@@ -205,8 +205,8 @@ The standard PEP workflow is:
205
205
* The title accurately describes the content.
206
206
* The PEP's language (spelling, grammar, sentence structure, etc.)
207
207
and code style (examples should match :pep:`7` & :pep:`8`) should be
208
- correct and conformant. The PEP text will be automatically checked for
209
- correct reStructuredText formatting when the pull request is submitted.
208
+ correct and conformant. The PEP text will be automatically checked for
209
+ correct reStructuredText formatting when the pull request is submitted.
210
210
PEPs with invalid reST markup will not be approved.
211
211
212
212
Editors are generally quite lenient about this initial review,
@@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ optional and are described below. All other headers are required.
547
547
Status: <Draft | Active | Accepted | Provisional | Deferred | Rejected |
548
548
Withdrawn | Final | Superseded>
549
549
Type: <Standards Track | Informational | Process>
550
- * Content-Type: < text/x-rst | text/plain>
550
+ * Content-Type: text/x-rst
551
551
* Requires: <pep numbers>
552
552
Created: <date created on, in dd-mmm-yyyy format>
553
553
* Python-Version: <version number>
@@ -603,11 +603,9 @@ The Type header specifies the type of PEP: Standards Track,
603
603
Informational, or Process.
604
604
605
605
The format of a PEP is specified with a Content-Type header.
606
- Valid values are ``text/plain`` for plaintext PEPs (see :pep:`9`)
607
- and ``text/x-rst`` for reStructuredText PEPs (see :pep:`12`).
608
- All new and active PEPs must use reStructuredText, but for backwards
609
- compatibility, plain text is currently still the default if no
610
- Content-Type header is present.
606
+ All PEPs must use reStructuredText (see :pep:`12`),
607
+ and have a value of ``text/x-rst``, the default.
608
+ Previously, plaintext PEPs used ``text/plain`` (see :pep:`9`).
611
609
612
610
The Created header records the date that the PEP was assigned a
613
611
number, while Post-History is used to record the dates of when new
0 commit comments