Our aims were (i) to explore why it is that one worker with a health problem is able to stay at w... more Our aims were (i) to explore why it is that one worker with a health problem is able to stay at work while the other is not, (ii) to identify signals for decreased functioning at work, and (iii) to explore if and how this can be measured. We conducted three focus groups: with workers with a health problem, occupational physicians, and human resources managers/supervisors. Individual differences in coping strategies, motivation, believes, attitudes, and values were mentioned. All three groups reported that the supervisor is the key figure in the functioning at work of workers with health problems. The supervisor can facilitate the work accommodation of workers and help optimizing functioning at work. The identified signals might contribute to the development of an instrument. Conditions for use were suggested, i.e. a "safe" setting. This focus group study provided insight in why it is that one worker is able to stay at work while the other is not, according to the opinions of three different groups. Although all three groups reported that the supervisor is the key figure in the functioning at work of workers with health problems, there are differences between how the three stakeholders perceive the situation.
To investigate what criteria are applied in the actual practice of patient selection for renal tr... more To investigate what criteria are applied in the actual practice of patient selection for renal transplantation and how practice relates to guidelines developed in medical ethics and health law. Two centres for renal transplantation and nine dialysis centres. Descriptive. Data were collected by observation and open interviews with 33 physicians and other health professionals involved, and analysed using a computer programme for qualitative data. Formally, scarcity of donor organs did not affect the referral and indication of patients for renal transplantation. However, according to some respondents, fewer people were entered on the waiting list because of scarcity. This concerned mainly patients less likely to benefit from a transplantation in terms of life expectancy or enhancement of quality of life. There was some 'covert selection', in that scarcity implicitly or unintentionally was a factor in the decision whether or not to place patients on the waiting list for renal transplantation. The absence of consensus on acceptable selection criteria and the emphasis on medical criteria in the social debate on selection criteria may have contributed to this covert selection.
The discomfort and benefits of a medical treatment may be appreciated differently by different pa... more The discomfort and benefits of a medical treatment may be appreciated differently by different patients. This is one of the reasons why patients should be informed thoroughly and included in the decision-making about treatment. The obligation to inform was laid down in 1995 in the Decree on the Medical Contract. In a case of metastasized cancer of the prostate it was decided more or less by mutual agreement between doctor and patient to administer palliative chemotherapy. It appeared subsequently that the physician had short-term palliation in mind, and the patient prolongation of survival. Although both are of the opinion that the patient was included actively in the decision-making, this was in reality not at all the case. The question arises whether the Decree on the Medical Contract does not demand too much from certain patients regarding their capacity to make a decision about the treatment of a terminal disease.
Our aims were (i) to explore why it is that one worker with a health problem is able to stay at w... more Our aims were (i) to explore why it is that one worker with a health problem is able to stay at work while the other is not, (ii) to identify signals for decreased functioning at work, and (iii) to explore if and how this can be measured. We conducted three focus groups: with workers with a health problem, occupational physicians, and human resources managers/supervisors. Individual differences in coping strategies, motivation, believes, attitudes, and values were mentioned. All three groups reported that the supervisor is the key figure in the functioning at work of workers with health problems. The supervisor can facilitate the work accommodation of workers and help optimizing functioning at work. The identified signals might contribute to the development of an instrument. Conditions for use were suggested, i.e. a "safe" setting. This focus group study provided insight in why it is that one worker is able to stay at work while the other is not, according to the opinions of three different groups. Although all three groups reported that the supervisor is the key figure in the functioning at work of workers with health problems, there are differences between how the three stakeholders perceive the situation.
To investigate what criteria are applied in the actual practice of patient selection for renal tr... more To investigate what criteria are applied in the actual practice of patient selection for renal transplantation and how practice relates to guidelines developed in medical ethics and health law. Two centres for renal transplantation and nine dialysis centres. Descriptive. Data were collected by observation and open interviews with 33 physicians and other health professionals involved, and analysed using a computer programme for qualitative data. Formally, scarcity of donor organs did not affect the referral and indication of patients for renal transplantation. However, according to some respondents, fewer people were entered on the waiting list because of scarcity. This concerned mainly patients less likely to benefit from a transplantation in terms of life expectancy or enhancement of quality of life. There was some 'covert selection', in that scarcity implicitly or unintentionally was a factor in the decision whether or not to place patients on the waiting list for renal transplantation. The absence of consensus on acceptable selection criteria and the emphasis on medical criteria in the social debate on selection criteria may have contributed to this covert selection.
The discomfort and benefits of a medical treatment may be appreciated differently by different pa... more The discomfort and benefits of a medical treatment may be appreciated differently by different patients. This is one of the reasons why patients should be informed thoroughly and included in the decision-making about treatment. The obligation to inform was laid down in 1995 in the Decree on the Medical Contract. In a case of metastasized cancer of the prostate it was decided more or less by mutual agreement between doctor and patient to administer palliative chemotherapy. It appeared subsequently that the physician had short-term palliation in mind, and the patient prolongation of survival. Although both are of the opinion that the patient was included actively in the decision-making, this was in reality not at all the case. The question arises whether the Decree on the Medical Contract does not demand too much from certain patients regarding their capacity to make a decision about the treatment of a terminal disease.
Uploads