8000 What kind of dataset is dataset-001? · Issue #1155 · w3c/dxwg · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What kind of dataset is dataset-001? #1155

Closed
aisaac opened this issue Nov 5, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

What kind of dataset is dataset-001? #1155

aisaac opened this issue Nov 5, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
dcat due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days Editorial
Milestone

Comments

@aisaac
Copy link
Contributor
aisaac commented Nov 5, 2019

Are the small examples given in the DCAT spec supposed to be building up a more complete picture of a bigger example?

If yes, then I'm puzzled by the story told for dataset-001. In example 6 its primary type says it is a dataset of manuscripts. But its content type in example 7 is "standard office documents", which hints these were not created purely by hand. And its temporal coverage elsewhere says it covers 2006. It's unlikely manuscripts would be created as a main source of data at or after that date. And it has a distribution as csv files, later.

I reckon that it is meant to be an imaginary dataset. Still we could aim at presenting slightly more consistent chimeras :-)

This is probably for future work anyway.

@riccardoAlbertoni riccardoAlbertoni added the future-work issue deferred to the next standardization round label Nov 5, 2019
@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for this editorial suggestion. Though it is not substantial, I agree that we could aim at presenting slightly more consistent chimaeras. So, as a reminder, I have labelled this issue as future work.

@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor
riccardoAlbertoni commented May 5, 2021

@aisaac, please take a look at PR #1361 , it changes the examples considering your remarks.

@riccardoAlbertoni
Copy link
Contributor

@aisaac, please take a look at PR #1361 , it changes the examples considering your remarks.

@aisaac: PR 1361 has been merged, if there are no objections, I think we can close this issue...

@riccardoAlbertoni riccardoAlbertoni added the due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days label May 26, 2021
@aisaac
Copy link
Contributor Author
aisaac commented May 30, 2021

@riccardoAlbertoni sorry for the delay. It doesn't look so inconsistent anymore, so this can be closed!

@andrea-perego andrea-perego removed the future-work issue deferred to the next standardization round label Mar 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dcat due for closing Issue that is going to be closed if there are no objection within 6 days Editorial
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants
0