You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Commits
-------
bad4a1f [OptionsResolver] CS fix in LazyOption
a54ea1b [OptionsResolver] small optimization in Options class
104dcf2 [OptionsResolver] fixed bugs concerning required options
1bfcff4 [OptionsResolver] added failing test cases to demonstrate two bugs
37a3a29 [OptionsResolver] optimized validation
Discussion
----------
[OptionsResolver] fixed two bugs and applied optimization
The first commit optimizes the validation in OptionsResolver by removing several unneeded method calls (without changing anything semantically).
Then I recognized two bugs in the current code that I wrote failing test cases for in the second commit.
1. setAllowedValues wrongly validated missing options
2. required options with defaults were considered missing by `resolve` (contrary to the `isRequired` method)
The third commit fixes these bugs.
The forth commit applies a small optimization in Options and uses a static function call for a static function.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-24T03:39:34Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1418785) (merged a54ea1b into b07fb3c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by travisbot at 2012-05-24T05:22:33Z
This pull request [fails](http://travis-ci.org/symfony/symfony/builds/1419232) (merged bad4a1f into b07fb3c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by bschussek at 2012-05-24T06:20:02Z
I just tested this on my machine, and static calls are a tiny bit faster here, although this is really irrelevant for practical use. Even though I dislike useless micro-optimizations like this, I'm ok with this PR in general.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-05-24T13:23:11Z
I didn't say that's an optimization in the first place. (The optimization was the removal of a variable assignment)
I just changed it because in other PRs I've been told, static functions should be called in a static way.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Tobion at 2012-05-24T23:36:13Z
Please merge before 4387
0 commit comments