8000 Apply suggestions from code review · python/cpython@6a3928e · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Commit 6a3928e

Browse files
pablogsalJelleZijlstraPrivat33r-dev
authored
Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: J 10000 elle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Kerim Kabirov <the.privat33r+gh@pm.me>
1 parent 50d8e06 commit 6a3928e

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

Doc/howto/perf_profiling.rst

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ How to work without frame pointers
211211
----------------------------------
212212

213213
If you are working with a Python interpreter that has been compiled without
214-
frame pointers you can still use the ``perf`` profiler but the overhead will be
214+
frame pointers, you can still use the ``perf`` profiler, but the overhead will be
215215
a bit higher because Python needs to generate unwinding information for every
216216
Python function call on the fly. Additionally, ``perf`` will take more time to
217217
process the data because it will need to use the DWARF debugging information to
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ which will enable the JIT mode for the ``perf`` profiler.
225225

226226
Due to a bug in the ``perf`` tool, only ``perf`` versions higher than v6.8
227227
will work with the JIT mode. The fix was also backported to the v6.7.2
228-
version of the tool.
228+
version of the tool.
229229

230230
Note that when checking the version of the ``perf`` tool (which can be done
231231
by running ``perf version``) you must take into account that some distros

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
0