diff --git a/packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-unsafe-enum-comparison.ts b/packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-unsafe-enum-comparison.ts
index 0d165ae7eb5c..2d03a7e65ba9 100644
--- a/packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-unsafe-enum-comparison.ts
+++ b/packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/no-unsafe-enum-comparison.ts
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@ import {
  */
 function typeViolates(leftTypeParts: ts.Type[], right: ts.Type): boolean {
   const leftValueKinds = new Set(leftTypeParts.map(getEnumValueType));
-
   return (
     (leftValueKinds.has(ts.TypeFlags.Number) &&
       tsutils.isTypeFlagSet(
diff --git a/packages/eslint-plugin/tests/rules/no-unsafe-enum-comparison.test.ts b/packages/eslint-plugin/tests/rules/no-unsafe-enum-comparison.test.ts
index b2d4eb907b33..14dca49da472 100644
--- a/packages/eslint-plugin/tests/rules/no-unsafe-enum-comparison.test.ts
+++ b/packages/eslint-plugin/tests/rules/no-unsafe-enum-comparison.test.ts
@@ -1080,5 +1080,16 @@ ruleTester.run('strict-enums-comparison', rule, {
         },
       ],
     },
+    {
+      code: `
+        enum Fruit {
+          Apple,
+        }
+        declare const foo: number & {};
+        if (foo === Fruit.Apple) {
+        }
+      `,
+      errors: [{ messageId: 'mismatched' }],
+    },
   ],
 });