raghusharma1 · raghusharma1 · Jun 10, 2025
diff --git a/projects/Calculate Age/requirements.txt b/projects/Calculate Age/requirements.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+
+pytest
diff --git a/projects/Calculate Age/test_CalculateJudgeLeapYear.py b/projects/Calculate Age/test_CalculateJudgeLeapYear.py
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+# ********RoostGPT********
+"""
+Test generated by RoostGPT for test Python-5768-test3 using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k
+
+ROOST_METHOD_HASH=judge_leap_year_f401fe1df5
+ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=judge_leap_year_4548bc7362
+
+
+
+Scenario 1: Verify Leap Year Determination for a Typical Leap Year
+Details:
+  TestName: test_typical_leap_year
+  Description: Test to confirm the function correctly identifies a typical leap year based on the rules of the Gregorian calendar.
+Execution:
+  Arrange: Prepare a valid leap year input, such as 2000.
+  Act: Call the `judge_leap_year` function with the year 2000.
+  Assert: Expect the function to return `True` as 2000 satisfies leap year conditions.
+Validation:
+  Rationalize that testing typical leap year functionality ensures the fundamental correctness of the function's approximation to the Gregorian calendar rules.
+
+Scenario 2: Test Regular Non-Leap Year
+Details:
+  TestName: test_regular_non_leap_year
+  Description: Verify the function correctly identifies a typical non-leap year that doesn't satisfy any leap year conditions.
+Execution:
+  Arrange: Choose a regular non-leap year, for example, 2019.
+  Act: Call the `judge_leap_year` function with the year 2019.
+  Assert: Expect the function to return `False` as 2019 does not fall under leap year rules.
+Validation:
+  Rationalize the importance of ensuring the function correctly excludes non-leap years from incorrectly being marked as leap years.
+
+Scenario 3: Test Leap Year Divisible by 4 but not 100 (Edge Case)
+Details:
+  TestName: test_leap_year_divisible_by_4_not_100
+  Description: Validate the function correctly identifies years that are divisible by 4 but not divisible by 100 unless divisible by 400.
+Execution:
+  Arrange: Prepare a year like 2024, which is divisible by 4 but not divisible by 100.
+  Act: Invoke the `judge_leap_year` using the year 2024.
+  Assert: Confirm the function returns `True` since 2024 follows leap year rules.
+Validation:
+  Rationalize testing edge cases based on divisibility rules ensures the function’s compliance with leap year logic.
+
+Scenario 4: Test Year Divisible by 100 but Not 400 (Non-Leap Year Edge Case)
+Details:
+  TestName: test_year_divisible_by_100_not_400
+  Description: Verify that the function identifies years divisible by 100 but not divisible by 400 as non-leap years.
+Execution:
+  Arrange: Use a year such as 1900 which is divisible by 100 but not divisible by 400.
+  Act: Call the `judge_leap_year` function and pass 1900 as input.
+  Assert: Expect the function to return `False`, as 1900 is correctly excluded from being a leap year.
+Validation:
+  Rationalize this edge case as critical to ensuring proper distinction between non-leap years and leap years in corner scenarios.
+
+Scenario 5: Verify Leap Year Divisible by 400
+Details:
+  TestName: test_leap_year_divisible_by_400
+  Description: Check if the function correctly identifies years divisible by 400 as leap years regardless of other conditions.
+Execution:
+  Arrange: Select a year like 1600 which is divisible by 400.
+  Act: Execute `judge_leap_year` with the input year 1600.
+  Assert: Verify the function returns `True` since 1600 fits leap year rules exactly.
+Validation:
+  Rationalize this scenario confirms that the function properly identifies and handles leap years divisible by 400 as per Gregorian calendar specifications.
+
+Scenario 6: Validate Negative Year Input (Boundary Condition)
+Details:
+  TestName: test_negative_year_input
+  Description: Ensure the function handles negative year values correctly by returning appropriate results based on leap year rules.
+Execution:
+  Arrange: Choose a negative year, such as -400 (leap year) or -500 (non-leap year).
+  Act: Invoke `judge_leap_year` with the negative years separately.
+  Assert: Confirm the function returns `True` for -400 and `False` for -500 as expected.
+Validation:
+  Rationalize that testing negative year inputs ensures the function's ability to handle historical dates correctly without breaking its logic.
+
+Scenario 7: Validate Boundary Year Input (Year 0 and Year 1)
+Details:
+  TestName: test_boundary_year_input
+  Description: Test the behavior of the function when dealing with boundary inputs like year 0 and year 1.
+Execution:
+  Arrange: Prepare years 0 and 1 as inputs for the function.
+  Act: Run `judge_leap_year` for both year values separately.
+  Assert: Expect the function to return `True` for year 0 and `False` for year 1.
+Validation:
+  Rationalize testing boundary years checks the robustness of the function when handling edge inputs within historical limits.
+
+Scenario 8: Verify Exact Result for Large Year Ranges
+Details:
+  TestName: test_large_year_range_input
+  Description: Ensure the function handles large year values consistently and accurately determines whether they are leap years.
+Execution:
+  Arrange: Prepare large year values such as 10000 (leap year) and 10001 (non-leap year).
+  Act: Invoke `judge_leap_year` with year 10000 and year 10001 separately.
+  Assert: Verify that the function returns `True` for 10000 and `False` for 10001 appropriately.
+Validation:
+  Rationalize testing large inputs safeguards against potential overflow or computational errors and ensures correct logic is applied across all valid year ranges.
+
+"""
+
+# ********RoostGPT********
+import pytest
+import time
+from calendar import isleap
+from calculate import judge_leap_year  # Ensure judge_leap_year is imported correctly
+
+class Test_CalculateJudgeLeapYear:
+
+    @pytest.mark.positive
+    @pytest.mark.smoke
+    def test_typical_leap_year(self):
+        # Arrange
+        year = 2000  # Typical leap year
+        # Act
+        result = judge_leap_year(year)
+        # Assert
+        assert result is True, f"Expected True for leap year {year}, but got {result}"
+
+    @pytest.mark.negative
+    @pytest.mark.regression
+    def test_regular_non_leap_year(self):
+        # Arrange
+        year = 2019  # Non-leap year
+        # Act
+        result = judge_leap_year(year)
+        # Assert
+        assert result is False, f"Expected False for non-leap year {year}, but got {result}"
+
+    @pytest.mark.edge_case
+    @pytest.mark.valid
+    def test_leap_year_divisible_by_4_not_100(self):
+        # Arrange
+        year = 2024  # Divisible by 4, not divisible by 100
+        # Act
+        result = judge_leap_year(year)
+        # Assert
+        assert result is True, f"Expected True for leap year {year}, but got {result}"
+
+    @pytest.mark.edge_case
+    @pytest.mark.valid
+    def test_year_divisible_by_100_not_400(self):
+        # Arrange
+        year = 1900  # Divisible by 100 but not divisible by 400
+        # Act
+        result = judge_leap_year(year)
+        # Assert
+        assert result is False, f"Expected False for non-leap year {year}, but got {result}"
+
+    @pytest.mark.positive
+    @pytest.mark.valid
+    def test_leap_year_divisible_by_400(self):
+        # Arrange
+        year = 1600  # Divisible by 400
+        # Act
+        result = judge_leap_year(year)
+        # Assert
+        assert result is True, f"Expected True for leap year {year}, but got {result}"
+
+    @pytest.mark.boundary
+    @pytest.mark.negative
+    def test_negative_year_input(self):
+        # Arrange
+        years = [-400, -500]  # Negative years, -400 is leap, -500 is non-leap
+        expected_results = [True, False]
+        # Act & Assert
+        for year, expected in zip(years, expected_results):
+            result = judge_leap_year(year)
+            assert result == expected, f"For year {year}, expected {expected} but got {result}"
+
+    @pytest.mark.boundary
+    @pytest.mark.valid
+    def test_boundary_year_input(self):
+        # Arrange
+        years = [0, 1]  # Boundary years, 0 is leap, 1 is non-leap
+        expected_results = [True, False]
+        # Act & Assert
+        for year, expected in zip(years, expected_results):
+            result = judge_leap_year(year)
+            assert result == expected, f"For year {year}, expected {expected} but got {result}"
+
+    @pytest.mark.performance
+    @pytest.mark.valid
+    def test_large_year_range_input(self):
+        # Arrange
+        years = [10000, 10001]  # Large year inputs, 10000 is leap, 10001 is non-leap
+        expected_results = [True, False]
+        # Act & Assert
+        for year, expected in zip(years, expected_results):
+            result = judge_leap_year(year)
+            assert result == expected, f"For year {year}, expected {expected} but got {result}"
+
+# TODO: Add more test scenarios if required based on updated requirements or edge cases