8000 gh-136145: Define 'standard library' and 'stdlib' in the glossary by zware · Pull Request #136146 · python/cpython · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content
/ cpython Public
< 8000 /div>

gh-136145: Define 'standard library' and 'stdlib' in the glossary #136146

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 9, 2025
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
Reword stdlib entry
  • Loading branch information
hugovk authored and zware committed Jun 30, 2025
commit 4b5f182ea820f92808c7b1dfed9f309e6d809d69
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Doc/glossary.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1298,7 +1298,7 @@ Glossary
and the :mod:`typing` module.

stdlib
A synonym for :term:`standard library`.
An abbreviation of :term:`standard library`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we hint that this isn't the appropriate term to use in CPython docs?

Suggested change
An abbreviation of :term:`standard library`.
An informal abbreviation of :term:`standard library`.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we hint that this isn't the appropriate term to use in CPython docs?

Seems reasonable ... could use "unofficial" as an alternative to "informal". (seems like this small change has gotten a little nitpicky, so I won't go on)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Both "informal" and "unofficial" works for me. But I agree that it's better with adjective.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Given that we use the term in places like sys.stdlib_module_names, is it "informal" or "unofficial"? There could be a case for the former, but I don't think we can say its "unofficial".


strong reference
In Python's C API, a strong reference is a reference to an object
Expand Down
Loading
0