8000 DOC: Release note snippets lost · Issue #25829 · numpy/numpy · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to content

DOC: Release note snippets lost #25829

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
seberg opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #25832
Closed

DOC: Release note snippets lost #25829

seberg opened this issue Feb 15, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #25832
Milestone
2.0.0 release

Comments

@seberg
Copy link
Member
seberg commented Feb 15, 2024 
          I think this lost the ones that were inlcuded by the previous generation in https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/24510?  There some smaller fixups on that, but not sure they are relevant, maybe it is easier to just pull in all those fragments again.

Originally posted by @seberg in #25827 (comment)
@seberg seberg added this to the 2.0.0 release milestone Feb 15, 2024
@charris
Copy link
Member
charris commented Feb 15, 2024

Might just merge the two, I have done that before. Made me wish for

$ git co <somewhere> <whatever> as tmp

In any case, the previous version isn't lost.

@seberg
Copy link
Member Author
seberg commented Feb 15, 2024

Right, just should remember to eventually restore whatever was there (likely not much anyway).

@rgommers
Copy link
Member

I'll fix it and then will follow up with the edits to make the log ready for the release.

@rgommers rgommers mentioned this issue Feb 15, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
2.0.0 release
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

DOC: add back 2.0.0 release note snippets that went missing rgommers/numpy
3 participants
@seberg @charris @rgommers
0