Ooh, thanks for reporting! Looks like we currently delete Bluesky bridged profiles when someone opts out, but not when they delete their fediverse account. We should! Should be straightforward.

MVP 🙏 cheers!

Actually, I take it back. The immediate problem here was that when Bridgy Fed followed you back from @bsky.brid.gy@bsky.brid.gy, c.wtf choked on that Follow activity and returned 500 "error". I expect this is the same Pleroma incompatibility as #12 / https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/issues/3206.

Since c.wtf never got that follow, it never started sending Bridgy Fed your activities, including the Delete when you deleted your account, so Bridgy Fed never knew it should disable your bridged Bluesky account.

Here's the Follow activity, sent at 2024-08-08 17:56:28 UTC:

POST https://c.wtf/users/breadguyyy/inbox
{
  "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
  "type": "Follow",
  "id": "https://bsky.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.brid.gy/#follow-back-https://c.wtf/users/breadguyyy-2024-08-08T17:40:53.226091+00:00",
  "actor": "https://bsky.brid.gy/bsky.brid.gy",
  "object": "https://c.wtf/users/breadguyyy",
  "to": ["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"]
}

Same issue here. I added #nobridge to my website and apparently the user page does not exist anymore (as expected): https://fed.brid.gy/web/cuducos.me gives me a 404.

However, the Bluesky account still exists : /

It was a few minutes ago, but I was hoping not to leave the #nobrige live on my website for that long…

OK, added an integration test for fediverse => Bluesky. If a fediverse account accepts @bsky.brid.gy@bsky.brid.gy's follow, we correctly deleted them.

@breadguyyy and @cuducos, I've deleted your bridged Bluesky accounts. Remaining work here is to add an integration test for web too.

Done!

Awesome ✨ Thank you so much : )

MVP 👍