8000 feat(repeatString): enforce manual implementation via loops (#460) · rwlarson1/javascript-exercises@29dd5a4 · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
8000

Commit 29dd5a4

Browse files
author
Nikita Revenco
authored
feat(repeatString): enforce manual implementation via loops (TheOdinProject#460)
Intent is to practise using loops rather than wrap the built-in `repeat` String method.
1 parent 0c5480d commit 29dd5a4

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

02_repeatString/README.md

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ repeatString('hey', 3) // returns 'heyheyhey'
88

99
This function will take two arguments, `string` and `num`.
1010

11+
Use loops to implement `repeatString` rather than using the builtin `String.prototype.repeat` which has the same behaviour.
12+
1113
*Note:* The exercises after this one will not have arguments provided as this one does - you will need to provide them yourself from now on. So read each exercise's README carefully to see what kinds of arguments will be expected.
1214

1315
You will notice in this exercise that there are multiple tests (see in file `repeatString.spec.js`). Only the first test is currently enabled. So after making sure that this first one passes, enable the others one by one by deleting the `.skip` from the `test.skip()` function.
@@ -17,8 +19,6 @@ You will notice in this exercise that there are multiple tests (see in file `rep
1719

1820
- Take note of the above function call- how exactly is it being called?
1921

20-
- You're going to want to use a loop for this one.
21-
2222
- Create a variable to hold the string you're going to return, create a loop that repeats the given number of times and add the given string to the result on each loop.
2323

2424
- If running `npm test repeatString.spec.js` returns results similar to the below, make sure you have enabled the rest of the tests, as described in the instructions above.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
0