8000 Use a separate interpreter for each calling SQL userid in plperl and … · rshsdev/postgres@8d7694b · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Commit 8d7694b

Browse files
tglsfdctglsfdc
committed
Use a separate interpreter for each calling SQL userid in plperl and pltcl.
There are numerous methods by which a Perl or Tcl function can subvert the behavior of another such function executed later; for example, by redefining standard functions or o 8000 perators called by the target function. If the target function is SECURITY DEFINER, or is called by such a function, this means that any ordinary SQL user with Perl or Tcl language usage rights can do essentially anything with the privileges of the target function's owner. To close this security hole, create a separate Perl or Tcl interpreter for each SQL userid under which plperl or pltcl functions are executed within a session. However, all plperlu or pltclu functions run within a session still share a single interpreter, since they all execute at the trust level of a database superuser anyway. Note: this change results in a functionality loss when libperl has been built without the "multiplicity" option: it's no longer possible to call plperl functions under different userids in one session, since such a libperl can't support multiple interpreters in one process. However, such a libperl already failed to support concurrent use of plperl and plperlu, so it's likely that few people use such versions with Postgres. Security: CVE-2010-3433
1 parent ee54ffd commit 8d7694b

File tree

9 files changed

+675
-386
lines changed

9 files changed

+675
-386
lines changed

‎doc/src/sgml/installation.sgml

Lines changed: 5 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -170,6 +170,11 @@ su - postgres
170170
recent <productname>Perl</productname> versions, but it was not
171171
in earlier versions, and in any case it is the choice of whomever
172172
installed Perl at your site.
173+
If you intend to make more than incidental use of
174+
<application>PL/Perl</application>, you should ensure that the
175+
<productname>Perl</productname> installation was built with the
176+
<literal>usemultiplicity</> option enabled (<literal>perl -V</>
177+
will show whether this is the case).
173178
</para>
174179

175180
<para>

‎doc/src/sgml/plperl.sgml

Lines changed: 43 additions & 16 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/plperl.sgml,v 2.37.4.1 2010/05/13 16:44:03 aduns
3535
<para>
3636
Users of source packages must specially enable the build of
3737
PL/Perl during the installation process. (Refer to <xref
38-
linkend="install-short"> for more information.) Users of
38+
linkend="installation"> for more information.) Users of
3939
binary packages might find PL/Perl in a separate subpackage.
4040
</para>
4141
</note>
@@ -397,6 +397,23 @@ $$ LANGUAGE plperl;
397397
<literal>return $_SHARED{myquote}-&gt;($_[0]);</literal>
398398
at the expense of readability.)
399399
</para>
400+
401+
<para>
402+
For security reasons, PL/Perl executes functions called by any one SQL role
403+
in a separate Perl interpreter for that role. This prevents accidental or
404+
malicious interference by one user with the behavior of another user's
405+
PL/Perl functions. Each such interpreter has its own value of the
406+
<varname>%_SHARED</varname> variable and other global state. Thus, two
407+
PL/Perl functions will share the same value of <varname>%_SHARED</varname>
408+
if and only if they are executed by the same SQL role. In an application
409+
wherein a single session executes code under multiple SQL roles (via
410+
<literal>SECURITY DEFINER</> functions, use of <command>SET ROLE</>, etc)
411+
you may need to take explicit steps to ensure that PL/Perl functions can
412+
share data via <varname>%_SHARED</varname>. To do that, make sure that
413+
functions that should communicate are owned by the same user, and mark
414+
them <literal>SECURITY DEFINER</>. You must of course take care that
415+
such functions can't be used to do anything unintended.
416+
</para>
400417
</sect1>
401418

402419
<sect1 id="plperl-trusted">
@@ -460,21 +477,31 @@ $$ LANGUAGE plperl;
460477
</para>
461478

462479
<note>
463-
<para>
464-
For security reasons, to stop a leak of privileged operations from
465-
<application>PL/PerlU</> to <application>PL/Perl</>, these two languages
466-
have to run in separate instances of the Perl interpreter. If your
467-
Perl installation has been appropriately compiled, this is not a problem.
468-
However, not all installations are compiled with the requisite flags.
469-
If <productname>PostgreSQL</> detects that this is the case then it will
470-
not start a second interpreter, but instead create an error. In
471-
consequence, in such an installation, you cannot use both
472-
<application>PL/PerlU</> and <application>PL/Perl</> in the same backend
473-
process. The remedy for this is to obtain a Perl installation created
474-
with the appropriate flags, namely either <literal>usemultiplicity</> or
475-
both <literal>usethreads</> and <literal>useithreads</>.
476-
For more details,see the <literal>perlembed</> manual page.
477-
</para>
480+
<para>
481+
While <application>PL/Perl</> functions run in a separate Perl
482+
interpreter for each SQL role, all <application>PL/PerlU</> functions
483+
executed in a given session run in a single Perl interpreter (which is
484+
not any of the ones used for <application>PL/Perl</> functions).
485+
This allows <application>PL/PerlU</> functions to share data freely,
486+
but no communication can occur between <application>PL/Perl</> and
487+
<application>PL/PerlU</> functions.
488+
</para>
489+
</note>
490+
491+
<note>
492+
<para>
493+
Perl cannot support multiple interpreters within one process unless
494+
it was built with the appropriate flags, namely either
495+
<literal>usemultiplicity</> or <literal>useithreads</>.
496+
(<literal>usemultiplicity</> is preferred unless you actually need
497+
to use threads. For more details, see the
498+
<citerefentry><refentrytitle>perlembed</></citerefentry> man page.)
499+
If <application>PL/Perl</> is used with a copy of Perl that was not built
500+
this way, then it is only possible to have one Perl interpreter per
501+
session, and so any one session can only execute either
502+
<application>PL/PerlU</> functions, or <application>PL/Perl</> functions
503+
that are all called by the same SQL role.
504+
</para>
478505
</note>
479506

480507
</sect1>

‎doc/src/sgml/pltcl.sgml

Lines changed: 34 additions & 10 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -210,14 +210,36 @@ $$ LANGUAGE pltcl;
210210
Sometimes it
211211
is useful to have some global data that is held between two
212212
calls to a function or is shared between different functions.
213-
This is easily done since
214-
all PL/Tcl functions executed in one session share the same
215-
safe Tcl interpreter. So, any global Tcl variable is accessible to
216-
all PL/Tcl function calls and will persist for the duration of the
217-
SQL session. (Note that <application>PL/TclU</> functions likewise share
218-
global data, but they are in a different Tcl interpreter and cannot
219-
communicate with PL/Tcl functions.)
213+
This is easily done in PL/Tcl, but there are some restrictions that
214+
must be understood.
220215
</para>
216+
217+
<para>
218+
For security reasons, PL/Tcl executes functions called by any one SQL
219+
role in a separate Tcl interpreter for that role. This prevents
220+
accidental or malicious interference by one user with the behavior of
221+
another user's PL/Tcl functions. Each such interpreter will have its own
222+
values for any <quote>global</> Tcl variables. Thus, two PL/Tcl
223+
functions will share the same global variables if and only if they are
224+
executed by the same SQL role. In an application wherein a single
225+
session executes code under multiple SQL roles (via <literal>SECURITY
226+
DEFINER</> functions, use of <command>SET ROLE</>, etc) you may need to
227+
take explicit steps to ensure that PL/Tcl functions can share data. To
228+
do that, make sure that functions that should communicate are owned by
229+
the same user, and mark them <literal>SECURITY DEFINER</>. You must of
230+
course take care that such functions can't be used to do anything
231+
unintended.
232+
</para>
233+
234+
<para>
235+
All PL/TclU functions used in a session execute in the same Tcl
236+
interpreter, which of course is distinct from the interpreter(s)
237+
used for PL/Tcl functions. So global data is automatically shared
238+
between PL/TclU functions. This is not considered a security risk
239+
because all PL/TclU functions execute at the same trust level,
240+
namely that of a database superuser.
241+
</para>
242+
221243
<para>
222244
To help protect PL/Tcl functions from unintentionally interfering
223245
with each other, a global
@@ -227,7 +249,9 @@ $$ LANGUAGE pltcl;
227249
<literal>GD</> be used
228250
for persistent private data of a function. Use regular Tcl global
229251
variables only for values that you specifically intend to be shared among
230-
multiple functions.
252+
multiple functions. (Note that the <literal>GD</> arrays are only
253+
global within a particular interpreter, so they do not bypass the
254+
security restrictions mentioned above.)
231255
</para>
232256

233257
<para>
@@ -666,8 +690,8 @@ CREATE TRIGGER trig_mytab_modcount BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON mytab
666690
exists, the module <literal>unknown</> is fetched from the table
667691
and loaded into the Tcl interpreter immediately before the first
668692
execution of a PL/Tcl function in a database session. (This
669-
happens separately for PL/Tcl and PL/TclU, if both are used,
670-
because separate interpreters are used for the two languages.)
693+
happens separately for each Tcl interpreter, if more than one is
694+
used in a session; see <xref linkend="pltcl-global">.)
671695
</para>
672696
<para>
673697
While the <literal>unknown</> module could actually contain any

‎doc/src/sgml/release-7.4.sgml

Lines changed: 37 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -37,6 +37,43 @@
3737

3838
<itemizedlist>
3939

40+
<listitem>
41+
<para>
42+
Use a separate interpreter for each calling SQL userid in PL/Perl and
43+
PL/Tcl (Tom Lane)
44+
</para>
45+
46+
<para>
47+
This change prevents security problems that can be caused by subverting
48+
Perl or Tcl code that will be executed later in the same session under
49+
another SQL user identity (for example, within a <literal>SECURITY
50+
DEFINER</> function). Most scripting languages offer numerous ways that
51+
that might be done, such as redefining standard functions or operators
52+
called by the target function. Without this change, any SQL user with
53+
Perl or Tcl language usage rights can do essentially anything with the
54+
SQL privileges of the target function's owner.
55+
</para>
56+
57+
<para>
58+
The cost of this change is that intentional communication among Perl
59+
and Tcl functions becomes more difficult. To provide an escape hatch,
60+
PL/PerlU and PL/TclU functions continue to use only one interpreter
61+
per session. This is not considered a security issue since all such
62+
functions execute at the trust level of a database superuser already.
63+
</para>
64+
65+
<para>
66+
It is likely that third-party procedural languages that claim to offer
67+
trusted execution have similar security issues. We advise contacting
68+
the authors of any PL you are depending on for security-critical
69+
purposes.
70+
</para>
71+
72+
<para>
73+
Our thanks to Tim Bunce for pointing out this issue (CVE-2010-3433).
74+
</para>
75+
</listitem>
76+
4077
<listitem>
4178
<para>
4279
Prevent possible crashes in <function>pg_get_expr()</> by disallowing

‎doc/src/sgml/release-8.0.sgml

Lines changed: 37 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -37,6 +37,43 @@
3737

3838
<itemizedlist>
3939

40+
<listitem>
41+
<para>
42+
Use a separate interpreter for each calling SQL userid in PL/Perl and
43+
PL/Tcl (Tom Lane)
44+
</para>
45+
46+
<para>
47+
This change prevents security problems that can be caused by subverting
48+
Perl or Tcl code that will be executed later in the same session under
49+
another SQL user identity (for example, within a <literal>SECURITY
50+
DEFINER</> function). Most scripting languages offer numerous ways that
51+
that might be done, such as redefining standard functions or operators
52+
called by the target function. Without this change, any SQL user with
53+
Perl or Tcl language usage rights can do essentially anything with the
54+
SQL privileges of the target function's owner.
55+
</para>
56+
57+
<para>
58+
The cost of this change is that intentional communication among Perl
59+
and Tcl functions becomes more difficult. To provide an escape hatch,
60+
PL/PerlU and PL/TclU functions continue to use only one interpreter
61+
per session. This is not considered a security issue since all such
62+
functions execute at the trust level of a database superuser already.
63+
</para>
64+
65+
<para>
66+
It is likely that third-party procedural languages that claim to offer
67+
trusted execution have similar security issues. We advise contacting
68+
the authors of any PL you are depending on for security-critical
69+
purposes.
70+
</para>
71+
72+
<para>
73+
Our thanks to Tim Bunce for pointing out this issue (CVE-2010-3433).
74+
</para>
75+
</listitem>
76+
4077
<listitem>
4178
<para>
4279
Prevent possible crashes in <function>pg_get_expr()</> by disallowing

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
0