-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.9k
test_pareto on 32-bit got even worse #18387
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I am surprised anything changed here, but marking for 1.20.2, just so that its not lost by accident. For what its worth, the mailing list link is slightly off for me, and this gives the right one: Out of curiosity, do you know that this is a regression in that the 1.19 passed fine with the same compiler versions, etc? |
See #18388 for build logs. Here is a passing one for 1.19.5: |
What is a little interesting is that it doesn't occur in the same test for RandomState. Even though the underlying code is the same, the seeding of the MT19937 generator in the failing file is different from that in the RandomState, and so the test values are different. |
I cleared the milestone here. @bashtage Seems this is a value issue/ |
I think it would be reasonable to relax the tolerance on 32-bit Linux as a pragmatic fix. It seems to be compiler-specific since the test doesn't fail on other 32-bit platforms including other 32-bit variants of Linux. |
I also reproduce this on i686-linux (GNU Guix). The
|
Hi,
NumPy 1.20.0 on openSUSE Tumbleweed 32-bit looks even worse than Ubuntu some years ago (#430):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: