-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11k
Switch from imgmath to mathjax #18828
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
MathJAX is also alive and well, and is a NumFOCUS sponsored project. Which is useful; for SciPy it hasn't given any issues in the past four years, but if it does we know that the project is maintained. |
I can take a look at this in the next few days - I think this is the right way to go. |
Thanks Melissa! |
I think it looks equal or better for everything I checked. Reducing the
In After this PR: |
Meant to post the above on the PR. Ah well. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
For html doc builds we currently need to have LaTeX installed, which in general is a pain. In the Gitpod setup this also bloats the Docker image.
sphinx.ext.imgmath
needs LaTeX,sphinx.ext.mathjax
does not.Older discussion in gh-11753. And from #18822 (comment):
mathjax
toimgmath
: MAINT: switch documentation build from mathjax to imgmath scipy/scipy#7358mathjax
instead: MAINT: bundle Mathjax with built docs scipy/scipy#7376mathjax
as well, but have limitations for viewing rendered math offline.I think the SciPy approach is preferred here.
Proposal: let's switch to
mathjax
and use https://github.com/scipy/scipy-mathjax as a submodule.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: