[go: up one dir, main page]

×
Each case study considers an alignment between a different pair of ontologies, ranging from rich and well-structured to small and poorly structured. This ...
Abstract. Evaluation of ontology alignments is in practice done in two ways: (1) assessing individual correspondences and (2) comparing the alignment to a ...
Evaluation of ontology alignments is in practice done in two ways: (1) assessing individual correspondences and (2) comparing the alignment to a reference ...
This paper proposes two alternative evaluation methods that take into account some characteristics of a usage scenario without doing a full-fledged ...
Goal 2: Insight into the effect of the characteristics of the ontologies on the quality of the alignment, and on the best evaluation method to choose.
Each case study considers an alignment between a different pair of ontologies, ranging from rich and well-structured to small and poorly structured. This ...
Two Variations on Ontology Alignment Evaluation: Methodological Issues by Laura Hollink, Mark van Assem, Shenghui Wang, Antoine Isaac, Guus Schreiber.
Two Variations on Ontology Alignment: Methodological Issues. Published on Aug 16, 20082742 Views. Laura Hollink · Research papers.
Missing: Evaluation: | Show results with:Evaluation:
People also ask
Jun 10, 2018 · Two Variations on Ontology Alignment Evaluation: Methodological Issues · A consensual dataset for complex ontology matching evaluation · Automatic ...
We have examined the possible variations of the ontology alignment problem. (§2) and the possible measures that can be used for evaluating alignment results.
Missing: Issues. | Show results with:Issues.