8000 Test 2.0.x on released python 3.6 by dstansby · Pull Request #8000 · matplotlib/matplotlib · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to content

Test 2.0.x on released python 3.6 #8000

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2017
Merged

Test 2.0.x on released python 3.6 #8000

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2017

Conversation

dstansby
Copy link
Member

...instead of -dev

@dopplershift
Copy link
Contributor

My only question is whether we should leave the build against pre-releases and the dev version of 3.6 as well--in theory the dev version is a snapshot for a future 3.6 release.

@dstansby
Copy link
Member Author

TIL that editing files via the web interface opens a new branch in the project and not your own account, sorry...

@QuLogic
Copy link
Member
QuLogic commented Feb 1, 2017

We've got a nightly build, so maybe it'll be fine (I realize that's 3.7.. though).

@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

upstream cpython is very good about not breaking things on mircos (I can only think of 1 issue in the last 4 years that is related to a micro-release and it has to do with fixing critical bugs in later micros).

Testing on 3.7-nightly more than covers the 3.6 dev channel, we only had both because at some point before 3.6 came out, the nightly moved to 3.7 and we needed the 3.6-dev to get the betas/rcs.

@dopplershift
Copy link
Contributor

Ok. That's a 👍 from me then.

@QuLogic QuLogic added this to the 2.0.1 (next bug fix release) milestone Feb 1, 2017
@QuLogic
Copy link
Member
QuLogic commented Feb 1, 2017

We can ignore the failing push part of CI.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants
0