pydantic
diff --git a/‎docs/migration.md‎
Lines changed: 63 additions & 0 deletions b/‎docs/migration.md‎
Lines changed: 63 additions & 0 deletions
@@ -180,6 +180,69 @@ Model(x=1)
   To work around this, use an `IsInstance` validator (more details to come).
 * Subclasses of built-ins won't validate into their subclass types; you'll need to use an `IsInstance` validator to validate these types.
 
+### Input types are not preserved
+
+In Pydantic V1 we made great efforts to preserve the types of all field inputs for generic collections when they were proper subtypes of the field annotations.
+For example, given the annotation `Mapping[str, int]` if you passed in a `collection.Counter()` you'd get a `collection.Counter()` as the value.
+
+Supporting this behavior in V2 would have negative performance implications for the general case (we'd have to check types every time) and would add a lot of complexity to validation. Further, even in V1 this behavior was inconsistent and partially broken: it did not work for most types (`str`, `UUID`, etc.) and even for generic collections it's impossible to re-build the original input correctly without a lot of special casing (consider `ChainMap`; rebuilding the input is necessary because we need to replace values after validation, e.g. if coercing strings to ints).
+
+In Pydantic V2 we no longer attempt to preserve the input type.
+Instead, we only promise that the output type will match the type annotations.
+Going back to the `Mapping` example, we promise the output will be a valid `Mapping`, in practice it will be a plain `dict`.
+
+```python
+from typing import Mapping
+
+from pydantic import TypeAdapter
+
+
+class MyDict(dict):
+    pass
+
+
+ta = TypeAdapter(Mapping[str, int])
+v = ta.validate_python(MyDict())
+print(type(v))
+#> <class 'dict'>
+```
+
+If you want the output type to be a specific type, consider annotating it as such or implementing a custom validator:
+
+```python
+from typing import Any, Mapping, TypeVar
+
+from typing_extensions import Annotated
+
+from pydantic import (
+    TypeAdapter,
+    ValidationInfo,
+    ValidatorFunctionWrapHandler,
+    WrapValidator,
+)
+
+
+def restore_input_type(
+    value: Any, handler: ValidatorFunctionWrapHandler, _info: ValidationInfo
+) -> Any:
+    return type(value)(handler(value))
+
+
+T = TypeVar('T')
+PreserveType = Annotated[T, WrapValidator(restore_input_type)]
+
+
+ta = TypeAdapter(PreserveType[Mapping[str, int]])
+
+
+class MyDict(dict):
+    pass
+
+
+v = ta.validate_python(MyDict())
+assert type(v) is MyDict
+```
+
 ### Changes to Generic models
 
 * While it does not raise an error at runtime yet, subclass checks for parametrized generics should no longer be used.