python
diff --git a/‎peps/pep-0772.rst
+68-65 b/‎peps/pep-0772.rst
+68-65
@@ -141,7 +141,8 @@ The council shall work to:
 * Establish appropriate decision-making processes.
 * Improve Python packaging's user experience.
 * Make contributing as accessible, inclusive, and sustainable as possible.
-* Strive to seek consensus among contributors before acting in a formal capacity.
+* Strive to seek consensus among contributors before acting in a formal
+  capacity.
 
 Responsibilities
 ================
@@ -167,19 +168,17 @@ publicly in a timely fashion.
 Delegations
 -----------
 
-The Python Steering Council is expected to delegate decision making to
-the Packaging Council for PEPs related to the Python packaging.  The bodies
-would work together on issues that intersect the packaging domain and language
-stewardship (including the CPython implementation, standard library, and
-distribution).
+The Python Steering Council will delegate decision making to the Packaging
+Council for PEPs related to the Python packaging. The bodies would work
+together on issues that intersect the packaging domain and language stewardship
+(including the CPython implementation, standard library, and distribution).
 
-The PSF Board is encouraged to formally deprecate the Packaging Workgroup
-and the Packaging Council would take on the responsibilities of the
-PSF's Packaging Workgroup.
+The PSF Board is encouraged to formally deactivate the Packaging Workgroup and
+the Packaging Council would take on the responsibilities of the PSF's Packaging
+Workgroup.
 
-The PyPA is expected to work with the Packaging Council to establish a
-decision making process that governs the technical projects under the PyPA
-umbrella.
+The PyPA is expected to work with the Packaging Council to establish a decision
+making process that governs the technical projects under the PyPA umbrella.
 
 Processes
 =========
@@ -189,13 +188,14 @@ Election of the council
 
 A council election consists of two phases:
 
-* Phase 1: A member of the Packaging community (defined later in this document)
-  can self-nominate themselves for the council elections.
-* Phase 2: Each Packaging community member can assign zero to five stars to
-  each candidate. Voting is performed anonymously. The outcome of the vote is
-  determined using the `STAR voting system`_, modified to use the `Multi-winner
-  Bloc STAR`_ approach. If a tie occurs, it may be resolved by mutual agreement
-  among the candidates, or else the winner will be chosen at random.
+* Phase 1: A voting member (defined later in this document) can self-nominate
+  themselves, or nominate any other candidate, for the council elections. Such a nomination must include
+  information about the member's relevant affiliations.
+* Phase 2: Each voting member can assign zero to five stars to each candidate.
+  Voting is performed anonymously. The outcome of the vote is determined using
+  the `STAR voting system`_, modified to use the `Multi-winner Bloc STAR`_
+  approach. If a tie occurs, it may be resolved by mutual agreement among the
+  candidates, or else the winner will be chosen at random.
 
 Each phase should last two weeks.
 
@@ -209,8 +209,8 @@ election for the council.
 Term
 ----
 
-There shall be two cohorts of council members: Cohort A composed of two
-members and Cohort B composed of three members.
+There shall be two cohorts of council members: Cohort A composed of two members
+and Cohort B composed of three members.
 
 Each council member shall be elected for a two-year term, unless they are
 replacing a council member that resigned, was removed, or otherwise becomes
@@ -223,9 +223,9 @@ finalised until the next elections for their cohort are finalised.
 
 Only for elections involving the entire council (like the initial council
 election), the two candidates receiving the highest number of votes shall be
-designated Cohort A with a two year term, and the three candidates
-receiving the highest number of votes after shall be designated Cohort B with a
-one year term.
+designated Cohort A with a two year term, and the three candidates receiving
+the highest number of votes after shall be designated Cohort B with a one year
+term.
 
 There are no term limits for individual council members.
 
@@ -245,14 +245,18 @@ Conflicts of interest
 ---------------------
 
 No more than two Packaging Council members should be employed by or
-significantly affiliated with the same entity. An entity would be a company,
-a company and its subsidiaries, or another incorporated entity such as a
-non-profit or educational institution with its own mission and goals.  PSF members are explicitly exempt from this restriction, but _not_ PSF employees, directors, or officers.
+significantly affiliated with the same entity. An entity is a company, a
+company and its subsidiaries, or another incorporated entity such as a
+non-profit or educational institution w
A3DB
ith its own mission and goals. PSF
+members are explicitly exempt from this restriction, but *not* PSF directors
+or officers.
 
 While we trust council members to act in the best interests of Python rather
 than themselves or their employers, the mere appearance of any one company
 dominating Python development could itself be harmful and erode trust.
 
+PSF staff members are not permitted to be members of the Packaging Council.
+
 In a council election, if more than two of the top five vote-getters work for
 the same employer, then whichever of them ranked lowest is disqualified and the
 6th-ranking candidate moves up into 5th place; this is repeated until a valid
@@ -263,48 +267,47 @@ During a council term, if changing circumstances cause this rule to be broken
 council members must resign to remedy the issue, and the resulting vacancies
 can then be filled as normal.
 
--------------------
-Packaging community
--------------------
+--------------
+Voting members
+--------------
 
 Responsibility
 ==============
 
-Packaging community members participate in formal votes to elect the Packaging
-Council.
+Voting members participate in formal votes to elect the Packaging Council.
+
 
 Processes
 =========
 
 Initial membership
 ------------------
 
-Initial membership in the Packaging community will include anyone who has taken
-the time to formalise their participation in the Packaging community. This
-includes:
+Initial set of voting members will include anyone who has taken the time to
+formalise their participation in the packaging community. This includes:
 
 * PyPA members: Anyone with the triage bit or commit bit, or at least one
   project in the PyPA organisation.
 * Packaging workgroup members: Anyone who is listed on the Packaging WG charter
-  will be moved into the Packaging community.
+  who is willing to participate is welcome.
 * Interested core team members: Any Python core team member who is willing to
   participate is welcome.
-* Wider community members: Non-profit organisations that participate in
-  packaging or working with new packagers. For example, PyOpenSci, NumFocus,
-  Django, are encouraged to initially nominate up to seven members by sending
-  an email to \[todo\].
+* Wider community members: An initial set of for-profit companies, nonprofit
+  organizations, academic or educational institutions and smaller unaffiliated
+  projects would be invited to nominate three individuals to represent them.
+  See [link to Appendix] for the initial set of community voting members.
 
 Adding a new member
 -------------------
 
-Members are added to the Packaging community by a simple majority vote by the
-current membership. Quorum for adding new members is 50%.
+New voting members are added by a simple majority vote by the current
+membership. Quorum for adding new members is 50%.
 
-A vote to add a new member is triggered when a Packaging community member calls
-for one publicly on an appropriate communication channel, and another Packaging
-community member seconds the call within two weeks.
+A vote to add a new member is triggered when a voting member calls for one
+publicly on an appropriate communication channel, and another voting member
+seconds the call within two weeks.
 
-The vote lasts for two weeks. Packaging community members vote for or against.
+The vote lasts for one week. Each member can vote for or against.
 
 Removal of a member
 -------------------
@@ -316,28 +319,28 @@ re-submit their intention to resume their participation to the Packaging
 Council in writing.
 
 In exceptional circumstances, it may be necessary to remove someone from the
-Packaging community against their will (for example: egregious and ongoing code
-of conduct violations). A Packaging community member may be removed by a
-two-thirds majority vote by the Packaging Council (in practice: 4:1 for a
-council with five members).
+voting members against their will (for example: egregious and ongoing code of
+conduct violations). A voting member may be removed by a two-thirds majority
+vote by the Packaging Council (in practice: 4:1 for a council with five
+members).
 
-If the relevant Packaging community member is also on the Packaging Council,
-then they can participate in the vote. They are removed from the Packaging
-Council if the vote removes them from the Packaging community. The vacancy is
-filled as per the process for filling vacancies in the Packaging Council.
+If the relevant voting member is also on the Packaging Council, then they can
+participate in the vote. They are removed from the Packaging Council if the
+vote removes them as a voting member. The vacancy is filled as per the process
+for filling vacancies in the Packaging Council.
 
 Vote of no confidence
 ---------------------
 
-In exceptional circumstances, the Packaging community may remove a sitting
-council member, or the entire council, via a vote of no confidence.
+In exceptional circumstances, the voting members may remove a sitting council
+member, or the entire council, via a vote of no confidence.
 
-A no-confidence vote is triggered when a Packaging community member calls for
-one publicly on an appropriate public communication channel, and another
-Packaging community member seconds the call within two weeks.
+A no-confidence vote is triggered when a voting member calls for one publicly
+on an appropriate public communication channel, and another voting member
+seconds the call within two weeks.
 
-The vote lasts for two weeks. Packaging community members vote for or against.
-If at least two thirds of voters express a lack of confidence, then the vote
+The vote lasts for two weeks. Each voting member votes for or against. If at
+least two thirds of voters express a lack of confidence, then the vote
 succeeds. Quorum for a vote of no confidence is 50%.
 
 There are two forms of no-confidence votes: those targeting a single member,
@@ -352,8 +355,8 @@ Changing the governance
 -----------------------
 
 Changes to this governance model, once it is accepted, will require at least a
-two-thirds majority of votes cast in a Packaging community vote which should be
-open for two weeks.
+two-thirds majority of votes cast in a vote, which should be open for two
+weeks.
 
 ==============
 Rejected Ideas
@@ -401,7 +404,7 @@ two individuals related to a single organisation can be on the council.
 Limiting it to one is workable; although it hasn't come up in the SC, people do
 move around, and we wouldn't want good candidates to either make employment
 decisions based on PC membership, or have to resign based on an employment
-change.  Limiting it to a maximum of two, plus votes of no confidence is
+change. Limiting it to a maximum of two, plus votes of no confidence is
 probably sufficient safety from any undue employer influence.
 
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -442,7 +445,7 @@ Packaging Council will meet on a regular basis (twice a month).
 * Coordinate with the Steering Council on PEPs that need input from both
   groups.
 * Coordinate with PyPA on their ongoing work to support individual projects.
-* Delegate to domain experts or working groups in the Packaging community, for
+* Delegate to domain experts or working groups in the packaging community, for
   initiatives/PEPs with a niche focus (analogous to how the Steering Council
   sends certain PEPs to the C API working group).
 * Scope out work that might best be done by hiring someone and then work with