8000 Revert: looks like Binary Large OBject[sic] wasn't a misspelling · postgrespro/postgres_cluster@7b243aa · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

Commit 7b243aa

Browse files
peterepetere
committed
Revert: looks like Binary Large OBject[sic] wasn't a misspelling
1 parent 5194b9d commit 7b243aa

File tree

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+2
-2
lines changed

‎doc/src/sgml/lo.sgml

Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
1-
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/lo.sgml,v 1.5 2010/08/17 04:37:20 petere Exp $ -->
1+
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/lo.sgml,v 1.6 2010/08/17 04:47:04 petere Exp $ -->
22

33
<sect1 id="lo">
44
<title>lo</title>
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
1919
<para>
2020
One of the problems with the JDBC driver (and this affects the ODBC driver
2121
also), is that the specification assumes that references to BLOBs (Binary
22-
Large Objects) are stored within a table, and if that entry is changed, the
22+
Large OBjects) are stored within a table, and if that entry is changed, the
2323
associated BLOB is deleted from the database.
2424
</para>
2525

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
0