Since the beginning of the century, after Y. Chu's group (1) announced the African ancestors of h... more Since the beginning of the century, after Y. Chu's group (1) announced the African ancestors of humans and then Stephen Oppenheimer (2) described how humans went from Africa to the world, many studies appeared believed that there were two migration routes, northern and southern. The loudest when talking about the Northern road was young Spencer Wells.(3) After much debate, but the evidence was not convincing, the idea of the "Northern Migration Route" faded, almost into oblivion. But recently it has risen again, with the article The northern dispersal of early modern humans in eastern Eurasia by the author group Feng Li, Michael Petraglia, Patrick Roberts, Xing Gao being typical. (4) Typical because it is backed by giant scientific centers:
Never before has the world's humanities suffered so many changes as in the first two decades of t... more Never before has the world's humanities suffered so many changes as in the first two decades of this century. Since 1998, when Y. Chu's group published the article Genetic relationships of the Chinese population,(1) causing a shock wave that turned world history upside down, many genetic discoveries about human origins and races declared . Many genetic discoveries about human origins and races have been published. Many theorists appeared and countless theories were born. Too many genius scholars only know their own or their group's theories and do not know others. The world has fallen into chaos. In that situation, the article On the origin of modern humans Asian perspectives appeared by a group of famous authors Christopher J. Bae,* Katerina Douka,* Michael D. Petraglia.(2) This article needs to be criticized. One of the ways to criticize is to write another article.
I. Chinese prehistory according to traditional concepts. At the beginning of the History of China... more I. Chinese prehistory according to traditional concepts. At the beginning of the History of China section, the Wikipedia page writes: "The cradle of national civilization of the first Chinese nation is said to be in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River, which first gradually expanded and developed maintained as it is today." "Prehistoric humans began inhabiting China at least nearly 1 million years ago, with some estimates placing it as far back as 2.24 million years ago. The first agricultural civilizations began to appear in China about 10,000-13,000 years ago, and by more than 5,000 years ago, these agricultural civilizations were fully developed, and bronze objects began to appear, the first State structures such as nobility, urban areas with palaces, religious buildings... The Chinese nation formed from the Central Plains of the Yellow River basin in the North China Plain, Hongshan Culture contributed to shaping civilization and the Chinese nation."
The article "MtDNA variation and the dispersion of Holocene humans southward in mainland Southeas... more The article "MtDNA variation and the dispersion of Holocene humans southward in mainland Southeast Asia" with a capacity of 12,652 words spread over 19 pages of the book and more than 50 references is a summary of science of Professor Stephen Oppenheimer. It can be said that the author has incorporated into his article a large amount of existing research. It helps people after him to be able to fully understand the research topic based on the massive amount of documents he cited. In the conclusion, he raised four issues for geneticists and archaeologists to continue discussing: First, are the modern-day Malay aborigines, who hold the R9b1-16288 lineage, partly descended from the Hoabinhian gardeners? Second, are the modern rice-growing Malays of Melayu who hold the B5a lineage (and are the main heirs of that lineage in the Peninsula), partly descended from rice farmers in the area? region as defined by the Ban Kao cultures or their ancestors? Third, was rice grown in western India, before the Middle Holocene as suggested by the early Holocene spread of B5a? Fourth, were there distinctive Indochinese rice cultures, such as the Da But (see Bulbeck this volume), that dispersed directly to the Orang Asli by various routes across the east coast of the Peninsula? Malay island in the mid-Holocene parallel to N9a6a and F1a1a? One can be sure that, possessing a rich amount of material, if the author cannot answer the questions he raises, those questions are just a puzzle to others.
In 2008, I published the treatise Vietnamese, the subject that created the Chinese language, a st... more In 2008, I published the treatise Vietnamese, the subject that created the Chinese language, a study meant to overthrow the current concept of the origin of Eastern languages. In 2011, I published the essay The Fallen Castle Reflections on Great Scientific Work, criticizing the book Origins and the process of forming Sino-Vietnamese reading by Professor Nguyen Tai Can. Right after that, I sent a letter to the Director of the Institute of Linguistics and the Director of the Institute of Sino-Nom Studies, saying, "My opinion may be wrong. Please review, if you find something wrong, please let everyone know to avoid confusion. And if it's true..." In 2012, when I had more documents about the letters carved on stone 4,000-6,000 years ago by the Lac Viet people in Canxiang, Guangxi, I published the article History of the formation of Chinese writing. Next is the article There is no such thing as Sino-Vietnamese words. In 2015, I published the next article Does Vietnamese only have 1200 years of history, criticizing the article Trying to differentiate the 12-century history of Vietnamese by Professor Nguyen Tai Can. As an outsider, forced to enter the prestigious field of science, I always knew that I was a novice and needed guidance from profound scholars. Especially after criticism to professor Nguyen Tai Can, who has so many famous students, I thought the ax would fall on my head. Not only because of scientific truth but also out of respect for the teacher; but it's so sad to have monologued in front of the desert! Recently, a friend sent me a short letter from a Linguistics Associate Professor discussing with him. The first time I heard a person in the profession, a licensed scholar comment on me, I read it carefully. After reading it, I understand that this is also the common view of linguists. Please allow me to present it to the public (please read below) and say a few words in return.
Many people ask, why until now has Europe not found its ancestors? Is it because European ancesto... more Many people ask, why until now has Europe not found its ancestors? Is it because European ancestors are too mysterious or do Europeans not know how to find and get lost in the maze? This treatise will bring out the truth.
Studying the formation of primitive tribes, European scholars believe that initially there was a ... more Studying the formation of primitive tribes, European scholars believe that initially there was a group of people with maternal blood relatives who gathered to form tribes. The tribe gradually grew larger, until one group split into a new tribe. Meeting favorable conditions, the group split up and developed, moved far away, and occupied new areas. While the original group is still stuck in the same place, it is not favorable so it cannot develop, remaining a small and weak group. The new group traveled far and wide, but knew that they were not the first builders but also had ancestors who started the business, so they called the starting tribe of the family is Proto. Since the 18th century, following that tradition, European scholars called the European population Indo-European and called the ancestral tribe is Proto Indo-European. Because they believe that if there is Indo-European, then there is also Proto-Indo-European, so they set the task of finding a Proto-Indo-European community.
Although many hypotheses have been put forward such as the Kurgan hypothesis and the Anatolia hyp... more Although many hypotheses have been put forward such as the Kurgan hypothesis and the Anatolia hypothesis, up to now European ancestors have not been found. Is it because European history is too mysterious or because of other reasons? This article says that, since 2003, the treatise Out of Africa peopling in the world has revealed the formation of the European population. But why haven't Europeans acknowledged it yet?
From the steppe region, the Kurgan Proto-IE conquerors first invaded Southern Eastern Europe, the... more From the steppe region, the Kurgan Proto-IE conquerors first invaded Southern Eastern Europe, then, in the 3rd millennium, after evolving into the so-called Battle Axe, somehow abolished most of the preexisting languages, and introduced IE throughout Europe." That is the content of the so-called Kurgan Hypothesis of European language origins. Born in the mid-twentieth century but 70 years later, it is still a topic of discussion among scholars. Is Kurgan a "timeless" hypothesis? A question arises: is such a long existence due to its "vitality" or is it the reality of "chicken tendons" in the Eastern proverb, which cannot be swallowed, cannot be spit not out? This is the situation of a hypothesis that cannot be proven and cannot be denied, so it will forever be just a hypothesis?!
More than 20 years since the discovery of the African migrant group to Vietnam, science has gradu... more More than 20 years since the discovery of the African migrant group to Vietnam, science has gradually confirmed it. It was the only successful group of migrants. From about 6,000 people to Vietnam 70,000 years ago, there were two population explosions in Vietnam that created the entire human race outside of Africa...
In the last century, Western scholars taught us a lot of valuable knowledge but also imposed bitt... more In the last century, Western scholars taught us a lot of valuable knowledge but also imposed bitter mistakes on our history such as: "The descendants of the Viet King Gouxian ran to the North delta, becoming Vietnam ancestors today." "Vietnamese borrows 70% from the Chinese language"… In this century, from the results of genetic and archaeological research, they are agreeing on a new "discovery": "A large number of Chinese farmers flooded down brought farming and replaced the indigenous people to make up the population of Vietnam." That is, from the "most modern and solid scientific" evidence, they determined that the Chinese are our ancestors and that farming was also passed down from the North! From my research, I wrote this article to refute that erroneous view. We welcome comments from scholars and readers. HVT.
Since 2006, I have been drafting this article but have not been able to complete it due to lack o... more Since 2006, I have been drafting this article but have not been able to complete it due to lack of documents. Recently supplemented with many documents from colleagues, I have completed the article and presented in a concise and accurate manner the process of forming the East Asian population according to molecular anthropology. Please introduce to your friends and colleagues.
Professor Liam Kelley about the work of career amateur historians surplus in Vietnam. I, Ha Van T... more Professor Liam Kelley about the work of career amateur historians surplus in Vietnam. I, Ha Van Thuy, one of the personal mentioned in the article. I am very grateful to the author of the article for recognizing and introducing our silent work. I am living in Vietnam. As independent researchers, our ideas are opposed to the mainstream academic and therefore are not accepted. The mainstream press does not publish our articles. We only publish on the internet. The fact that the magazine publishes an article about our work is an opportunity for the world to understand that in Vietnam there is a "history on the sidelines" who is writing a new version of Vietnamese history. On this occasion, I write an exchange with Liam C.
In the Eastern population, the Mongoloid race is full of mystery. Only appeared briefly 70,000 ye... more In the Eastern population, the Mongoloid race is full of mystery. Only appeared briefly 70,000 years ago, when African migrants came to Vietnam, then disappeared for 30,000 years. But suddenly 40,000 years ago appeared on Mongolian land with the North Mongoloid genetic code. Unexpectedly, 7,000 years ago, the South Mongoloid race appeared in the Yang Shao culture and then, as if by magic, became the most populous community in Asia... The treatise in your hands will decode the greatest mystery of the history of the Eastern population. Among the four ancient Vietnamese races born 70,000 years ago, when Africans migrated to Vietnam: Indonesian, Melanesian, Mongoloid and Negritos, (1) the Mongoloid race has an extremely mysterious fate. They were present at the same time as three brothers but then disappeared for 30,000 years and only reappeared in Mongolia 40,000 years ago (2). What happen?
is one of the most famous Vietnamese scholars, both in Vietnam and abroad. He is also a unique Vi... more is one of the most famous Vietnamese scholars, both in Vietnam and abroad. He is also a unique Vietnamese scholar, from the starting point, to the path he took in studying Vietnamese studies, the different stages and diversions on that path, and perhaps even the attachment, His strange closeness to the historical research community in Vietnam, the movements within that research." And: "Thank you, Keith Weller Taylor, for your genuine love and tireless efforts for Vietnamese historical science, for Vietnam." (end of excerpt)
In 1838, author of the Dictionarium Annamitico-Latinum, Bishop Taberd declared: "Annamese is a re... more In 1838, author of the Dictionarium Annamitico-Latinum, Bishop Taberd declared: "Annamese is a recession variant of the Han language." In 1912, in the project "The study of historical phonetics of Annam" (Etudes sur la phonétique historique de la langue annamite: Les initiales), Academician Henri Maspéro confirmed that Vietnamese borrowed about 75% from Han language. Someone who proposed the idea of establishing the Annam language family was rejected by the reason: "Unworthy because of borrowing too much from abroad." This idea was replaced by the Mon-Khmer language family. For more than half a century, pioneering scholars like Tran Trong Kim and Ngo Tat To ... have studied to teach Vietnamese people.
Since the beginning of the century, after Y. Chu's group (1) announced the African ancestors of h... more Since the beginning of the century, after Y. Chu's group (1) announced the African ancestors of humans and then Stephen Oppenheimer (2) described how humans went from Africa to the world, many studies appeared believed that there were two migration routes, northern and southern. The loudest when talking about the Northern road was young Spencer Wells.(3) After much debate, but the evidence was not convincing, the idea of the "Northern Migration Route" faded, almost into oblivion. But recently it has risen again, with the article The northern dispersal of early modern humans in eastern Eurasia by the author group Feng Li, Michael Petraglia, Patrick Roberts, Xing Gao being typical. (4) Typical because it is backed by giant scientific centers:
Never before has the world's humanities suffered so many changes as in the first two decades of t... more Never before has the world's humanities suffered so many changes as in the first two decades of this century. Since 1998, when Y. Chu's group published the article Genetic relationships of the Chinese population,(1) causing a shock wave that turned world history upside down, many genetic discoveries about human origins and races declared . Many genetic discoveries about human origins and races have been published. Many theorists appeared and countless theories were born. Too many genius scholars only know their own or their group's theories and do not know others. The world has fallen into chaos. In that situation, the article On the origin of modern humans Asian perspectives appeared by a group of famous authors Christopher J. Bae,* Katerina Douka,* Michael D. Petraglia.(2) This article needs to be criticized. One of the ways to criticize is to write another article.
I. Chinese prehistory according to traditional concepts. At the beginning of the History of China... more I. Chinese prehistory according to traditional concepts. At the beginning of the History of China section, the Wikipedia page writes: "The cradle of national civilization of the first Chinese nation is said to be in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River, which first gradually expanded and developed maintained as it is today." "Prehistoric humans began inhabiting China at least nearly 1 million years ago, with some estimates placing it as far back as 2.24 million years ago. The first agricultural civilizations began to appear in China about 10,000-13,000 years ago, and by more than 5,000 years ago, these agricultural civilizations were fully developed, and bronze objects began to appear, the first State structures such as nobility, urban areas with palaces, religious buildings... The Chinese nation formed from the Central Plains of the Yellow River basin in the North China Plain, Hongshan Culture contributed to shaping civilization and the Chinese nation."
The article "MtDNA variation and the dispersion of Holocene humans southward in mainland Southeas... more The article "MtDNA variation and the dispersion of Holocene humans southward in mainland Southeast Asia" with a capacity of 12,652 words spread over 19 pages of the book and more than 50 references is a summary of science of Professor Stephen Oppenheimer. It can be said that the author has incorporated into his article a large amount of existing research. It helps people after him to be able to fully understand the research topic based on the massive amount of documents he cited. In the conclusion, he raised four issues for geneticists and archaeologists to continue discussing: First, are the modern-day Malay aborigines, who hold the R9b1-16288 lineage, partly descended from the Hoabinhian gardeners? Second, are the modern rice-growing Malays of Melayu who hold the B5a lineage (and are the main heirs of that lineage in the Peninsula), partly descended from rice farmers in the area? region as defined by the Ban Kao cultures or their ancestors? Third, was rice grown in western India, before the Middle Holocene as suggested by the early Holocene spread of B5a? Fourth, were there distinctive Indochinese rice cultures, such as the Da But (see Bulbeck this volume), that dispersed directly to the Orang Asli by various routes across the east coast of the Peninsula? Malay island in the mid-Holocene parallel to N9a6a and F1a1a? One can be sure that, possessing a rich amount of material, if the author cannot answer the questions he raises, those questions are just a puzzle to others.
In 2008, I published the treatise Vietnamese, the subject that created the Chinese language, a st... more In 2008, I published the treatise Vietnamese, the subject that created the Chinese language, a study meant to overthrow the current concept of the origin of Eastern languages. In 2011, I published the essay The Fallen Castle Reflections on Great Scientific Work, criticizing the book Origins and the process of forming Sino-Vietnamese reading by Professor Nguyen Tai Can. Right after that, I sent a letter to the Director of the Institute of Linguistics and the Director of the Institute of Sino-Nom Studies, saying, "My opinion may be wrong. Please review, if you find something wrong, please let everyone know to avoid confusion. And if it's true..." In 2012, when I had more documents about the letters carved on stone 4,000-6,000 years ago by the Lac Viet people in Canxiang, Guangxi, I published the article History of the formation of Chinese writing. Next is the article There is no such thing as Sino-Vietnamese words. In 2015, I published the next article Does Vietnamese only have 1200 years of history, criticizing the article Trying to differentiate the 12-century history of Vietnamese by Professor Nguyen Tai Can. As an outsider, forced to enter the prestigious field of science, I always knew that I was a novice and needed guidance from profound scholars. Especially after criticism to professor Nguyen Tai Can, who has so many famous students, I thought the ax would fall on my head. Not only because of scientific truth but also out of respect for the teacher; but it's so sad to have monologued in front of the desert! Recently, a friend sent me a short letter from a Linguistics Associate Professor discussing with him. The first time I heard a person in the profession, a licensed scholar comment on me, I read it carefully. After reading it, I understand that this is also the common view of linguists. Please allow me to present it to the public (please read below) and say a few words in return.
Many people ask, why until now has Europe not found its ancestors? Is it because European ancesto... more Many people ask, why until now has Europe not found its ancestors? Is it because European ancestors are too mysterious or do Europeans not know how to find and get lost in the maze? This treatise will bring out the truth.
Studying the formation of primitive tribes, European scholars believe that initially there was a ... more Studying the formation of primitive tribes, European scholars believe that initially there was a group of people with maternal blood relatives who gathered to form tribes. The tribe gradually grew larger, until one group split into a new tribe. Meeting favorable conditions, the group split up and developed, moved far away, and occupied new areas. While the original group is still stuck in the same place, it is not favorable so it cannot develop, remaining a small and weak group. The new group traveled far and wide, but knew that they were not the first builders but also had ancestors who started the business, so they called the starting tribe of the family is Proto. Since the 18th century, following that tradition, European scholars called the European population Indo-European and called the ancestral tribe is Proto Indo-European. Because they believe that if there is Indo-European, then there is also Proto-Indo-European, so they set the task of finding a Proto-Indo-European community.
Although many hypotheses have been put forward such as the Kurgan hypothesis and the Anatolia hyp... more Although many hypotheses have been put forward such as the Kurgan hypothesis and the Anatolia hypothesis, up to now European ancestors have not been found. Is it because European history is too mysterious or because of other reasons? This article says that, since 2003, the treatise Out of Africa peopling in the world has revealed the formation of the European population. But why haven't Europeans acknowledged it yet?
From the steppe region, the Kurgan Proto-IE conquerors first invaded Southern Eastern Europe, the... more From the steppe region, the Kurgan Proto-IE conquerors first invaded Southern Eastern Europe, then, in the 3rd millennium, after evolving into the so-called Battle Axe, somehow abolished most of the preexisting languages, and introduced IE throughout Europe." That is the content of the so-called Kurgan Hypothesis of European language origins. Born in the mid-twentieth century but 70 years later, it is still a topic of discussion among scholars. Is Kurgan a "timeless" hypothesis? A question arises: is such a long existence due to its "vitality" or is it the reality of "chicken tendons" in the Eastern proverb, which cannot be swallowed, cannot be spit not out? This is the situation of a hypothesis that cannot be proven and cannot be denied, so it will forever be just a hypothesis?!
More than 20 years since the discovery of the African migrant group to Vietnam, science has gradu... more More than 20 years since the discovery of the African migrant group to Vietnam, science has gradually confirmed it. It was the only successful group of migrants. From about 6,000 people to Vietnam 70,000 years ago, there were two population explosions in Vietnam that created the entire human race outside of Africa...
In the last century, Western scholars taught us a lot of valuable knowledge but also imposed bitt... more In the last century, Western scholars taught us a lot of valuable knowledge but also imposed bitter mistakes on our history such as: "The descendants of the Viet King Gouxian ran to the North delta, becoming Vietnam ancestors today." "Vietnamese borrows 70% from the Chinese language"… In this century, from the results of genetic and archaeological research, they are agreeing on a new "discovery": "A large number of Chinese farmers flooded down brought farming and replaced the indigenous people to make up the population of Vietnam." That is, from the "most modern and solid scientific" evidence, they determined that the Chinese are our ancestors and that farming was also passed down from the North! From my research, I wrote this article to refute that erroneous view. We welcome comments from scholars and readers. HVT.
Since 2006, I have been drafting this article but have not been able to complete it due to lack o... more Since 2006, I have been drafting this article but have not been able to complete it due to lack of documents. Recently supplemented with many documents from colleagues, I have completed the article and presented in a concise and accurate manner the process of forming the East Asian population according to molecular anthropology. Please introduce to your friends and colleagues.
Professor Liam Kelley about the work of career amateur historians surplus in Vietnam. I, Ha Van T... more Professor Liam Kelley about the work of career amateur historians surplus in Vietnam. I, Ha Van Thuy, one of the personal mentioned in the article. I am very grateful to the author of the article for recognizing and introducing our silent work. I am living in Vietnam. As independent researchers, our ideas are opposed to the mainstream academic and therefore are not accepted. The mainstream press does not publish our articles. We only publish on the internet. The fact that the magazine publishes an article about our work is an opportunity for the world to understand that in Vietnam there is a "history on the sidelines" who is writing a new version of Vietnamese history. On this occasion, I write an exchange with Liam C.
In the Eastern population, the Mongoloid race is full of mystery. Only appeared briefly 70,000 ye... more In the Eastern population, the Mongoloid race is full of mystery. Only appeared briefly 70,000 years ago, when African migrants came to Vietnam, then disappeared for 30,000 years. But suddenly 40,000 years ago appeared on Mongolian land with the North Mongoloid genetic code. Unexpectedly, 7,000 years ago, the South Mongoloid race appeared in the Yang Shao culture and then, as if by magic, became the most populous community in Asia... The treatise in your hands will decode the greatest mystery of the history of the Eastern population. Among the four ancient Vietnamese races born 70,000 years ago, when Africans migrated to Vietnam: Indonesian, Melanesian, Mongoloid and Negritos, (1) the Mongoloid race has an extremely mysterious fate. They were present at the same time as three brothers but then disappeared for 30,000 years and only reappeared in Mongolia 40,000 years ago (2). What happen?
is one of the most famous Vietnamese scholars, both in Vietnam and abroad. He is also a unique Vi... more is one of the most famous Vietnamese scholars, both in Vietnam and abroad. He is also a unique Vietnamese scholar, from the starting point, to the path he took in studying Vietnamese studies, the different stages and diversions on that path, and perhaps even the attachment, His strange closeness to the historical research community in Vietnam, the movements within that research." And: "Thank you, Keith Weller Taylor, for your genuine love and tireless efforts for Vietnamese historical science, for Vietnam." (end of excerpt)
In 1838, author of the Dictionarium Annamitico-Latinum, Bishop Taberd declared: "Annamese is a re... more In 1838, author of the Dictionarium Annamitico-Latinum, Bishop Taberd declared: "Annamese is a recession variant of the Han language." In 1912, in the project "The study of historical phonetics of Annam" (Etudes sur la phonétique historique de la langue annamite: Les initiales), Academician Henri Maspéro confirmed that Vietnamese borrowed about 75% from Han language. Someone who proposed the idea of establishing the Annam language family was rejected by the reason: "Unworthy because of borrowing too much from abroad." This idea was replaced by the Mon-Khmer language family. For more than half a century, pioneering scholars like Tran Trong Kim and Ngo Tat To ... have studied to teach Vietnamese people.
Uploads