10000 Example in documentation of sfs.mono.source.point_velocity shows sound pressure of a dipole · Issue #64 · sfstoolbox/sfs-python · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Example in documentation of sfs.mono.source.point_velocity shows sound pressure of a dipole #64

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
spors opened this issue Oct 24, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Example in documentation of sfs.mono.source.point_velocity shows sound pressure of a dipole #64

spors opened this issue Oct 24, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees
@mgeier
Labels
docs

Comments

@spors
Copy link
Member
spors commented Oct 24, 2018

The example in documentation of sfs.mono.source.point_velocity shows sound pressure of a dipole. See http://python.sfstoolbox.org/en/0.4.0/frequency-domain.html#sfs.mono.source.point_velocity
@spors spors added the docs label Oct 24, 2018
@mgeier
Copy link
Member
mgeier commented Oct 31, 2018

The docs are somehow messed up on RTD. The functions were in alphabetical order, even though they should be in the order from the source file.

I've "wiped" and re-built the docs for master and 0.4.0 on RTD. Now the order of functions is correct, but the plot images are completely mixed up ... when I build it locally, it looks fine.

@hagenw
Copy link
Member
hagenw commented Nov 1, 2018

If I look at 8000 http://python.sfstoolbox.org/en/0.4.0/frequency-domain.html#sfs.mono.source.point_velocity the figures are not mixed up, or do I miss something?

@mgeier
Copy link
Member
mgeier commented Nov 1, 2018

Indeed, now it looks OK! This may have been a caching issue on my browser (or on the server?).

AFAICT, now everything looks as expected, I think we can close this issue.

@mgeier mgeier closed this as completed Jan 3, 2019
@mgeier mgeier mentioned this issue Jan 3, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mgeier mgeier

Labels
docs
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@hagenw @mgeier @spors
0