Commit bf4052f
committed
Don't reject ROW_MARK_REFERENCE rowmarks for materialized views.
We should allow this so that matviews can be referenced in UPDATE/DELETE
statements in READ COMMITTED isolation level. The requirement for that
is that a re-fetch by TID will see the same row version the query saw
earlier, which is true of matviews, so there's no reason for the
restriction. Per bug #9398.
Michael Paquier, after a suggestion by me1 parent 0024a3a commit bf4052f
File tree
3 files changed
+41
-6
lines changed- src
- backend/executor
- test/regress
- expected
- sql
3 files changed
+41
-6
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1102 | 1102 | | |
1103 | 1103 | | |
1104 | 1104 | | |
1105 | | - | |
1106 | | - | |
1107 | | - | |
1108 | | - | |
1109 | | - | |
| 1105 | + | |
| 1106 | + | |
| 1107 | + | |
| 1108 | + | |
| 1109 | + | |
| 1110 | + | |
1110 | 1111 | | |
1111 | 1112 | | |
1112 | | - | |
| 1113 | + | |
1113 | 1114 | | |
1114 | 1115 | | |
1115 | 1116 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
476 | 476 | | |
477 | 477 | | |
478 | 478 | | |
| 479 | + | |
| 480 | + | |
| 481 | + | |
| 482 | + | |
| 483 | + | |
| 484 | + | |
| 485 | + | |
| 486 | + | |
| 487 | + | |
| 488 | + | |
| 489 | + | |
| 490 | + | |
| 491 | + | |
| 492 | + | |
| 493 | + | |
| 494 | + | |
| 495 | + | |
| 496 | + | |
| 497 | + | |
| 498 | + | |
| 499 | + | |
| 500 | + | |
| 501 | + | |
| 502 | + | |
| 503 | + | |
| 504 | + | |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
186 | 186 | | |
187 | 187 | | |
188 | 188 | | |
| 189 | + | |
| 190 | + | |
| 191 | + | |
| 192 | + | |
| 193 | + | |
| 194 | + | |
| 195 | + | |
| 196 | + | |
0 commit comments