a puzzle game. But well executed overall! Great work :)

Hey guys, when I was brainstorming, I had a somewhat similar idea to yours! After thinking of several others, I changed it and arrived at something a bit different, for the sake of originality and practicality; I think our games are still somewhat similar, although I opted for a different core mechanic. I was very curious and eager to find an idea that other people would not think about, and I see that was a close call. XD

We tried to think of an idea for a game that strayed away from randomness as we knew that would be a common interpretation of the jam theme.

We really went through the same thought process. I guess you have to think ten (chess) steps ahead to really differentiate from the others — that’s what I did, but we were still close! Now, I wonder if there is any other entry in the contest that also looks like ours… :o

I will try not to think too much of my game for reviewing yours, but it’s hard. ;) I may make some comparisons, as I feel they are relevant. (Discard that, having now written most of it and rereading myself, I am mainly taking the comparison as the pivotal point of this little ‘review’!)

Various comments:

1. I often have to ‘grumble’ (gently ;)) because of games using only the QWERTY convention for movement, but I am pleased to see yours was programmed to take into account the keyboard display: my AZERTY is satisfied! :) I wonder if we think about it more easily because we are not English native speakers (I am unsure of the Spanish keyboard layout convention, but the French one is definitely AZERTY). (I have just checked and it turns out the Spanish keyboard is QWERTY, I had no idea; I would have expected it not to follow the English language convention, given that its lexicon seems closer to French to me. ¡ Vete a saber !)
2. I like the clean style and the soothing music. (Funnily enough, I made opposite choices: a ‘natural’ environment and a driving mysterious theme. A disadvantage of mine is that it was more difficult to get a representation of the sides of the dice both for technical reasons — 2D vs. 3D — and conceptual reasons — my die does not have the classic ‘seven’s complement’ which lets you deduce an opposite side.)
3. I have a small question: why did you choose 2 as the winning number? Is it only so that you could use your (cool) logo or is there any deeper reason? ;)
4. Level design: as other commenters said, you let multiples solutions, which is indeed fine. (My own criterion also lets you do that, actually.)
5. I see we also both decided to take the classic ‘let’s give our levels witty names’ puzzle/reflection game approach, in Baba-Is-Youesque fashion. XD
6. What a coincidence, I must say level 11 ‘Journey’ has me laughing: it is the polar opposite of my own level 7 ‘Jittery Mayhem’, where you can get bounced off chaotically into infinite loops by the arrows! XD
7. I think I spotted another bug than those you listed on the game page: in level 4 (‘One Way’), I managed once to get on the arrow without getting moved, and at the end of the level, I won with the 6 side upwards instead of the 2.
8. I know for a fact that my former levels are more thought-out, while my latter levels are way more experimental (I had then very little time left to craft them carefully), and this may also be the case for some of yours. For example, your level 7 can be finished quite early and is called ‘Beta’ (was that some kind of test you used?), and level 11, although poetic, is a simple (yet effective) demonstration of how arrows work.
   By the way, another (quasi-)coincidence: you provided 12 levels, I provided 11. Some telepathy at work there?
9. As a last coincidence, we chose our main titles in our respective native languages. XD (Spanish dos and French idiomatic phrase face à face.)

If I should compare our games on the ‘technical’ side, I would say that yours is neater (both visually and as to some level design) and clearer, while mine is more colourful and (I hope!) bugless (I think I spotted zero bugs in mine, which is a little miracle, as any programmer probably knows). Although it is very easy to restart a level or choose another one in your game, so there is very little to no bother anyway. :)

On the conceptual side, yours focuses on the ground tiles, while mine focuses on the die (and a bit on the tiles through the stamps). Yours uses a classic numbered die with homemade tiles, while mine uses a homemade die (and matching stamps).

So, kudos to you, I enjoyed your game. :) (I even forgot to mention it! XD I was too obsessed by the resemblance.)

One big question I ask myself is which of the two is more complicated (which can be either a drawback or a boon, depending on how you see it) for both the player and the level designer to deal with? They may be of somewhat equivalent potential. Very interesting.

(Once again, I do not mean to compare out of pride or anything, it’s just that I am literally struck at the partial resemblance. XD I am glad we did not settle upon the very same idea! And also glad that the puzzle/reflection genre has other enthusiasts here. ;))

Very nice game, thought of the treadmills too but didnt have the time in the end. Super very clean presentation idd, nice complementing music, sweet transitions. 

Offcourse there is the direction problem had the same comments. Obvious seen the title afterwards but initially didn't really understand the objective. Some puzzles I solved randomly without using allot of the tiles.  And I would go to next level automaticly as well indeed!

Really nice job guys!

Best puzzle game of this type I've seen incredibly polished and responsive.
Only two issues:

-The angle you look at the board is 45 degrees meaning that its unclear in which direction which button takes you: "Will W take me left up or right up?" - me a dummy thinks for the 3rd time in the same level

-No next level button so you need to waste 2 seconds watching the sweet transiton to the level select.

Outside these two issues its perfect.

Favourite puzzle game so far, easy to understand instructions and simple but relatively tricky puzzles. Felt very satisfying overall (level 3 particulary felt satisfying) 

couldnt beat level 11 it was just soooo hard!! :P 

Already been said I know you couldnt get it working but on page restart button/next level and perhaps just some text to say what level the player is on, but other than that, amazing lil game!