You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If an element that is being parsed is both a property and a microformat, values are extracted for the property. In spec look for: “if that child element itself has a microformat ("h-*" or backcompat roots) and is a property element”.
I would expect dt- properties to get a value based on a dt- property within the nested microformat.
Change proposal:
if that child element itself has a microformat ("h-*" or backcompat roots) and is a property element, add it into the array of values for that property as a { } structure, add to that { } structure:
value:
if it's a p-* property element, use the first p-name of the h-* child
else if it's an e-* property element, re-use its { } structure with existing value: inside.
else if it's a u-* property element and the h-* child has a u-url, use the first such u-url
else if it's a dt-* property element and the h-* child has a dt-* property of its own, use the first such dt-* property value
else use the parsed property value per p-*,u-*,dt-* parsing respectively
(Only the second to last step is new.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If an element that is being parsed is both a property and a microformat, values are extracted for the property. In spec look for: “if that child element itself has a microformat ("h-*" or backcompat roots) and is a property element”.
I would expect
dt-
properties to get avalue
based on adt-
property within the nested microformat.Change proposal:
(Only the second to last step is new.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: