8000 [css-spec-shortname-1] Wrap definition of `@content-list` in <dfn> by OnkarRuikar · Pull Request #9404 · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

[css-spec-shortname-1] Wrap definition of @content-list in <dfn> #9404

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[css-spec-shortname-1] Wrap definition of @content-list in <dfn> #9404

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

OnkarRuikar
Copy link
Contributor
@OnkarRuikar OnkarRuikar commented Sep 25, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Without the <dfn> tag the crowler is not able to pick the syntax.

There are 4-5 more docs in different modules that need such change. Should I create a separate PR for each module or include those changes here?

@OnkarRuikar
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've linked the GitHub account to fix the ipr issue.

@w3cbot
Copy link
w3cbot commented Sep 25, 2023

dontcallmedom marked as non substantive for IPR from ash-nazg.

@tabatkins
Copy link
Member

Unfortunately this is wrong - it's a type, and so should be defined with angle brackets (and referenced with <<content-list>>). I'll go fix it properly, thanks for bringing it to my attention.

@tabatkins tabatkins closed this Sep 29, 2023
tabatkins added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2023
@tabatkins
[css-gcpm-3][editorial] Fix markup for <content-list>. #9404
3ef169e
@OnkarRuikar OnkarRuikar deleted the patch-1 branch September 30, 2023 03:59
@OnkarRuikar
Copy link
Contributor Author
OnkarRuikar commented Sep 30, 2023 •
edited
Loading

I'll go fix it properly,

@tabatkins Thanks!

Also could you look into following issues:

  1. <urange> type is not being extracted by reffy bot in webref. Don't know if the doc needs fixing or the reffy bot.
  2. for background-blend-mode shouldn't this line be <pre class='propdef shorthand'> or use expanded version <<blend-mode>> | <a>plus-lighter</a> on line 299?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@OnkarRuikar @w3cbot @tabatkins
0