8000 [Discussion] Splitting interfaces like Illuminate Contracts ? · Issue #12544 · symfony/symfony · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

[Discussion] Splitting interfaces like Illuminate Contracts ? #12544

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
harikt opened this issue Nov 22, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

[Discussion] Splitting interfaces like Illuminate Contracts ? #12544

harikt opened this issue Nov 22, 2014 · 3 comments

Comments

@harikt
Copy link
harikt commented Nov 22, 2014

Hi,

I did a search for contracts inside the issues. Didn't noticed anything. In case this is already discussed, my apologies. Please link me to the particular thread.

The idea is to split some of the interfaces that are needed / useful inside certain components.

I have a feeling that when interfaces are split to its own ( probably single interfaces ) it will help not to include the library itself on the require-dev. But it will help to make use of the interface being used inside the component.

So if someone need to make use of a third party component they could just implement the interface and make use of their own components so will reduce a tight coupling. And as Symfony components already implement them users can just bind it easily.

Interested to hear if anyone have thought / discussed this. ( Inspired by Illuminate contracts , psr/log, psr/http-message)

Thank you.
@unkind
Copy link
Contributor
unkind commented Nov 22, 2014

Sounds reasonable. I faced with it in #12115. I failed to find better place for the interface as Symfony doesn't have something like ClosureKit component. Thus, my interface looks awkward in any component.

@Tobion
Copy link
Contributor
Tobion commented Nov 22, 2014

Looks like duplicate of #6129

8253

@harikt
Copy link
Author
harikt commented Nov 22, 2014

@Tobion thank you.

@harikt harikt closed this as completed Nov 22, 2014
@unkind unkind mentioned this issue Nov 22, 2014
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@harikt @Tobion @unkind
0