Permalink
Comparing changes
Choose two branches to see what’s changed or to start a new pull request.
If you need to, you can also or
learn more about diff comparisons.
Open a pull request
Create a new pull request by comparing changes across two branches. If you need to, you can also .
Learn more about diff comparisons here.
...
- 17 commits
- 28 files changed
- 11 contributors
Commits on Feb 7, 2024
-
fix: typo in compareBuild debug message (#682)
Correcting the debug message in `compareBuild`
Commits on Mar 20, 2024
Commits on Apr 7, 2024
-
I had these benchmarks from the last time I did some perf research in this repo, so I thought maybe it was a good idea to have them in the repo itself, so other people can use them and you guys can verify if the perf is still good or you had any regression.
Commits on Apr 21, 2024
-
chore: bump @npmcli/template-oss from 4.21.3 to 4.21.4
Bumps [@npmcli/template-oss](https://github.com/npm/template-oss) from 4.21.3 to 4.21.4. - [Release notes](https://github.com/npm/template-oss/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/npm/template-oss/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](npm/template-oss@v4.21.3...v4.21.4) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: @npmcli/template-oss dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Commits on May 2, 2024
-
-
fix: use internal cache implementation
This change removes the dependency on the `lru-cache` package. It is replaced by a comparable, but much simpler class in this package.
-
Commits on May 3, 2024
Commits on May 4, 2024
Commits on May 7, 2024
-
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [7.6.1](v7.6.0...v7.6.1) (2024-05-04) ### Bug Fixes * [`c570a34`](c570a34) [#704](#704) linting: no-unused-vars (@wraithgar) * [`ad8ff11`](ad8ff11) [#704](#704) use internal cache implementation (@mbtools) * [`ac9b357`](ac9b357) [#682](#682) typo in compareBuild debug message (#682) (@mbtools) ### Dependencies * [`988a8de`](988a8de) [#709](#709) uninstall `lru-cache` (#709) * [`3fabe4d`](3fabe4d) [#704](#704) remove lru-cache ### Chores * [`dd09b60`](dd09b60) [#705](#705) bump @npmcli/template-oss to 4.22.0 (@lukekarrys) * [`ec49cdc`](ec49cdc) [#701](#701) chore: chore: postinstall for dependabot template-oss PR (@lukekarrys) * [`b236c3d`](b236c3d) [#696](#696) add benchmarks (#696) (@H4ad) * [`692451b`](692451b) [#688](#688) various improvements to README (#688) (@mbtools) * [`5feeb7f`](5feeb7f) [#705](#705) postinstall for dependabot template-oss PR (@lukekarrys) * [`074156f`](074156f) [#701](#701) bump @npmcli/template-oss from 4.21.3 to 4.21.4 (@dependabot[bot]) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Commits on May 9, 2024
-
fix(lru): use map.delete() directly (#713)
The default implementation already returns boolean if the value has been deleted. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Map/delete#return_value It's also faster since we don't double check the hashmap for a value. --------- Co-authored-by: Luke Karrys <luke@lukekarrys.com>
-
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [7.6.2](v7.6.1...v7.6.2) (2024-05-09) ### Bug Fixes * [`6466ba9`](6466ba9) [#713](#713) lru: use map.delete() directly (#713) (@negezor, @lukekarrys) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Commits on Jul 16, 2024
-
fix: optimize Range parsing and formatting (#726)
<!-- What / Why --> <!-- Describe the request in detail. What it does and why it's being changed. --> This pull request optimizes the Range class in the following ways: 1. Produce fewer intermediate objects when reducing a range's space characters to single spaces. This seems to improve bench-subset scores by up to 5%, and bench-satisfies scores to a lesser degree. 2. Optimize Range formatting with explicit for loops instead, avoiding an intermediate array creation. This seems to improve bench-satisfies and bench-subset scores by up to 20%. 3. Calculate Range's `.range` string (used by `.format()` and `.toString()`) lazily. This seems to improve bench-satisfies and bench-subset scores by up to 9%. The external interface for the class stays the same, except for the new internal `.formatted` property used to cache its lazily calculated string. `Range#range` property is now also read-only. There is a new test lazy formatting to ensure full test coverage. The benchmarks bench-satisfies and bench-subset benefit from these changes, sometimes by up to 40%. Other benchmark results seem to stay the same. Here are the affected benchmarks before: ``` $ node benchmarks/bench-satisfies.js satisfies(1.0.6, 1.0.3||^2.0.0) x 695,094 ops/sec ±0.68% (97 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.2.2||~3.0.0) x 764,115 ops/sec ±0.40% (99 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.3.0||<4.0.0) x 805,593 ops/sec ±0.62% (97 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 1.0.3||^2.0.0, {"includePrelease":true}) x 695,045 ops/sec ±0.73% (95 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.2.2||~3.0.0, {"includePrelease":true}) x 750,433 ops/sec ±0.66% (99 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.3.0||<4.0.0, {"includePrelease":true}) x 787,903 ops/sec ±0.39% (99 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 1.0.3||^2.0.0, {"includePrelease":true,"loose":true}) x 652,166 ops/sec ±0.34% (99 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.2.2||~3.0.0, {"includePrelease":true,"loose":true}) x 696,377 ops/sec ±0.36% (96 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.3.0||<4.0.0, {"includePrelease":true,"loose":true}) x 721,729 ops/sec ±0.35% (98 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 1.0.3||^2.0.0, {"includePrelease":true,"loose":true,"rtl":true}) x 585,692 ops/sec ±0.75% (95 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.2.2||~3.0.0, {"includePrelease":true,"loose":true,"rtl":true}) x 631,653 ops/sec ±0.33% (96 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.3.0||<4.0.0, {"includePrelease":true,"loose":true,"rtl":true}) x 650,110 ops/sec ±0.64% (95 runs sampled) $ node benchmarks/bench-subset.js subset(1.2.3, *) x 633,342 ops/sec ±0.61% (95 runs sampled) subset(^1.2.3, *) x 743,036 ops/sec ±0.47% (97 runs sampled) subset(^1.2.3-pre.0, *) x 680,087 ops/sec ±0.76% (98 runs sampled) subset(^1.2.3-pre.0, *) x 680,948 ops/sec ±0.46% (96 runs sampled) subset(1 || 2 || 3, *) x 330,669 ops/sec ±0.53% (98 runs sampled) ``` And after: ``` $ node benchmarks/bench-satisfies.js satisfies(1.0.6, 1.0.3||^2.0.0) x 896,936 ops/sec ±0.53% (94 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.2.2||~3.0.0) x 998,214 ops/sec ±0.40% (95 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.3.0||<4.0.0) x 1,000,593 ops/sec ±0.43% (97 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 1.0.3||^2.0.0, {"includePrelease":true}) x 890,369 ops/sec ±0.41% (100 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.2.2||~3.0.0, {"includePrelease":true}) x 977,239 ops/sec ±0.48% (97 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.3.0||<4.0.0, {"includePrelease":true}) x 983,682 ops/sec ±0.95% (96 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 1.0.3||^2.0.0, {"includePrelease":true,"loose":true}) x 805,330 ops/sec ±0.84% (98 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.2.2||~3.0.0, {"includePrelease":true,"loose":true}) x 894,117 ops/sec ±0.43% (99 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.3.0||<4.0.0, {"includePrelease":true,"loose":true}) x 911,742 ops/sec ±0.42% (96 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 1.0.3||^2.0.0, {"includePrelease":true,"loose":true,"rtl":true}) x 741,254 ops/sec ±0.35% (97 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.2.2||~3.0.0, {"includePrelease":true,"loose":true,"rtl":true}) x 807,380 ops/sec ±0.42% (99 runs sampled) satisfies(1.0.6, 2.3.0||<4.0.0, {"includePrelease":true,"loose":true,"rtl":true}) x 820,390 ops/sec ±0.37% (99 runs sampled) $ node benchmarks/bench-subset.js subset(1.2.3, *) x 905,030 ops/sec ±0.63% (96 runs sampled) subset(^1.2.3, *) x 1,026,457 ops/sec ±0.63% (95 runs sampled) subset(^1.2.3-pre.0, *) x 923,789 ops/sec ±0.41% (97 runs sampled) subset(^1.2.3-pre.0, *) x 923,136 ops/sec ±0.44% (96 runs sampled) subset(1 || 2 || 3, *) x 432,037 ops/sec ±0.67% (96 runs sampled) ``` -
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [7.6.3](v7.6.2...v7.6.3) (2024-07-16) ### Bug Fixes * [`73a3d79`](73a3d79) [#726](#726) optimize Range parsing and formatting (#726) (@jviide) ### Documentation * [`2975ece`](2975ece) [#719](#719) fix extra backtick typo (#719) (@stdavis) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Loading
This comparison is taking too long to generate.
Unfortunately it looks like we can’t render this comparison for you right now. It might be too big, or there might be something weird with your repository.
You can try running this command locally to see the comparison on your machine:
git diff v7.6.0...v7.6.3