8000 Rename `TimeSeriesCV` to `TimeSeriesSplit` by yenchenlin · Pull Request #7245 · scikit-learn/scikit-learn · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Rename TimeSeriesCV to TimeSeriesSplit #7245

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

yenchenlin
Copy link
Contributor
@yenchenlin yenchenlin commented Aug 25, 2016

According to discussion in #6586, this PR rename TimeSeriesCV to TimeSeriesSplit and add it to the classes.rst.

shuffle=False,
random_state=None)
super(TimeSeriesSplit, self).__init__(n_splits,
shuffle=False,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

some odd whitespace here and the line below?

Copy link
Contributor Author
@yenchenlin yenchenlin Aug 25, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I run flake8, it seems okay?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if flake8 is fine, then that's fine. thanks! :)

@amueller
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@jnothman
Copy link
Member

please add what's new too

@yenchenlin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jnothman okay!

@jnothman
Copy link
Member

Thanks

@jnothman jnothman merged commit a7d748b into scikit-learn:master Aug 26, 2016
TomDLT pushed a commit to TomDLT/scikit-learn that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2016
* rename TimeSeriesCV to TimeSeriesSplit

* Add TimeSeriesSplit

* Add whats new
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0