You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If I understand correctly, it’s not uncommon for CMake projects to consist of several subprojects that could use different relevant args or hypothetically even different compilers (i.e. target binaries vs. tools built for the host system to be used by the build).
There is also the need for C vs. C++ information, as compiler queries for either may result in different system include paths.
Processing N sets of compiler paths/args here would be similar to what cpptools does with compile_commands.json files - processes all provided compiler paths and (unique and relevant combinations of) args, to build the browse path(s). Cpptools should be able to avoid redundantly querying compilers, so it should not be critical that the configuration provider de-dupe this set.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If I understand correctly, it’s not uncommon for CMake projects to consist of several subprojects that could use different relevant args or hypothetically even different compilers (i.e. target binaries vs. tools built for the host system to be used by the build).
There is also the need for C vs. C++ information, as compiler queries for either may result in different system include paths.
Processing N sets of compiler paths/args here would be similar to what cpptools does with
compile_commands.json
files - processes all provided compiler paths and (unique and relevant combinations of) args, to build the browse path(s). Cpptools should be able to avoid redundantly querying compilers, so it should not be critical that the configuration provider de-dupe this set.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: