-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.9k
[MRG] Adds the ability load datasets from OpenML containing string attributes #13177
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Binary file added
BIN
+418 Bytes
sklearn/datasets/tests/data/openml/40945/api-v1-json-data-40704.json.gz
Binary file not shown.
Binary file added
BIN
+264 Bytes
sklearn/datasets/tests/data/openml/40945/api-v1-json-data-features-40704.json.gz
Binary file not shown.
Binary file added
BIN
+378 Bytes
.../data/openml/40945/api-v1-json-data-list-data_name-titanic-limit-2-data_version-1.json.gz
Binary file not shown.
Binary file added
BIN
+446 Bytes
.../data/openml/40945/api-v1-json-data-list-data_name-titanic-limit-2-status-active-.json.gz
Binary file not shown.
Binary file added
BIN
+876 Bytes
sklearn/datasets/tests/data/openml/40945/api-v1-json-data-qualities-40704.json.gz
Binary file not shown.
Binary file added
BIN
+1.08 KB
sklearn/datasets/tests/data/openml/40945/api-v1-json-data-qualities-40945.json.gz
Binary file not shown.
Binary file added
BIN
+31.6 KB
sklearn/datasets/tests/data/openml/40945/data-v1-download-16826755.arff.gz
Binary file not shown.
Binary file added
BIN
+2.69 KB
sklearn/datasets/tests/data/openml/40945/data-v1-download-4965305.arff.gz
Binary file not shown.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that this change will reverse the enhancement from #13312.
@jorisvandenbossche Do you know what would be best here. It seems that we make our own
fromiter
which will select the column of X and y when iterating over the iterator. We should know the size in advance as well, isn't it?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this reverses the recent enhancement, to use fromiter. Thinking about it, this change is somewhat messier with fromiter. Not sure what the right solution is. The purpose of fromiter was to avoid materialising all the python objects, which was consuming a lot of temporary memory. But there are other ways to chunk the reading, I suppose.
The bigger problem here is that we're temporarily converting all numeric values to strings, which undoes the conversion work in the arff library.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suspect that we will need to treat string columns separately before this, with an operation like:
Though this may all be essentially replicating functionality in Pandas, so if we just supported pandas output, we could avoid this.