@@ -208,8 +208,8 @@ The standard PEP workflow is:
208
208
* The title accurately describes the content.
209
209
* The PEP's language (spelling, grammar, sentence structure, etc.)
210
210
and code style (examples should match :pep:`7` & :pep:`8`) should be
211
- correct and conformant. The PEP text will be automatically checked for
212
- correct reStructuredText formatting when the pull request is submitted.
211
+ correct and conformant. The PEP text will be automatically checked for
212
+ correct reStructuredText formatting when the pull request is submitted.
213
213
PEPs with invalid reST markup will not be approved.
214
214
215
215
Editors are generally quite lenient about this initial review,
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ optional and are described below. All other headers are required.
596
596
Status: <Draft | Active | Accepted | Provisional | Deferred | Rejected |
597
597
Withdrawn | Final | Superseded>
598
598
Type: <Standards Track | Informational | Process>
599
- * Content-Type: < text/x-rst | text/plain>
599
+ * Content-Type: text/x-rst
600
600
* Requires: <pep numbers>
601
601
Created: <date created on, in dd-mmm-yyyy format>
602
602
* Python-Version: <version number>
@@ -649,11 +649,9 @@ The Type header specifies the type of PEP: Standards Track,
649
649
Informational, or Process.
650
650
651
651
The format of a PEP is specified with a Content-Type header.
652
- Valid values are ``text/plain`` for plaintext PEPs (see :pep:`9`)
653
- and ``text/x-rst`` for reStructuredText PEPs (see :pep:`12`).
654
- All new and active PEPs must use reStructuredText, but for backwards
655
- compatibility, plain text is currently still the default if no
656
- Content-Type header is present.
652
+ All PEPs must use reStructuredText (see :pep:`12`),
653
+ and have a value of ``text/x-rst``, the default.
654
+ Previously, plaintext PEPs used ``text/plain`` (see :pep:`9`).
657
655
658
656
The Created header records the date that the PEP was assigned a
659
657
number, while Post-History is used to record the dates of when new
0 commit comments