8000 Doc: improve partitioning discussion in ddl.sgml. · postgres/postgres@dbca945 · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content
{"payload":{"commit":{"oid":"dbca94510c9e564708a10a1259f6f1d8ad09862c","url":"/postgres/postgres/commit/dbca94510c9e564708a10a1259f6f1d8ad09862c","authoredDate":"2020-11-14T13:09:53.000-05:00","committedDate":"2020-11-14T13:09:53.000-05:00","shortMessage":null,"shortMessageMarkdown":"\u003cdiv\u003eDoc: improve partitioning discussion in ddl.sgml.\u003c/div\u003e","shortMessageMarkdownLink":null,"bodyMessageHtml":"This started with the intent to explain that range upper bounds\nare exclusive, which previously you could only find out by reading\nthe CREATE TABLE man page. But I soon found that section 5.11\nreally could stand a fair amount of editorial attention. It's\napparently been revised several times without much concern for\noverall flow, nor careful copy-editing.\n\nBack-patch to v11, which is as far as the patch goes easily.\n\nPer gripe from Edson Richter. Thanks to David Johnston for review.\n\nDiscussion: \u003ca href=\"https://postgr.es/m/DM6PR13MB3988736CF8F5DC5720440231CFE60@DM6PR13MB3988.namprd13.prod.outlook.com\" rel=\"nofollow\"\u003ehttps://postgr.es/m/DM6PR13MB3988736CF8F5DC5720440231CFE60@DM6PR13MB3988.namprd13.prod.outlook.com\u003c/a\u003e","authors":[{"login":"tglsfdc","displayName":"Tom Lane","avatarUrl":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8755309?v=4","path":"/tglsfdc","isGitHub":false}],"committerAttribution":false,"committer":{"login":"tglsfdc","displayName":"Tom Lane","avatarUrl":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8755309?v=4","path":"/tglsfdc","isGitHub":false},"parents":["788dd0b839fc9f2c85caf86014105afdb60ed5e3"],"globalRelayId":"MDY6Q29tbWl0OTI3NDQyOmRiY2E5NDUxMGM5ZTU2NDcwOGExMGExMjU5ZjZmMWQ4YWQwOTg2MmM=","sha1":"788dd0b839fc9f2c85caf86014105afdb60ed5e3","sha2":"dbca94510c9e564708a10a1259f6f1d8ad09862c"},"currentUser":null,"repo":{"id":927442,"defaultBranch":"master","name":"postgres","ownerLogin":"postgres","currentUserCanPush":false,"isFork":false,"isEmpty":false,"createdAt":"2010-09-21T11:35:45.000Z","ownerAvatar":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/177543?v=4","public":true,"private":false,"isOrgOwned":true},"diffEntryData":[{"path":"doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml","pathDigest":"8349b777d1977c8ed9c26a1405f59fe168ce0ca2642b72c9daf8ff1b0510a668","status":"MODIFIED"}],"splitViewPreference":"unified","ignoreWhitespace":false,"repoOwnerGlobalRelayId":"MDEyOk9yZ2FuaXphdGlvbjE3NzU0Mw==","commentsPreference":"visible","diffLineSpacingPreference":"relaxed","useMonospaceFont":false,"pasteUrlLinkAsPlainText":false,"userNotices":[],"path":"/postgres/postgres/commit/dbca94510c9e564708a10a1259f6f1d8ad09862c","fileTreeExpanded":true,"headerInfo":{"additions":203,"deletions":168,"filesChanged":1,"filesChangedString":"1"},"moreDiffsToLoad":true,"asyncDiffLoadInfo":{"startIndex":0,"truncated":false,"byteCount":0,"lineShownCount":0},"commentInfo":{"canComment":false,"locked":false,"canLock":false,"repoArchived":false},"csrf_tokens":{"/users/diffview?diff=split":{"post":"Vh41y93q_O1KgN8DKLoILxJ2gXoFwASlFydcgOo3mDBJip9avQXtB0JQpF0LoAmP2QoHg9L7K5q8QiSmKDKqwg"},"/users/diffview?diff=unified":{"post":"aJ7tNzWyDwwMrH9qk3_N_5HBkeLlTR-h87CfA7mHaFN3CkemVV0e5gR8BDSwZcxfWr0XGzJ2MJ5Y1ecle4JaoQ"},"/notifications/thread":{"post":"kyJs6vBvp04mQTGAfoT9IFSHpk6NXLOd8HklSAKft25WZhfOgOKlzNrZ2D-FiZrhL5kMDfLMHWEkvKcHAZrMBg"}}},"title":"Doc: improve partitioning discussion in ddl.sgml. · postgres/postgres@dbca945","appPayload":{"helpUrl":"https://docs.github.com","findInDiffWorkerPath":"/assets-cdn/worker/find-in-diff-worker-2bfe39677d14.js","enabled_features":{"diff_ux_refresh_beta":false,"diff_inline_comments":true,"diff_ux_refresh_ssr_five":false,"diff_ux_refresh_ssr_ten":false,"react_diff_line_type_character_correction":true}}}

Commit dbca945

Browse files
tglsfdctglsfdc
committed
Doc: improve partitioning discussion in ddl.sgml.
This started with the intent to explain that range upper bounds are exclusive, which previously you could only find out by reading the CREATE TABLE man page. But I soon found that section 5.11 really could stand a fair amount of editorial attention. It's apparently been revised several times without much concern for overall flow, nor careful copy-editing. Back-patch to v11, which is as far as the patch goes easily. Per gripe from Edson Richter. Thanks to David Johnston for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DM6PR13MB3988736CF8F5DC5720440231CFE60@DM6PR13MB3988.namprd13.prod.outlook.com
1 parent 788dd0b commit dbca945

File tree

1 file changed

+203
-168
lines changed

1 file changed

+203
-168
lines changed

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)
0