[css-cascade-6] Can we support implicit scopes in nested settings? #10497
Description
We have previously resolved to supply an 'implicit' scope-root inside <style>. The root is the parent node of the <style> element:
<article id="my-thing">
<style>@scope { /* similar to `@scope (article#my-thing)` */ }</style>
</article>A different implicit scope-root might be more useful when @scope is nested inside other selectors. In that case, I would expect the missing (<scope-start>) should default to (&):
article {
/* un-scoped `article` declarations */
@scope { /* same as `@scope (&)` */ }
@scope to (.another-thing) { /* @scope (&) to (.another-thing) */ }
}That isn't exactly a parallel behavior, and I'm not sure if there are edge cases where it might be unclear which is intended. But I think this would be the most useful/expected result from a nested @scope syntax.