Change from stale-bot? #662
Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
|
Hmmm, looks like votes are anonymous, so we won't be able to get a good idea of what the collaborators and owner want vs random votes, I guess best to just discuss and ignore the poll 🤷 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I think this depends on the activity of the community. With about 20 issues, this repo is well maintained. I would therefore suggest a switch to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
+1 for |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
GitHub issues now support multiple closed states. Would it make sense to close stale issues as "not planned" instead (if possible via the action)? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
This would definitely make sense, but I don't think this feature is supported by the stale action yet. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Yeah, just opened actions/stale#744 to ask if there are plans for it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Forgot to mention that actions/stale#764 was merged. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Looks like stale-bot might not be working anymore (probot/stale#354, probot/stale#349). Also, we haven't gotten any stale updates in a while.
(This doesn't have to be a poll, just took this opportunity to try this cool feature 😅)
3 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions