8000 [MRG] DOC More detailed pull request and fork instructions (#8530) by tfolkman · Pull Request #8538 · scikit-learn/scikit-learn · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

[MRG] DOC More detailed pull request and fork instructions (#8530) #8538

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 7, 2017

Conversation

tfolkman
Copy link
Contributor
@tfolkman tfolkman commented Mar 5, 2017

Reference Issue

Fixes #8530.

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

Any other comments?

@codecov
Copy link
codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #8538 into master will decrease coverage by -0.73%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8538      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.48%   94.76%   -0.73%     
==========================================
  Files         342      342              
  Lines       61000    61013      +13     
==========================================
- Hits        58246    57818     -428     
- Misses       2754     3195     +441
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
sklearn/feature_extraction/tests/test_image.py 4.78% <0%> (-95.22%)
sklearn/utils/sparsetools/tests/test_traversal.py 53.84% <0%> (-46.16%)
sklearn/feature_extraction/image.py 58.16% <0%> (-41.84%)
sklearn/utils/fixes.py 73.1% <0%> (-11.35%)
sklearn/utils/sparsetools/_graph_validation.py 48.38% <0%> (-9.68%)
sklearn/utils/tests/test_estimator_checks.py 88.23% <0%> (-7.57%)
sklearn/utils/tests/test_utils.py 92.94% <0%> (-7.06%)
sklearn/datasets/olivetti_faces.py 35.55% <0%> (-6.67%)
sklearn/_build_utils/init.py 55.1% <0%> (-6.13%)
sklearn/datasets/california_housing.py 36.84% <0%> (-5.27%)
... and 38 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5135c56...13a0db9. Read the comment docs.

@rishikksh20
Copy link
Contributor

@tfolkman please add reference issue and other descriptions in PR description

Copy link
Member
@lesteve lesteve left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is a good idea to leverage off github instructions rather than maintain our own that are bound to become outdated after some time.

CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ GitHub, clone, and develop on a branch. Steps:

1. Fork the [project repository](https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn)
by clicking on the 'Fork' button near the top right of the page. This creates
a copy of the code under your GitHub user account.
a copy of the code under your GitHub user account. For more details on how to fork a repository see [this guide.](https://help.github.com/articles/fork-a-repo/)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your lines are too long. Find an editor that breaks lines after a decent width say 80.

@lesteve
Copy link
Member
lesteve commented Mar 6, 2017

Please use "Fix #issueNumber" this way the associated issue gets closed automatically when the PR is merged. For more details, look at this.
I have edited your description but please bear this in mind for your next PR.

@tfolkman tfolkman force-pushed the update-pull-req-instr branch from 360c8b5 to bf2ab4f Compare March 6, 2017 17:38
@tfolkman
Copy link
Contributor Author
tfolkman commented Mar 6, 2017

Thank you - and sorry for the learning curve! I updated to make the lines shorter than 80 characters.

@jnothman
Copy link
Member
jnothman commented Mar 6, 2017

Well @amueller in #8530 wanted mention of the automatically appearing create pull request button, but I personally think it's too confusing to document and am fine with these changes.

@lesteve
Copy link
Member
lesteve commented Mar 7, 2017

I pushed some minor tweaks in the markdown. With these LGTM, merging thanks!

@lesteve lesteve merged commit 618f8d2 into scikit-learn:master Mar 7, 2017
@Przemo10 Przemo10 mentioned this pull request Mar 17, 2017
jwjohnson314 pushed a commit to jwjohnson314/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

pull request instructions not up to date in dev docs.
5 participants
0