Permalink
Comparing changes
Choose two branches to see what’s changed or to start a new pull request.
If you need to, you can also or
learn more about diff comparisons.
Open a pull request
Create a new pull request by comparing changes across two branches. If you need to, you can also .
Learn more about diff comparisons here.
...
- 1 commit
- 8 files changed
- 3 contributors
Commits on Sep 2, 2024
-
feat: allow conditional skip on success and fail comments (#874)
* feat: add `failCommentCondition` to `fail` script * feat: add `successCommentCondition` and `failCommentCondition` to `resolve-config` * feat: add `successCommentCondition` and `failCommentCondition` to `success` scipt * fix(build): lint * test: add `fail` case `Does not post comments if "failCommentCondition" is "false"` * test: add `fail` case for `Does not post comments on existing issues when "failCommentCondition" is "false"` * fix(build): lint * test(fail): add case for `Post new issue if none exists yet, but don't comment on existing issues when "failCommentCondition" is disallows it` * test(success): add case `Does not comment on issues/PR if "successCommentCondition" is "false"` * Update test/fail.test.js Co-authored-by: Jonas Schubert <jonas.schubert.projects@web.de> * test(success): add case for `Add comment and label to found issues/associatedPR using the "successCommentCondition"` * nits * test(success): add case for `Does not comment/label found associatedPR when "successCommentCondition" disables it` * test(success): improve case `Does not comment/label found associatedPR when "successCommentCondition" disables it` * doc: add documentation for `successCommentCondition` and `failCommentCondition` * Update lib/success.js Co-authored-by: Gregor Martynus <39992+gr2m@users.noreply.github.com> * refactor: modify `failTitle`, `failComment` and `successComment` false deprecation message * refator: implement early return in `fail` and `success` lifecyccle helper function * Update README.md Co-authored-by: Jonas Schubert <jonas.schubert.projects@web.de> * remove `failCommentCondition` example wrong description * build: fix lint * feat: add validators for `successCommentCondition` and `failCommentCondition` * feat: add `buildAssociatedPRs` to create pr object in form of issue object with pull_request property * doc: update README.md * build: fix lint * build: fix failing test `Add custom comment and labels` * feat: request more field for `associatedPRs` via graphql and improve `buildAssociatedPRs` response object with * test: modify integration tests * test: modify `success` unit tests * build: fix lint * build: fix failing tests * feat: add `__typename` to `issue.user` object * test: add new case `Does not comment/label associatedPR created by "Bots"` * test: modify `pull_request` mock value to `boolean` * chore(test): clean debug comments * feat: re-integrate `buildAssociatedPRs` * feat: re-introduced and modifed `loadSingleCommitAssociatedPRs` * refactor: introduce `parsedIssues` as returned value from `prs**.body` and `commits**.message` * feat: added `buildRelatedIssuesQuery` util graphql query builder * feat: implement computation for `responseRelatedIssues` * fix: correct `number` arg type in `buildRelatedIssuesQuery` * refactor: extract common field accross graphql queries to `baseFields` * refactor: transform `buildAssociatedPRs` to `buildIssuesOrPRsFromResponseNode` with ability to build both `PRs` and `Issues` object * feat: integrate `buildIssuesOrPRsFromResponseNode` * feat: implement `issueOrPR` for correctly addressing issues and pr in logs * feat: implement improved chunk operation helper `inChunks` and integrate in pr and issues fetch * build: fix lints * test: update `integrations` test * test: address PR and Issue naming in logs in `success` * refactor: why the `Promise.all()`? Removed it haha * feat: set default `type` param in `buildIssuesOrPRsFromResponseNode` * feat: address edge cases * test: fixed matchers in graphql request in `success` units * build: lint * docs: add ignore bots pr/issues example * fix: user issue `number` over `id` * test: improve case `'Does not comment/label associatedPR and relatedIssues created by "Bots"'` * doc: modify `buildIssuesOrPRsFromResponseNode` documentation --------- Co-authored-by: Jonas Schubert <jonas.schubert.projects@web.de> Co-authored-by: Gregor Martynus <39992+gr2m@users.noreply.github.com>
3 people authoredSep 2, 2024
Loading
This comparison is taking too long to generate.
Unfortunately it looks like we can’t render this comparison for you right now. It might be too big, or there might be something weird with your repository.
You can try running this command locally to see the comparison on your machine:
git diff v10.2.0...v10.3.0