8000 Mark PEP 734 as the superseder of PEP 554. · python/peps@4d3f06e · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Commit 4d3f06e

Browse files
Mark PEP 734 as the superseder of PEP 554.
1 parent 1b7f9eb commit 4d3f06e

File tree

2 files changed

+16
-1
lines changed

2 files changed

+16
-1
lines changed

peps/pep-0554.rst

Lines changed: 8 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ PEP: 554
22
Title: Multiple Interpreters in the Stdlib
33
Author: Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently@gmail.com>
44
Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-554-multiple-interpreters-in-the-stdlib/24855
5-
Status: Draft
5+
Status: Superseded
66
Type: Standards Track
77
Content-Type: text/x-rst
88
Created: 05-Sep-2017
@@ -14,8 +14,15 @@ Post-History: `07-Sep-2017 <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@p
1414
`04-May-2020 <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/X2KPCSRVBD2QD5GP5IMXXZTGZ46OXD3D/>`__,
1515
`14-Mar-2023 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-554-multiple-interpreters-in-the-stdlib/24855/2/>`__,
1616
`01-Nov-2023 <https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-554-multiple-interpreters-in-the-stdlib/24855/26/>`__,
17+
Superseded-By: 734
1718

1819

20+
.. note::
21+
This PEP is actually continued in a cleaner form in :pep:`734`.
22+
This PEP is kept as-is for the sake of the various sections of
23+
background information and deferred/rejected ideas that have
24+
been stripped from :pep:`734`.
25+
1926
Abstract
2027
========
2128

peps/pep-0734.rst

Lines changed: 8 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -6,8 +6,16 @@ Type: Standards Track
66
Content-Type: text/x-rst
77
Created: 06-Nov-2023
88
Python-Version: 3.13
9+
Replaces: 554
910

1011

12+
.. note::
13+
This PEP is essentially a continuation of :pep:`554`. That document
14+
had grown a lot of ancillary information across 7 years of discussion.
15+
This PEP is a reduction back to the essential information. Much of
16+
that extra information is still valid and useful, just not in the
17+
immediate context of the specific proposal here.
18+
1119
Abstract
1220
========
1321

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
0